Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan Oleh Kepolisian Daerah Gorontalo: Respon terhadap Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 Zumiyati Sanu Ibrahim
Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2017): Al-Mizan
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (291.879 KB) | DOI: 10.30603/am.v13i1.907

Abstract

This study discusses the adjustment of minor criminal offenses and the amount of fines in the Criminal Code in the investigation process by the Gorontalo Regional Police. This type of research is descriptive qualitative using a juridical and empirical approach. Data was collected through an interview, observation and documentation process. The results showed that the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2012 concerning Adjustment of Limits of Minor Crimes and the Amount of Fines in the Criminal Code, has been implemented and applied in the resolution of minor criminal offenses in Gorontalo, where the Police Investigators in the Gorontalo Regional Police have a good response and welcome positively the regulation.
Happiness Permissibility: Negotiating Hadith on Polygamy as Perfection of Worship in Wahdah Islamiyah Muslim Women Husain, Rahmin Talib; Abd. Hamid Wahid; Mahbub Ghozali; Zumiyati Sanu Ibrahim; Misbahuddin Asaad
AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia IAIN Madura collaboration with The Islamic Law Researcher Association (APHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/al-lhkam.v19i2.11352

Abstract

The practice of polygamy, which is debated among women, is accepted by Wahdah Islamiyah Muslim women as an embodiment of religious teachings enshrined in the hadith. This acceptance does not negate the complexities and contradictions inherent in the hadith that discuss the practice. This study explores the reading position of Wahdah Islamiyah Muslim women in understanding and practicing the hadith of polygamy. Using qualitative methods, data were collected through in-depth interviews with 12 persons consisting of 5 first wives, 5 second wives, 1 da’īyah (preacher), and 1 head of the Wahdah Islamiyah Muslim women. In-depth observations were also made of key informant activities. The data were analyzed using a fiqh (Islamic Jurisprudence) analysis model combined with the framework of Stuart Hall's reception theory. The findings of this study reveal three different reading positions: 1) The hegemonic reading model using the argument of belief in an authoritative text. 2) the negotiated reading model emphasizing the fulfillment of the husband's needs driven by concerns about the husband's compliance with the principles of justice. 3) the oppositional reading model rooted in the vulnerability of wives who challenge of ensuring fair treatment. These three positions emerge from the structure of the hadith discourse where the textual affirmation of polygamy serves as the basis for its resolution. The incorporation of settlement in an interpretive and counterintuitive perspective in the development of fiqh signifies a full acceptance of the law while also considering the goals of responsible individuals (maqāṣid al-mukallafīn).
Islamic Law and Human Rights: Convergence or Conflict? Zumiyati Sanu Ibrahim; Karimullah, Suud Sarim; Sulastri; Yavuz Gönan; Hüseyin Okur
Nurani Vol 24 No 2 (2024): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v24i2.19595

Abstract

The background of this study is rooted in the significance of human rights as a universal principle, which often faces challenges when applied within the context of Islamic law. The main issue is the incompatibility between some practices of Islamic law and the principles of human rights, which raises the question of how these two legal systems can interact without compromising their fundamental values. This study aims to explore the relationship between Islamic law and human rights, understand the challenges arising from differences in interpretation and implementation, and offer solutions to bridge these differences. This study uses a qualitative method combining text analysis, literature, and secondary data better to understand the concept of human rights in Islam and identify areas of potential conflict. The results show that the relationship between Islamic law and human rights is complex, where potential conflicts and convergence efforts coexist. Despite potential conflicts, the values of justice, equality, and human dignity in Islam align with Human Rights principles. However, differences in interpretation and implementation of the law can be a significant source of tension. This study highlights the importance of an approach rooted in cross-cultural and religious dialogue, as well as respect for diversity, to achieve a more harmonious convergence between Islamic law and universal human rights.