Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Changes in the Scheme from Production Sharing Contracts to Gross Split for Upstream Oil and Gas Investments in Indonesia Jody Rabbani Hidayat; Wuryandari, Utji Sri Wulan; Djaelani, Fahmi Ardhi
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2437

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of the change in contract scheme from production sharing to Gross Split on investment in Indonesia's upstream oil and gas sector using a normative juridical approach. This policy transformation represents the government's response to the administrative complexity and uncertainty inherent in conventional production sharing contract schemes that have been in place for more than five decades. The research method uses content analysis of laws and regulations, policy documents, and related literature to evaluate the effectiveness of the Gross Split scheme implementation. The results show that the implementation of Gross Split has succeeded in creating a simpler, more transparent, and more predictable regulatory framework compared to the previous system. The elimination of complex cost recovery mechanisms has reduced regulatory uncertainty and accelerated investment decision-making. An evaluation of the investment climate indicates increased exploration activity, improved cash flow predictability, and enhanced access to financing for contractors. However, challenges remain in adaptation challenges, the complexity of split factors, and market acceptance that require continuous improvement. The study recommends the development of a systematic review mechanism, strengthening of regulatory infrastructure, and increasing scheme flexibility to optimize Indonesia's competitiveness in attracting global oil and gas investment. The Gross Split scheme has the potential to become a leading model for sustainable upstream oil and gas sector management.
Forgery of Authentic Instruments by Notaries and the Scope of Legal Liability Khadijah, Khadijah; Tarsono, Edi; Wuryandari, Utji Sri Wulan; Surono, Agus
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.421

Abstract

The forgery of authentic deeds by notaries constitutes a serious legal issue with direct implications for legal certainty and public trust in the civil law system. As public officials, notaries are not only responsible for the formal accuracy of deeds but are also bound by a duty of care in verifying the identities and documents of the parties involved. This article examines the construction of notarial legal liability in cases of authentic deed forgery and the legal consequences arising from deeds executed on the basis of invalid document verification. Employing a normative legal approach, the study analyzes statutory regulations, legal doctrine, and judicial decisions, with particular emphasis on Bandung High Court Decision No. 73/Pid/2023/PT.BDG as a case study. The findings indicate that a notary’s failure to exercise due care, especially within the scope of official authority, may constitute fault giving rise to criminal, civil, and administrative liability. Authentic deeds prepared on the basis of invalid documentation may suffer a degradation of evidentiary value and may lead to the annulment of the legal acts embodied therein. The Bandung High Court decision affirms that the notary’s duty of care serves as a primary benchmark in assessing criminal liability, while also highlighting the need for clearer parameters to distinguish administrative negligence from criminal negligence in order to safeguard legal certainty.