Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.633
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum LAW REVIEW Global Legal Review Indonesian Journal of International Law Jurnal Konstitusi COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Jamin Ginting
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Asset Recovery Principles in the United Nations Convention Against Corrution 2003 (UNCAC 2003) to Support Corruption Eradication in Indonesia Ginting, Jamin
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1609.156 KB)

Abstract

Indonesia considers the problem of corruption is one issue that cannot be handled domestically but also internationally. Based on this, international cooperation becomes essential in preventing and combating corruption, especially the attempt of corruptors to hide the corrupted assets through money laundering through an effective international transfers.There is not a small amount of public assets which had been corrupted that was stored in financial centers in developed countries that are protected both by the legal system as well as professionals hired by the corruptors. As such, the determination of International society to combat corruption is implemented through of United Nations Convention Against Corruption, 2003 (UNCAC in 2003) received by the UN General Assembly (UN SMU) on October 31, 2003 through the UN High Resolution A/58/4. This article will discuss about the position of Indonesia with regard to this matter.
FAKTOR HUKUM DAN NON HUKUM DALAM PUTUSAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA Jamin Ginting
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 19, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.v19i2.108

Abstract

The role of a judge is very important in deciding corruption cases in Indonesia, if a judge is affected by external which will make him/her unobjective in deciding a corruption case, thus his/her independency is judged. According to the research results, there is difference between cases which occurred in Java Island and Sumatera Island, where there is more corruption cases in Java compared to Sumatera and the punishment is more severe than in Sumatera, apart from that there are a lot of corruption done by company leaders with the average age of 46-54 years old. This shows that a leader of the mentioned range of age tends to misuse their position and opportunities while on the other hand, judges seldom give maximum punishment to corruptorKey words: Corruption, Judged, Independency, Legal Factor, Non Legal Factor.
IMPLIKASI HUKUM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTIUSI NOMOR 16/PUU-XVIII/2020 TERHADAP NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI DALAM KASUS PIDANA [Implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 16/PUU-XVIII/2020 towards Notaries as Witnesses in Criminal Cases] Jamin Ginting; Helfinsi Raportina
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i2.4152

Abstract

There have been a few times attempt to cancel article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN 2014 after previously Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN 2004 was canceled by the Constitutional Court through Decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012. With similar redactional but changing the authority of the MPD to MKN, the petitioner argued that Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN 2014 also violates Article 27 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia where every citizen is equal before the law without exception, this principle is called equality before the law as well as Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which states that “everyone has the right to recognition, guarantee, protection, legal certainty and equal treatment before the law” as has been declared so for Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN 2014. The existence of authentic deed and the appointment of a notary as a public official is the state’s effort to guarantee the constitutional rights of citizens of legal protection in document in the form of authentic deed. Notary as public officials have oaths and regulation to keep secret as regulated by laws while legal process often require notary as witness. Notaries as public officials are protected and under the care the Notary Honorary Council which established by laws and regulations to ensure that Notaries maintain the secrecy and dignity of their position. Notary shall always be in care and diligence corridor because criminal, civil, ethic sanction but above all, is morale.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN 2014 telah diajukan permohonan pembatalan beberapa kali setelah sebelumnya Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN 2004 telah dibatalkan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui Putusan No. 49/PUU-X/2012. Dengan redaksional yang hampir sama, namun mengganti kewenangan MPD menjadi MKN, maka Pemohon berargumen bahwa Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN 2014 juga melanggar Pasal 27 ayat (1) UUD 1945, di mana setiap warga negara sama di muka hukum tanpa terkecuali, prinsip ini dinamakan equality before the law dan Pasal 28D ayat (1) UUD 1945, di mana dinyatakan bahwa setiap orang berhak atas pengakuan, jaminan, perlindungan, dan kepastian hukum yang adil, serta perlakuan yang sama di hadapan hukum, sebagaimana telah ditetapkan demikian untuk Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN 2004. Adanya akta otentik dan penunjukkan Notaris sebagai pejabat umum untuk hal tersebut merupakan upaya negara dalam menjamin hak konstitusional warga negara untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum atas dokumen berupa akta otentik. Notaris sebagai pejabat publik memiliki sumpah dan aturan untuk menjaga rahasia jabatan sebagaimana diatur oleh peraturan perundang-undangan, sementara proses hukum kerapkali membutuhkan keterangan Notaris sebagai saksi. Notaris sebagai pejabat publik dilindungi dan dibina oleh Majelis Kehormatan Notaris yang dibentuk oleh peraturan perundang-undangan untuk memastikan bahwa Notaris menjaga rahasia dan martabat jabatan. Notaris dalam menjalankan jabatannya tetap harus dalam koridor kehati-hatian dengan sanksi pidana, perdata, kode etik, dan di atas itu semua adalah moral.
SANKSI KERJA SOSIAL SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF BENTUK PEMIDANAAN DALAM SISTEM HUKUM DI INDONESIA Jamin Ginting
Law Review Volume XIX, No. 3 - March 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v19i3.2098

Abstract

Perubahan zaman yang sangat cepat mengakibatkan adanya perubahan juga pada segi-segi kehidupan manusia dan mengharuskan adanya penyesuaian terkhusus dan termasuk pada bidang hukum pidana yang sudah usang di Indonesia. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan membandingkan pidana kerja sosial di Belanda, Malaysia, Indonesia, Portugal dan kaitannya dengan keadilan restoratif. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pidana kerja sosial adalah wujud dari keadilan restoratif agar lebih menimbulkan jera kepada pelaku pidana. Di Indonesia, pidana kerja sosial baru sebatas wacana yang dituangkan dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (RUU KUHP), tetapi di Malaysia, Belanda, dan Portugal telah lama menerapkan pidana kerja sosial sebagai alternatif pemidanaan serta dengan perhitungan tertentu.
Legal Pluralism Perspective in Prosecuting Perpetrators of Bribery and Gratuities Corruption Crimes: Perspektif Pluralisme Hukum dalam Penindakan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Suap dan Gratifikasi Ginting, Jamin; Talbot, Patrick; Darryl, Erdick
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 20 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2049

Abstract

The act of giving and receiving has been a practice since feudal times. Gifts or tributes to kings or officials, among other forms of giving, are part of traditional customs and are considered social etiquette. To address these issues, the authors analyze the theory of criminal liability, lawlessness, legal pluralism, and the legal system. This research uses a normative juridical research methodology. The findings reveal that there are no clear boundaries concerning regulations related to bribery and gratuities, specifically regarding gifts or promises in which civil servants or public officials can or cannot accept. The application of the bribery and gratuity clause was misdirected, resulting in innocent individuals being punished while the guilty were acquitted.
Legal Protection for Creditors Against the Assets of Bankrupt Debtors Confiscated as Evidence Adipradana, Nugroho; Adi, Rianto; Ginting, Jamin
Global Legal Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): October
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/glr.v4i2.8485

Abstract

The uncertainty of the status of affiliated bankruptcy debtors as evidence of criminal offenses is a classic problem that until now has not found an alternative legal solution. When a bankruptcy debtor is proven to have committed a criminal offense, resulting in the debtor's assets becoming evidence seized by the criminal, the curator will experience difficulties in the process of liquidating the debtor's assets. On the one hand, the prosecutor's office has the authority to confiscate the assets of the debtor (defendant), as well as the curator who has the authority to liquidate. The emergence of these two types of seizure is certainly intended to provide legal certainty and legal protection for the community. However, in its implementation, when the two types of seizure clash, the aspects of certainty and justice for the community will not be achieved. Therefore, it is necessary to establish regulations that can bridge or unravel the problem of attraction of seizure objects between the curator and the prosecutor's office. The research method used in this research is juridical-normative by using several research approaches, namely statute approach and conceptual approach. The use of statute approach in the research is intended to provide an overview of the construction of bankruptcy and criminal law so as to hamper the process of liquidation of bankruptcy assets. While the use of conceptual approach is intended as a basis for thinking to reconstruct the legal construction so as to create harmonious and synchronous bankruptcy and criminal regulations and can provide certainty and justice for the legal protection of creditors.
The Deviation of Law in the Practice of Merariq Kodeq Tradition (Underage Runaway Marriage/Elopement) of the Sasak Community in Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara Sumerah; Rodliyah; Ginting, Jamin
Law Review Volume 25 Issue 1 (March 2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v25i1.8650

Abstract

There are complex problems of underage runaway marriage/elopement practices in the Sasak community in Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara. Merariq is running off with a girl to make her a wife. The practice of merariq in the Sasak community in Lombok is rife with underage children or what is known as merariq kodeq. The focus of this research is the deviation of law in the practice of merariq kodeq tradition (underage runaway marriage/elopement) of the Sasak Community in Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara. The type of this research is descriptive qualitative with data collection from conducting observations, interviews, documentation and literature studies. The findings of this research show that some of law deviations, including the legalization of child marriage (merariq kodeq/merariq kocet), have brought about the high rate of sirri marriage practice and early divorce, giving effect to the counterproductive dispensation of marriage in the Sasak community in Lombok, high rate of early divorce, and finally has an impact on the increasing numbers of schools’ dropouts. Further investigation of this traditional merariq practice has violated the rights of a minor, and this is within the category of deviation of law, namely the law on child protection and can also be classified as a criminal act. Among the legal issues in the practice of merariq kodeq among the people of Lombok, namely, legal issues of the criminal act of taking away a minor, the criminal act of violence, the criminal act of sexual violence, and the criminal act of neglecting a child. Efforts to prevent the practice of merariq kodeq are urgently needed as in the cases raised in this research, such as reviving local culture/local wisdom with full responsibility. On the other hand, efforts are needed to optimize socialization about marriage; real government intervention is needed in persuasive and educational efforts (a marriage school is needed as a media center); and the importance of carrying out non-litigation efforts on legal issues that arise in the practice of merariq kodeq, namely, maximizing peace efforts between parties, and increasing legal awareness in society in order to prevent people from being entangled in criminal acts and legal processes or legal punishment.
Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Perkawinan Yang Dibuat di Luar Negeri Oleh Warga Negara Asing (WNA) Yang Telah Menjadi Warga Negara Indonesia (WNI) di Indonesia Elizabeth Chen; Jamin Ginting
Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/cerdika.v5i6.2672

Abstract

A Prenuptial Agreement is an agreement or agreement made by a husband and wife which is intended to regulate the consequences of marriage on the assets of the husband and wife, before or during the marriage. In practice, there are problems that arise regarding this Prenuptial Agreement, namely a Prenuptial Agreement made by a foreign citizen couple abroad whose marriage registration was also carried out in Indonesia, but in this case the Defendant had become an Indonesian citizen before their marriage was registered in Indonesia and then there was a lawsuit for the division of assets in the form of land belonging to the husband. The formulation of the problem in this research is How is the Legal Force of a Prenuptial Agreement made Abroad by a Foreign Citizen (WNA) who has become an Indonesian Citizen (WNI) in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to examine the concept of regulating Prenuptial Agreement in Indonesia. The benefits of this study are to provide additional knowledge in the field of legal science, especially in Prenuptial Agreement. The Prenuptial Agreement made by a foreign citizen couple in Italy in this case is binding on the parties because the parties acknowledge the existence of a Prenuptial Agreement. However, legally if the Prenuptial Agreement is not made with a notary deed domiciled in Indonesia and is not legalized by a marriage registrar, the Prenuptial Agreement is not binding on third parties. Therefore, the marriage agreement is made before a notary domiciled in Indonesia so that it can be registered in Indonesia and the assets purchased become separate assets since the marriage is reported in Indonesia.
The Position of Collateral Assets Owned by Third Parties in the Management and Administration of Bankruptcy Assets Sitanggang, Rufina Astuti; Silalahi, Udin; Ginting, Jamin
Global Legal Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/glr.v5i2.8746

Abstract

Collateral serves as a guarantee for debt, with third parties often acting as guarantors or providing collateral that is not the debtor’s asset. When debtors file for bankruptcy, they may include third-party assets as collateral. The issue arises when these third-party assets are listed as bankruptcy assets, leading to conflicting court decisions—some include them as part of bankruptcy assets, while others do not. This dualism undermines legal certainty. The purpose of this research is to analyse the regulation regarding the position of collateral assets belonging to third parties in the management and administration of bankruptcy assets in Indonesia; the application of arrangements regarding collateral assets owned by third parties in the management and administration of bankruptcy assets in Indonesia; and legal certainty regulated over collateral assets belonging to third parties in bankruptcy in Indonesia. This research uses normative-juridical research with a statutory and conceptual approach with the analytical tools of agreement theory, legal certainty theory, and legal protection theory. Regulations regarding these issues are contained in Article 21 of Law Number 37 of 2004 and the guarantee agreement as an accessory agreement, Law Number 4 of 1996, Law Number 42 of 1999 and Book II and Book III of the Civil Code. The application of collateral payments owned by third parties in Indonesia's bankruptcy assets management and administration is currently has dualism. Pointing out that there are decisions that either declare collateral assets as bankruptcy assets or not, based on allegations and suspicions about ownership and the intention to accelerate the management and administration process. To address this, Article 21 of Law Number 37 of 2004 should be amended to clarify that bankruptcy assets are the assets of the bankrupt debtor and that collateral assets belonging to third parties are not included in bankruptcy assets as an affirmation of the previous provision.
Implementation of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Concept in Handling Corporate Crime in the Laws of Indonesia and Other Countries Ibrahim, Metty Murni Wati; Irawati, Jovita; Ginting, Jamin; Purba, Nelson Pardamean
Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 5 (2024): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : PT Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/edunity.v3i6.252

Abstract

This research uses a normative empirical research method that combines a normative analysis approach with empirical methods to explore certain legal issues that discuss the concept of a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) as an alternative dispute resolution in corporate crime cases in Indonesia, taking into account the experiences of the United States and the United Kingdom. The main focus is to identify the advantages and disadvantages of DPA implementation in Indonesia, including maintaining corporate reputation, minimizing the risk of bankruptcy, and resolving cases efficiently. The weaknesses of DPA in Indonesia include its vulnerability to abuse of authority and the absence of specific regulations governing its use.
Co-Authors Chen, Elizabeth Darryl, Erdick Elizabeth Chen Fadjar, Raden Febriarto Helfinsi Raportina Hernico, Brenda Ibrahim, Metty Murni Wati Irawati, Jovita Jur. M. Udin Silalahi Nugroho Adipradana Purba, Nelson Pardamean Rianto Adi, Rianto Rodliyah Sitanggang, Rufina Astuti Sumerah Talbot, Patrick Vincensia Esti Purnama Sari