Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.909
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum LAW REVIEW Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Global Legal Review Indonesian Journal of International Law Notary Journal Jurnal Konstitusi COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia JPNM : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin
Jamin Ginting
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL DALAM PENGEMBALIAN ASET HASIL KORUPSI DI INDONESIA Ginting, Jamin
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 11, No 3 (2011)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.3.173

Abstract

International agreement is an important requirement to make asset recovery effectively.  Mutual Legal Assistant (MLA) and Extradition are types of international agreement which usually used among country in asset recovery.  Beside the regulations mentioned above, there are international regulation in United Nations ConventionAgaints Corruptio, 2003 (UNCAC 2003) which should be adopted and applied in Indonesian Regulation to make asset recovery  effectively, such as regulation concerning Illicit Enrichment, Trading in Influence, bribery of foreign public officials and officials of Public international organizations, bribery in the private sector and another regulations which is  supposed to be regulated in Indonesian’s regulation.Key words: corruption, international agreements, extradition
Kedudukan Hukum Pemohon Perusahaan Swasta Dalam Permohonan PKPU Terhadap PT Persero di Indonesia (Analisis Putusan Nomor 425/PDT.Sus-Pkpu/2021/PN.Niaga.JKT.PST) Ginting, Jamin; Hernico, Brenda
COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 10 (2025): COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/comserva.v4i10.2937

Abstract

Suspension of Payment (PKPU) is a legal mechanism allowing debtors to propose a peace agreement with creditors before being declared bankrupt, as regulated in Article 2 of Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment. However, discrepancies arise when PKPU applications from private companies against PT. Persero conflict with Article 2 paragraph (5), which requires certain BUMNs to have applications filed by the Minister of Finance. In the case of PKPU No. 425/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, PT Mitra Buana Koorporindo’s application against PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk was granted, highlighting legal uncertainty for private creditors unable to submit similar claims. This research aims to examine the judge's considerations and the legal standing of private PKPU applicants against PT. Persero under the Bankruptcy Law. Using a normative-empirical method, supported by case studies and interviews, the study finds that classifications of PKPU applicants are detailed in the Bankruptcy Law but often cause confusion in practice. The findings reveal that the current regulations do not sufficiently protect private creditors' rights. Nevertheless, in PKPU case No. 425/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, the application was deemed compliant with the Bankruptcy Law, allowing private creditors to pursue claims against PT. Persero.
Extraterritorial Jurisdictions: Implementation of Foreign Public Officials in United States, United Kingdom, and Indonesia Ginting, Jamin; Fadjar, Raden Febriarto; Talbot, Patrick
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Cross-border business transactions have the potential to be corrupted, especially in the form of bribery committed by actors from different countries and within different jurisdictions. The Indonesian Corruption Law has not regulated how to criminalize Indonesian public officials or certain private companies who bribe officials in other countries or vice versa. Although Indonesia has ratified the United Nation Convention Against Corruption, it has not adopted provision on bribery of foreign public officials. Among the international community, the regulations for bribery of foreign public officials have been started by the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977. The United Kingdom also has an international bribery law for British entities called the United Kingdom Bribery Act 2010. The research issue is the implementation of the bribery article to the providers and receivers, under the conditions that they are not Indonesian citizens and the crimes were done outside of Indonesia. By using normative legal research method, the authors expect to provide an overview of Indonesian legal arrangements regarding the bribery of foreign public officials in order to banish foreign bribery practices that involve Indonesians and foreigners.
Corporate Criminal Liability in Jordan, Australia, and Indonesia: A Comparative Analysis of Doctrines and Recent Developments Emiliya Febriyani; Jamin Ginting; Basuki Rekso Wibowo
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 10 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jlpt.v10i2.11527

Abstract

This study analyzes the development of corporate criminal liability in Jordan, Australia, and Indonesia through a comparative doctrinal approach, focusing on the shift from the traditional identification doctrine toward models that attribute criminal fault to corporate culture. The research applies a normative legal method combined with comparative legal analysis, examining the Jordanian Penal Code, the Australian Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) and the Australian Law Reform Commission Report No. 136 (2020), Law No. 1 of 2023 on the New Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), and Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2023, alongside scholarly literature on identification doctrine, vicarious liability, strict liability, and corporate culture theory. The findings show that Jordan retains a classical identification-based model, holding corporations liable only when fault can be linked to individuals acting as the “directing mind and will.” Australia has adopted the most advanced framework through Section 12.3 of the Criminal Code, which attributes fault based on corporate culture and is strengthened by proposals for system-of-conduct offences. Indonesia occupies a transitional position: although the Law No. 1 of 2023  formally recognizes corporations as criminal subjects, its fault-attribution structure remains hybrid, and organizational fault is only expressly acknowledged sectorally through Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2023. The study concludes that effective corporate criminal liability depends on a legal system’s capacity to conceptualize fault as systemic failure rather than individual wrongdoing.
Strategi Pemerintah Kabupaten Deli Serdang dalam Implementasi Peraturan Perlindungan Data Pribadi: Studi Kasus di Kecamatan Sibolangit Ginting, Jamin; Sukardi, Ellora; Roseny, Chelsea Surya; Maya Puteri, Elisabeth Ryanthie
Notary Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Program Studi Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/nj.v6i1.10329

Abstract

This study analyzes the strategy of the Deli Serdang Regency Government in implementing personal data protection regulations, especially in Sibolangit District. In technological developments, the advancement of information technology has increased individual privacy risks, such as identity theft and data leaks. Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (UU PDP) serves as a significant step to protect individual rights in the collection, use, and exchange of personal data. However, implementation at the local level faces challenges. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study design, involving interviews, observations, and the distribution of questionnaires to 80 respondents from various backgrounds in Sibolangit District. The results show several challenges, such as some community members not fully understanding the UU PDP, a high incidence of data misuse, and a gap between normative awareness and practical caution in managing personal data. Although the public is aware of the importance of data protection, 64 out of 80 respondents are still willing to provide personal data for promotions or certain application registrations. In response, the Deli Serdang Regency Government has implemented strategies that include socializing the dangers of social media use and commercial service registration. The government has also integrated the Satu Data Indonesia program for human resource development and information dissemination through various media. This study recommends the need to strengthen infrastructure, improve human resource capacity, and conduct more targeted education for the public, especially young people and government employees, to be more prudent in managing personal data. Bahasa Indonesia Abstract: Penelitian ini menganalisis strategi Pemerintah Kabupaten Deli Serdang dalam mengimplementasikan peraturan perlindungan data pribadi, khususnya di Kecamatan Sibolangit. Perkembangan digital, kemajuan teknologi informasi telah meningkatkan risiko privasi individu, seperti pencurian identitas dan kebocoran data. Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi (UU PDP) hadir sebagai langkah signifikan untuk melindungi hak-hak individu dalam pengumpulan, penggunaan, dan pertukaran data pribadi. Namun, implementasi di daerah menghadapi tantangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus, melibatkan wawancara, observasi, dan penyebaran kuesioner kepada 80 responden dari berbagai latar belakang di Kecamatan Sibolangit. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat tantangan, seperti sebagian masyarakat yang belum sepenuhnya memahami UU PDP, tingginya insiden penyalahgunaan data, dan adanya celah antara kesadaran normatif dan kehati-hatian praktis dalam mengelola data pribadi. Meskipun masyarakat menyadari pentingnya perlindungan data, 64 dari 80 responden masih bersedia memberikan data pribadi untuk promosi atau pendaftaran aplikasi tertentu. Sebagai respons, Pemerintah Kabupaten Deli Serdang menerapkan strategi yang meliputi sosialisasi bahaya penggunaan media sosial dan pendaftaran layanan komersial. Pemerintah juga telah mengintegrasikan program Satu Data Indonesia untuk pengembangan sumber daya manusia dan diseminasi informasi melalui berbagai media. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya penguatan infrastruktur, peningkatan kapasitas sumber daya manusia, dan edukasi yang lebih terarah kepada masyarakat, khususnya kaum muda dan pegawai pemerintah, agar lebih bijaksana dalam mengelola data pribadi.
Peran Kewajiban Suami Dan Istri Dalam Mencegah Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Lady Kendra; Jamin Ginting
JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): May : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin (ACCEPTED)
Publisher : SM Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59945/jpnm.v4i2.1246

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas peran kewajiban perkawinan antara suami dan istri dalam mencegah kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT). KDRT masih menjadi permasalahan sosial dan hukum yang signifikan karena berdampak tidak hanya pada korban, tetapi juga terhadap stabilitas keluarga dan masyarakat secara keseluruhan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui analisis peraturan perundang-undangan, khususnya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemenuhan hak dan kewajiban oleh kedua pasangan suami istri berkontribusi dalam terciptanya rumah tangga yang harmonis serta meminimalkan potensi terjadinya kekerasan dalam keluarga. Sikap saling menghormati, tanggung jawab, komunikasi, dan kesadaran hukum merupakan faktor-faktor penting dalam menjaga keharmonisan keluarga. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menyoroti pentingnya edukasi masyarakat mengenai tanggung jawab perkawinan serta penegakan hukum yang konsisten guna mengurangi kasus KDRT. Oleh karena itu, penguatan kesadaran terhadap kewajiban perkawinan dan peningkatan mekanisme perlindungan hukum dipandang sebagai upaya preventif yang penting dalam menciptakan keluarga yang aman dan bebas dari kekerasan.
Co-Authors Basuki Rekso Wibowo Chen, Elizabeth Darryl, Erdick Elizabeth Chen Emiliya Febriyani Fadjar, Raden Febriarto Helfinsi Raportina Hernico, Brenda Jur. M. Udin Silalahi Lady Kendra Maya Puteri, Elisabeth Ryanthie Nugroho Adipradana Rianto Adi, Rianto Rodliyah Roseny, Chelsea Surya Sitanggang, Rufina Astuti Sukardi, Ellora Sumerah Talbot, Patrick Vincensia Esti Purnama Sari