Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.844
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum LAW REVIEW Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Global Legal Review Indonesian Journal of International Law Jurnal Konstitusi COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia JPNM : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin
Jamin Ginting
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Kedudukan Hukum Pemohon Perusahaan Swasta Dalam Permohonan PKPU Terhadap PT Persero di Indonesia (Analisis Putusan Nomor 425/PDT.Sus-Pkpu/2021/PN.Niaga.JKT.PST) Ginting, Jamin; Hernico, Brenda
COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 10 (2025): COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/comserva.v4i10.2937

Abstract

Suspension of Payment (PKPU) is a legal mechanism allowing debtors to propose a peace agreement with creditors before being declared bankrupt, as regulated in Article 2 of Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment. However, discrepancies arise when PKPU applications from private companies against PT. Persero conflict with Article 2 paragraph (5), which requires certain BUMNs to have applications filed by the Minister of Finance. In the case of PKPU No. 425/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, PT Mitra Buana Koorporindo’s application against PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk was granted, highlighting legal uncertainty for private creditors unable to submit similar claims. This research aims to examine the judge's considerations and the legal standing of private PKPU applicants against PT. Persero under the Bankruptcy Law. Using a normative-empirical method, supported by case studies and interviews, the study finds that classifications of PKPU applicants are detailed in the Bankruptcy Law but often cause confusion in practice. The findings reveal that the current regulations do not sufficiently protect private creditors' rights. Nevertheless, in PKPU case No. 425/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, the application was deemed compliant with the Bankruptcy Law, allowing private creditors to pursue claims against PT. Persero.
Extraterritorial Jurisdictions: Implementation of Foreign Public Officials in United States, United Kingdom, and Indonesia Ginting, Jamin; Fadjar, Raden Febriarto; Talbot, Patrick
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Cross-border business transactions have the potential to be corrupted, especially in the form of bribery committed by actors from different countries and within different jurisdictions. The Indonesian Corruption Law has not regulated how to criminalize Indonesian public officials or certain private companies who bribe officials in other countries or vice versa. Although Indonesia has ratified the United Nation Convention Against Corruption, it has not adopted provision on bribery of foreign public officials. Among the international community, the regulations for bribery of foreign public officials have been started by the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977. The United Kingdom also has an international bribery law for British entities called the United Kingdom Bribery Act 2010. The research issue is the implementation of the bribery article to the providers and receivers, under the conditions that they are not Indonesian citizens and the crimes were done outside of Indonesia. By using normative legal research method, the authors expect to provide an overview of Indonesian legal arrangements regarding the bribery of foreign public officials in order to banish foreign bribery practices that involve Indonesians and foreigners.
Corporate Criminal Liability in Jordan, Australia, and Indonesia: A Comparative Analysis of Doctrines and Recent Developments Emiliya Febriyani; Jamin Ginting; Basuki Rekso Wibowo
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 10 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jlpt.v10i2.11527

Abstract

This study analyzes the development of corporate criminal liability in Jordan, Australia, and Indonesia through a comparative doctrinal approach, focusing on the shift from the traditional identification doctrine toward models that attribute criminal fault to corporate culture. The research applies a normative legal method combined with comparative legal analysis, examining the Jordanian Penal Code, the Australian Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) and the Australian Law Reform Commission Report No. 136 (2020), Law No. 1 of 2023 on the New Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), and Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2023, alongside scholarly literature on identification doctrine, vicarious liability, strict liability, and corporate culture theory. The findings show that Jordan retains a classical identification-based model, holding corporations liable only when fault can be linked to individuals acting as the “directing mind and will.” Australia has adopted the most advanced framework through Section 12.3 of the Criminal Code, which attributes fault based on corporate culture and is strengthened by proposals for system-of-conduct offences. Indonesia occupies a transitional position: although the Law No. 1 of 2023  formally recognizes corporations as criminal subjects, its fault-attribution structure remains hybrid, and organizational fault is only expressly acknowledged sectorally through Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2023. The study concludes that effective corporate criminal liability depends on a legal system’s capacity to conceptualize fault as systemic failure rather than individual wrongdoing.
Peran Kewajiban Suami Dan Istri Dalam Mencegah Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Lady Kendra; Jamin Ginting
JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): May : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin (ACCEPTED)
Publisher : SM Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59945/jpnm.v4i2.1246

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas peran kewajiban perkawinan antara suami dan istri dalam mencegah kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT). KDRT masih menjadi permasalahan sosial dan hukum yang signifikan karena berdampak tidak hanya pada korban, tetapi juga terhadap stabilitas keluarga dan masyarakat secara keseluruhan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui analisis peraturan perundang-undangan, khususnya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemenuhan hak dan kewajiban oleh kedua pasangan suami istri berkontribusi dalam terciptanya rumah tangga yang harmonis serta meminimalkan potensi terjadinya kekerasan dalam keluarga. Sikap saling menghormati, tanggung jawab, komunikasi, dan kesadaran hukum merupakan faktor-faktor penting dalam menjaga keharmonisan keluarga. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menyoroti pentingnya edukasi masyarakat mengenai tanggung jawab perkawinan serta penegakan hukum yang konsisten guna mengurangi kasus KDRT. Oleh karena itu, penguatan kesadaran terhadap kewajiban perkawinan dan peningkatan mekanisme perlindungan hukum dipandang sebagai upaya preventif yang penting dalam menciptakan keluarga yang aman dan bebas dari kekerasan.
Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Perkawinan Yang Dibuat di Luar Negeri Oleh Warga Negara Asing (WNA) Yang Telah Menjadi Warga Negara Indonesia (WNI) di Indonesia Elizabeth Chen; Jamin Ginting
Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/cerdika.v5i6.2672

Abstract

A Prenuptial Agreement is an agreement or agreement made by a husband and wife which is intended to regulate the consequences of marriage on the assets of the husband and wife, before or during the marriage. In practice, there are problems that arise regarding this Prenuptial Agreement, namely a Prenuptial Agreement made by a foreign citizen couple abroad whose marriage registration was also carried out in Indonesia, but in this case the Defendant had become an Indonesian citizen before their marriage was registered in Indonesia and then there was a lawsuit for the division of assets in the form of land belonging to the husband. The formulation of the problem in this research is How is the Legal Force of a Prenuptial Agreement made Abroad by a Foreign Citizen (WNA) who has become an Indonesian Citizen (WNI) in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to examine the concept of regulating Prenuptial Agreement in Indonesia. The benefits of this study are to provide additional knowledge in the field of legal science, especially in Prenuptial Agreement. The Prenuptial Agreement made by a foreign citizen couple in Italy in this case is binding on the parties because the parties acknowledge the existence of a Prenuptial Agreement. However, legally if the Prenuptial Agreement is not made with a notary deed domiciled in Indonesia and is not legalized by a marriage registrar, the Prenuptial Agreement is not binding on third parties. Therefore, the marriage agreement is made before a notary domiciled in Indonesia so that it can be registered in Indonesia and the assets purchased become separate assets since the marriage is reported in Indonesia.
The Deviation of Law in the Practice of Merariq Kodeq Tradition (Underage Runaway Marriage/Elopement) of the Sasak Community in Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara Sumerah; Rodliyah; Jamin Ginting
Law Review Volume 25 Issue 1 (March 2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v25i1.8650

Abstract

There are complex problems of underage runaway marriage/elopement practices in the Sasak community in Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara. Merariq is running off with a girl to make her a wife. The practice of merariq in the Sasak community in Lombok is rife with underage children or what is known as merariq kodeq. The focus of this research is the deviation of law in the practice of merariq kodeq tradition (underage runaway marriage/elopement) of the Sasak Community in Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara. The type of this research is descriptive qualitative with data collection from conducting observations, interviews, documentation and literature studies. The findings of this research show that some of law deviations, including the legalization of child marriage (merariq kodeq/merariq kocet), have brought about the high rate of sirri marriage practice and early divorce, giving effect to the counterproductive dispensation of marriage in the Sasak community in Lombok, high rate of early divorce, and finally has an impact on the increasing numbers of schools’ dropouts. Further investigation of this traditional merariq practice has violated the rights of a minor, and this is within the category of deviation of law, namely the law on child protection and can also be classified as a criminal act. Among the legal issues in the practice of merariq kodeq among the people of Lombok, namely, legal issues of the criminal act of taking away a minor, the criminal act of violence, the criminal act of sexual violence, and the criminal act of neglecting a child. Efforts to prevent the practice of merariq kodeq are urgently needed as in the cases raised in this research, such as reviving local culture/local wisdom with full responsibility. On the other hand, efforts are needed to optimize socialization about marriage; real government intervention is needed in persuasive and educational efforts (a marriage school is needed as a media center); and the importance of carrying out non-litigation efforts on legal issues that arise in the practice of merariq kodeq, namely, maximizing peace efforts between parties, and increasing legal awareness in society in order to prevent people from being entangled in criminal acts and legal processes or legal punishment.
Co-Authors Basuki Rekso Wibowo Darryl, Erdick Elizabeth Chen Emiliya Febriyani Fadjar, Raden Febriarto Helfinsi Raportina Hernico, Brenda Jur. M. Udin Silalahi Lady Kendra Nugroho Adipradana Rianto Adi, Rianto Rodliyah Rodliyah Sitanggang, Rufina Astuti Sumerah Sumerah Talbot, Patrick Vincensia Esti Purnama Sari