Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Medis dan Pasien Pada Tindakan Gawat Darurat Muhammad Afiful Jauhani; Yoga Wahyu Pratiwi; supianto supianto
JURNAL RECHTENS Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): Desember
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56013/rechtens.v11i2.1790

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi tenaga medis dan pasien terhadap tindakan gawat darurat dalam perspektif hukum pidana dan dalam perspektif hukum perdata. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pasien yang mendapati kesalahan dokter pada saat melakukan tindakan kedokteran dalam situasi gawat darurat dan perbuatan tersebut memenuhi unsur pidana maka pasien dapat menuntut pertanggungjawaban dokter secara pidana, namun sesuai asas ultimum remedium, hukum pidana hendaklah dijadikan upaya terakhir dalam hal penegakan hukum. Dalam perspektif hukum perdata, Pasal 58 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Kesehatan menyatakan bahwa tuntutan ganti rugi tidak berlaku bagi tenaga kesehatan yang melakukan tindakan penyelamatan nyawa atau pencegahan kecacatan seseorang dalam keadaan darurat. Pasien yang kepentingannya dirugikan atas tindakan dokter dalam menjalankan praktik kedokteran dapat mengadukan secara tertulis kepada Ketua Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia dan tidak menghilangkan hak setiap orang untuk melaporkan adanya dugaan tindak pidana kepada pihak yang berwenang dan/atau menggugat kerugian perdata ke pengadilan.  Kata kunci: Gawat darurat, Medis, Pasien, Perlindungan hukum This study aims to determine the form of legal protection for medical personnel and patients against emergency measures in the perspective of criminal law and in the perspective of civil law. The method used in this research is normative juridical. The results of the study show that patients who find a doctor's mistake when carrying out medical actions in an emergency situation and the act fulfills a criminal element, the patient can hold the doctor accountable criminally, but according to the principle of ultimum remedium, criminal law should be used as a last resort in terms of law enforcement. From a civil law perspective, Article 58 paragraph (2) of the Health Law states that claims for compensation do not apply to health workers who take actions to save lives or prevent someone from becoming disabled in an emergency. Patients whose interests are harmed by the doctor's actions in carrying out medical practice can complain in writing to the Chairman of the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council and do not eliminate the right of everyone to report suspected criminal acts to the authorities and/or sue for civil damages to court.  Keywords: Emergency, Medical, Patient, Legal protection   REFERENCES Bickenbach, Jerome. “WHO’s Definition of Health: Philosophical Analysis.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine, edited by Thomas Schramme and Steven Edwards, 1–14. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_48-1. Buamona, Hasrul. “Tanggung Jawab Pidana Dokter Dalam Kesalahan Medis.” Almazahib 2, no. 2 (2014): 215–38. Chazawi, Adami. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2002. Dini, Sandra, and Febri Aristya. “Pembuktian Perdata Dalam Kasus Malpraktik Di Yogyakarta.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 0, no. 0 (2011): 180–205. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.361. Dorland. Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary. 33rd ed. Elsevier, 2019. Garner, Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictionary. Thomson Reuters. 11th ed., 2019. Hamzah, Andi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010. Herkutanto. “Aspek Medikolegal Pelayanan Gawat Darurat.” Majalah Kedokteran Indonesia 57, no. 2 (2007): 37–40. Heuken, Adolf. Ensiklopedi Populer Politik Pembangunan Pancasila. 4th ed. Jakarta: Yayasan Cipta Loka Caraka, 1984. Jauhani, Muhammad Afiful. Dilema Kapabilitas Dan Imparsialitas Dokter Sebagai Mediator Sengketa Medis. Surabaya: Scopindo Media Pustaka, 2020. Muntaha. Hukum Pidana Malapraktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017. Nurhayati, Bernadeta Resti. “Perikatan Usaha (Inspanning Verbintenis) Versus Perkatan Hasil (Resultaat Verbintenis) Dalam Perjanjian Terapeutik,” no. November (2018): 1-8. Perwira, Indra. “Memahami Kesehatan Sebagai Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Lembaga Studi & Advokasi Masyarakat, 2001, 1–19. Pujiyono, Eko. Keadilan Dalam Perawatan Medis. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2017. Sulistyani, Venny, and Zulhasmar Syamsu. “Pertanggungjawaban Perdata Seorang Dokter Dalam Kasus Malpraktek Medis.” Lex Jurnalica 12, no. 2 (2015). Widjaja, S. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pasien Selaku Konsumen terhadap Tindakan Malpraktik di Bidang Kesehatan. JURNAL RECHTENS, 9(1), hlm.47. https://doi.org/10.36835/rechtens.v9i1.660  https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1134311282?search_mode=content&search_text=jurnal%20rechtens&search_type=kws&search_field=full_search&and_facet_source_title=jour.1406386
PENDAFTARAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA SEBAGAI PEMENUHAN ASAS PUBLISITAS Supianto Supianto; Nanang Tri Budiman
Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Jember: Sharia Faculty State Islamic Institute of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/ijl.v1i3.84

Abstract

Before the birth of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law (UUJF), the issue of fiduciary security registration was not an obligation, but with the birth of the UUJF, registration of fiduciary guarantees was a very crucial stage and had an impact on many aspects of the following law. Such explanation is also recognized in the General Elucidation of UUJF that one of the reasons fiduciary guarantees does not provide legal certainty, especially to fiduciary recipients, one of which is because the fiduciary guarantee is not registered. The fulfillment of the principle of publicity in fiduciary security is carried out by registering fiduciary security at the Fiduciary Registration Office. Regarding the request, the registration office will record the guarantee in the Fiduciary Register Book and will issue a Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate which has the order for Justice Based on Almighty God. The normalization of fiduciary security registration in UUJF is a legal norm that is compelling (dwingend recht). This can be seen through two aspects, namely the use of the word mandatory in UUJF as a command norm, and from the aspect of the legal principle of objects which are closed, so that the norm cannot be deviated. With regard to fiduciary security that is not registered, the creditor as the recipient of fiduciary does not receive the rights and benefits specified in the UUJF, including material rights, priority rights, executive rights, and application of criminal provisions.
Parate Executie dalam Fidusia Menurut Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Rumawi Rumawi; Udiyo Basuki; Mellisa Towadi; Supianto Supianto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1933

Abstract

This article aims to analyze legal subjects whose rights have been violated by the Fiduciaire Act. The Act law can be revoked by the Constitutional Court. The act that violates the rights of subjects is the rule in the provisions of parate executie on Fiduciaire Act. The first analysis is the ontology of parate executives that inflict certain subjects, and the second analysis is the ratio decidendi decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. This paper uses dogmatize analysis. The decisions of the Constitutional Court are analyzed with the doctrine of experts and regulations. Parate execution is a right attached to the recipient fiduciary which can exercise if the fiduciary giver breaks the commitment. Collateral is auctioned through a public offering submitted by the recipient of guarantee. Default by a fiduciary giver occurs if there is an agreement between the giver and the fiduciary recipient. Default occurs based on legal remedies in determining the default. The agreement of the collector with the fiduciary acquirer, the emergence of a broken pledge experienced by the fiduciary giver can give birth to a parate executie.
Parate Executie dalam Fidusia Menurut Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Rumawi Rumawi; Udiyo Basuki; Mellisa Towadi; Supianto Supianto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (565.067 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1933

Abstract

This article aims to analyze legal subjects whose rights have been violated by the Fiduciaire Act. The Act law can be revoked by the Constitutional Court. The act that violates the rights of subjects is the rule in the provisions of parate executie on Fiduciaire Act. The first analysis is the ontology of parate executives that inflict certain subjects, and the second analysis is the ratio decidendi decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. This paper uses dogmatize analysis. The decisions of the Constitutional Court are analyzed with the doctrine of experts and regulations. Parate execution is a right attached to the recipient fiduciary which can exercise if the fiduciary giver breaks the commitment. Collateral is auctioned through a public offering submitted by the recipient of guarantee. Default by a fiduciary giver occurs if there is an agreement between the giver and the fiduciary recipient. Default occurs based on legal remedies in determining the default. The agreement of the collector with the fiduciary acquirer, the emergence of a broken pledge experienced by the fiduciary giver can give birth to a parate executie.
Karakteristik Perseroan Terbatas Perorangan dalam Hukum Indonesia Rumawi Rumawi; Siti Sariroh; Udiyo Basuki; Mellisa Towadi; Moh Ali; Supianto Supianto
Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Vol. 12 No. 02 (2023): Artikel Riset Volume 12 Issue 02, Maret 2023
Publisher : Information Technology and Science (ITScience)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47709/jhb.v12i2.2151

Abstract

Latar belakang: Dalam dekade terakhir ini, di Indonesia terdapat perkembangan yang luar biasa yaitu dalam hukum perusahaan. Perusahaan yang identik dengan perseroan terbatas, sering disebut dengan PT, telah mengalami perubahan makna. Perubahan tersebut sangat fundamental, bahwa pendiri PT tidak harus lebih dari satu orang, sekarang pendirian PT dapat didirikan oleh satu orang. Pendirian PT dengan satu orang pemegang saham ini dapat memantik perdebatan dipelbagai kalangan. Dengan pendirian PT oleh satu orang maka menampik keberadaan perjanjian dalam pendiriannya. Di samping itu, akibat dari pendirian hanya oleh satu orang pemegang saham, PT tersebut tidak perlu terdiri atas persekutuan modal. Modal hanya berasal dari pendirinya yang hanya satu orang pemegang saham tersebut. Metode penelitian: penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bertumpu pada riset terhadap normat-norma tematik dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undnagan dan pendekatan konspetual. Hasil penelitian: Berdasarkan kajian perseroan terbatas memiliki unsur-unsur sebagaimana unsur-unsur yang terdapat dalam perseroan terbatas. Unsur-unsur tersebut meliputi: badan hukum, PT adalah persekutuan modal, didirikan berdasarkan perjanjian (oleh undang-undang), melakukan kegiatan usaha, dan modalnya terdiri dari saham-saham. Sedangkan, perseroan terbatas perorangan memiliki unsur-unsur dalam kategori yang terdapat badan hukum. Unsur-unsur perseroan terbatas perorangan meliputi: adanya harta kekayaan yang terpisah, mempunyai tujuan tertentu, mempunyai kepentingan sendiri, dan adanya organisasi yang teratur, dinyatakan sebagai badan hukum oleh undang-undang. Kesimpulan: perseroan terbatas perorangan dapat diklasifikasikan sebagai perseroan terbatas dan badan hukum.