Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
I Gede Artha
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA

 1 
The Role of the Prosecutor in Executing the Payment of Replacement Money I Gede Artha; Ni Nengah Adiyaryani
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 3 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i03.p05

Abstract

This research is about the role of the Prosecutor as an executor in executing the assets of the convicts of corruption, to recover the State financial losses from corruption. Besides that, this research aims to know about the returning of State financial losses through the payment of replacement money. Corruption is an extraordinary crime, veiled and endanger national stability and security and inhibiting Indonesian economic development. This research is a normative legal research with primary, secondary and tertiary legal material supported by data. This research is using statutory, case, and comparative approaches. The legal basis used in this research are Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001, Law No. 16 of 2004 and Law No. 8 of 1981 (Indonesian Criminal Procedural Code). The corruption has become systematic and the scope enters into all aspect of life, start with the lower level with State Officers and law enforcers becomes the dominant actors. In imposing the sanction, The Judges are not only charge imprisonment but also charge additional fines and/or penalties to returning the State financial losses and ask the convicts of corruption to pay the replacement money to the State. The problem arises in this research related to the execution of the verdict about returning State financial losses which are the assets of the convicted person is already in the third party hands or have been depleted, dual population administration, the length of the judicial process, the convicted person prefers to take the subsidiary criminal charge and the hollow of norm regarding technical execution for the Prosecutors so that the execution cannot be carried out.
Pemberantasan Mafia Hukum di Pengadilan Putu Tresna Nararya Indranugraha; I Gede Artha
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p16

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze the occurrence of judicial mafia actions in court institutions and to review and provide solutions to overcome judicial mafia actions in courts. The above phenomena will be studied based on normative legal research. With a statutory approach, a legal concept approach, and a case approach. The analysis used is technical evaluative, argumentative, and descriptive. Problem are studied and analyzed based on theoretical foundations such as legal principles, legal concepts, doctrine, jurisprudence and legal theory. The results of the study explained that the judicial mafia that occurs in Indonesian criminal justice does not only occur in legal courts and law enforcement regarding the judicial mafia that occurs in the courts requires strategies and strict actions for the perpetrators, so far the occurrence of lawlessness by judges is still difficult to control, stemming from low morals, a consumptive lifestyle easily tempted by the lure of bribes, gratification that results in abuse of authority, until it leads to the emergence of legal mafia actions in court Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis terjadinya Tindakan mafia peradilan pada Lembaga pengadilan serta mengkaji dan memberi solusi guna mengatasi Tindakan mafia peradilan di pengadilan. Terhadap fenomena diatas akan diteliti berdasar penelitian hukum normatif. Dikaji melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep hukum serta pendekatan kasus. Analisis yang digunakan dengan teknis evaluatif, argumentatif dan deskriptif. Permasalahan dikaji dan dianalisis berdasar Landasan teoritis seperti asas-asas hukum, konsep hukum, doktrin, yurisprudensi dan teori hukum. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa mafia peradilan yang terjadi dalam peradilan pidana Indonesia bukan saja terjadi di pengadilan hukum serta penegakan hukum menyangkut mafia peradilan yang terjadi di pengadilan memerlukan strategi dan tindakan tegas bagi pelakunya, selama ini terjadinya pelanggaran hukum oleh oknum hakim masih sulit dikendalikan, bersumber dari moral yang rendah, gaya hidup konsumtif dengan mudah tergoda iming-iming suap, gratifikasi yang mengakibatkan penyalahgunaan kewenangan, sampai berujung munculnya tindakan mafia hukum di pengadilan.
Co-Authors Alberto Rischi Putra Bana Diah Vina Laoka Boru Sitorus Ema Wulandari Etik Jamsianah Firhan Umar Bagazi Gede Agus Engga Suryawan Sudirga I Dewa Narapati I Gst. Ag. Gd Surya Banyuning I Gusti Made Aditya Permana I Gusti Ngurah Yudha Adi Pradana I Ketut Mertha I Ketut Sudjana I Made Dwikka Surya Pratama I Putu Sika Adi Putra I Putu Yogi Indra Permana I Wayan Bela Siki Layang Ida Ayu Putri Permata Sari Ida Ayu Putu Sugiantari Ketut Gde Dannu Mertha Wiguna Komang Alit Antara Komang Tamar Pebru Wijana Made Prasasta Primandhika Made Prilita Saraswati Putri Indrawan Ni Made Ayu Purwati Ni Nengah Adiyaryani Ni Putu Manik Mas Widiasih Ni Putu Nanda Oktaviani Ni Putu Winda Adilla Putri Putri Nik Mirah Mahardani Nindayani Ainan Nirmaya Bekti Nyoman Arista Wirdiantara Putu Oka Bayu Aditya Kuntala Putu Tresna Nararya Indranugraha Putu Tresna Nararya Indranugraha Satria Fajar Putra Dipayana Siti Nurjannah