Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Anayasa

LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF LAW NUMBER 45 OF 2009 ON UNLAWFUL FISHING ACTIVITIES IN THE NATUNA REGION Harahap, Emirza Henderlan
ANAYASA : Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): ANAYASA
Publisher : PT. Altin Riset Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61397/ays.v1i2.91

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze the law regarding the impact of law number 45 of 2009 on unlawful fishing activities in the Natuna region .Researchers use normative law as their research methodology.  Normative law is a type of research that uses law as a system of norms . This norm system involves norms, rules, principles and legal regulations. Normative research is a process of finding legal rules, principles, or theories to solve legal problems. Normative research, also known as doctrinal law, is a type of research that aims to develop new theories, concepts or arguments to help solve problems . The results of this research are that many illegal fishing activities occur in the Natuna sea. Apart from that, the lack of supervision has resulted in a large number of individuals from foreign countries. So the elements resulting in illegal fishing ( fishing) in Natuna waters are as follows: very limited skills for investigators in the field of fisheries as well as TNI-AL officers and law enforcement officers in the field of maritime affairs and fisheries, as well as prosecutors and judges; lack of coordination and equality between law enforcers; lack of plans to implement law enforcement systematically and over a long period of time; lack of integrity of law enforcement, which is capable of having an impact on the process and law enforcement.
EFFORTS TO IMPLEMENT THE PRINCIPLE OF COORDINATION BETWEEN POLICE INVESTIGATORS AND PROSECUTORS IN PROCESSING CRIMINAL CASES IN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PEKANBARU POLICE STATION Aristyan , Christ; Harahap, Emirza Henderlan
ANAYASA : Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): ANAYASA
Publisher : PT. Altin Riset Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61397/ays.v2i1.194

Abstract

To enforce criminal law, there needs to be coordination between police investigators and public prosecutors. This is to the existing provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code in the form of criminal offenses must be disclosed, investigators must notify the public prosecutor if there is a termination or extension in the case. If the functional relationship and coordination do not go well, there will be many arrears of problems in the Prosecutor's Office, thus affecting the problem-solving process. Likewise, on the other hand, if there is coordination and communication between investigators and public prosecutors, they will be able to resolve each case properly. So, the obstacles in the implementation of the principle of coordination between police investigators and public prosecutors are the lack of communication, prioritizing the interests of their departments, the existence of sectoral arrogance, and lack of trust in the police to enforce the law and so on. This also grows from the stigma of the community towards the police so that it causes difficulties in conveying aspirations in the field, neglect of legal aspects, police ethics whose morale is still low, and equipment and investigations are still limited.