Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.779
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Selat ADIL : Jurnal Hukum Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences
Prija Djatmika
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
REFORMULATION OF GREEN VICTIMOLOGY ARRANGEMENTS IN THE LAW OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT THAT BETTER GUARANTEES LEGAL PROTECTION FOR THE ENVIRONMENT Ummu Salamah; Prija Djatmika; I Nyoman Nurjaya
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): July
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i4.3763

Abstract

This research is motivated by Law Number 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, which, in fact, remains limited accommodating the concept of green victimology in the regulation and handling of environmental crimes. Given the prevalence of environmental crimes whose perpetrators are not punished proportionately to the human and non-human losses caused, it is important to question the legal implications of applying the concept of green victimology to the legal protection of environmental victims in the Environmental Protection and Management Law and the regulation of green victimology in the Environmental Protection and Management Law that Better Ensures Legal Protection for the Environment. The type of research used by the author is normative legal research with an explanatory nature. Legal materials for analysis were obtained from primary legal sources in the form of criminal and environmental laws, as well as secondary legal materials from literature on environmental crime and green victimology. The research was conducted through literature review, using a legal and comparative approach, and analyzed qualitatively. The legal implications of applying green victimology in the Environmental Protection and Management Law (UUPPLH) encourage reforms in the definition of victims, the right to sue, recovery mechanisms, as well as sanctions and law enforcement that are more comprehensive and ecological justice. the regulation of Green victimology in the UUPPLH to ensure legal protection for the environment can begin with the reconstruction/reformulation of the UUPPLH by expanding the definition of victims to include the environment as a victim with the right to protection and selected as a subject of environmental law enforcement, up to expanding the definition of victims by including the environment as a victim with the right to protection and selected as a subject of environmental law enforcement.
THE URGENCY OF FORMING SPECIAL CRIMINAL LAWS FOR CRIMINALS COMMITTED BY CHILDREN IN CASES OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN REVIEWED FROM THEORY OF LEGAL CERTAINTY Imera Azzahra Alivia; Prija Djatmika; Nurini Aprilianda
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v4i6.2077

Abstract

Sexual violence against children committed by child perpetrators is a serious issue in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. Currently, Indonesian criminal law does not specifically regulate a comprehensive handling mechanism for this case, thus causing problems in the application of fair law and providing optimal protection for children as victims and perpetrators. This study aims to analyze the urgency of establishing a special criminal law that handles criminal acts of sexual violence by children against other children. A normative legal approach with a conceptual approach, a legislative approach and a comparative approach and the theory of legal certainty are used in this study to explore the need for clearer and more responsive regulations. The results of the study indicate that the establishment of a special criminal law can provide better legal certainty, including appropriate protection and rehabilitation mechanisms for children as perpetrators and victims. This is important to ensure that the criminal justice system not only prioritizes punishment, but also protection and rehabilitation in accordance with the principle of the best interests of the child. The establishment of this special regulation can also strengthen the justice system to be more adaptive and responsive to the special characteristics of cases of child sexual violence.
THE JUSTICE ASPECT OF JUDICIAL CONSIDERATIONS ON THE FULFILLMENT OF VICTIMS’ RIGHTS IN PAST ACTS OF TERRORISM Kurnia, Rizky; Prija Djatmika; Milda Istiqomah
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2733

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 103/PUU-XXI/2023 marks a pivotal turning point in the protection of the rights of victims of terrorism, particularly those affected prior to the enactment of Law Number 5 of 2018, who have not yet received adequate legal protection. This paper analyzes the aspect of justice considered by the Constitutional Court judges in fulfilling the rights of past victims of terrorism as reflected in Decision Number 103/PUU-XXI/2023, as well as the conceptual framework for the realization of such rights within the Indonesian criminal justice system. The findings of this study reveal that the element of justice in the Court's reasoning is embodied in a substantive and humanistic approach, which reinforces the state's responsibility to fulfill the constitutional rights of victims of past terrorism acts as a manifestation of human rights protection and the principle of equality before the law. The ideal concept of fulfilling the rights of victims of past acts of terrorism emphasizes restorative justice through recognition, protection, and recovery, supported by a comprehensive legal framework and equitable, implementable policies.
BASIS FOR JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN SENTIMENTING CRIMINAL SENTENCES BELOW THE MINIMUM SPECIFICALLY IN THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE OF INDEMNITY REVIEWED FROM THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY (Study of Decision Number 7/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Sos) Andi Pambudi Utomo; Prija Djatmika; Milda Istiqomah
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2762

Abstract

Hakim memainkan peranan penting dalam menegakkan hukum dan keadilan, termasuk ketika menjatuhkan pidana di bawah batas minimum khusus dalam perkara pencabulan terhadap anak. Meskipun langkah ini dimaksudkan untuk mewujudkan keadilan substantif, penerapannya dapat menimbulkan dilema hukum karena berisiko mengurangi kepastian hukum dan menyebabkan ketidakkonsistenan dalam putusan. Oleh karena itu, perlu dilakukan kajian lebih mendalam untuk menemukan titik temu antara keadilan dan kepastian hukum dalam praktik peradilan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana di bawah batas minimum khusus dalam perkara pencabulan anak dari sudut pandang asas kepastian hukum. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga mengevaluasi dampak hukum dari praktik tersebut terhadap sistem peradilan pidana dan jaminan perlindungan hukum bagi korban. Metodologi yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif, dengan penelaahan terhadap regulasi dan studi kasus. Sumber data meliputi bahan hukum primer (peraturan perundang-undangan), bahan hukum sekunder (literatur akademik), serta bahan hukum tersier (kamus hukum). Analisis dilakukan melalui metode interpretasi ekstensif guna menilai penerapan asas kepastian hukum serta ruang kebebasan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan. Temuan penelitian mengungkap bahwa hakim mempertimbangkan faktor hukum maupun non-hukum dalam menjatuhkan pidana di bawah minimum khusus. Walaupun langkah ini bertujuan mengharmoniskan antara keadilan dan kepastian hukum, praktik tersebut tetap berpotensi menimbulkan disparitas putusan dan ketidakpastian hukum. Selain itu, penggunaan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) sebagai acuan juga menimbulkan perdebatan terkait supremasi hukum dan konsistensi penerapan pidana minimum khusus.
THE PRINCIPLE OF THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST CHILDREN WHO COMMIT RAPE Shafira, Cindy; Prija Djatmika; Nurini Aprilianda
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2772

Abstract

Handling rape cases involving children as perpetrators has become a complicated issue within the juvenile justice system in Indonesia. This crime not only causes deep psychological wounds to the victims, who are also still children, but also presents complex legal issues in the law enforcement process against the perpetrators who are legally minors. The principle of "the best interests of the child," as stipulated in” Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA)” and “the Convention on the Rights of the Child”, emphasizes that the approach to children in conflict with the law should focus more on rehabilitation and protection rather than mere punishment. This research aims to deeply explore the underlying considerations of judges in adjudicating cases of rape committed by children, using a case study from the Pasir Pengaraian District Court's verdicts. Through normative legal research methods with a case study approach, it was found that the Judge in adjudicating the case had prioritized the principle of "the best interests of the child." Disparities in court rulings result from the juvenile justice system's uneven practical implementation, notwithstanding its normative orientation toward a restorative justice paradigm that prioritizes rehabilitation. To guarantee a more uniform, equitable, and really child-centered justice system, this study emphasizes the necessity of harmonizing and standardizing the application of the "best interests of the child" principle across the entire legal procedure.
THE INDONESIAN SUPREME COURT REGULATION: ENABLING OFFENDERS AND VICTIMS TO FULFILL RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AGREEMENTS DURING PROBATION Alya Dean Putri; Prija Djatmika; Setiawan Nerdajasakti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2853

Abstract

This study investigates the application of conditional sentencing within the framework of restorative justice as outlined in Indonesian Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2024. This regulation offers a mechanism that enables offenders to fulfill their obligations from restorative agreements during the probation period, promoting both offender accountability and victim restoration. The research analyzes the procedural aspects of restorative justice in criminal cases in Indonesia, particularly focusing on how it is implemented in courts. It highlights the benefits of integrating restorative justice with conditional sentencing, while also identifying challenges and gaps in the legal framework. Additionally, the study calls for further empirical research to evaluate the practical effectiveness of this approach and the legal consequences if offenders fail to fulfill their obligations during the probation period.
THE AUTHORITY OF JUDGES IN GOVERNING THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE IN INDONESIA’S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Matius Evan Anggara; Prija Djatmika; Yuliati
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): September
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.4010

Abstract

The doctrine of criminal evidence, encapsulated in the maxim in criminalibus probationes debent esse luce clariores, establishes that the evidence presented in criminal proceedings should be as transparent as light. This requirement entails that evidence—both in its formal dimension and in its material substance—must be subject to rigorous testing concerning the legality and authenticity of its acquisition. Nevertheless, the evidentiary process frequently encounters problems in both formal and material respects. Judicial scrutiny of evidentiary quality and admissibility includes, among others, examining whether documentary evidence was obtained through unlawful means or produced under circumstances that undermine its validity. Employing a normative juridical research method, this study investigates the judicial application of the Exclusionary Rules of Evidence in Indonesia’s criminal justice system through statutory and conceptual approaches.
Criminal Law Formulation Policy Regarding Payment of Money In Substitution For Criminal Acts of Corruption From The Perspective of Dignified Justice Ni'Am, M. Khoirun; Prija Djatmika; Abdul Madjid
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.321

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime that remains a serious problem in Indonesia despite the implementation of various regulations such as Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption. One important instrument in recovering state losses due to corruption is the penalty of replacement money. However, in practice, the application of replacement money as an additional penalty has not been effective due to legal and technical obstacles, such as the difficulty of tracking assets, weak coordination between law enforcement agencies, and the absence of a consistent execution mechanism. This study aims to analyze the legal implications of criminal law formulation policies related to the regulation of replacement money and to formulate a direction for criminal law reform based on the concept of dignified justice. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory, case, and conceptual approach. The analysis is conducted prescriptively through grammatical and systematic interpretation of laws and regulations, doctrine, and judicial practice. The results show that the regulation of replacement money as an additional penalty does not reflect substantive justice because it emphasizes the retributive aspect rather than the restorative aspect. Legal reform is needed by making compensation a primary punishment so that the primary objective of punishment is to restore state losses. The dignified justice approach positions humans as moral subjects responsible for redressing public losses, in line with the values ​​of Pancasila. Therefore, this reformulation is expected to create a more just, humane, and socially just criminal legal system.
COMPARISON OF THE JUDICIAL FORGIVENESS (RECHTERLIJK PARDON) BETWEEN CIVIL LAW SYSTEM AND ISLAMIC LAW SYSTEM (FINDING THE FORMULATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF RECHTERLIJK PARDON IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW) Budimansyah; Prija Djatmika; Rachmad Safa’at; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): July
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v3i4.946

Abstract

This study falls under the category of normative legal research or doctrinal legal research. Primary legal resources, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials are all used library research techniques for gathering legal materials (library research). In contrast, the descriptive analysis approach is used for data processing. According to the conclusions of this study, various civil law system nations, like the Netherlands, Greece, and Portugal, use the principle of judicial forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon). However, long before these nations implemented the principle of forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) in their criminal law, Islamic criminal law used principle of forgiveness first in jarimah qadzaf (accusing adultery), jarimah qishas-diyat, and jarimah Ta'zir. Compared to the principle of forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) in the civil law system, the principle of forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) in Islamic criminal law offers benefits. The formulation of the principle of judicial forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) in Indonesian criminal law in the future is to prescribe the principle of judicial forgiveness in Islamic criminal law since it is seen to have advantages. Furthermore, incorporating the notion of judicial forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) from Islamic criminal law into Indonesian criminal law is sociologically consistent with the legal knowledge of the Indonesian people, the majority of whom are Muslims.
IMPLICATIONS OF REGULATION OF THE CRIME OF PERSECUTION IN LAW NUMBER 1 OF 2023 CONCERNING THE CRIMINAL LAW BOOK Chyntia Vindy Rahmani; Prija Djatmika; Nurini Aprilianda
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): January
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v4i1.1385

Abstract

The term persecution is not contained in the Criminal Code (KUHP). However, in practice, acts of persecution are often threatened with criminal penalties contained in the Criminal Code, namely abuse, beatings and violence. However, as is known, persecution is part of crimes against humanity regulated in Article 7 of the Rome Statute. With the existence of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (UU KUHP), acts of persecution have now become part of criminal acts. Therefore, this research will discuss whether the regulation of persecution in article 599 letter c of the Criminal Code Law is in accordance with international conventions? and what are the legal implications of the regulation of persecution in article 599 letter c of the Criminal Code Law in the context of legal certainty. The research method used in this research is normative juridical with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a comparative approach.
Co-Authors A Ira Fadilla Rohmadanti Abdul Madjid Alya Dean Putri Andi Pambudi Utomo Bambang Arjuno Budimansyah Chyntia Vindy Rahmani Dhia Fadlia Dody Heryanto Fachrizal Afandi Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Henny Yuningsih I NYOMAN NURJAYA Imera Azzahra Alivia Jeremia Sipahutar Kurnia, Rizky Lilik Mulyadi Masruchin Ruba’I Matius Evan Anggara Milda Istiqomah Moerdany, Vira Muhammad Fathony Rizky Noorizain Muhammad Luthfi Ni'Am, M. Khoirun Nurini Aprilianda Putri Darmawan Charles Rachmad Safa’at Setiawan Nerdajasakti Setiawan Noerdajasakti Shafira, Cindy Simamora, Putri Carera Santi Romauli Syamsiar, Syamsiar Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara Ummu Salamah Yohanes Fiodas Jaman Yuliati -