Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Universal Health Coverage Implementation: A Comparative Policy Review Based on WHO and World Bank Reports Ilham Kurniawan
Hippocratica : Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): March: Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Universal Health Coverage (UHC) has become a central objective of global health governance, yet significant variation persists in how countries interpret and implement its policy architecture. This study examines how implementation pathways are constructed and evaluated within major global policy reports, focusing on analytical frameworks developed by leading international health and development institutions. Using a non-empirical qualitative policy review design, the research analyzes institutional reports published between 2015 and 2025 alongside comparative scholarly literature on financing, governance, and service delivery. Documents were examined through thematic coding and comparative discourse analysis to identify how coverage, financial protection, quality of care, and governance are framed as reform priorities. Findings indicate that global monitoring systems tend to emphasize measurable financial indicators and insurance expansion, while empirical research highlights governance coordination, primary health care capacity, and adaptive policy learning as more decisive for equitable and sustainable outcomes. The study concludes that global evaluation frameworks function not only as assessment tools but also as normative instruments shaping national reform agendas. Reframing monitoring approaches toward systemic integration may strengthen the effectiveness of future UHC strategies.
Indexed, Ranked, but Not Verified: Why Bibliometric Status Cannot Guarantee Scholarly Integrity in the Age of AI-Hallucinated Citations? Editorial Letter Ilham Kurniawan
Journal of Diverse Medical Research : Medicosphere Vol. 3 No. 5 (2026): Journal of Diverse Medical Research : Medicosphere 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine - Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33005/jdiversemedres.v3i5.355

Abstract

Preamble A question that should unsettle every editor, reviewer, and author is this: What happens when fabricated, unverifiable references appear in peer‑reviewed articles published in indexed journals? This is no longer hypothetical. It is a reality that forces us to confront an uncomfortable truth indexation is not innocence, and a Scopus badge is not a certificate of integrity. As Deputy Editor-in-Chief of Medicosphere, I believe this demands urgent attention. The integrity of the scholarly record the foundation of scientific progress is under threat from generative artificial intelligence.
The Assistant, Not the Author: Confronting the Misuse of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing: Editorial Letter Ilham Kurniawan
Journal of Diverse Medical Research : Medicosphere Vol. 3 No. 6 (2026): Journal of Diverse Medical Research : Medicosphere 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine - Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33005/jdiversemedres.v3i6.357

Abstract

Preamble A fundamental question facing academic publishing today is this: Where do we draw the line between legitimate assistance and unacceptable delegation when it comes to artificial intelligence? As generative AI tools become increasingly integrated into research workflows, the distinction between using AI as a helper and presenting it as a creator has never been more critical or more frequently misunderstood. As Deputy Editor-in-Chief of Medicosphere, I write to address a growing concern: the misuse of AI in scholarly manuscripts, particularly the tendency to treat AI-generated content as if it were the author’s own work, or worse, to list AI tools as co-authors. This is not a technological problem it is an ethical one. And it demands our immediate attention.
Medical Education in the Age of AI: Shaping Technologically Literate yet Humanistic Doctors: Editorial Letter Rika Yuliwulandari; Ilham Kurniawan; Laurentius Johan Ardian
Journal of Diverse Medical Research : Medicosphere Vol. 3 No. 7 (2026): Journal of Diverse Medical Research : Medicosphere 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine - Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33005/jdiversemedres.v3i7.362

Abstract

Preamble A fundamental question facing medical educators today is this: How do we prepare future doctors for a world where artificial intelligence is reshaping every aspect of clinical practice, without losing the humanistic core that defines the art of medicine? This is no longer a theoretical debate it is an urgent pedagogical imperative. As Editor-in-Chief and Deputy Editor-in-Chief of Medicosphere, we believe this question demands our immediate attention. AI is rapidly transforming healthcare reshaping clinical decision-making, diagnostic imaging, and patient care. Deep learning algorithms have demonstrated remarkable performance in tasks such as image classification, leading to improved diagnostic accuracy. Yet, paradoxically, at the very moment when technology offers unprecedented capabilities, the need for distinctly human qualities in medicine empathy, compassion, ethical reasoning, and clinical wisdom has never been greater. The challenge before us is clear: we must train doctors who are not only technologically literate but also deeply humanistic. This is not an either‑or proposition. It is both.
Complete Resection of A Giant Convexity Meningioma Involving The Middle Cerebral Artery: A Case Report and Surgical Considerations: A Case Report M. Irfan Rahmatullah; Ordelia Nur Inayah Sunarto; Muhammad Daffa Ratsmawan; Ilham Kurniawan
Journal of Diverse Medical Research : Medicosphere Vol. 3 No. 7 (2026): Journal of Diverse Medical Research : Medicosphere 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine - Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33005/jdiversemedres.v3i7.371

Abstract

Meningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults, accounting for approximately 37.6% of all primary central nervous system neoplasms. Although convexity meningiomas are generally surgically accessible, large tumors with neurovascular involvement present significant operative challenges, especially when acute neurological deterioration necessitates emergent intervention. A 46-year-old female presented with decreased consciousness (GCS E2V3M4) and progressive hemiparesis. Preoperative CT revealed a large temporoparietal extra-axial mass with significant mass effect and middle cerebral artery (MCA) involvement. Emergent craniotomy and stepwise debulking were performed utilizing gravity-assisted retraction, central dural incision, pial plane preservation, early arterial feeder coagulation, and systematic hemostasis. The philosophy of prioritizing patient safety over gross total resection guided the strategy. Postoperatively, the patient regained full consciousness (GCS E4V5M6) with marked motor improvement. Emerging evidence supports subtotal resection with adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery for residual tumors. Emergent surgical debulking of large convexity meningiomas with neurovascular involvement is feasible and effective when guided by stepwise resection, pial plane preservation, and patient safety. Adjuvant radiosurgery should be considered for any residual tumor on follow-up imaging.