Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Semaya Masalah-Masalah Hukum Rechtsidee Perspektif Hukum
Dicky Eko Prasetio
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PLURALISME KEWENANGAN PENYIDIKAN DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA Adam Ilyas; Felix Ferdin Bakker; Dicky Eko Prasetio
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (288.453 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2021.v10.i01.p13

Abstract

Kewenangan penyidikan dalam perkara korupsi di Indonesia ditangani oleh tiga lembaga yaitu Kepolisian, Kejaksaan, dan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). Melalui penelitian hukum yuridis-normatif ini, adapun tujuan penulis dalam melakukan kajian hukum ini adalah untuk mengetahui seberapa efektif penyelesaian tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia yang memberikan kewenangan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi kepada tiga lembaga dibandingkan dengan keberhasilan penyelesaian perkara korupsi di Singapura yang hanya dilakukan oleh satu lembaga yakni Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB). Hasilnya pluralisme ini tidak efektif. Oleh karena itu, berdasarkan hasil penelitian maka kebijakan untuk melakukan perubahan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait untuk menyelesaikan kasus korupsi di Indonesia dengan menempatkan KPK sebagai satu-satunya lembaga penegak hukum yang independen yang dapat melakukan penyelidikan dan penyidikan perkara korupsi. Hal lain yang perlu di kaji yaitu posisi Indonesia sebagai negara kepulauan, maka diperlukan adanya KPK cabang provinsi agar sistem pencegahan dan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi dapat berjalan efektif dan merata. The investigation authority in corruption cases in Indonesia is handled by three institutions, namely the Police, the Prosecutor's Office, and the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). Through this juridical-normative legal research, the author's aim in conducting this legal study is to find out how effective the settlement of corruption crimes in Indonesia is that gives the authority to investigate corruption crimes to three institutions compared to the successful completion of corruption cases in Singapore which one person only carried out. Institution, namely the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB). As a result, this pluralism is not adequate. Therefore, based on the research results, the policy is to make changes to the relevant laws and regulations to resolve corruption cases in Indonesia by placing the KPK as the only independent law enforcement agency that can conduct investigations and investigations of corruption cases. Another thing that needs to be studied is the position of Indonesia as an archipelagic country. It is necessary to have a provincial branch of the KPK so that the system for preventing and eradicating corruption can run effectively and evenly.
REKONSTRUKSI KONSTITUSI DALAM REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH TERHADAP FUNGSI LEGISLATIF Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan; Dicky Eko Prasetio
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 48, No 3 (2019): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (454.136 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.48.3.2019.266-274

Abstract

Dewan Perwakilan Daerah atau DPD merupakan lembaga legislatif yang lahir dari gejolak reformasi 1998 yang keberadaan yuridis terkait DPD dan kewenangannya didasarkan Pasal 22D UUD NRI 1945. Dalam regelende functie  maka sejatinya peran DPD sebagai perwakkilan daerah untuk mengimbangi adanya peran Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat sebagai political. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk meninjau dan menganalisis kembali bagaimana seharusnya keberadaan DPD dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan analitis (analytical approch), bahwa keanggotaan DPD haruslah merupakan calon perseorangan yang terbebas dari jabatan dan fungsionaris partai politik. Hal ini untuk mempertegas serta mengoptimalkan peran regional representative supaya dari proses pencalonan, pengangkatan, dan perumusan kebijakan merupakan perorangan yang benar-benar concern terhadap permasalahan, dinamika, dan kepentingan daerah yang diwakilinya.
The Legal Pluralism Strategy of Sendi Traditional Court in the Era of Modernization Law Dicky Eko Prasetio; Fradhana Putra Disantara; Nadia Husna Azzahra; Dita Perwitasari
Rechtsidee Vol 8 (2021): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.2021.8.702

Abstract

The Sendi customary community is a community that has procedures for implementing customary law through the customary justice system. Not only that, the Sendi customary community also has a distinctive legal code and customary apparatus; so that its existence needs to be maintained in the face of the era of legal modernization. This research is an empirical legal research; by using secondary data types obtained from various searches for journal articles, books, and information through online news online; relating to the substance of the research. The purpose of this research is to describe the structure of Sendi's customary court in maintaining the existence of customary law; as well as describing the strategy of legal pluralism in Sendi's customary court to face modernization of law era. This empirical legal research focuses on the structure of Sendi's customary court with an approach of legal pluralism. The results of the study confirm that a legal pluralism strategy is needed to maintain the existence of the Sendi traditional court in the era of legal modernization; and integration efforts are needed between the law and the customary apparatus of Sendi with the law and the national or state apparatus.
Penataan Penataan Kewenangan KPU dan Bawaslu dalam Melakukan Pengawasan dan Menangani Sengketa Proses Pemilu Hananto Widodo; Dicky Eko Prasetio
Perspektif Hukum VOLUME 21 ISSUE 2
Publisher : Faculty of Law Hang Tuah University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/ph.v21i2.93

Abstract

The general election organizing body is an institution designed to have a check and balance function so that it is oriented towards realizing a democratic process in accordance with the constitution. In Indonesia, the institution responsible for the implementation of the general election is not only the General Election Commission but also other institutions, such as the General Elections Supervisory Board and the Honorary Council for General Election Organizers. This study seeks to initiate the structuring of the General Election Commission and the General Elections Supervisory Agency in supervising and handling disputes over the General Election process. This research is a legal research. This research uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a historical approach. The results of this study indicate that if it is made in stages, if the election participants do not accept the General Election Commission's attitude, then the election participants can appeal to the General Elections Supervisory Agency, and if there are parties who cannot accept the decision of the General Elections Supervisory Board, then the those who cannot accept it should file a lawsuit to the State Administrative High Court.
Co-Authors Adam Ilyas Dita Perwitasari Felix Ferdin Bakker Fradhana Putra Disantara hananto widodo Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan Nadia Husna Azzahra