p-Index From 2021 - 2026
10.386
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Siasat Bisnis Kertha Patrika Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Hukum Progresif JURNAL BISNIS STRATEGI Ekonomi Bisnis Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan Kinerja JDM (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen) Pandecta JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Journal The Winners CommIT (Communication & Information Technology) FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship (IJBE) Arena Hukum Jurnal Manajemen Atma Jaya Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis dan Manajemen (JABM) E-Journal Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Hukum Novelty LAW REVIEW Diponegoro Law Review Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Binus Business Review Jurisprudence Jurnal Pariwisata Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Hasanuddin Law Review Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Ekonomi Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Inovasi : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen Varia Justicia Journal Economics & Business Atmajaya Indonesia Nagari Law Review Jurnal Kreativitas PKM Sociological Jurisprudence Journal KERTHA WICAKSANA Jurdimas (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Royal JURNAL MERCATORIA Unes Law Review JIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Keuangan dan Perbankan Ultima Management : Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan) Humaniora Economics and Finance in Indonesia Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan RANDANG TANA - Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Simbur Cahaya To Maega: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Pelayanan dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (Pamas) Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Jurnal Abdi: Media Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Unnes Law Journal Madaniya Borobudur Law Review Vivabio : Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Jurnal Manajemen Rudence: Rural Development for Economic Resilience Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Proceeding of the International Conference on Family Business and Entrepreneurship (ICFBF) Hang Tuah Law Journal Prosiding Seri Seminar Nasional Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan Daerah Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat - Teknologi Digital Indonesia Business and Entrepreneurial Review Jurnal Manajemen dan Pemasaran Jasa International Journal of Application on Economics and Business Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Economic and Finance in Indonesia SASI Unnes Law Journal : Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MERCATORIA

Definisi Perseroan Terbuka atau Publik Menurut Peraturan Perundang-undangan Indonesia Suwinto Johan
JURNAL MERCATORIA Vol 14, No 1 (2021): JURNAL MERCATORIA JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/mercatoria.v14i1.4429

Abstract

Dalam masyarakat, kita sering mendengarkan perusahaan terbuka. Perusahaan terbuka seakan-akan menjadi dua suku kata memperoleh penghargaan untuk sebuah perusahaan dalam memperoleh kepercayaan. Banyak masyarakat menginginkan usahanya menjadi perusahaan terbuka. Perusahaan terbuka akan dengan mudah memperoleh dana dari umum. Perusahaan terbuka menurut masyarakat adalah perusahaan yang menawarkan sahamnya di bursa efek. Definisi ini berbeda dengan definisi pada Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal (UU PM). Perbedaan definisi mengakibatkan timbulnya kebingungan di masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis definisi Perseroan Terbatas, Perseroan Terbatas Terbuka berdasarkan UU PT dan UU PM. Penelitian ini mempergunakan metode yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UU PT), perseroan terbuka adalah perseroan yang melakukan penawaran umum, sedangkan berdasarkan UU PM, perusahaan publik adalah perseroan yang sahamnya telah dimiliki sekurang-kurangnya oleh 300 (tiga ratus) pemegang saham dan memiliki modal disetor sekurang-kurangnya Rp.3.000.000.000,00 (tiga miliar rupiah) atau suatu jumlah pemegang saham dan modal disetor yang ditetapkan dengan peraturan pemerintah. Definisi penawaran umum terdapat pada UU PM, yakni kegiatan penawaran Efek yang dilakukan oleh emiten untuk menjual efek kepada masyarakat berdasarkan tata cara yang diatur dalam UU PM dan peraturan pelaksanaannya. Dengan adanya Undang-undang Cipta Kerja telah dilakukan sinkronisasi definisi perseroan terbuka dan perseroan publik di UU PM dan UU PT.
Forced Resignation of Financial Industry Workers by Employers Judging from The Legislation Suwinto Johan; Ariawan Gunadi
JURNAL MERCATORIA Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL MERCATORIA DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/mercatoria.v15i2.7030

Abstract

This study aims to discuss the impact of employer-forced layoffs on employees. Industrial interactions between employees and employers are sometimes a source of contention. In a country's economy, the financial industry plays a critical role. Both parties need each other, yet their tactics are very different. The government is the only party with authority to settle labor-management disputes. Employer-initiated layoffs (PHK) harm the economy, particularly in the country's financial sector and socio-political life. Unemployment will rise as a result of layoffs, causing national instability. Unemployment can lead to riots and other social problems. This discussion is based on the Manpower Law's normative. This research employs a normative legal approach. Forced layoffs or revisions to worker resignations, according to this study, violate the Manpower Act. The rights of workers who wish to resign and workers laid off differ significantly. Instead of layoffs, companies might save money on severance pay by having employees retire. The company's responsibility to give compensation in severance pay and other workers' rights will be eliminated if employees depart. Dispute resolution forums can help workers and employers work out their differences.
Justice Aspects of Financial Service Authorities’s Competence for Bankruptcy and PKPU of Financial Service Institutions Based on Law No. 4 Year 2023 Suwinto Johan; Ariawan Gunadi
JURNAL MERCATORIA Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023): JURNAL MERCATORIA JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/mercatoria.v16i1.9222

Abstract

The Law on the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector was legalized by President Joko Widodo. The Act is known as Law No. 4 of 2023 often known as the P2SK Law, which stipulates that the Financial Services Authority or Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) is the only party that has the authority to file for bankruptcy and postpone debt payment obligations for financial service institutions. This research will provide novelty, especially on the definition of justice in the financial services sector, especially related to the interests of consumers and creditors with regulatory authority.This right has eliminated the creditor rights of insolvent financial service institutions. Creditors do not have any rights or legal action against defaulting or insolvent financial institutions. This research aims to examine the authority of OJK over bankruptcy and PKPU of Financial Services Institutions and justice for other creditors dan consumers according to the OJK’S authority. This researchers employed the normative juridical method. This study concluded that the authority of the OJK must be reviewed with consideration of the authority already possessed by the OJK, practical conditions in the business world specifically for financial service institutions, and the position and rights of creditors for loans to financial service institutions. The results of the study also found that the authority of the Financial Services Authority did not reflect the value of justice for consumers and creditors