Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik Jurnal Populasi Musawa : Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Journal of Governance and Public Policy Policy & Governance Review Jurnal Inada: Kajian Perempuan Indonesia di Daerah Tertinggal, Terdepan, dan Terluar Jurnal Public Policy Buletin Psikologi JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) PALASTREN: Jurnal Studi Gender
Ambar Widaningrum
Departement Of Public Policy And Management, Faculty Of Social And Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Asymmetric Decentralization and the Rise of Monitorial Citizens: Institutional Opportunity Structures in Indonesia's Special Autonomy Regions Cicellia, Celly; Widaningrum, Ambar; Isnadi, Yuli
Journal of Governance and Public Policy Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgpp.v13i2.30171

Abstract

Monitorial citizenship is a model of citizenship widely regarded as more realistic, yet the literature on it remains dominated by Western countries, thereby neglecting the specific contexts of developing nations. This study analyzes the potential for the development of the “monitorial citizen” by linking it to the context of asymmetric decentralization in Indonesia. Using a qualitative multiple-case study approach with an embedded method across four asymmetric regions (Papua, Aceh, Yogyakarta, and Jakarta), this study fully utilizes secondary data comprising regional democracy indices, the performance achievements of Regional People’s Representative Councils, and relevant regulations. The study’s findings indicated that asymmetric decentralization does not automatically influence the potential for the development of “monitorial citizens.” Variations in institutional configurations across the four case studies confirm this. Four aspects influence the development of citizen monitoring: the quality of regional democracy, the capacity of representative institutions, the availability of complementary participation channels, and the interaction between existing institutions and the public. This study also provides recommendations that emphasize institutional aspects in discourses on citizen monitoring and asymmetric decentralization.
Co-Authors Agus Pramusinto Anang Prihanto, Bayu Andang Nugrahena Sutrisno Celly Cicellia, Celly Faturochman Faturochman Isnadi, Yuli Janianton Damanik Janianton Damanik Miladiyatu Tsania Zulfa Muhadjir Darwin Muhadjir Darwin Nunuk Dwi Retnandari Nurhadi Kumayza, Toni Soraya Isfandiari Sutrisno, Andang Nugerahatara Sutrisno, Andang Nugrahena Tobirin Tobirin