Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Komunikasi Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies Journal of English and Education Journal of English Literacy Education Accounting Analysis Journal Wiralodra English Journal (WEJ) Research and Innovation in Language Learning IALLTEACH (Issues In Applied Linguistics & Language Teaching) Pedagogy : Journal of English Language Teaching CONCEPT SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education Communications in Humanities and Social Sciences Studies in English Language and Education Journal of English Language Teaching and English Linguistics ELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context
Intan Pradita
Universitas Islam Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Language Learning Strategies: A Cross Sectional Survey Of Vocational High School Students Intan Pradita; Jethra Nuha Nindita
ELT Echo : The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): December
Publisher : IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/eltecho.v4i2.5277

Abstract

The use of language learning strategies might be influenced by many factors such as gender, background cultures, career orientation and learning settings. In vocational setting, career orientation become an issue that needs a concern. The choice of department as career orientation is suspected to affect different strategies in learning English. This study aimed to identify the language learning strategies employed by the vocational high school students and to find out the differences in strategy use between two majors. This study involved 95 students from automotive engineering and electrical engineering of vocational high school students. Strategies Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) questionnaire which was constructed by Oxford (1990) was used in this study. Six domains were included in this questionnaire: Memory, Cognitive, Compensatory, Metacognitive, Affective, and Social. There are 50 items with 5 likert points in data completion. To analyze the data, SPSS and Microsoft Excel were used by the researcher. Results showed that there was a difference (M=9.168) in language learning strategies use of electrical engineering and automotive engineering students. Furthermore the metacognitive strategy was the most used while the memory strategy was the least used by the students.
A case study of argument diagramming in Thai and Indonesian higher education argumentative essays Annisa Laura Maretha; Intan Pradita
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 11, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v11i1.30418

Abstract

This study explores first-year undergraduate students argumentation essays using argument diagramming structure. A corpus-driven data of 394 argumentative essays were gathered from both Indonesian and Thai universities. A content analysis was employed to examine the dataset of the students argumentative essays. After gathering primary information from the body parts of their essays, we subcategorized their argumentations into claims and premises in a compliant reading. To ensure data trustworthiness, this study employed triangulation by source and method. The findings show that the most prominent type of argument diagramming was a basic argument, followed by convergent and divergent arguments. Regardless of how the argument diagramming was written, the study found that the students still lacked mastery in structuring their logic when building up the case to be extended to claims and premises. This study suggests a need to revisit pedagogical instructions, in which there should be a provision not only on the basic knowledge of argument structures but also on the skills to recognize the quality of a good argument cognitively. This additional practice will provide important insights to recognize the representational strengths and weaknesses of the students argumentative writing proficiency to achieve a better performance in the content of their essays.
Co-Authors Al Mubarokah, Laelah Alfa Lisa Muslimah Febriyanti Reddy Anggi Aulia Rahma Annisa Laura Maretha Annisa Laura Maretha Badingatus Solikhah Bayu Permana Sukma Bob Rachman Dhinda Azizah Putri Dinda Fitriana Dinda Gusti Ayu Berlianti Jethra Nuha Nindita Karlina, Yenny Muhammad Pebriansyah Rifaldo Nizamudin Sadiq Norman Shiddiq Prayitno Puspitasari, Devi Ambarwati Reddy, Alfa Lisa Muslimah Febriyanti Safira Pelita Fadila Siti Nihayati Aribah Tasya Rahmania