Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.671
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies Journal of English and Education ELT Echo Journal of English Literacy Education Accounting Analysis Journal Wiralodra English Journal (WEJ) Research and Innovation in Language Learning IALLTEACH (Issues In Applied Linguistics & Language Teaching) Pedagogy : Journal of English Language Teaching CONCEPT SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education Communications in Humanities and Social Sciences Studies in English Language and Education Journal of English Language Teaching and English Linguistics
Intan Pradita
Universitas Islam Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
A case study of argument diagramming in Thai and Indonesian higher education argumentative essays Maretha, Annisa Laura; Pradita, Intan
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 11, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v11i1.30418

Abstract

This study explores first-year undergraduate students argumentation essays using argument diagramming structure. A corpus-driven data of 394 argumentative essays were gathered from both Indonesian and Thai universities. A content analysis was employed to examine the dataset of the students argumentative essays. After gathering primary information from the body parts of their essays, we subcategorized their argumentations into claims and premises in a compliant reading. To ensure data trustworthiness, this study employed triangulation by source and method. The findings show that the most prominent type of argument diagramming was a basic argument, followed by convergent and divergent arguments. Regardless of how the argument diagramming was written, the study found that the students still lacked mastery in structuring their logic when building up the case to be extended to claims and premises. This study suggests a need to revisit pedagogical instructions, in which there should be a provision not only on the basic knowledge of argument structures but also on the skills to recognize the quality of a good argument cognitively. This additional practice will provide important insights to recognize the representational strengths and weaknesses of the students argumentative writing proficiency to achieve a better performance in the content of their essays.
Co-Authors Al Mubarokah, Laelah Alfa Lisa Muslimah Febriyanti Reddy Anggi Aulia Rahma Annisa Laura Maretha Badingatus Solikhah Bob Rachman Dhinda Azizah Putri Dinda Fitriana Dinda Gusti Ayu Berlianti Jethra Nuha Nindita Maretha, Annisa Laura Muhammad Pebriansyah Rifaldo Nizamudin Sadiq Norman Shiddiq Prayitno Reddy, Alfa Lisa Muslimah Febriyanti Safira Pelita Fadila Siti Nihayati Aribah Tasya Rahmania