Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.47
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Social Politics and Governance (JSPG) Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik J-3P (Jurnal Pembangunan Pemberdayaan Pemerintahan) Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja Jurnal Kebijakan Pemerintahan GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan Journal of Social Research Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum JEKP (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Publik) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Khazanah Hukum
Dedy Pribadi Uang
Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PENGANGKATAN PPPK DALAM PROGRAM MAKAN BERGIZI GRATIS Zi Lilianda Naufani; Dedy Pribadi Uang
GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan Vol. 13 No. 5 (2026): 2026 Mei
Publisher : Lembaga Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Politik (LKISPOL)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56015/gjikplp.v13i5.885

Abstract

This study aims to examine in depth how the implementation of the policy of attracting PPPK in the MBG program is carried out by the government and analyze the implementation of the policy of attracting PPPK in the MBG program. This study uses a qualitative approach with a literature study type. Data sources in this study were obtained from various relevant literature. The literature used is mainly related to the concept of bureaucratic reform, PPPK policy, public policy implementation, and the Free Nutritional Meals policy program. The data analysis technique in this study uses a qualitative descriptive analysis method. The analysis was carried out through four stages, namely: (1) collection and selection of relevant literature; (2) identification of concepts and key findings from each source; (3) comparison and synthesis of findings between sources; and (4) interpretation with the findings contained in the theoretical framework of George C. Edward III's policy implementation. The policy of featuring PPPK in the Free Nutritional Meals program, especially for SPPG workers, shows an imbalance with honorary workers in other sectors, which has the potential to cause noise and includes political resilience in the government system.
Decentralization Politics in Southeast Asia: A Narrative Literature Review of Institutional, Political, and Economic Dimensions (2014–2024) Dedy Pribadi Uang
Journal of Social Research Vol. 4 No. 12 (2025): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v4i11.2865

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the development of decentralization politics in Southeast Asia during the 2014–2024 period using a Narrative Literature Review (NLR) approach. The study focuses on four representative countries: Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia, each of which has distinct characteristics in the implementation of political, institutional, and economic decentralization. This study uses the NLR method with a narrative synthesis framework approach to identify, select, and synthesize scientific articles from the Scopus, DOAJ, and Google Scholar databases. The study results show that decentralization politics in Southeast Asia experiences a strong differentiation between democratic decentralization models (Indonesia and the Philippines) and controlled or constrained decentralization models (Thailand and Malaysia). The findings also indicate that the success of decentralization is influenced by a combination of political stability, regional institutional capacity, and the effectiveness of fiscal transfers. This article makes a theoretical contribution to the literature on decentralization politics and provides new research directions for understanding the relationship between institutions, power, and political economy in Southeast Asia
Indonesia's Geopolitical Calculation as a Middle Power in the Board of Peace Membership Muhammad Syahdan Aprillianza; Dedy Pribadi Uang
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (May - Jun
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v4i2.812

Abstract

Indonesia’s decision to join the US-led Board of Peace (BoP) on January 22, 2026, raised significant debate regarding its consistency with the nation’s bebas aktif (independent and active) foreign policy principle. However, existing literature has not systematically analyzed Indonesia’s geopolitical calculation as a middle power in this specific case. This study aims to unpack the strategic logic behind Indonesia’s BoP membership. Using a qualitative single case study design, it integrates Middle Power Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis through deductive content analysis of official documents, bilateral agreements, and think-tank reports. Three main findings emerge. First, a strong temporal correlation exists between BoP membership and the finalization of the Indonesia-US Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) signed on the same day, revealing a diplomatic-economic nexus. Second, Indonesia’s choice to contribute military capabilities rather than financial fees reflects niche diplomacy logic. Third, BoP membership signals a shift from traditional non-alignment toward pragmatic multi-alignment, with the independent-active principle retained as a rhetorical frame. This study contributes to middle power literature by demonstrating that emerging middle powers prioritize strategic pragmatism over normative commitments.
Komparasi Yuridis Mekanisme Audit Dana Kampanye: Studi Perbandingan antara Sistem KPU-BPK di Indonesia dengan Federal Election Commission di Amerika Serikat Febrian Fajar Dwi Widiatmaja; Dedy Pribadi Uang; Muhammad Syahdan Aprillianza
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, April 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i2.1973

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji dan membandingkan mekanisme audit dana kampanye di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat secara yuridis-komparatif. Indonesia mengoperasikan sistem audit berbasis kepatuhan administratif yang melibatkan dua lembaga secara tumpang-tindih, yakni Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) dan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK), sementara Federal Election Commission (FEC) di Amerika Serikat menjalankan audit fungsional-investigatif yang didukung oleh transparansi data secara real-time. Menggunakan pendekatan penelitian hukum normatif dengan metode perbandingan hukum (comparative approach) dan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), penelitian ini menganalisis tiga permasalahan utama: (1) perbandingan kerangka hukum dan kewenangan kelembagaan; (2) efektivitas mekanisme audit dan sanksi; serta (3) proyeksi normatif adopsi nilai-nilai sistem FEC ke dalam hukum kepemiluan Indonesia. Data empiris dari Pengumuman KPU Nomor 48/PL.01.7-PU/05/2024 mengonfirmasi bahwa total pengeluaran kampanye yang dilaporkan secara resmi, yang mana pasangan calon terlaporkan terbesar mencapai Rp506,89 miliar, secara struktural tidak sebanding dengan estimasi biaya riil kampanye legislatif yang mencapai rata-rata Rp5 miliar per caleg (WFD, 2025), sehingga hal ini mengindikasikan celah pelaporan yang signifikan. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem KPU-BPK secara struktural lemah pada dimensi enforcement dan tidak mampu menjangkau pendanaan di luar Rekening Khusus Dana Kampanye (RKDK). Penelitian ini merekomendasikan transformasi desain kelembagaan menuju model lembaga audit kampanye independen berbasis transparansi digital sebagaimana dicontohkan FEC, melalui prinsip functional transplant dalam agenda pembaruan UU No. 7 Tahun 2017.
THE COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE IN THE RUMAH PENTING PROGRAM: A STUDY ON STRENGTHENING ADOLESCENT PARTICIPATION IN STUNTING MITIGATION IN JEMBRANA REGENCY I Kadek Marssel Bagia Sedana; Dedy Pribadi Uang
Journal of Social Politics and Governance (JSPG) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (June)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/4qs7rr70

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of adolescent participation through the Rumah Penting initiative in addressing stunting in Jembrana Regency, Bali Province. This study employs the collaborative governance theory proposed by Chris Ansell and Alison Gash (2008), which emphasizes four key dimensions: initial conditions, facilitative leadership, institutional design, and collaborative processes in achieving collective outcomes. A qualitative case study approach was applied, with data collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The findings reveal that the implementation of Rumah Penting reflects an effective collaborative governance process. Initial conditions were characterized by limited resources but supported by social trust, prior collaboration, and shared commitment among stakeholders. Facilitative leadership played a significant role in creating an inclusive and participatory environment, enabling adolescents to act as agents of change in stunting prevention. Institutional support through local policies and the GenRe forum further strengthened youth participation, while the collaborative process was reflected in open communication, shared responsibilities, and collective ownership. These efforts generated tangible outcomes, including increased nutritional awareness, stronger family engagement, and improved adolescent capacity in stunting advocacy. Therefore, this study recommends strengthening institutional support, expanding adolescent-based collaborative initiatives, and replicating the Rumah Penting model to accelerate stunting reduction efforts in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ardika Nurfurkon Ayler Beniah Ndraha Bagia Sedana, I Kadek Marssel Elvis, Elvis Febrian Fajar Dwi Widiatmaja Hari Nur Cahya Murni I Kadek Marssel Bagia Sedana Jalesy, Naaman Marthinus Karolina R.S Wenggi Karolina R.S. Wenggi Mayor, David E. Muchammad Rezal Ardiansyah Muhammad Syahdan Aprillianza Muhammad Syahdan Aprillianza Rosidin, Utang Sadmoko, Rudi Siswanto, Amos Situmorang, Alpriyanto Timoty Yusuf Salama Utang Rosidin Wenggi, Karolina R.S. Zi Lilianda Naufani