Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

PERPANJANGAN HAK GUNA BANGUNAN BAGI PERSEROAN TERBATAS DITINJAU DARI PRINSIP KEPASTIAN HUKUM, KEADILAN DAN INVESTASI BERKELANJUTAN MENUJU KESEJAHTERAAN RAKYAT Puspadma, I Nyoman Alit
Arena Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (47.368 KB)

Abstract

Abstract Land Law is governing the extension of Rights for Building in line with Article 35 paragraph (2), which contains norm fuzziness. The word "may" in standardization in the article raises different interpretations, so it is contrary to the provisions of Article 5 letters f of Law No. 12. Year 2011, which ordered that in every establishment of good laws, one of the conditions that must be met is "clear statement". Rights for Building on the subject referred to in Article 36 paragraph (1) of Land Law, which is a. Citizens of Indonesia and b. legal entities established under Indonesian law and domiciled in Indonesia. Legal entities that are used in this study are a limited liability company. In this regard, there are three problems examined, namely: How is the extension of Rights for Building arranged? How to interpret the provisions of Article 35 paragraph (2) of Land Law if it is associated with principles of legal certainty, justice, and sustainable investment towards social welfare, as well as the legal consequences for Rights For Building  for limited liability company  if the extension is denied? The theories used to analyze the problems are theory classes of Norma (stuffen theory), Legal Certainty theory, theory of justice, and the welfare state theory, while the method of research applied in accordance with normative legal research is the approach of legislation or statute approach, conceptual approach, and the analytical approach, with the source of legal material in the form of the law of primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary. Based on the analysis, the conclusion is as follows: the extension of Rights For Building  above state land is stipulated in Article 35 paragraph (2) Land Law in conjunction with Article 26 paragraph (1) Government Regulation 40 of 1996 in conjunction with Article 40 Minister Of Agrarian Regulation/Head National Land Board 9 year 1999, while the extension of Rights For Building  over Land Rights Management  occurred after the approval of the Land Rights Management  holders stipulated in Article 35 paragraph (2) Land Law  Article 26 paragraph (2) Government Regulation 40 of 1996 in conjunction with Article 45 Minister Of Agrarian Regulation/Head National Land Board 9 1999. Rights For Building on the land of private property is set to be not extended, but according to the provisions of Article 29 paragraph (2) Government Regulation 40 of 1996 may be updated. Interpreting the provisions of Article 35 paragraph (2) Land Law should always be associated with Article 2 paragraph (3) and Article 3 of Capital Market Law.  In the case of Rights For Building  expires, the land is returned to the state when it was coming from State Land or Land Rights Management  holder if the land comes from Land Rights Management , and the Limited Liability Company  was no longer able to use the land as a place of business or investing. If Limited Liability Company did not get land to run their business (investment), then there will be other legal consequences, namely the dissolution of Limited Liability Company, and employees lay off, which will lead to other consequences, such as economic and social consequence. Key words: extension, rights for building, investment, public welfare Abstrak Hukum Tanah yang mengatur perpanjangan Kuasa untuk Membangun sejalan dengan Pasal 35 ayat (2), yang berisi norma ketidakjelasan. Kata “dapat” dalam standardisasi dalam artikel menimbulkan interpretasi yang berbeda, sehingga bertentangan dengan ketentuan Pasal 5 huruf f UU No 12. Tahun 2011, yang memerintahkan bahwa dalam setiap pembentukan undang-undang yang baik, salah satu syarat yang harus dipenuhi adalah “pernyataan yang jelas”. Hak untuk Membangun pada subjek dimaksud dalam Pasal 36 ayat ( 1 ) UU Pertanahan, yang merupakan: a)Warga Indonesia dan b)badan hukum yang didirikan berdasarkan hukum Indonesia dan berkedudukan di Indonesia. Badan hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan perseroan terbatas. Dalam hal ini, ada tiga masalah yang diteliti, yaitu: Bagaimana perpanjangan Hak untuk Bangunan diatur ? Bagaimana menafsirkan ketentuan Pasal 35 ayat (2) UU Tanah jika dikaitkan dengan prinsip kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan investasi berkelanjutan menuju kesejahteraan sosial, serta konsekuensi hukum Hak Untuk Bangunan untuk perseroan terbatas jika ekstensi ditolak? Teori yang digunakan untuk menganalisis masalah adalah kelas teori Norma (stuffen theory), teori Kepastian Hukum, teori keadilan, dan teori negara kesejahteraan, sedangkan metode penelitian yang diterapkan sesuai dengan penelitian hukum normatif adalah pendekatan peraturan atau undang-undang pendekatan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan analitis, dengan sumber bahan hukum dalam bentuk undang-undang bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Berdasarkan analisis, kesimpulannya adalah sebagai berikut: perpanjangan Hak Untuk Membangun di atas tanah negara yang diatur dalam Pasal 35 ayat (2) UU Pertanahan juncto Pasal 26 ayat (1) Peraturan Pemerintah 40 Tahun 1996 jo Pasal 40 Menteri of Peraturan Agraria/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional 9 tahun 1999, sedangkan perpanjangan Kuasa Untuk Membangun atas Manajemen Hak atas Tanah terjadi setelah persetujuan pemegang Hak Pengelolaan Lahan diatur dalam Pasal 35 ayat (2) UU Tanah Pasal 26 ayat (2) Peraturan Pemerintah 40 Tahun 1996 jo Pasal 45 Peraturan Menteri of Agraria/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional 9 1999. Hak Untuk Membangun tanah milik pribadi diatur untuk tidak diperpanjang, tetapi menurut ketentuan Pasal 29 ayat (2) Peraturan Pemerintah 40 Tahun 1996 dapat diperbarui`. Menafsirkan ketentuan Pasal 35 ayat (2) UU Pertanahan harus selalu dikaitkan dengan Pasal 2 ayat (3) dan Pasal 3 UU Pasar Modal. Dalam kasus Hak Untuk Membangun berakhir, lahan tersebut dikembalikan ke negara ketika itu datang dari Tanah Negara atau Tanah Hak Pengelolaan pemegang jika tanah berasal dari Manajemen Hak atas Tanah, dan Perseroan Terbatas sudah tidak mampu lagi untuk menggunakan tanah sebagai tempat usaha atau investasi. Jika Perseroan Terbatas tidak mendapatkan lahan untuk menjalankan bisnis mereka (investasi), maka akan ada konsekuensi hukum lainnya , yaitu pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas, dan karyawan PHK, yang akan mengakibatkan konsekuensi lainnya, seperti konsekuensi ekonomi dan sosial. Kata kunci: ekstensi, hak untuk membangun, investasi, kesejahteraan masyarakat
EXTENSION OF RIGHTS FOR BUILDING BY THE LIMITED LIABILITY REVIEWED FROM LEGAL CERTAINTY, JUSTICE AND TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENTS AND PEOPLE’S WELFARE I Nyoman Alit Puspadma
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (467.177 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACTUUPA HGB regulates the extension of Article 35 paragraph (2), which containsfuzziness norm. The word "may" in norms in the article lead to different  interpretations, so contrary to the provisions of Article 5 of Law No. f letters. 12 in 2011, which ordered that in every formation a good rule, one of the requirements that must be met is "clear statement". Regarding the subject of HGB stipulated in Article 36 paragraph (1) UUPA, which is a. Citizens, and b. legal entities established under Indonesian law and domiciled in Indonesia. Legal entity used in this study is a limited liability company (PT). In that regard there are three problems examined, namely: How does extension HGB werearranged? How to interpret the provisions of Article 35 paragraph (2) if it is associated with UUPA kepastia principles of law, keadian, and continued investment towards social welfare, as well as the legal consequences for HGB PT when the extension is rejected? Theory is used to analyze the hierarchy theory Norma (stuffen theory), the theory of legal certainty, justice theory, and the theory of the Welfare State, while the research method used in accordance with the normative legal research is a method of approach to legislation (statute approach), approaches the concept (conceptual approach), and analytical approaches (analytic approach), with the source material in the form of the lawof primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary. Once analyzed, the conclusion is as follows: extension HGB above TN stipulated in Article 35 paragraph (2) UUPA conjunction with Article 26 paragraph (1) 1996 PP 40 in conjunction with Article 40 PMNA / KBPN 9, 1999, while the extension of HGB over HPL occurred after the approval of the shareholders of HPL stipulated in Article 35 paragraph (2) UUPA Article 26 paragraph (2) 1996 PP 40 in conjunction with Article 45 PMNA / KBPN 9, 1999. HGB on land ownership is set to be extended, but in accordance with Article 29 paragraph (2) PP 40 epidemic in 1996 may be updated. Interpret the provisions of Article 35 paragraph (2) UUPA should always be associated with Article 2 (3) and Article 3 of the Capital Market Law UUPA. In terms of HGB  expires, the land is returned to the States when coming from TN or holder if 2 the land comes from HPL HPL, and PT was no longer able to use the land as a place of business (investing). If PT does not get land to run his business (investment), then there will be other legal consequences, namely: PT dissolution, and laid off employees, which will lead to other consequences, such as economic and social consequence.Key Words : Extension Of Rights For Building, Company Limited Liability, Legal Certainty, Sustainable Investments, People's Welfare
Arrangement of Agricultural Land Production Sharing Agreements in the Development of Environmentally Friendly Agrotourism Ni Putu Dewi Susilawati; Putu Ayu Sriasih Wesna; I Nyoman Alit Puspadma
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 1 No. 8 (2022): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3643.934 KB) | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v1i8.126

Abstract

One model of tourism development that is in line with alternative tourism is community-based tourism as a pattern that is believed to provide economic benefits and equity, environmental preservation, local culture preservation, social empowerment, community empowerment. Community-based tourism is a tourism development with a high level of local community involvement and can be accounted for from the socio-cultural and environmental aspects. So far, there are no clear rules that explicitly regulate the arrangement of profit sharing, especially in the field of agro-tourism. According to Article 1320 of the KUHPerdata, an agreement is valid if it meets the following four conditions: Agree of those who bind themselves, The ability to make an engagement, a certain thing, a lawful cause—referring to the Legal Principles of Agreement as contained in the KUHPerdata (KUHPerdata), namely Personality Principles (Article 1315 jo 1340 KUHPerdata), Consensualotas Principles (Article 1320 KUHPerdata), Freedom of Contract Principles (Article 1338 paragraph (1) KUHPerdata). In the current reformation era, the legal development strategy is directed towards responsive law characterized by the large role of judicial institutions and the broad participation of social groups or the participation of individuals in society to determine the direction of legal development, resulting in the formation of clear legislation. Furthermore, provide legal certainty in making agreements for agricultural land products related to agro-tourism with environmental insight.
Inheritance Rights of Children of Extramarital in the Perspective of Balinese Customary Law After Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 MAHARANI, Trisna Sandya; SUJANA, I Nyoman; PUSPADMA, I Nyoman Alit
Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty (January – March 2023)
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/jpls.v1i1.63

Abstract

Purpose:This Article analyzes the inheritance rights of children of extramarital in the perspective of Balinese Customary Law after Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010. This study is focused on the children born with extramarital inheritance as regulated under the customary law in Bali after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision regarding children of extramarital.Methodology:This research is conducted with normative legal methods by applying the statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The theory of justice and legal certainty is applied as the tools for analyzing legal issues as the focus of the study.Findings:After the analysis, it can be understood that the inheritance rights of children born extramarital under customary law in Bali are still marginalized because for them to obtain the position of being an heir, the Balinese customary law and community still consider legal marriage as determining point whether a person can become an heir or not.Implication: Even though the Supreme Court Decision determines that the biological father has a civil relationship with a child born extramarital, providing that it can be proven by science or technology and or for other evidence under the applicable laws and regulations or other supporting evidence legally, but if the ratification is not carried out for husband and wife relationship through a religious ceremony as referred to in Article 2 Paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law, then a child born of extramarital still has no relationship in terms of inheritance to his father's kinship lineage or patrilineal kinship lineage. Children born of extramarital have an inheritance relationship with their mother or their mother's family.
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF DEPOSITED FUNDS TO PUBLIC NOTARY BEFORE PREPARATION OF SALES AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT: A Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 508 K/PID/2017 Jayanti, Ni Nyoman Tri; Wesna, Dr. Putu Ayu Sriasih; Puspadma, Dr. I Nyoman Alit
IUS POSITUM: Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement Vol. 3 Issue 3 (2024)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jlte.v3i3.607

Abstract

Depositing funds to the notary before the preparation of the Sales and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) is a common property transaction in Indonesia. It ensures the safety of the funds prior to the final agreement between the buyer and seller. However, there are legal risks associated with the management and use of these funds, especially if there is a dispute or a violation of the agreement. This research analyzes the legal consequences of entrusting funds to a notary by examining the case of Supreme Court Decision Number 508 K/PID/2017. This decision provides important insights into the responsibilities and obligations of notaries in the context of fund entrustment and its legal implications for the parties involved. This research aims to analyze the legal consequences of deposited money to public notary before making a land sale and purchase agreement. This research uses a normative method through legal approach and legal concept analysis. Data was obtained from relevant regulations and legal literature. The results indicated that if a notary receives money before the agreement is made, he/she acts outside his/her authority as a notary and only as a trustee. If there is any misuse of the money, the notary can be charged with embezzlement under Article 372 of the Criminal Code. This dispute can be resolved through legal channels (litigation) or negotiation and mediation (non-litigation). Depositing funds with a notary before the sale and purchase agreement can have serious legal consequences if it does not fulfill the correct procedure, as shown in Supreme Court Decision Number 508 K/PID/2017.
OWNERSHIP OF LAND RIGHTS BY FOREIGNERS USING THE NAME OF INDONESIAN CITIZENS Manuaba, Ida Ayu Sintya Naraswari; Setyawati, Dr. Ni Komang Arini; Puspadma, Dr. I Nyoman Alit
IUS POSITUM: Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement Vol. 3 Issue 3 (2024)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jlte.v3i3.611

Abstract

National land law prohibits land ownership by foreigners, in accordance with Article 9 of the Agrarian Law, which states that only Indonesian citizens can own property rights to land. Meanwhile, Article 26 Paragraph (2) of the Agrarian Law also prohibits the transmission of land ownership rights from Indonesian citizens to foreigners, either directly or indirectly. However, many foreigners control land through certain agreements made before a notary or PPAT. This research is intended to determine and evaluate the validity of land rights acquisition by foreigners and the legal consequences of such acquisition if certain agreements are used. The research method in this research uses a normative legal approach, which focuses on examining legal norms and analyzing library materials to examine the application of positive law. This research indicates that even though formally land ownership by foreigners can be considered legal, it violates Article 26 Paragraph (2) of the Agrarian Law because it is an indirect way to transmit property rights to foreigners. As a legal consequence, land ownership by foreigners through certain agreements is considered null and void, as evidenced in Gianyar District Court Decision Number 259/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Gin because it does not fulfill the objectual requirements under Article 1320 of the Civil Code.
Analysis of Sale and Purchase Deed Made before Land Deed Making Officials in Gianyar Regency Ni Putu Tryana Tresna Dewi; Ni Made Jaya Senastri; I Nyoman Alit Puspadma
Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): February 2025
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/jlca.v4i1.12995

Abstract

In order to comply with the principle of freedom of contract, this study examines the content of sale and purchase deeds made before Land Deed Making Officials in Gianyar Regency as well as their form in relation to Article 1868 of the Civil Code. According to this study's findings, the sale and purchase agreement executed in front of Gianyar Regency's Land Deed Making Officer, in accordance with Article 1868 of the Civil Code, is a legitimate document. Although the form and content of the act are regulated by this Ministerial Regulation, its annexes may restrict flexibility and run the danger of breaching the law if the parties' agreement is not accommodated.
Legal Protection and Legal Certainty in Indonesia’s Land Title Registration System Agung, Anak Agung Istri; Sukandia, I Nyoman; Puspadma, I Nyoman Alit; Chornous, Yuliia
JURNAL AKTA Vol 9, No 4 (2022): December 2022
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v9i4.35387

Abstract

This research aims to scrutinize challenges in Indonesia’s land title registration system, focusing on legal protection and certainty for land title holders, particularly when titles are acquired through binding agreements. Emphasis is placed on publicity principle, exploring its role in ensuring transparent access to information about land titles. The normative legal research method, employing a normative juridical approach, involves a thorough examination of legal materials, including theories, concepts, and legislation such as Regulation Number 16 of 2021, Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997, and Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2021. Results highlight a significant gap between land title deeds based on agreements and the necessity for proper registration to guarantee legal protection. Failure to register undermines the “opernbaarheid” principle, turning agreements into private arrangements. Addressing this gap is crucial for establishing a transparent land title registration system, ensuring uniform legal protection for all holders, and reducing potential disputes. The implications of this research extend to policymakers, legal practitioners, and stakeholders, offering insights to enhance the transparency and effectiveness of Indonesia’s land administration. Policymakers can leverage these findings to refine regulations, aligning the system with principles of openness and accessibility, fostering a fair land tenure system, and supporting sustainable development.
Registration of Transfer of Joint Ownership of Land Rights After Divorce I Nyoman Alit Puspadma
Law Doctoral Community Service Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Law Doctoral Community Service Journal
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55637/ldcsj.2.2.7641.111-117

Abstract

The maintenance of land registration data has been regulated in statutory regulations, among others regulating the transfer of land rights that occur by law in the form of inheritance. Of all the HAT transfer registrations, there is no regulation regarding the registration of the land rights transfer jointly owned by the divorced husband and wife. A husband and wife bought a plot of land and registered it in the husband's name, then they divorced and agreed that the land would become part of the wife. The question arises what are the effects of divorce on assets and how is the procedure for registering the transfer ofland rights between husband and wife who are divorced from land rights belonging to them together? Thus, this study aims to discuss the effects of divorce on assets and to find out how to register the transfer of land rights between husband and wife who are divorced. This type of normative legal research, with primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, uses statutory and case approaches. Legal material is analyzed by legal analogy construction with deductive thinking method. The results obtained show that first the wife's name is recorded in the certificate, then an APHB is made by the Land Deed Officials and registered at the Land Office so that the certificate is written in the name of the wife.
Non-Performing Loan and How to Solve It I Nyoman Alit Puspadma
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/scj.4.2.2021.145-152

Abstract

Credit delivery by the bank requires the debtor to pay the obligations that have been scheduled in the credit agreement, but it will not always work well, sometimes because of something and other things there are also debtors who can not fulfill the obligations that have been promised so that credit problems occur. Non-performing loans also cause problems for banks, because they can make banks collapse. Thus the question arises, how to avoid the occurrence of problem loans and if it occurs, how is the solution?.