Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.394
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Jurnal Kabar Masyarakat Aladalah: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Transformasi Masyarakat : Jurnal Inovasi Sosial dan Pengabdian Sosial Simbiosis: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum International Journal of Sociology and Law Abdi Karya: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum
Roy Marthen Moonti
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 29 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 29 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Money Politik di Bawaslu Kabupaten Gorontalo Stepi Ayu; Rustam Hs. Akili; Roy Marthen Moonti; Muslim A. Kasim
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i2.1725

Abstract

The problem of election violations in the form of money politics continues to be a challenge in the democratization process in Indonesia, including in Gorontalo Regency. Although regulations have been strictly regulated in Law Number 7 Year 2017, the implementation of law enforcement against money politics still faces various obstacles. This study aims to analyze the obstacles faced by law enforcement officials, especially the Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu), in taking action against money politics violations during the implementation of the General Election in Gorontalo Regency. This type of research is empirical juridical research, with a qualitative approach and using interview techniques with Bawaslu commissioners as the main data source. The main findings show that the main obstacles come from weak evidentiary instruments, a deeply rooted transactional political culture in the community, and Bawaslu's limited authority in the law enforcement process. In addition, the lack of public participation in reporting violations is a factor that contributes to weakening the effectiveness of law enforcement. The conclusion of this study confirms that the success of law enforcement against money politics is largely determined by the synergy between strong regulations, independent and professional supervisory institutions, and public political awareness. Therefore, it is recommended that strengthening the institutional capacity of Bawaslu, reformulating regulations regarding the proof of money politics violations, and increasing public political education be prioritized in the electoral reform agenda in the regions.
Kekerasan Berbasis Gender terhadap Anak dan Perempuan: Antara Stigma Sosial dan Ketimpangan Perlindungan Hukum Arman Hanapi; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i4.1032

Abstract

Gender-based violence against women and children is a serious problem in Indonesia that reflects the inequality of social structures and the weakness of legal implementation. This study aims to examine the extent to which the Indonesian legal system is able to provide fair, equal, and gender-responsive protection to victims of violence, as well as assess the challenges in its application. The type of research used is a normative-critical study with a Feminist Legal Theory approach. The results of the analysis show that although there are regulatory advances such as the TPKS Law and the Presidential Instruction on Gender Mainstreaming, their application is still biased, not victim-friendly, and lacks a gender perspective. In conclusion, the law in Indonesia has not fully guaranteed substantive justice for victims. Therefore, it is recommended that legal reforms based on victims' experiences, increasing the capacity of law enforcement officials, and strengthening victim service institutions to encourage inclusive and transformative justice.
Tinjauan Kriminologis terhadap Faktor Penyebab Overkriminalisasi di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Reformasi Hukum Dewayanti Tomayahu; Nabila Putri Isabel Yahya; Roy Marthen Moonti
Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/terang.v2i2.1027

Abstract

The phenomenon of overcriminalization in Indonesia reflects the excessive use of criminal law against actions that should not be classified as crimes. This study aims to identify the criminogenic factors behind overcriminalization and to evaluate the urgency of reforming criminal policy. Using a normative-juridical and criminological approach, the research reveals that overcriminalization is driven by ambiguous legal norms, weak law enforcement capacity, cultural bias, and the lack of restorative justice mechanisms. As a result, vulnerable groups—such as minors, youth drug users, and the economically disadvantaged—are often subjected to disproportionate criminalization. The study concludes that the criminal justice system must return to the principle of ultimum remedium. A comprehensive legal reform is recommended through interdisciplinary methods, inclusive public participation in legislation, and the strengthening of humanistic and contextual legal education.
Kewenangan Penggunaan Kekuatan oleh Korps Brimob Polri dalam Penanganan Rusuh Massa Berdasarkan Prinsip Hukum Pidana Muhammad S.Gani; Roy Marthen Moonti; Marten Bunga; Muslim A. Kasim
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v2i2.894

Abstract

This research aims to analyse the authority of the Police Mobile Brigade Corps (Brimob) in handling mass riots and examine the implementation of criminal law in evaluating the actions taken during the operation. This research departs from the importance of ensuring that every action of law enforcement officials, especially Brimob, remains within the corridors of Indonesian positive law and is oriented towards the principles of human rights. The results show that the Brimob Corps has the legal authority under Law No. 2 of 2002 on the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia to deal with high-level situations, including mass riots. In carrying out its duties, Brimob is authorised to use coercive measures, but must still pay attention to the principles of necessity, proportionality, legality, and accountability. The implementation of criminal law is an important instrument in evaluating Brimob's actions, by assessing whether the use of force meets the elements of legal justification such as forced defence or official orders, in accordance with the Criminal Code and human rights principles. It is suggested that there is a need to improve legal training for Brimob members on the limits of the use of force and the implementation of criminal law principles in emergency situations. In addition, it is necessary to strengthen internal and external evaluation mechanisms, including cooperation with independent institutions such as Komnas HAM, to maintain transparency and accountability. Thus, the rule of law and the protection of human rights can be better upheld in every operation to handle mass riots by Brimob officers.
Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Lia Mastaria Duda; Roslan Ishak; Roy Marthen Moonti
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v2i3.1028

Abstract

The protection of human rights is a fundamental element of Indonesian constitutional law. Although it has been constitutionally regulated through the 1945 Constitution and a number of laws, the implementation of human rights protection still faces various challenges, including discrimination, violence by the authorities, and inconsistency in legal politics. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the constitutional law system in ensuring human rights protection as well as the role of state institutions such as Komnas HAM, the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary. The results show that human rights protection has not been optimal due to weak coordination, lack of accountability, and lack of support for independent institutions. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of legal reform, institutional strengthening, and harmonization between national law and international human rights standards. Suggestions include improving human rights education, empowering civil society, and consistent law enforcement to create a democratic and just rule of law.
Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Debt Collector dalam Melakukan Penarikan Kendraan Bermotor Secara Paksa Terhadap Konsumen Rahmawati Rahmawati; Roy Marthen Moonti; Nurwita Ismail; Muslim A. Kasim
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Juli : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research examines the criminal liability of debt collectors involved in forcibly seizing motorized vehicles from consumers. Such actions, often conducted by third parties representing finance companies, frequently occur without proper legal procedures and involve violence, coercion, or violations of consumer rights. The study responds to ongoing incidents where debt collectors act with force, while legal enforcement remains insufficient. Utilizing an empirical normative legal approach, the study combines a review of relevant laws—such as the Criminal Code (KUHP), Consumer Protection Law, and Financial Services Authority regulations with field research, including interviews with victims and observations in Kayubulan Village, Limboto Subdistrict, Gorontalo Regency. The findings reveal that debt collectors who repossess vehicles without official documentation, prior notification, or through intimidation may be committing criminal acts under Article 368 of the KUHP (extortion) and Article 335 (unpleasant acts). These actions clearly conflict with legal norms and consumer protection principles. The study recommends that finance institutions strengthen oversight of third-party collectors and ensure all collection activities comply with legal and ethical standards. Additionally, raising public legal awareness is essential, particularly regarding consumer rights and available legal remedies against coercion or unlawful conduct during debt collection. This dual strategy enhancing institutional accountability and empowering consumers aims to bridge the gap between law and practice, ensuring justice and legal protection in financial transactions.
Analisis Penegakan Hukum Pidana terhadap Kejahatan Korporasi Riski Yunus; Roy Marthen Moonti; Nurmik K. Martam; Muslim A. Kasim
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Juli : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v2i3.660

Abstract

Corporate crime within PT Permodalan Nasional Madani (PNM) Palu Branch reflects the vulnerability of state-owned financial institutions to practices of abuse of authority and violation of the law by internal elements. This case caused state losses and damaged public trust. This research aims to analyze the criminal sanctions and obstacles faced by law enforcement officials in cracking down on corporate crime, as well as formulating solutions for handling it. This research uses a normative juridical approach with the support of empirical data from cases in the Palu District Attorney's Office. The results show that criminal sanctions against individual perpetrators have been applied, but have not yet touched on aspects of institutional corporate responsibility. The main obstacles in law enforcement include limited evidence, the complexity of the organizational structure, the apparatus' lack of understanding of corporate law, and external pressures that interfere with the independence of the investigation. Suggestions include the need to increase the capacity of investigators in forensic audit and corporate law, strengthening the internal monitoring and whistleblowing system at PNM, and collaboration between law enforcement agencies. Thus, law enforcement against corporate crime can be carried out more effectively, fairly, and able to prevent the recurrence of similar crimes in the future.
Juridical Analysis of Witness Testimony De Auditu in the Case of Sexual Abuse of Minors Moh. Eka Valen Arman; Yusrianto Kadir; Roy Marthen Moonti; Muslim A. Kasim
International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Sociology and Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v2i1.311

Abstract

This study aims to juridically analyse the use of testimonial witness testimony de auditu in cases of sexual abuse of minors with a case study of case number 26/Pid. Sus/2024/PN Lbo. In the context of criminal law, testimonial witness testimony de auditu refers to a statement submitted by a witness regarding what he heard from another party, which cannot be used as direct valid evidence, but can provide relevant clues. This research examines the admissibility and influence of such testimony on evidence in cases of child sexual abuse, as well as its relevance in the Indonesian criminal justice system. The method used is Empirical approach by analysing legal practices, as well as related court decisions. The results showed that de auditu testimony has limitations in terms of evidentiary power, its use in cases of child sexual abuse, de auditu witness testimony should be accepted, but must be supplemented with additional evidence such as medical examinations, digital evidence, or witnesses who can confirm the event. Judges should prioritise the principles of caution, objectivity and fairness in evaluating such testimony, to ensure that the decision made is not only fair to the victim but also to the defendant.
Analisis Restorative Justice dalam Penelantaran Anak Pasca Cerai di Kabupaten Gorontalo Windy Olivia Dawa; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad; Muslim A. Kasim
Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Januari : Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/perspektif.v2i1.137

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of restorative justice in handling cases of child neglect after divorce in Gorontalo Regency. The main focus of this study is to ensure the fulfillment of children's rights, reduce parental conflict, and minimize negative impacts on children. The formulation of the problem in this study includes: how to apply restorative justice in cases of child neglect after divorce, and how to be held accountable for criminal acts of child neglect after divorce. By using the juridical-empirical method and descriptive-analytical approach, this study uses data from literature studies such as journals, legal documents, laws and regulations. As well as qualitative data analysis from the BPS of Gorontalo Regency. The results of the study indicate that restorative justice is effective in creating humane solutions through constructive dialogue that ensures that children's custody, livelihood, and emotional needs are met.  
Co-Authors Arman Hanapi Asfariyani A. Talango Avid Wahyudi Ibrahim Dewayanti Tomayahu Dince Aisa Kodai Dwi Anggriani Hariyanto Huntua Ibrahim Ahmad Irawan Kusumo Kahar S. Laiya Karmila Saleh Lia Mastaria Duda Lutfiana Lukman Marten Bunga Moh. Eka Valen Arman Monira A. Kasim Muhamad Zulkifli Lamatenggo Muhammad S.Gani Muslim A. Kasim Nabila Putri Isabel Yahya Nurmala, Leni Dwi Nurmik K. Martam Nurwita Ismail Prio Suryanto Ibrahim Pulu, Ican Rahmattullah Lihawa Rahmawati Rahmawati Riski Yunus Robby Waluyo Amu Rosalinda Irvandi Moonti Roslan Ishak Rustam HS. Akili Sakina Kantu Sity Rahma Polinggapo Stepi Ayu Suharyono Paputungan Syahrul Nugraha Baderung Windy Claudia Yunus Windy Olivia Dawa Yusrianto Kadir