Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.296
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Jurnal Cita Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam Risâlah, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir'ah Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran ALQALAM MIZAN Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal
Arip Purkon
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
A Comparative Analysis of Minority Political Participation from an Islamic Perspective in Indonesia and Singapore Syarif, Mujar Ibnu; Kharlie, Ahmad Tholabi; Purkon, Arip
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 9 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v9i2.11124

Abstract

This study aims to examine the Islamic political concept of minority political participation and compare its implementation in the contexts of Indonesia and Singapore. The research is a qualitative study utilizing a comparative method, combined with descriptive and analytical approaches. The data sources are twofold: primary sources, such as the Constitutions of the Republic of Indonesia and Singapore, and secondary sources, including several academic works relevant to the research topic, sourced from both print and online media. Data analysis was carried out in four stages: data collection, reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings of this study indicate that political participation refers to the actions of citizens to influence government policies, enabling the government to be guided towards issuing egalitarian policies. Minorities in Indonesia include Protestants, Catholics, Buddhists, Hindus, and Confucians, while minorities in Singapore comprise Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Confucians, Taoists, and atheists. Indonesia is a moderate country that blends Islamism and secularism, whereas Singapore is a secular state. The conclusion of this study reveals that most Islamic scholars argue that non-Muslim minorities cannot fully participate in politics unless in emergency situations. On the other hand, liberal Muslim intellectuals believe that non-Muslims can fully participate in politics, even outside of emergency contexts. The majority of Muslim intellectuals in both Indonesia and Singapore allow full political participation for minorities, including becoming president, as there are no restrictions in either country preventing minorities from holding the presidency. The comparative analysis shows that minorities in both Indonesia and Singapore have equal standing with the majority. However, in Indonesia, no minority has yet succeeded in becoming President, whereas in Singapore, Halimah Yacob, a Muslim minority, became the country’s first female president.
PEMBAGIAN HARTA WARIS DENGAN WASIAT (PENDEKATAN USHUL FIQIH) Purkon, Arip
JURNAL ILMU SYARIAH Vol 2 No 1 (2014): JUNI
Publisher : IBN KHALDUN BOGOR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (397.057 KB) | DOI: 10.32832/mizan.v2i1.109

Abstract

A Hidden Inheritance With the Probate Division (Usul Fiqh Approach). In Islamic law, the division of the estate (faraidh) is part of theproblem is already clear rules (qat'i al-dilalah). However, there are still a few people who questioned aspects of justice in this faraidh problem. One solution to bridge this is the concept of testament. The division of property by testamentary relatively more flexible than those specified in the science faraidh. However, will still not be separated from the legal rules that have been set Qur'an and Sunnah.
HISTORICAL DYNAMICS OF ISLAMIC LAW METHODOLOGHY (USHUL FIQH) Purkon, Arip
JURNAL ILMU SYARIAH Vol 6 No 2 (2018): DESEMBER
Publisher : IBN KHALDUN BOGOR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/mizan.v6i2.20237

Abstract

Ushul fiqh merupakan salah satu khazanah keilmuan Islam yang diwariskan oleh para ulama dari generasi ke generasi. Cikal bakal ushul fiqh berasal dari praktek dan metodologi yang dilakukan oleh Rasulullah SAW dan para sahabat dalam menyikapi suatu permasalahan, khususnya yang berkaitan dengan hukum. Ilmu ini kemudian mengalami perkembangan yang dinamis dari generasi ke generasi. Hal ini disebabkan antara lain karena para ulama memberikan perhatian yang cukup besar serta senantiasa melakukan dialektika dengan perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan pada masanya.
Talfīq as A Method for Legal Solutions in Contemporary Islamic Law Jamaludin, Mohd Hafiz; Buang, Ahmad Hidayat; Purkon, Arip
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v24i1.33608

Abstract

Talfīq, or the combination of various opinions of jurisprudence madhhab, is frequently used to arrive at solutions in Islamic law. It was used extensively in the tajdīd era, the early 20th century AD, namely through the Islamic law reforms in family and personal matters in most Muslim countries. The concept is controversial and not universally accepted by ulama. Most classical ulama opposed it, although most contemporary ulama believe that talfīq is acceptable as a method for legal solutions. This research investigated the reasons or factors for this disagreement by analyzing the related views of such ulama. The qualitative research used a literature review from classical and contemporary books about talfīq. This research concluded that although the classical ulama appeared to be grounded firmly in their opposition to the practice of talfīq, subsequent development of Islamic law showed practical consideration made inroads in accepting talfīq as a method for legal solution. This acceptance is made by putting conditions and controls on how and when talfīq can be used to solve modern Muslim legal problems. This modification ensures the traditionalists that the danger of talfīq, as previously envisaged, would be avoided Abstrak: Talfīq atau gabungan berbagai pendapat mazhab fikih merupakan metode yang sering digunakan untuk mencari solusi dalam hukum Islam. Hal ini digunakan secara luas pada zaman tajdīd, yaitu awal abad XX Masehi, melalui reformasi hukum Islam dalam masalah hukum privat dan keluarga di sebagian besar negara Muslim. Konsepnya kontroversial dan tidak disetujui secara universal oleh para sarjana. Mayoritas ulama Islam klasik telah menentangnya meskipun sebagian besar ulama kontemporer berpandangan bahwa talfīq dapat diterima sebagai metode penyelesaian hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki alasan atau faktor ketidaksepakatan ini dengan melihat sampel dari pandangan terkait dari para ulama tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan tinjauan pustaka. Data diperoleh dari buku-buku klasik dan kontemporer yang menulis tentang talfīq. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa meskipun para ulama klasik pada mulanya tampak berpijak kuat pada penentangan mereka terhadap praktik talfīq, perkembangan hukum Islam selanjutnya menunjukkan pertimbangan praktis yang membuat terobosan dalam menerima talfīq sebagai metode penyelesaian hukum. Penerimaan ini dilakukan dengan meletakkan kondisi dan kontrol tentang bagaimana dan kapan talfīq dapat digunakan dalam memberikan solusi atas masalah hukum Islam modern. Modifikasi ini memastikan kaum tradisionalis menghindari bahaya talfīq seperti yang dibayangkan sebelumnya. 
Co-Authors Ahmad Hidayat Buang Ahmad Hidayat Buang Ahmad Hidayat Buang Ahmad Tholabi Kharlie Ali Imron Harun Rasyid Kamarusdiana Mohd Hafiz Jamaludin Mohd Hafiz Jamaludin Mohd. Hafiz Jamaludin Muhammad Shuhufi Mujar Ibnu Syarif Rosyid, Maskur Suma, M. Amin