Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal)

PENYALAHGUNAAN KEADAAN (UNDUE INFLUENCE) DAN PELANGGARAN PRINSIP UTMOST GOODFAITH DALAM PRAKTIK INVESTASI SKEMA PIRAMIDA Tuti Rastuti; Rd. Dewi Asri Yustia; Utari Dewi Fatimah
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol 18 No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (816.77 KB) | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v18i2.887

Abstract

Pyramid schemes are strictly prohibited by Law No. 7 of 2014 on Commerce in Article 9, but the practice of this business scheme continues to grow. People are often fooled by lucrative offers. The offer is often packed in the form of fraud and undue influence. The weakness of the Civil Code as a legal umbrella guarding the process of investing agreement is alleged to be the factor of not offering the bidder to do this pyramid scheme marketing strategy. Only Article 1321 Civil Code can be used as a legal backlash against undue influence, while the legal aspects arising from business investment pyramid schemes are so complex. This study focuses on the study of the undetermined forms undertaken by offerors on offeree in pyramid scheme business investment practices, as well as reviewing legal aspects arising from abuse of circumstances, and reviewing the legal responsibilities of offerors in practice business investment pyramid scheme. Using the juridical-empirical approach method and the research specification is analytical descriptive, then analyzed by qualitative juridical, the research results show that, in practice pyramid scheme various forms of undue influence on offeree, partly because of economic condition, psychological condition, and livinglaw values, such as communal values ​​and mutual cooperation, and trust factors. Initially simple from abuse of circumstances when the bidding process, but raises multi-faceted law, covering aspects of civil law, aspects of criminal law, and economic laws. From multi aspects of the law that arise then lead to convergence of legal responsibility for the offeror. Keywords: Undue Influence, Pyramid Scheme.
MENDOBRAK KELEMAHAN LITIGASI KONVENSIONAL MELALUI MODEL ADVOKASI MANDIRI DALAM RANGKA PEMBAHARUAN PROSES PERADILAN Rd. Dewi Asri Yustia; Tuti Rastuti; Utari Dewi Fatimah
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol 16 No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (421.29 KB) | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v16i1.51

Abstract

In Indonesia, various legislations have been enacted to protect women. In fact, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women has been ratified through Act No. 7 Year 1984. But numbers of discrimination, domination, and violence against women is increasing. This is motivated finding of preliminary data at the penitentiary that women cases that affect women perpetrators of criminal acts predominantly sourced from domestic violence. This study uses normative juridical methods empirically supported, through a multidisciplinary approach is the approach of the legal aspects of civil and criminal law and procedural law. The data obtained and analyzed by juridical qualitatively. The results showed that, the model of conventional litigation, directs the entire process of the law to be passed by left entirely to legal counsel. Model of this litigation has not provided the knowledge, understanding and awareness of the law against female perpetrators (victims marginalized). Results of this study recommend a model of independent litigation. This model is expected to accommodate the litigation needs of female perpetrators of criminal acts, so that they can advocate for themselves in the face of the proceedings. In addition, the model is expected to have an independent advocate can be a new alternative in the judicial process, and can be used as a reason for consideration for renewal effort does justice process.Keywords: Empowerment; Women; Self Advocacy; RenewalDi Indonesia, berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan telah diberlakukan untuk melindungi kaum perempuan. Bahkan, telah meratifikasi Convention on The Elimination of  All Forms of Discrimination Against Women melalui Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 1984. Namun faktanya diskriminasi, dominasi, dan kekerasan terhadap perempuan semakin meningkat. Hal ini dilatarbelakangi ditemukannya data awal bahwa di lembaga pemasyarakatan perempuan kasus-kasus yang menimpa perempuan pelaku tindak pidana dominan bersumber dari KDRT. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan didukung metode yuridis empiris, melalui pendekatan multidisiplin yaitu pendekatan dari aspek hukum perdata dan hukum pidana serta hukum acara. Data yang diperoleh kemudian dianalisis secara yuridis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa, model litigasi konvensional, mengarahkan pada seluruh proses hukum yang akan dilalui diserahkan seluruhnya kepada penasihat hukum. Model litigasi ini belum memberikan pengetahuan, pemahaman dan kesadaran hukum terhadap perempuan pelaku tindak pidana (korban termarginalkan). Hasil penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya model litigasi mandiri. Model ini diharapkan mampu mengakomodasi kebutuhan berlitigasi dari perempuan pelaku tindak pidana, sehingga dapat mengadvokasi dirinya sendiri pada saat menghadapi proses beracara. Selain itu, diharapkan model advokasi mandiri ini dapat dijadikan alternatif baru di dalam proses peradilan, dan dapat dijadikan alasan pertimbangan untuk dilakukannya upaya pembaharuan proses peradilan.Kata Kunci :   Pemberdayaan; Perempuan; Advokasi Mandiri; Pembaharuan
NILAI-NILAI KEPEMIMPINAN ISLAM DALAM BERKELUARGA SEBAGAI TOLAK UKUR MENDASAR (BASE ON) INTEGRITAS CALON LEGISLATIF Tuti Rastuti
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol 15 No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (816.392 KB) | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v15i1.75

Abstract

Prepare leaders with integrity processed fostering of the family. Various methods are used to determine the state 's future leaders, both through the regeneration of the cadre, the appointment or election. Election is a means to process and determine who will lead and hold the mandate of the people they lead. Election is a process, but the nature of the leader determines to be seen from the quality of his personality. Communities are often faced with the dilemma of how good a leader ? Values of the Islamic leadership in the family will answer what and how a leader with high integrity. Therefore, the family is the smallest unit of a miniature community. Integration leader is a leader who has a commitment to his family. The leader of the ummah in a large scale is determined by its leadership in the small-scale leader applying Islamic values in the family.Keywords : Islamic Values; Family; Leadership; LegislativeABSTRAKMempersiapkan pemimpin yang berintegritas diproses pembinaannya dari keluarga. Berbagai cara dilakukan oleh negara untuk menentukan calon pemimpin, baik melalui regenerasi pengkaderan, penunjukan ataupun pemilihan. Pemilu merupakan sarana untuk mengolah dan menentukan siapa yang akan memimpin dan memegang amanah rakyat yang dipimpinnya. Pemilu merupakan proses, namun hakikat menentukan pemimpin harus dilihat dari  kualitas kepribadiannya. Masyarakat sering dihadapkan pada dilema sosok pemimpin bagaimanakah yang baik? Nilai-Nilai kepemimpinan Islam dalam berkeluarga akan menjawab apa dan bagaimana pemimpin yang memiliki integritas tinggi. Sebab, keluarga merupakan miniatur unit terkecil dari suatu komunitas. Pemimpin yang berintegrasi adalah pemimpin yang memiliki komitmen  terhadap keluarganya. Pemimpin umat dalam skala yang besar ditentukan oleh kepemimpinannya dalam skala kecil yaitu pemimpin yang menerapkan nilai-nilai Islam dalam berkeluarga. Kata Kunci: Nilai Islam; Keluarga; Kepemimpinan; Legislatif
Indonesia's Legal Policy in Responding to China's Trade War Retaliation Against the United States Based on the Principle of Protectionism: Politik Hukum Indonesia dalam Menghadapi Retaliasi Perang Dagang China terhadap Amerika Serikat Berdasarkan Prinsip Proteksionisme Rastuti, Tuti; Khoirudin, Andian Achya Dzikriyyah
LITIGASI Vol. 26 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v26i1.15157

Abstract

The trade war between the United States and China, driven by protectionist policies, has significantly disrupted global trade flows. For Indonesia, the conflict impacts exports, imports, and investment, while raising three critical: protecting domestic industries, maintaining neutral trade relations, and adhering to the principles of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Indonesia must formulate a balanced legal and trade strategy that upholds both national interests and international obligations. This study analyzes Indonesia’s legal-political response to China’s trade war retaliation against the United States, emphasizing the application of protectionist principles within the WTO framework. Employing normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study draws on WTO agreements, national trade laws, and relevant case studies. The research findings indicate that Indonesia is able to maintain economic stability and promote peaceful relations with both conflicting countries through trade cooperation, while remaining compliant with the principles of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The "free and active" foreign policy is implemented as a form of “strategic hedging” or “pragmatic engagement” in Indonesia’s international trade policy. This concept serves to mitigate the risks associated with global trade war retaliation. Such a trade policy is in line with Indonesia’s foreign policy as mandated by the Constitution.