Articles
Problem Diplomasi Perbatasan dalam Tata Kelola Perbatasan Indonesia-Malaysia
Rachmawati, Iva;
Fauzan, -
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 16, No 2 (2012): Mengelola Perbatasan Negara
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1.795 KB)
The border diplomacy which is intended as tool for gaining national interest should be built on 3 foundations. Those fondations are law, social and economic development and also institution building. This article will highlight the importance of institution building in border diplomacy. In order to manage the cross border relation with neighbour country, the government needs certain institution to holds the task. Related to our case, we will discuss about KK Sosek Malindo as the main institution which has been managing the border issues between Indonesia and Malaysia. KK Sosek Malindo routinely meets to solve several problems arise between both countries in the border. Since 1985, theyâve already agreed various cooperations related to border management and border area development. Unfortunately, this institution became useless when cannot implement those agreements and contribute more because distracted by inapropriate structure of KK Sosek Malindo. This article also tend to convince that restructuritation of KK Sosek Malindo should be done in order to optimalize the function of KK Sosek Malindo for better bilateral relation and border area development.
The Reinforcement of Multiculture-Based Curriculum For Students of Foreign Nationalities in Indonesian Schools
Rachmawati, Iva
KOMUNITAS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE Vol 7, No 2 (2015): Komunitas, September 2015
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v7i2.4547
Multicultural curriculum in Indonesia is developed for students with multicultural backgrounds to internalize multicultural values without having to lose their own cultural identity. A multicultural curriculum is designed to promote teaching methods developed based on the diversity of the students themselves with the purpose of educating them to understand pluralism, humanism, and democracy and to respect each other both inside and outside the school. Such a multicultural curriculum proves to be a barrier for students with non multicultural backgrounds. Â Their different backgrounds limit their understanding of the diversity. This situation requires a new curriculum. This article is the result of the Competitive Grants research regarding multicultural curriculum for students of foreign nationalities. The interviews with the participants of IACS (Indonesian Art & Culture Sholarship) program in 2013 and 2014 have indicated that classroom discussions and direct interaction with the local community could become some kind of reinforcement for the formation of a new curriculum for students with foreign nationalities to better understand the diversity of Indonesia instead of art and cultural education.
The Reinforcement of Multiculture-Based Curriculum For Students of Foreign Nationalities in Indonesian Schools
Rachmawati, Iva
KOMUNITAS: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture Vol 7, No 2 (2015): Komunitas, September 2015
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v7i2.4547
Multicultural curriculum in Indonesia is developed for students with multicultural backgrounds to internalize multicultural values without having to lose their own cultural identity. A multicultural curriculum is designed to promote teaching methods developed based on the diversity of the students themselves with the purpose of educating them to understand pluralism, humanism, and democracy and to respect each other both inside and outside the school. Such a multicultural curriculum proves to be a barrier for students with non multicultural backgrounds. Â Their different backgrounds limit their understanding of the diversity. This situation requires a new curriculum. This article is the result of the Competitive Grants research regarding multicultural curriculum for students of foreign nationalities. The interviews with the participants of IACS (Indonesian Art & Culture Sholarship) program in 2013 and 2014 have indicated that classroom discussions and direct interaction with the local community could become some kind of reinforcement for the formation of a new curriculum for students with foreign nationalities to better understand the diversity of Indonesia instead of art and cultural education.
Pendekatan Konstruktivis dalam Kajian Diplomasi Publik Indonesia
Rachmawati, Iva
Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Vol 5, No 2 (2016): October
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.18196/hi.5290
Rationalist approach remains dominant in the research of Indonesian public diplomacy. Therefore, public diplomacy is always used as a tool to gain the national interests through a particular image. In such framing, all activities in public diplomacy are intended for the state’s positive image. Besides, Rationalist still puts state as the main actor in public diplomacy. Domestic dimension did not have the same position as the state in interpreting international phenomena. Whereas, each actor has the same access to information and communication nowadays. Rationalist has given dialogue as an important contribution to public diplomacy strategy. Dialogue is one of the communication forms which have a capability to build trust between actors. Several problems in limiting the development of public diplomacy concept become a reference for proposing Constructivist as an alternative approach. This approach will help understanding public diplomacy more by putting the consciousness of the difference of national identity and relationship building as the main purposes. Several empirical studies showed that national identity preservation had already held by not only a state but also domestic dimension. This approach will give domestic dimension a wider room in public diplomacy as well as the state in interpreting international phenomenon. Dalam kajian-kajian diplomasi publik Indonesia, pendekatan rasionalis masih merupakan pendekatan yang dominan. Akibatnya, diplomasi publik selalu diletakkan sebagai alat untuk meraih kepentingan nasional melalui citra tertentu. Pembingkaian diplomasi publik semacam ini mengarahkan sejumlah kegiatan yang dilakukan dalam diplomasi publik semata-mata demi meraih citra positif negara tersebut. Di samping itu, pendekatan ini juga masih menempatkan negara sebagai aktor utama dalam diplomasi publik. Dimensi domestik belum mendapat tempat sebagai aktor yang sejajar dalam menginterpretasi fenomena antar negara. Sementara itu pada kenyataannya, setiap aktor memiliki akses yang sama dalam informasi dan komunikasi. Rasionalis memang telah memberi kontribusi penting dalam strategi dalam diplomasi publik, yaitu dialog, dimana komunikasi dalam bentuk dialog mampu menumbuhkan kepercayaan antar aktor. Beberapa hal yang dirasa membatasi perkembangan konsepsi diplomasi publik menjadi rujukan melalui artikel ini untuk mengusulkan pendekatan Konstruktivis dalam memahami diplomasi publik. Pendekatan tersebut meletakkan kesadaran atas perbedaan identitas nasional dan relationship building sebagai tujuan utamanya. Beberapa kajian empiris menunjukkan bahwa upaya memelihara identitas nasional telah dilakukan oleh tidak saja negara tetapi juga dimensi domestik. Dengan demikian, pendekatan ini memberikan ruang bagi dimensi domestik sebagai aktor di samping negara dalam diplomasi publik
A Note for Indonesia’s Border Diplomacy in Tanjung Datu, West Kalimantan
Rachmawati, Iva;
Dewi, Machya Astuti
Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Vol 9, No 1 (2020): April
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.18196/hi.91158
This article aims to propose a fundamental overhaul of the understanding of Indonesia’s border diplomacy, which has so far state-centric and only prioritizes the role of the central government. Despite being in the high politics issue, border diplomacy can no longer elitist practiced. Referring to several problems that arise at the practical and academic level, Indonesia’s border diplomacy is the time to expand diplomacy by considering other important actors, namely subnational actors and non-state actors. Not only at the provincial level, but sub-national actors to the lowest level in the border region also have a significant contribution to Indonesia’s border diplomacy, as well as non-state actors from academia. This article is the result of research based on a qualitative methodology using Personal Communication withs and documentation studies. The research discovered many essential notes, including firstly, the confusion of information in the Tanjung Datu issue in both Camar Bulan and Gosong Niger has harmed the bilateral relations between Indonesia and Malaysia. Second, independence in the practice of relations between two communities between countries showed that subnational actors have a vital influence on Indonesia-Malaysia bilateral relations.
Karakter Diplomasi Publik Indonesia terhadap Malaysia
Rachmawati, Iva
Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Vol 6, No 1 (2017): April
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.18196/hi.61105
Public diplomacy, as an effort to maintain the system of inter-state relations and also its existence in the international environment, refers to the communicative activities of the state as well as the domestic public to the public outside the state. Public diplomacy then becomes a supportive tool for maintaining inter-state relations and avoiding conflicts arising between countries. However, in Indonesia-Malaysia relations, the practice of public diplomacy tends to lead to negative actions in influencing relations. This article shows that negative Indonesian public diplomacy towards Malaysia has been influenced by distinctive characters, reactive and inferior. Those characters were formed by historical frame on collective memory which collide Malaysian NEP impact. As a result, public diplomacy does not exist as a bridge to maintain relationships positively but rather tends to be practised through negative communication forms. This article is a result of qualitative research methods based on interviews and literature studies. Diplomasi publik, sebagai upaya untuk memelihara sistem relasi antar negara dan juga keberadaannya dalam lingkungan internasional yang merujuk pada aktfitas komunikatif publik domestik suatu negara terhadap publik di luar negara. Diplomasi publik kemudian menjadi alat yang suportif untuk menjaga relasi antar negara dan menghindarkan negara dari konflik akibat persoalan yang muncul antar negara. Namun, pada relasi Indonesia-Malaysia, praktik diplomasi publik cenderung mengarah pada tindakan-tindakan yang negatif dalam memengaruhi relasi. Artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa praktik-praktik diplomasi publik Indonesia terhadap Malaysia yang negatif tersebut dipengaruhi oleh karakter yang khas, yaitu karakter reaktif dan inferior. Karakter tersebut terbentuk oleh bingkai sejarah pada memori kolektif yang bertemu dengan dampak NEP Malaysia. Akibatnya, diplomasi publik tidak hadir sebagai jembatan untuk memelihara relasi secara positif melainkan cenderung dipraktikkan melalui bentuk-bentuk komunikasi yang negatif. Artikel ini merupakan hasil riset yang dilakukan dengan metode kualitatif berdasar pada wawancara dan studi literatur.
FILM SEBAGAI DIPLOMASI BUDAYA?
Iva Rachmawati
Jurnal Studi Diplomasi dan Keamanan Vol 11, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Studi Diplomasi dan Keamanan
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hubungan Internasional
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31315/jsdk.v11i1.2916
The power of movies are believed to be able to change the perception of international public towards particular country. Movies then became a popular thing as part of a country's cultural diplomacy because of its huge influence nowadays. A number of countries put movies as part of their cultural diplomacy. Likewise with Europe, which began to use Europe on Screen (EoS) as part of its cultural diplomacy. However, the debate about cultural diplomacy appears to be related to the objectives of cultural diplomacy itself. Some academicians believe that diplomacy is always related to the political goals of the state, while others believe that cultural diplomacy must be distinguished from other diplomatic activities because the aim is merely to foster mutual understanding and harmony through the introduction of culture. This article was written to understand the concept of cultural diplomacy and to know whether a movie can be part of cultural diplomacy, especially activities organized by Europe on Screen. This article will be presented by tracing back what is meant by cultural diplomacy and how the practice of cultural diplomacy through movies by a number of countries. By referring to the conception of cultural diplomacy and the practice of using movies by a number of countries, this article puts Europe on Screen as part of cultural diplomacy not because of the movies itself but from the overall project activities of the EoS.
Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dalam Rangka Pengembangan Mata Kuliah Konsentrasi Di Prodi Ilmu Hubungan Internasional
Sri Issundari;
Iva Rachmawati
Jurnal Studi Diplomasi dan Keamanan Vol 7, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Studi Diplomasi dan Keamanan
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hubungan Internasional
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31315/jsdk.v7i2.1792
This research will map out the problems faced by the Department of International Relations in the application of concentration courses namely Diplomacy Negotiation and also Defence and Security, while offering models cooperative model for developing of student’s competence. Based on the results of a questionnaire distributed among students in 2012 showed that the concentration courses of diplomacy negotiation and defense & security studies were not interesting for students to learn as they were boring and saturate. This condition is considered derived from learning model that has not involving students actively in the lecturing process, whereas the course of concentration is very important to support the competence of students after graduation. This research will mapping out the problems in the course of concentration course through FGD (Focus Group Discussion) and analyze of Design of Learning (Rancangan Sistem Pembelajaran). This study will also try out a model of learning through cooperative models as a solution to increase the active participation of students in the class. Cooperative learning method uses game system, in which there is also a space for learners to participate in determining the course of the game. Students take responsibility to organize learning process. The method used in this research is a classroom action research methods. Parameters used to determine the method of learning is through testing students' perceptions in cooperative learning methods in the classroom.
Konstruktivisime sebagai Pendekatan Alternatif dalam Hubungan Internasional
Iva Rachmawati, M.Si
Jurnal Paradigma Vol 16, No 1 (2012): JANUARI
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31315/paradigma.v16i1.2456
In the study of international relation, Constructivism proposes an alternative way to analize international phenomenon. It evaluates that the two previous approach, Realism and Liberalism failed in explaining some policies makings by certain countries in differents issues. This approach is built above three elements, those are: relativism, subjectivism and the openness. Through these elements, constructivism tries to avoid the weakness as the positivist approach has, for instance: positivist believes that reality can only be explained by theoretical frame. Thus, the knowledge is based on deeds concepts or speech which has capability in building social constructivism.Furthermore, Constructivism tries to replace material condition to ideas as the base of international system. This is an important part of constructivism because ideas was put as the main factor on influencing state behaviours and international relations. The impact of this approach is we can find that instead of the defence and economic issues some issues, such as environmental issue, gender issue and human rights issue can determine state behaviours.
The Failure of Indonesia’s Public Diplomacy in Managing Malaysian Cultural Claim Issue
Iva Rachmawati;
Sri Issundari
The Indonesian Journal of Communication Studies Vol 3, No 2 (2010)
Publisher : Department of Communication Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Universitas
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31315/ijcs.v3i2.1345
According to traditional conception of public diplomacy, the positive building of country’s image is the main aim of public diplomacy by sharing clear and credible information and persuading other foreign government and public abroad. In the era of rapid development of information and communication technology, the good image of one country cannot be build by focusing on the parties abroad. The image should be built by focusing on domestic public. By sharing clear and credible information government can persuade public in shaping supportive attitudes. Unfortunately, Indonesia government failed in managing public diplomacy. The anarchic actions and narrative coercion were frequently happened during Malaysian cultural claims. These were unsupportive situation for Indonesian image itself. Lack of mechanism in public access to obtain trusted information and also lack of guidance to respond sensitive issues determine those attitude and lessen the level of relation between countries.