Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Justisi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pemuliaan Hukum Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal)
Wiwin Triyunarti
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Hubungan Hukum Antara Dokter Dan Pasien Yeni Nuraeni; L. Alfies Sihombing; Wiwin Triyunarti
JURNAL PEMULIAAN HUKUM Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Pemuliaan Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (590.028 KB) | DOI: 10.30999/jph.v3i1.1029

Abstract

Dokter merupakan sebuah profesi yang khusus dan mulia. Dokter dipercaya dapat menyembuhkan pasien, sehingga dalam hubungan antara dokter dan pasien disebut dengan hubungan paternalistic atau hubungan antra bapak dan anak. Ketika seorang pasien mendatangi dokter untuk mendapatkan pelayanan Kesehatan, semenjak itu pula terjadi hubungan hukum antara dokter dengan pasien. Oleh sebab itu dalam melakukan pelayanan Kesehatan seorang dokter mengacu pada standar profesi kedokteran. Dimana kewajiban dan hak masing-masing diatur dalam perundang-undangan.
Doctor's Legal Relationship with Patients and Pharmacy Subagyo Sri Utomo; Wiwin Triyunarti
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 3 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute August
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i3.6872

Abstract

The medical profession is a profession accompanied by high morality, where every doctor must be ready at any time to provide assistance to anyone, anytime and anywhere in accordance with professional standards. Public unrest is directed at the medical profession who provides drugs that exceed the quality that should be given to patients or only gives certain drugs directly to patients, so the patient must buy the drug in question at the pharmacy. Of course, there is an interest behind the doctor's habit, namely getting a commission from a pharmaceutical company. This habit is carried out continuously, and the number of doctors involved in the conspiracy is also increasing, even though the doctor is aware that his actions have violated the positive law and harmed his patients. Normative juridical research method, with descriptive analytical specifications. Normative legal research is research that only uses secondary data sources, namely legislation and legal theories. Health issues are no longer only between doctors and their patients, but also involve health workers, financing and so on, including pharmacy. An agreement between a doctor and a patient can be classified as an agreement to do or do something. The agreement occurs when the patient calls the doctor or goes to the doctor, and the doctor fulfills the patient's request to treat him. When doctors perform health services when prescribing to patients, it is a breach of ethics committed by doctors and dentists. Meanwhile, patients who are consumers, wherever they are, all have basic social rights. In one therapeutic class there are many drugs that have the same indication/efficacy under various brand names and generic names produced by various pharmaceutical companies. Of course, the patient hopes that the selection of drugs made by the doctor is the best for the patient's health and is affordable by his financial capabilities. the high number of competitions in the promotion of its drugs so that each company approaches doctors with compensation in the form of rewards.
Legal Protection For Informal Workers In Realizing Decent Work To Achieve The Sustainable Development Goals Imam Budi Santoso; Wiwin Triyunarti; Farhani, Athari; Faiqah Nur Azizah
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025): June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v20i1.11714

Abstract

Goal 8 of the Sustainable Development Goals aims to promote inclusive and sustainable economic development, provide full and productive employment, and ensure decent work for all individuals. Regrettably, in Indonesia, the concept of decent work encompassing social security, workers' rights, social dialogue, and employment is exclusively applicable to the formal economic sector, neglecting the informal economic sector, which comprises unregulated wage workers, employers, and homeworkers. Indeed, informal economic development is a fundamental foundation of the nation's economy. Achieving this type of decent work is a goal for sustainable development and would help support a lasting economy, as stated in Article 28, paragraph (2) of the constitution. This research seeks to examine the legal safeguards for labor and decent work, the realization of labor rights post-labor legislation, and the correlation between employment and sustainable development. The research methodology used is normative, using both a conceptual framework and an analysis of laws and regulations. This study's findings indicate a correlation between employment and sustainable development. An adept workforce may expedite the nation's developmental trajectory, enabling it to compete with more advanced nations. The results will positively influence the process of entering new markets.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR INFRINGEMENT OF UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THE REGISTERED TRADEMARK SARAH GAJAH DUDUK Aditya Yunianto; Ade Maman Suherman; Tri Setiady; Wiwin Triyunarti
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/2cwwn189

Abstract

 PT. Gajah Duduk is one of the largest sarong manufacturing companies in Indonesia. In carrying out its business activities, PT. Gajah Duduk uses a distinctive symbol—commonly referred to as a trademark—on its products to make them recognizable to the public. This trademark has been officially registered with the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. However, over time, PT. Prisma Abadi Jaya was found to have produced sarongs bearing a mark that closely resembled the registered Gajah Duduk trademark. Moreover, the goods in question fall under the same class of goods for which PT. Gajah Duduk holds its trademark rights. This action clearly violates statutory provisions and causes harm to the legitimate trademark holder. In response, PT. Gajah Duduk filed a lawsuit to cancel the trademark allegedly used without authorization by the other party. Given this context, it is essential to further examine the legal protection of registered trademarks in Indonesia, how unauthorized use of trademarks applies in the case of the Gajah Duduk sarong, and how PT. Gajah Duduk’s trademark rights are protected against PT. Prisma Abadi Jaya. In addition, a comparative analysis with trademark protection systems in other countries will also be discussed. This research employs a normative-juridical method, which involves analysis based on legal theories, expert opinions, legal literature, and applicable regulations. The findings of this study indicate that legal protection for trademarks in Indonesia has been established through enacted legislation and other relevant regulatory frameworks.  
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COPYRIGHT DISPUTE RESOLUTION THROUGH ARBITRATION BETWEEN INDONESIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM Ali Abdulah; Ade Maman Suherman; Tri Setiady; Wiwin Triyunarti
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/0wbfpq39

Abstract

Settling copyright disputes through arbitration is an out-of-court alternative that is considered more efficient, faster, and maintains the confidentiality of the parties' business. Indonesia, through Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration, has opened up space for non-litigation copyright dispute resolution. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom with its common law system has developed a more mature arbitration mechanism through the Arbitration Act 1996 and the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This article aims to comparatively analyze the arbitration system in resolving copyright disputes in Indonesia and the United Kingdom. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that although both countries recognize arbitration as a dispute resolution forum, the United Kingdom has a more advanced legal infrastructure, international arbitration institutions, and practices than Indonesia. This study recommends strengthening copyright arbitration in Indonesia by adopting best practices from the UK, particularly regarding the specialization of IP arbitrators and the effectiveness of the enforcement of arbitral awards.
THE ROLE OF THE WEST JAVA PROVINCE DPRD IN SUPERVISION Dea Eka Rizaldi; Ade Maman Suherman; Tri Setiady; Wiwin Triyunarti
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/hjrre111

Abstract

The context of West Java Province is interesting to study in depthbecause its complex characteristics in terms of population,budget allocation, and diversity of sectoral issues require a stronger and more adaptive oversight mechanismthan other regions. To achievethese objectives, this study will use a comparative qualitative research designand document analysis, in-depth interviews, and case studies. Overall, the DPRD oversight mechanism in Indonesia has a fairlycomplete set of normative instruments, but its effectiveness is still influenced by internal factorssuch as the political and regulatory capacity of council members, as well as external factorssuch as executive transparency and public participation. Therefore, increasing legislative professionalism and inter-institutional synergy is animportant agenda for strengthening local government accountability. Finally, public participation and local media play a reinforcing role in thelegislative oversight mechanism. Support from civil society, non-governmental organizations(NGOs), and regional media can increase public pressurefor the DPRD to carry out its control function more firmly and openly. A responsive public complaint mechanismcan also be an effective channel foridentifying policy irregularities at the local level. However, several reinforcing factors such as budget transparency, the role of external (BPK) andinternal audits, as well as public and media participation can encourage improvements in thequality of oversight. In the context of West Java, which is highly complexand covers a large area, DPRD oversight has a positive influence onthe accountability of regional heads, although there is still a gap between regulatory normsand implementation practices in the field.   Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Co-Authors Ade Maman Suherman Aditya Yunianto Ali Abdulah Athari Farhani Dea Eka Rizaldi Faiqah Nur Azizah Imam Budi Santoso Sihombing, L. Alfies Subagyo Sri Utomo tri setiady Yeni Nuraeni