Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.267
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Kodifikasia: Jurnal Penelitian Islam Al-Ahkam Jurnal Al-Tadzkiyyah Episteme: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman MUSLIM HERITAGE: JURNAL DIALOG ISLAM DENGAN REALITAS Justicia Islamica : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Sosial KARSA: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Keislaman (Journal of Social and Islamic Culture) Cakrawala: Jurnal Litbang Kebijakan Ulumuna JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) Muslim Heritage Excelencia : Journal Of Islamic Education & Management Jurnal Antologi Hukum Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah Journal of Economics, Law, and Humanities Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Journal of Sharia Economic Law
Abid Rohmanu
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 30 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Economics, Law, and Humanities

 1 
Ratio Decidendi Hakim dalam Penetapan Nafkah Iddah terhadap Istri yang Nusyuz Perspektif Dhariah Hajrah, Siti; Saifullah, Saifullah; Rohmanu, Abid
Journal of Economics, Law, and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Economics, Law, and Humanities
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/jelhum.v4i2.5269

Abstract

This study is motivated by legal issues regarding the provision of iddah maintenance for a wife who is considered nusyuz in divorce cases at the Religious Court of Ponorogo. This study aims to analyze the judges’ ratio decidendi in determining iddah maintenance for a nusyuz wife and to examine its relevance to the theory of dhariah in Islamic law. The qualitative research employs a normative juridical method using a statutory and case law approach. Data were obtained through interviews with judges handling similar cases and documentation such as court decisions and relevant Supreme Court Circular Letters (SEMA). The data were analyzed descriptively and analytically by exploring the judges’ legal and moral considerations in making decisions. The results show that the judges’ ratio decidendi in granting iddah maintenance is based on the absence of clear evidence of nusyuz, thereby affirming the wife’s right to maintenance based on principles of justice and protection of women. Conversely, when nusyuz is proven, judges may deny iddah maintenance by applying sadd al-dhariah to prevent social harm. The relevance of dhariah theory in these decisions emphasizes the importance of balancing public benefit (maslahah) and substantive justice. Thus, judges’ decisions toward maslahah can be essential to strengthen gender justice in Islamic family law.
Co-Authors Ani Rachmawati Antikasari, Tiara Widya Arif Rahman Hakim Arif Rahman Hakim Arsyadani, Achmad Arfinanto Azme Bin Haji Matali Damayanti, Vivi V. W. Evi Muafiah Muafiah Fadhil Wafa Fikriawan, Suad Hajrah, Siti Hariyanto, Wahid Icca Febriyanti Jamianto, Jamianto Khusniati Rofiah Lesta Pangesti Mahfud Martha Eri Safira Mintyastuti, Dyah Sri Muafiah, Evi Muafiah Murdianto Murdianto, Murdianto Napitupulu, Pesta Asni W Prasasti, Bagio Saifullah Saifullah Sri Lumatus Sa'adah Sumarsono, Cokro Wibowo Supriati, Eny Vivi V. W. Damayanti