Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

Kahoot as an Assessment Tools: Students' Perception of Game-based Learning Platform Iman, Nurul; Ramli, Munasprianto; Saridewi, Nanda
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA Vol 7, No 2 (2021): Available Online in November 2021 (Web of Science Indexed)
Publisher : Department of Science Education, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30870/jppi.v7i2.8304

Abstract

This study aims to determine students' perception of game-based learning platform as a learning evaluation medium. The approach used in this research is descriptive quantitative, and qualitative—the instrument used in the form of a questionnaire containing 22 questions and interviews. The research was conducted in two analytical chemistry classes at a public university in Indonesia. Researchers used Kahoot every two weeks over four months as a tool for formative assessment. Three students from each class were interviewed to explore their experiences and perceptions of Kahoot. Questionnaire data were processed using descriptive statistics, while data from interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings show that chemistry education students' perception of game-based learning platform as a learning evaluation medium is quite good. Students also perceived that Kahoot provided a challenge in learning. Kahoot is also a fun and exciting assessment medium for students. In addition, students feel that their learning motivation has increased in preparing the material to be tested, so direct feedback from Kahoot is very effective in correcting mistakes.
Navigating the tech-savvy generation; key considerations in developing of an artificial intelligence curriculum Ramli, Munasprianto; Fatra, Maifalinda; Murtadlo, Muhamad; Albana, Hasan; Hana Susanti, Baiq; Aldeia, Saifullah
IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI) Vol 13, No 4: December 2024
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/ijai.v13.i4.pp3942-3950

Abstract

The progress in artificial intelligence (AI) technology has greatly changed various facets of society. This study aimed to explore aspects that need to be considered in developing AI curriculum for senior high schools in Indonesia. The qualitative approach employed in this study. The researchers utilized focus group discussions with schools’ management and students at seven cities and group interviews with students at three cities. The results show that some schools want AI as an extracurricular activity, while others want it as a mandatory subject. School management and teachers aim for 2-3 competent AI instructors in each school. If no teachers are available, training will be provided to ICT, mathematics, or physics teachers for about a year to become AI educators. All participants agree on the importance of teaching students about AI applications and discussing ethical issues related to AI.
“What do fishermen catch?”; Exploring Talk between Students in Primary Science Classroom Implementing Curriculum 2013 Ramli, Munasprianto
TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society TARBIYA: JOURNAL OF EDUCATION IN MUSLIM SOCIETY | VOL. 5 NO. 1 JUNE 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Educational Sciences, Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/tjems.v5i1.7496

Abstract

AbstractThe objective of this research is to explore of dialogue in primary science classrooms that implement Curriculum 2013. Dialogue is a term used in a broad sense to mean the exchange of information, thought and ideas from the sources to audiences through both written and spoken language. In this study, the sort of dialogue I am interested in is classroom talk; even more specifically, talk between students in the primary science classroom. A case study approach is employed for this study. I am focusing my study on twelve science lessons at year four of one primary schools in the Greater Jakarta. Data were gathered using classroom observations. I wrote a field note for each lesson and record the observation using audio and video recorder For analysing the data, I employed socio culture discourse analysis. The study shows that talk between students during a science lesson is adapted from both a traditional triadic pattern called Initiation, Response, Feedback (IRF) and a non-triadic pattern of Initiation, Response, Feedback, Response, Feedback (IRFRF) chain. In addition, the findings indicate that students were able to develop the four domains of scientific literacy through talks during science lessons.AbstrakTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengeksplorasi dialog di dalam kelas sains dasar yang menerapkan Kurikulum 2013. Dialog adalah istilah yang digunakan dalam arti luas berarti pertukaran informasi, pemikiran dan ide-ide dari sumber pembicara ke lawan bicara melalui komunikasi baik lisan maupun tulisan. Dalam penelitian ini, jenis dialog yang menarik bagi peneliti adalah pembicaraan di kelas; khususnya, pembicaraan antara siswa di kelas sains tingkat Sekolah Dasar. Pendekatan studi kasus digunakan pada penelitian ini. Fokus penelitian ini adalah dua belas materi ajar mata pelajaran sains pada kelas empat dari salah satu sekolah dasar di Jabodetabek. Data penelitian ini dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan observasi kelas. Peneliti menulis catatan lapangan untuk setiap pengajaran dan merekam kegiatan pengajaran menggunakan audio dan perekam video. Untuk menganalisis data, peneliti menggunakan analisis wacana sosial budaya. Studi ini menunjukkan bahwa perbincangan antara siswa selama pelajaran sains diadaptasi dari pola triadic-tradisional yang disebut Initiation (Inisiasi), Response (Respon), dan Feedback (Timbal Balik) yang disingkat IRF dan pola non-triadic yang disebut Initiation (Inisiasi), Response (Respon), Feedback (Timbal Balik), Response (Respon), Feedback (Timbal Balik) yang disebut denga Rantai IRFRF. Selain itu, temuan menunjukkan bahwa siswa mampu mengembangkan empat domain literasi ilmiah melalui diskusi selama pelajaran ilmu pengetahuan How to Cite : Ramli, M. (2018).  What do fishermen catch?”; Exploring Talk between Students in Primary Science Classroom Implementing Curriculum 2013. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 5(1), 1-10. doi:10.15408/tjems.v5i1.7496. 
Pengembangan Video Animasi Kimia Terintegrasi Keislaman pada Materi Struktur Atom Muslim, Buchori; Ramli, Munasprianto; Nursarifah, Ulfah
Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry Vol 3, No 2 (2021): August
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34312/jjec.v3i2.11568

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan suatu produk media pembelajaran berupa video animasi kimia terintegrasi keislaman pada materi struktur atom. Proses pengembangan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan model ADDIE yang terdiri dari dari analyze (analisis), design (perancangan), development (pengembangan), implementation (implementasi), dan evaluation (evaluasi). Hasil penelitian uji coba terbatas kepada mahasiswa diantaranya aspek minat terhadap media dengan presentase 84%, aspek penguasaan materi dengan presentase 83,30%, aspek integrasi sains dan islam dengan presentase 86,4%, aspek tampilan dengan presentase 83%, aspek keterlaksanaan dengan presentase 84,7%, serta aspek audio dengan presentase 84,1%. Sehingga secara keseluruhan uji coba terbatas kepada mahasiswa mendapatkan presentase 84,30% dengan kriteria sangat layak. Hasil penilaian produk video animasi oleh ahli media sebesar 82,50% untuk video 1, 83,75% untuk video 2, dan 82,50% untuk video 3. Sehingga video animasi yang dikembangkan dalam penelitian ini mendapat kriteria sangat layak.
“What do fishermen catch?”; Exploring Talk between Students in Primary Science Classroom Implementing Curriculum 2013 Ramli, Munasprianto
TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society TARBIYA: JOURNAL OF EDUCATION IN MUSLIM SOCIETY | VOL. 5 NO. 1 JUNE 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, UIN (State Islamic University) Syarif Hidayatul

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/tjems.v5i1.7496

Abstract

AbstractThe objective of this research is to explore of dialogue in primary science classrooms that implement Curriculum 2013. Dialogue is a term used in a broad sense to mean the exchange of information, thought and ideas from the sources to audiences through both written and spoken language. In this study, the sort of dialogue I am interested in is classroom talk; even more specifically, talk between students in the primary science classroom. A case study approach is employed for this study. I am focusing my study on twelve science lessons at year four of one primary schools in the Greater Jakarta. Data were gathered using classroom observations. I wrote a field note for each lesson and record the observation using audio and video recorder For analysing the data, I employed socio culture discourse analysis. The study shows that talk between students during a science lesson is adapted from both a traditional triadic pattern called Initiation, Response, Feedback (IRF) and a non-triadic pattern of Initiation, Response, Feedback, Response, Feedback (IRFRF) chain. In addition, the findings indicate that students were able to develop the four domains of scientific literacy through talks during science lessons.AbstrakTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengeksplorasi dialog di dalam kelas sains dasar yang menerapkan Kurikulum 2013. Dialog adalah istilah yang digunakan dalam arti luas berarti pertukaran informasi, pemikiran dan ide-ide dari sumber pembicara ke lawan bicara melalui komunikasi baik lisan maupun tulisan. Dalam penelitian ini, jenis dialog yang menarik bagi peneliti adalah pembicaraan di kelas; khususnya, pembicaraan antara siswa di kelas sains tingkat Sekolah Dasar. Pendekatan studi kasus digunakan pada penelitian ini. Fokus penelitian ini adalah dua belas materi ajar mata pelajaran sains pada kelas empat dari salah satu sekolah dasar di Jabodetabek. Data penelitian ini dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan observasi kelas. Peneliti menulis catatan lapangan untuk setiap pengajaran dan merekam kegiatan pengajaran menggunakan audio dan perekam video. Untuk menganalisis data, peneliti menggunakan analisis wacana sosial budaya. Studi ini menunjukkan bahwa perbincangan antara siswa selama pelajaran sains diadaptasi dari pola triadic-tradisional yang disebut Initiation (Inisiasi), Response (Respon), dan Feedback (Timbal Balik) yang disingkat IRF dan pola non-triadic yang disebut Initiation (Inisiasi), Response (Respon), Feedback (Timbal Balik), Response (Respon), Feedback (Timbal Balik) yang disebut denga Rantai IRFRF. Selain itu, temuan menunjukkan bahwa siswa mampu mengembangkan empat domain literasi ilmiah melalui diskusi selama pelajaran ilmu pengetahuan How to Cite : Ramli, M. (2018).  What do fishermen catch?”; Exploring Talk between Students in Primary Science Classroom Implementing Curriculum 2013. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 5(1), 1-10. doi:10.15408/tjems.v5i1.7496. 
Investigasi Tingkat Kecemasan Mahasiswa Sains dan Pendidikan Sains Terhadap Mata Kuliah Dasar Yusna, Nabillah; Ramli, Munasprianto; Muslim, Buchori
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i5.15455

Abstract

Chemistry lessons in the world of education are one of the lessons that are considered difficult. Chemistry is not only found in the High School period but also found at the University level. The Department of Science apart from Chemistry also re-learns this subject with Basic Chemistry courses in the Biology and Physics majors. This creates anxiety for students who are less interested in Basic Chemistry courses. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of anxiety of students of science and science education in basic chemistry subjects at UIN Syarif Hidataullah Jakarta. The Mixed Method Research. Participants were selected using a convenience sampling approach, totaling 224 students. The instrument used was 36 statement items in the questionnaire and interviews. Questionnaire data were processed by descriptive statistics and interviews with thematic analysis. The results showed that the difference in anxiety levels between students and science education, namely the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training (FITK) had higher anxiety, namely Aspect 1 FITK had a proportion of 41.18% and FST 40.09%, in Aspect 2 FITK had a proportion of 34 .69% and 34.39% FST and in Aspect 3: FITK has a proportion of 32.75% and FST 31.05%. From the results of this study, it was found that science education students had higher levels of anxiety than pure science students.
ANALYSING TRADITIONAL ISLAMIC BOARDING SCHOOL STUDENTS SCIENTIFIC LITERACY USING PISA FRAMEWORK Ramli, Munasprianto; Saridewi, Nanda; Rifki, Abdul
JPPIPA (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya in collaboration with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia (PPII)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jppipa.v6n1.p31-39

Abstract

The study aims to determine the scientific literacy ability of class IPA 11th grade students at traditional Islamic boarding schools using the 2015 PISA framework. Descriptive quantitative method used for this research. The research was conducted at two traditional Islamic boarding schools in South Tangerang called the Jamiyah Islamiyah Islamic Boarding School and the Madinatunnajah Islamic Boarding School. The research sample consisted of 57 students consisting of 33 students of the Jamiyah Islamiyah Islamic Boarding School and 24 students of the Madinatunnajah Islamic Boarding School chosen using a purposive sampling technique. The written test used is a test that distributed at PISA 2012 and 2015 which focus on two main domains of PISA 2015 scientific literacy, namely the domain of competence and knowledge. The results of this study indicate that the scientific literacy skills of students in Islamic boarding schools using the 2015 PISA framework are still "low" with an average percentage of scientific literacy obtained of 29.03%.
Indonesian Students' Scientific Literacy in Islamic Junior High School Ramli, Munasprianto; Susanti, Baiq Hana; Yohana, Media Putri
International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability Vol 2, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Gemilang Maju Publikasi Ilmiah (GMPI) 

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (505.808 KB) | DOI: 10.53889/ijses.v2i1.33

Abstract

Scientific literacy is one of the main and key aspects of facing various challenges in the 21st century. Building students' scientific literacy does not mean making every student a future scientist. However, this is more about building their knowledge of science and technology to play a role in making choices that impact the survival of life today and in the future. This study aimed to analyze the scientific literacy skills of Islamic Junior High School students in Indonesia by using PISA questions from the previous year and finding out their perceptions of PISA academic literacy questions. This study used a sequential explanatory research method with a mixed quantitative and qualitative approach. A total of 150 students from eight Islamic Junior High Schools in West Sumatra and DKI Jakarta Provinces in Indonesia were selected using a purposeful sampling technique. The instruments used are scientific literacy tests to collect quantitative data, interview guides, and open questionnaires for qualitative data. The quantitative data obtained were analyzed by descriptive statistics, while the qualitative data were analyzed by thematic analysis. The results show that the science literacy score of Indonesian Students in Islamic Junior High schools value of Islamic Junior High School students is lower than the average value of the OECD countries and the United States. Then, the students also thought that the scientific literacy questions tested were difficult because they rarely got similar questions. This results also suggest that several factors cause the low literacy scores of Islamic junior high school  students, namely their lack of habit of working on similar questions, the limited number of teachers in giving questions that promote critical and analytical thinking skills and the low desire of students to read and explore knowledge other than what they get in school.