Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.79
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ilmu Hukum Prima Jurnal Syntax Transformation Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha International Journal of Social Service and Research Journal of Social Research Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Journal of Social Science Return : Study of Management, Economic and Bussines INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
Erikson Sihotang
Universitas Mahendradatta
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Legal Force of Final Decisions of the Constitutional Court I Nyoman Suandika; I Made Suwena; Erikson Sihotang
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 7 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i7.1455

Abstract

The problem addressed in this research is what rationale underlies the granting of permanent legal force to Constitutional Court decisions since they are pronounced in a public plenary session. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, historical, and comparative approaches. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials is conducted through document studies, while the technique for analyzing legal materials is descriptive-analytical. The results of the study show that the rationale underlying the granting of permanent legal force to Constitutional Court decisions after they have been pronounced in a public plenary session is that cases submitted to the Constitutional Court are related to state administration, requiring prompt decisions and being subject to time constraints to prevent disruption to the continuity of other state administration agendas. The possibility of conducting a judicial review of Constitutional Court decisions, viewed from a normative perspective, is not available because Article 47 of the Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi confirms that Constitutional Court decisions obtain permanent legal force once they are pronounced in a public plenary session. This principle is further emphasized in the explanation of Article 10 paragraph (1), which states that permanent means that no further legal action can be taken.
Co-Authors Achmad Ady Shufi Dahlan Anak Agung Gde Putra Arjawa Cicilia Indra Jayanti Dalmonce Dalmonce Dedy Parta Kusuma Dewa Ayu Sinta Wiranti Rendang Dhiyo Hadi Diah Yustiasari Erick Avriandi Firmansyah Firmansyah I Komang Edy Dharma Saputra I Made Mulyawan Subawa I Made Suwena I Nengah Simpen I Ngurah Agus Dwi Widiatmika Putra I Nyoman Suandika I Wayan Aditya Pradnyandita Kadek Dedy Suryana Kadek Dedy Suryana Made Dewi Saraningsih Made Larasati Made Sada Muchamad Bratadewa Yuda Pratama Ni Ketut Wiratny Ni Luh Wiwik Sariani Ni Putu Nadya Guna Artha Prasasta Nyoman Suandika Nyoman Tri Jaya Putra Souki Aditya Pratama Kesdu Zuhro Nurindahwati