Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.578
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Yustisia Merdeka : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Hukum Positum Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia Harmonization Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal Sovereignty Law and Diplomatic Politics Pamulang Law Review
Sultoni Fikri
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Limits on Constitutional Court Judicial Activism as A Negative Legislator: Analysis of Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 Nata Senora; Sultoni Fikri; Md. Abdul Mannan Bhuyean
Journal Sovereignty Law And Diplomatic Politics Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): Journal Sovereignty Law and Diplomatic Politics
Publisher : CV Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jlsdp.v2i3.2789

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the limits of judicial activism exercised by the Constitutional Court in Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 concerning the design of the simultaneous implementation of general elections and regional head elections. The decision has generated considerable debate because the Constitutional Court constructed a new constitutional framework regarding the relationship between national elections and regional head elections. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings demonstrate that Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 reflects the practice of judicial activism through the application of systematic and teleological interpretation to address regulatory ambiguity concerning the simultaneity of elections. Although the Constitutional Court provides guidance for the future design of electoral administration, the decision remains within the scope of the Court's authority as a negative legislator because it does not establish operational legal norms, which fall within the competence of the legislature. The limits of judicial activism in this decision are reflected in the existence of a clear constitutional basis, respect for the doctrine of open legal policy, and the absence of any assumption of the legislative function vested in the DPR and the President. Accordingly, Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 demonstrates that judicial activism may serve as an instrument for constitutional protection, provided that it continues to uphold the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and legal certainty within Indonesia's constitutional system.
Co-Authors Anang Fajrul Ukhwaluddin Baharuddin Riqiey Demas Brian Wicaksono Diana Anggraeni Asyrofi Gaung Agung Rachmatullah I Gde Sandy Satria Md. Abdul Mannan Bhuyean Miftaqul Janah Muhammad Iffatul L Muhammad Mutawalli Mukhlis Nata Senora Paul Atagamen Aidonojie Rendy Dwi Syahputra Reza Yuna Dwi Rahmawati Rizky Bangun Wibisono Syofyan Hadi Wiwik Afifah