Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.012
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Yustitia Notaire JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Eka Nanda Ravizki
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya 60294, Indonesia
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
STRATEGI BALAI PEMASYARAKATAN KELAS SATU SURABAYA DALAM MEMPERSIAPKAN NASIONALISASI HUKUM PIDANA Addelia Aizah Rachma; Eka Nanda Ravizki
Yustitia Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v11i2.332

Abstract

Laws must continue to be updated in order to keep up with the dynamics of societal development. This also applies to the current Indonesian Criminal Code so that the determination of punishment can effectively achieve community welfare. The purpose of punishment in Articles 51-52 of the National Criminal Code shows that punishment is not only aimed at providing a sense of deterrence, but also as rehabilitation for prisoners. In this case, BAPAS plays a role in guiding correctional clients so they can return to society. However, the scope of the work area is too broad so that coaching cannot be maximized. BAPAS Class One Surabaya has a working area covering five regions including Surabaya, Sidoarjo, Gresik, Jombang and Mojokerto. The method used in this research is empirical juridical conducted through interviews. The collected data will be analyzed descriptively-analytically. The research results show that to optimize the recovery of correctional clients, BAPAS formed Griya Abhipraya as a forum for correctional clients to develop their independence and skills.
EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PIDANA PENJARA TERHADAP ANAK YANG TELAH MELAMPAUI BATAS USIA 18 TAHUN DALAM PERSPEKTIF SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK Nila Wahyuningtyas Wardani; Eka Nanda Ravizki
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i4.6822

Abstract

This study analyzes the issues surrounding the execution of imprisonment sentences against offenders who have exceeded the age of 18 within the framework of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA), referring to Decision Number 2818 K/PID.SUS/2024. The problem arises at the stage of executing the court decision when the convicted individual has surpassed the age of 18, resulting in administrative and legal obstacles concerning placement in a Special Child Development Institution (LPKA). The refusal of admission by the LPKA places the prosecutor, as the executing authority, in a dilemma between enforcing the court’s ruling and complying with statutory regulations. This research employs an empirical juridical method with statutory and case approaches, supported by field data on the practical implementation of court decisions. The findings indicate a lack of judicial precision in determining the appropriate correctional placement, as normatively, individuals who have exceeded the age of 18 should be placed in a Youth Correctional Institution. This condition reflects a lack of synchronization between the operative part of the judgment and the provisions of the SPPA, resulting in legal uncertainty during the execution stage. Greater judicial accuracy and regulatory harmonization are required to ensure legal certainty and the protection of children's rights within the criminal justice system.Keywords: Execution of Judgment; Juvenile Offender; Juvenile Criminal Justice System; Legal Certainty
Co-Authors Addelia Aizah Rachma Adelia Savitri Ajeng Althafira Alkansa Fritta Omea Mellenia Larasati Larasati Lintang Yudhantaka Muhammad Ilham Muladi Wilopo Nila Wahyuningtyas Wardani Rafi Great Akbar Rafli Yovianto Rr. Chantika Vebyola Wijaya Siska Elina Rahmaningsih Syaifulloh Umar Zuhda Mila Fitriana