Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.829
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) PATTIMURA Legal Journal Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif Jurnal Hukum Statuta Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review
Tri Sulistiyono
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Can the Erga Omnes Principle Revolutionize State Administrative Courts? A Challenge Through Lawrence M. Friedman’s Legal System Theory Mayaka, Raphael Bertrand; Sulistiyono, Tri; Gusthomi, Moh. Imam; Windiahsari, Windiahsari
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Indonesian State Law Review, October 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v7i2.18870

Abstract

The principle of erga omnes, which signifies obligations binding on all parties, has traditionally been associated with international law and human rights. However, its application within state administrative courts remains an underexplored and provocative area of legal theory. This study delves into whether the erga omnes principle can be adapted to revolutionize Indonesia’s State Administrative Court (PTUN) system, drawing on Lawrence M. Friedman’s Legal System Theory as a framework. Friedman’s theory, which emphasizes the interaction of legal rules, legal culture, and the legal environment, offers an insightful lens to analyze the broader implications of applying erga omnes in the domestic administrative context. The findings suggest that while the erga omnes principle could significantly strengthen the role of state administrative courts in ensuring broader societal justice, its implementation presents notable challenges. These challenges include the difficulty in aligning domestic legal systems with the universal and binding nature of erga omnes, the risk of overwhelming courts with cases that require systemic change, and the potential for conflicting interpretations of the principle's scope. Despite these challenges, the study proposes that strategically applying erga omnes could enhance legal coherence, public trust, and accountability in administrative decision-making. This research challenges conventional thinking by proposing an audacious application of international legal principles to domestic administrative law. It provides fresh insights into how judicial reform could reshape the PTUN system, urging policymakers and legal scholars to rethink the boundaries of state administrative justice in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Aisyah Putri Arsya Andrian, Yasmine Putri Bayangsari Wedhatami Deswinta, Shinta Widi Dwi Pangestu Khoirunisa Gusthomi, Moh. Imam Iwan Sulistiyo Khoirunisa, Dwi Pangestu Mayaka, Raphael Bertrand Pratama Herry Herlambang Ratih Damayanti Ridwan Arifin Sabbichis, Najma Fadhilatul Sabri, Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad Safitri, Eka Ayu Salsabila, Masyita Isnadya Risky Suwinda Suwinda Wedhatami, Bayangsari Windiahsari, Windiahsari