Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.457
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Kosmik Hukum Recidive : Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik International Journal of Law Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Sulistyanta Sulistyanta
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Tinjauan Kriminologi Terhadap Pelaku Penipuan Jual Beli Album K-Pop : Studi Pada Sosial Media X @ongableu2 Sarah Azzahra; Sulistyanta Sulistyanta
Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Mei : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/hakim.v2i2.1812

Abstract

The increase in K-Pop fans in Indonesia affects the high number of sales and purchases of K-Pop albums, which is an opportunity for irresponsible people to commit fraud. Provisions regarding online fraud are regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code and Article 28 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law. The purpose of this article is to examine criminology related to the factors that cause perpetrators to commit fraud in buying and selling K-Pop albums and efforts to overcome criminal acts of fraud on social media. Countermeasures related to fraud in buying and selling K-Pop albums are in the form of preventive efforts and repressive efforts. The research methodology used in this article is secondary data sources followed by primary data sources. Secondary data sources are obtained through literature studies, while primary data sources are obtained through interviews and observations.
Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Di Kejaksaan Negeri Klaten Dessy Permata Diani; Sulistyanta Sulistyanta
Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Mei : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/hakim.v2i2.1822

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of finding out the application and obstacles to restorative justice in resolving the crime of embezzlement at the Klaten District Prosecutor's Office. This research uses a type of juridical-empirical research, namely research by collecting data through interviews. This research uses material collection techniques through interviews and observations as well as literature study. The crime of embezzlement is one of the crimes that can be implemented by restorative justice efforts, because in general this crime is a property crime that can be restored to the goods or objects that are the object of the crime of embezzlement so that when the restoration to its original condition is fulfilled, then the criminal case is there is no need to continue the legal process. The results of this research indicate that the application of restorative justice in resolving the crime of embezzlement at the Klaten District Prosecutor's Office is guided by the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. The implementation of the restorative justice process does not always run smoothly, there are several obstacles. However, this obstacle is not a serious problem so it can be overcome by the Klaten District Prosecutor's Office.
Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penipuan Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice Di Kepolisian Resor Purworejo Ratna Sary Gayatri; Sulistyanta Sulistyanta
Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Mei : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/hakim.v2i2.1826

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the implementation of restorative justice in resolving criminal acts of fraud at the Purworejo Police Station and to determine the obstacles experienced by investigators at the Purworejo Police Station in resolving criminal acts of fraud using a restorative justice approach. This research uses empirical legal research with a legal sociology approach. The crime of fraud is a crime against property. Losses incurred as a result of criminal acts of fraud are in the form of material, whether in the form of money or property. When the loss has been returned, punishment is no longer necessary. The process of resolving criminal acts of fraud through restorative justice at the Purworejo Police Station has been going well and is in accordance with the Republic of Indonesia State Police Regulation No. 8 of 2021. In resolving criminal acts of fraud through restorative justice at the Purworejo Resort Police, there are 2 obstacles, namely obstacles in terms of regulations and obstacles in terms of implementation
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SECARA “WIN-WIN SOLUTION” KASUS RESIKO ATAU KEKELIRUAN MEDIS (MEDICAL MALPRACTICE) Sulistyanta, Sulistyanta; Fitriono, Riska Andi; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Ginting, R; Budyatmojo, Winarno; Subekti, Subekti; Setyanto, Budi; Pratiwi, Dian Esti
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2021: Volume 7 Nomor 2 Juni 2021
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v7i2.459

Abstract

Pemahamam malparaktek medis harus di dasarkan pada asas praduga tak bersalah, bahwa kecil kemungkinan dokter dengan sengaja menimbulkan korban dalam melaksanakan tugas profesionalnya. Sifat hubungan kontrak ini bila dihubungkan masalah malpraktik medis menjadi persoalan rumit. Sehingga penyelesaian yang lebih berkeadilan, berimbang dan bermartabat perlu dipikirkan. Tawaran alternatif penyelesaian kasus malpraktik medis dengan menerapkan restorative justice didasarkan pada asumsi bahwa penafsiran malpraktik medis secara substansif masih multitafsir dan relative. Keadaan ini dapat menimbulkan rasa tidak puas, termasuk tahapan penyelesaian persoalan yang ada. Alternatif penyelesaian restoratif justice berbasis pada kesepakatan, kepercayaan dan keterbukaan, tanpa paksaan kedua belah pihak dapat menjadi alternatif penyelesaian yang berkeadilan dan bermartabat. Alternatif penyelesian ini didasarkan pada keseimbangan antara tugas professional tenaga medis dan perhatian terhadap korban (pasien). Suatu konstruksi penegakan hukum non litigasi yang diharapkan dapat memberikan keadilan bagi semua pihak. Terdapat kelebihan dan kekuarangan dalam penerapan restoratif justice. Kelebihannya dapat dilakukan secara cepat, biaya murah, menghemat waktu dan tenaga. Urgensi penelitian ini antara lain (1) mengatasi persoalan malpraktik yang selama ini telah menimbulkan korban namun penyelesaiannya kurang memuaskan, (2). mencari keseimbangan antara pelayanan kesehatan dan pengguna kesehatan dengan merekonstruksi penegakan hukum yang berkeadilan. Metode dengan melakukan identifkasi dan menganalisis dan mengevaluasi kasus malpraktik medis dan kasus yang diduga malpraktik yang telah membawa korban dan penyelesaian (hukum) dilakukan. Alternatif penyelesaian atau penegakkan hukum medis yang berkeadilan ini selain berkontribusi pada tataran teoretik dalam pengembangan teori penyelesaian dan penegakan hukum di bidang medis yang berkeadilan, transparan, dan jujur, diharapkan juga dapat menjadi model ideal bagi penegakan hukum malpraktik medik di Indonesia.
Pengaturan Ganja Medis dalam Hukum Pidana: Perbandingan Internasional dan Implikasinya bagi Indonesia Kamil, Muhammad Irfan; Sulistyanta, Sulistyanta
Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH)
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The regulation of cannabis in Indonesian positive law continues to classify *Cannabis sativa* as a Schedule I narcotic, prohibiting its use for medical purposes and creating legal issues when cannabis is used to address specific health needs. This study analyzes cannabis regulation in Indonesia and several other countries and examines the possibility of legalizing medical cannabis from the perspectives of criminal law and the right to health. Using normative legal research with statutory and comparative approaches, the study relies on literature review of legislation, court decisions, and relevant legal scholarship, analyzed systematically and prescriptively. The findings show that Indonesia maintains a repressive and prohibitionist approach under Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, which provides no legal basis for medical cannabis use. In contrast, countries such as Thailand, the Netherlands, and Turkey permit limited medical cannabis under strict state supervision. Constitutional Court Decision Number 106/PUU-XVIII/2020 affirms that legalization constitutes an open legal policy subject to legislative discretion based on scientific evidence. The study recommends revising Law Number 35 of 2009 to allow limited and controlled medical cannabis use, enhancing protection of the right to health and reducing criminalization. Its originality lies in integrating criminal law, human rights, and comparative law perspectives to support narcotics policy reform.
Penegakan Hukum Terkait Distribusi Konten Bermuatan SARA Berdasarkan Hukum Positif di Indonesia Ardi Tasmara; Sulistyanta Sulistyanta
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Agustus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v1i3.454

Abstract

Dampak negatif dari penggunaan media sosial yang luas tidak dapat dihindari. Media sosial merupakan platform yang memungkinkan orang untuk berbagi informasi dengan cepat. Keberlimpahan informasi di media sosial dapat mengakibatkan konsekuensi yang merugikan, seperti penyebaran konten yang berisi unsur SARA. Mengingat adanya aturan dalam Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik yang mengatur penyebaran konten berbahaya tersebut, para pengguna media sosial harus lebih berhati-hati dalam menyebarkan informasi yang berpotensi dianggap sebagai ujaran kebencian. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis pasal-pasal dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan masalah yang akan diteliti oleh peneliti. Pengaturan mengenai tindak pidana ujaran kebencian di media sosial didasarkan pada ketentuan-ketentuan di luar KUHP. Penentuan apakah suatu tindakan dapat dikategorikan sebagai tindak pidana ujaran kebencian di media sosial tergantung pada Pasal 28 ayat (2) Jo. Pasal 45A ayat (2) Undang-Undang tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik yang mengandung unsur pidana dalam ujaran kebencian, serta Surat Edaran Kapolri Nomor: SE/6/X/2015 tentang Penanganan Ujaran Kebencian (hate speech) yang mencakup ruang lingkup ujaran kebencian.
Perbandingan Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Judi Online Sebagai Cybercrime di Indonesia dan Brunei Darussalam Perwira, Evan Adriawan Cipta; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Sulistyanta, Sulistyanta; Sulistyanta, Sulistyanta
Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH)
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has transformed conventional gambling into online gambling, which is characterized by its borderless nature, anonymity, and complex digital infrastructure. This phenomenon presents significant challenges for criminal law enforcement, particularly within the framework of cybercrime. This research aims to analyze and compare the regulation of online gambling offenses in Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam, and to identify constructive legal reforms that may be adopted in Indonesia. The study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that Indonesia adopts a total prohibition model, regulating online gambling through the new Penal Code and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. Despite fulfilling the principle of legality, enforcement faces obstacles related to digital evidence, cross-border servers, encryption systems, and uneven targeting of offenders. Brunei Darussalam also applies a total prohibition approach but within a dual legal system integrating the Common Gaming Houses Act and the Syariah Penal Code Order 2013. The comparative analysis demonstrates that regulatory effectiveness depends not only on the severity of sanctions but also on normative consistency, institutional integration, and preventive strategies. This study concludes that Indonesia requires harmonization of legal provisions, proportional sentencing differentiation, and stronger institutional coordination to effectively combat online gambling as a form of cybercrime.
Perbandingan Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Judi Online Sebagai Cybercrime di Indonesia dan Brunei Darussalam Perwira, Evan Adriawan Cipta; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Sulistyanta, Sulistyanta; Sulistyanta, Sulistyanta
Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH)
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has transformed conventional gambling into online gambling, which is characterized by its borderless nature, anonymity, and complex digital infrastructure. This phenomenon presents significant challenges for criminal law enforcement, particularly within the framework of cybercrime. This research aims to analyze and compare the regulation of online gambling offenses in Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam, and to identify constructive legal reforms that may be adopted in Indonesia. The study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that Indonesia adopts a total prohibition model, regulating online gambling through the new Penal Code and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. Despite fulfilling the principle of legality, enforcement faces obstacles related to digital evidence, cross-border servers, encryption systems, and uneven targeting of offenders. Brunei Darussalam also applies a total prohibition approach but within a dual legal system integrating the Common Gaming Houses Act and the Syariah Penal Code Order 2013. The comparative analysis demonstrates that regulatory effectiveness depends not only on the severity of sanctions but also on normative consistency, institutional integration, and preventive strategies. This study concludes that Indonesia requires harmonization of legal provisions, proportional sentencing differentiation, and stronger institutional coordination to effectively combat online gambling as a form of cybercrime.
The The Impact of Statute of Limitations on Efforts to Recover Corruption Assets and Public Perceptions of Justice anastasia, anastasia; Sulistyanta, Sulistyanta
International Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): International Journal of Law
Publisher : Badan usaha Milik Desa Berkaho Pungpungan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64084/ijl.v2i1.187

Abstract

Corruption eradication efforts in Indonesia not only focus on punishing offenders but also on restoring state financial losses through asset recovery. However, these efforts face numerous challenges, one of which is the existence of a statute of limitations under the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), which also applies to corruption offenses. As an extraordinary crime that is often uncovered only years after its commission, the application of a statute of limitations creates a potential legal loophole that undermines the objectives of law enforcement itself. This study aims to analyze the juridical and sociological impacts of the statute of limitations in two crucial aspects: the effectiveness of corruption asset recovery and public perceptions of justice. This research employs a socio-legal methodology with a qualitative approach. Primary data were obtained from in-depth normative materials, including academic literature and insights from anti-corruption practitioners. Secondary data were collected from statutory and regulatory analysis, court decisions, scientific journals, and media reports related to corruption cases discontinued due to the statute of limitations. Data were analyzed descriptively and analytically to map the correlation between the statute of limitations, asset recovery failures, and public responses. The findings indicate that the statute of limitations significantly impedes asset recovery efforts, particularly in complex corruption cases involving money laundering and offshore asset concealment, which require lengthy investigative processes. The statutory time limit provides a semblance of legal certainty for perpetrators while hindering the state’s ability to pursue diverted assets. From a sociological perspective, the discontinuation of corruption cases due to the statute of limitations erodes public trust in the judicial system. The public perceives such outcomes as forms of impunity and injustice, whereby the law fails to address crimes that inflict substantial harm on public interests. This study recommends a review or even abolition of the statute of limitations for corruption offenses as a strategic measure to strengthen the anti-corruption regime, maximize state asset recovery, and restore societal perceptions of justice
THE MODEL OF CORRUPTION COURT IN THE ARCHIPELAGO PROVINCE WITH LOW COSTS, QUICK, AND SIMPLE PROCESS OF IMPLEMENTATION Sulistyanta, Sulistyanta; Sinurat, Aksi; Effendi, Jauhari; Putri, Fatma Ayu Jati
Yustisia Vol 6, No 1: April 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v6i1.11594

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 46 of 2009 about Corruption Court, is authorized to examine and decide the crime of corruption cases proposedby KPK or Prosecutor (State and High). Based on Article 35 paragraph (1) jo paragraph (4) of Law Number 46 of 2009, confirmed that corruption courts (TIPIKOR courts) are only located in each provincial capital whose jurisdiction covers the province concerned. By this provision, the Prosecutor Office in each district/city must transfer the corruption cases to the Corruption Court in the provincial capital. There are the problems as the following: first one, Is the process of criminal justice in the archipelago province like East Nusa Tenggara (NTT) able to fulfill the judicial principle of quick, low cost and simple?; second one, Is this condition not an obstacle in the process of criminal law enforcement in NTT?; The result of this research is that the Corruption Court in Kupang, conducted by several Prosecutor Offices, the samples do not meet the judicial principles of quick, low costs and simple. The obstacles besides spending much expenses, there are other factors such as weather, intentionally neglect the obligation as the experts, witnesses due to long time and high expenses.  Law enforcement becomes less maximal due to the existing budget, and it can only be done by a minimal law enforcement process with a fairly expensive cost.
Co-Authors Aina Aurora Mustikajati Anastasia Anastasia Ardi Tasmara Arif Rahman Hakim Budi Setyanto Danendra, Ravi Dessy Permata Diani Dewi Maesyaroh Dian Esti Pratiwi Fitriono, Riska Andi Ginting, R Haidar Aufan Maulana Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani Ismunarno Ismunarno Jauhari Effendi Kamil, Muhammad Irfan Khuszaimah Anggraheni Nur Amalia Lego Karjoko Notonagoro, Muhammad Arya Perwira, Evan Adriawan Cipta Putri, Fatma Ayu Jati Ratna Sary Gayatri Rizal Rizqi Ramadhan Sabar Selamet Sarah Azzahra Shaifu, Awwal Muhammad Sinurat, Aksi Subekti Subekti Supanto Supanto Tika Andarani Parwitasari Winarno Budyatmojo