Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : LEGAL BRIEF

Responsibility of Notaries in The Inclusion of The Names of Instrumentary Witnesses Who Were Not Present at The Signing of Authentic Deeds (Study of The Decision of The Rantau Prapat District Court Number 26 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PN RAP) Adella Tanuwidjaja; Siti Hajati Hoesin
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 4 (2022): October: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (267.463 KB)

Abstract

In essence, the scope of the task of carrying out the position of a Notary is to make evidence as desired by the parties who appear to carry out a certain legal action. The case raised in this study originated from a lease agreement made before a Notary. Based on the applicable laws and regulations, the Notary is obliged to read the Deed in front of an audience in the presence of at least 2 witnesses, or 4 witnesses specifically for the making of a private will, and signed at the same time by the appearer, witness, and the Notary. However, the Notary in this case included the name of a witness in the relevant Lease Deed, even though the witness was actually not present on the day of making, reading, and signing of the deed by the parties. Therefore, one of the parties in the Lease Deed filed a lawsuit against the Notary because he felt aggrieved by the possibility that the Lease Deed would lose its proving power as an Authentic Deed because it did not meet the requirements as regulated in the laws and regulations. The main issue raised in this study is the responsibility of the Notary in including the name of the Instrumental Witness who was not present at the signing of the Authentic Deed and its implementation in the decision of the Rantau Prapat District Court Decision Number 26/Pdt.G/2020/PN RAP. This research is normative judicial research. The type of data used is secondary data obtained through literature study. To further elaborate the main issue, it is further described in the introduction, a discussion of the Instrumental Witness and the responsibilities of the Notary in relation to the inclusion of the name of the Instrumental Witness who was not present at the signing of the Authentic Deed, and closing.
Validity and Legal Consequences of Granting Building Use Rights to the Komanditer/Comanditaire Venootshap Guild (CV) Muhamad Mahdifa Lazuardi; Siti Hajati Hoesin
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 5 (2022): Desember: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The granting of Building Use Rights (hereinafter referred to as HGB) cannot be given to limited partnerships. This is because the Limited Partnership is a business entity, while what can be granted HGB is a legal entity. HGB is the right to construct or own a building on land that is not one's own for a limited period of time. In Indonesia, this HGB is regulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (hereinafter referred to as UUPA) and those who can own this HGB are Indonesian Citizens (WNI) and legal entities established and domiciled in Indonesia as described in Article 36 paragraph (1 ) UUPA. In practice, there is a policy that allows these Limited Partnerships to own HGB as contained in Circular Letter Number 2/SE-HT.02.01/VI/2019 issued by the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning regarding the Granting of HGB to Limited Partnerships. This Circular Letter aims to increase investment and encourage economic growth in all regions of Indonesia by granting HGB to Limited Partnerships. This research focuses on discussing the suitability and legal consequences of granting HGB to limited partnerships based on Circular Letter Number 2/SE-HT.02.01/VI/2019. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and an analytical approach. This research will explain the granting of HGB based on the UUPA and government regulations, the status of limited partnerships in Indonesia, and the legal consequences of enforcing Circular Letter Number 2/SE-HT.02.01/VI/2019 on obtaining HGB for limited partnerships.