Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Pemenuhan Hak Memperoleh Pekerjaan Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disab Delfina Gusman; Didi Nazmi; Yunita Syofyan
Riau Law Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/rlj.6.2.231-245

Abstract

Human Rights (HAM) is a gift from God to his creatur human rights should not be kept away or separated from the personal existence of the individual or human being. Protection of persons with disabilities has 22 (twenty two) rights. This arrangement is regulated through Article 5 Law Number 8 Year 2016 regarding an elaboration of the rights that will be received for individuals with disabilities in carrying out the nature of their lives until they die. Persons with disabilities also have the right to work and get rewarded for their hard work and of course it has been regulated through the written constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Without realizing it in almost all areas of life, people with disabilities are still discriminated against. There is even an assumption from some people that the affairs of people with disabilities are solely the business of the Social Service or the Ministry of Social Affairs. The research method uses empirical research with a statutory approach (statue approach) and an analytical approach (conceptual approach). The fulfillment of employment opportunities for people with disabilities shows that there is still a shortage due to the need for job providers, the quality of people with disabilities, and their still being selective in every job field on a micro basis. The city of Padang related to employment rights for persons with disabilities continues to strive to fulfill their work rights. In the legal construction of regulating employment rights for persons with disabilities, there must be a balance towards optimizing work through personnel from persons with disabilities. So that the fulfillment of the law both das sollen and das sein is accommodated appropriately
STUDI PERBANDINGAN PERKAWINAN ANAK DALAM HUKUM ADAT DI INDONESIA DAN INDIA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA Syofyan, Yunita; Nazmi, Didi
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 6 No 4 (2023): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (Januari 2023)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v6i4.288

Abstract

The Convention on the Rights of the Child (Convention of the Rights of the Child) defines a child as every human being under the age of 18 (eighteen) years so that marriage (marriage) carried out by someone who has not reached the age of 18 is internationally categorized as Child marriage is also a form of violence against children and is a violation of human rights. The patterns and diversity of forms of marriage found in each region make Indonesia rich in culture, however, if one pays attention to the forms of marriage in Bulukumba Regency, especially in Ara Village, which is one of the regions in Indonesia, forms of marriage still violate positive law. . Where in this area there are still child marriages for reasons of local customs. Apart from this area, it also occurs in the Dayak tribe, Kalimantan. Several countries in the world still exist due to customs that marry children, including Pakistan, Africa and India. Child marriage can only be understood when examined from the point of view of the dynamics between state law, religious law and customary law. The legal culture of society and the role of religious leaders are important factors in determining the acceptance or rejection of child marriage.
STUDI PERBANDINGAN SISTEM JAMINAN SOSIAL ANTARA INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA DALAM RANGKA PEMENUHAN HAK KESEHATAN DI INDONESIA Syofyan, Yunita; Gusman, Delfina
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (April 2023)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i1.325

Abstract

Kesehatan merupakan hak setiap manusia di dunia. Hal ini tertuang jelas dalam Deklarasi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa tahun 1948 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia Pasal 25 ayat (1) “setiap orang berhak atas derajat hidup yang memadai untuk kesehatan dan kesejahteraan dirinya dan keluarganya termasuk hak atas pangan pakaian, perumahan dan perawatan kesehatan serta pelayanan sosial yang diperlukan dan berhak atas jaminan pada saat menganggur, menderita sakit, cacat, menjadi janda/duda, mencapai usia lanjut atau keadaan lainnya yang mengakibatkan kekurangan nafkah, yang berada di luar kekuasaannya.Dengan landasan inilah setiap negara berusaha memenuhi hak kesehatan bagi warga negaranya. Sistem pembiayaan kesehatan yang dipakai setiap negara pun berbeda-beda. Secara umum sistem pembiayaan di dunia terbagi menjadi 4 tipe yaitu Konsep Asuransi swasta dengan subsidi pemerintah (Traditional Sickness Insurance), Konsep pemerintah membiayai asuransi kesehatan nasional (National Health Insurance), Konsep penyediaan layanan kesehatan oleh pemerintah (National Health Service), Campuran antara pembiayaan tradisional dan pembiayaan kesehatan nasional (Health Insurance dan Health Service).
Country Boundary Agreement as An Effort to Resolve The South China Sea Dispute Syofyan, Yunita
Ekasakti Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): June
Publisher : Master of Law Program, Ekasakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60034/fjebsw40

Abstract

The dispute in the South China Sea Area is a form of large international dispute where the parties are the countries that have interests. The dispute in the South China Sea first occurred when China claimed that the area belonged to the territory unilaterally. The claim made by China refers to the principle of Nine Dash Line, which means that it fully belongs to China's territorial sea so that the North Natuna Sea belonging to Indonesia is also claimed in such a way. The resolution of this dispute has been brought to the forum or International Court, but has not found a common ground or end of the disputed case. Juridical Normative method is a form of research with primary legal materials in the form of legislation (statue approach) and conceptual approach, secondary legal material in the form of a library research. That the settlement of disputes can be carried out peacefully or violently which has been recognized in the custom of international law. However, international dispute resolution efforts do not have a significant impact on the settlement of these disputes. In the 1982 UNCLOS provisions that every coastal state must enforce the law to get justice for the existence of marine waters that own the territory of other countries. Of course, by the existence of negotiations between disputing countries in requesting a detailed explanation of the basics of and the boundaries of the Nine Dash Line.
Pelibatan Publik dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Mewujudkan Idealitas Kehidupan Demokrasi Yunita Syofyan
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i1.3072

Abstract

Demokrasi mendorong umat warga negara untuk dapat menentukkan arah kehidupan bernegaranya demi terciptanya keseimbangan antara rakyat dengan negara. Lagi-lagi Indonesia sedang darurat demokrasi yang dimana minimnya pelibatan publik untuk dapat berpatisipasi melalui aspirasinya dalam hal perumusan produk hukum. Produk hukum adalah setiap putusan, ketetapan, peraturan, dan Keputusan yang dapat berguna untuk memberikan Batasan-batasan tindakan pemerintah dan jaminan hak asasi manusia pada rakyat. Pelibatan publik terhadap produk hukum adalah untuk menyuarakan seluruh aspirasinya yang akan menjadi suatu norma sehingga dapat diterapkan berdasarkan keadaan dan kebutuhan hukum Masyarakat. Konteks pelibatan publik dalam perumusan produk hukum sebagai bentuk mewujudkan cita-cita negara Indonesia yang sejahtera. Untuk mewujudkan cita-cita tersebut dibutuhkan kebijakan berupa produk legislasi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian huku, (doctrinal research) dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statues approach), pendekatan analitis (analytical approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa pertama, Masyarakat di mata hukum sebagai sebagai alat untuk menghantarkan nilai-nilai yang dapat memberikan kebaikan. Mengantarkan nilai kebaikan dapat dilakukan dengan cara menciptakan rasa sadar masyarakat untuk saling menghargai masing-masing hak dengan individu lainnya. Kedua, Partisipasi masyarakat dalam proses pembentukan undang-undang bertujuan untuk mempengaruhi lembaga legislatif dalam membuat undang-undang untuk memperhatikan, mempertimbangkan   dan   merumuskan   materi   sesuai   dengan   keinginan   orang   atau kelompok yang melibatkan dirinya  dalam  proses  pembentukan  suatu  undang-undang tersebut. Ketiga, Idealitas kehidupan demokrasi melalui pelibatan partisipasi publik dalam pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan tidak hanya berdasarkan political will melainkan harus pelibatan Masyarakat demi mendapatkan kebutuhan hukum yang dibutuhkan.
Public Participation In Legislation (Legal Comparation Studies In Indonesia, South Africa, And United State) Gusman, Delfina; Syofyan, Yunita
Nagari Law Review Vol 6 No 2 (2023): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.6.i.2.p.133-145.2023

Abstract

Community participation and the legal needs of the community are inherent in the process of forming laws. In fact, these two elements are manifestations and crystallizations of the ideal idea of ​​democracy. In a democracy, public participation is a condition sine qua non. Without public participation in the process of making laws, it will only result in authoritarian regulations and bias against the true meaning of democracy. So that it will result in the formation of laws that are not sourced from the soul and legal needs of the community (volkgeist). The method in this study uses legal research methods with a qualitative approach in the form of normative legal studies and (normative legal studies), where the type of research is descriptive analytical research. In addition, the approach used is a comparative approach (comparison), a historical approach, an institutional approach and a futuristic approach. Community participation in the formation of laws in Indonesia, South Africa and the United States has already started. Although public participation in law-making has some constraints such as slowdown in the legislative process and budgetary requirements, it brings more benefits to the government and society. However, the legitimacy of the process, the issue of justice, also creates better regulations and ultimately creates a stronger quality of democracy so that there is no doubt that public participation is an important part of the legislative process.
KETERKAITAN PAHAM DEMOKRASI TERHADAP SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA SETELAH PERUBAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945 Syofyan, Yunita; Gusman, Delfina; Alsyam, Alsyam
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i2.354

Abstract

After the Amendment of 1945 Constitution, democracy and Rule of Law become two concepts. They are the concept on how to run the power and run the goverment of Indonesia. Both concept, are interconected among each others and can not be separated, because on one side, democracy gives the grounds and mechanisme of power based on the principles of togetherness and equality, while on the other side, rule of law gives guide lines that goverment in the state is not a human but the law of human being. The both of concepts have relation each other. This article are trying to connected and related both concepts in an unseperated function.
MODEL OMNIBUS LAW DALAM PENYUSUNAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN YANG BERLAKU DI INDONESIA Alsyam, Alsyam; Syofyan, Yunita
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.423

Abstract

In the history of the formation of laws and regulations in Indonesia, the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2020 Concerning Job Creation, is a product of laws and regulations that used the Omnibus Method for the first time in drafting its laws. The Mechanism for Forming Law Number 11 of 2020 refers to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 of 2011 concerning Formation of Legislation and as amended by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning Formation of Legislation, these two laws do not regulate the Omnibus Method. Arrangements related to the new Omnibus Method are included in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2022 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Formation of Legislation.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NUMBER 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 ON LAW NUMBER 11 YEAR 2020 Syofyan, Yunita; Nazmi, Didi
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.584

Abstract

The interest of the people is the formation of rules that are able to accommodate the eye of the law. Article 20 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution states that "The House of Representatives holds the power to make laws. The formation of a regulation carried out by the parliament is a manifestation as a state of law, the state is obliged to carry out the development of national law which is carried out in a planned, integrated and sustainable manner in the national legal system that guarantees the protection of the rights and obligations of all Indonesian people based on the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945. This research is a normative law (doctrinal research), namely. In normative legal research, research is carried out through library research. The results of this study indicate that the Implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91 of 2020 have the consequence of a formation of legislation without reflecting the principle of legal certainty and the principle of openness must be declared procedurally flawed in order to protect the public from the interests of legal product makers. The follow-up to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91 of 2020 that tolerance for a legally defective product must not be re-applied even though the constitutional judge provides conditions as long as it is repaired for 2 (two) years, especially the Job Creation law. Thus, legal products must have concrete legal force in order to obtain legal certainty.
Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 68/PUU-XII/2014 tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Syofyan, Yunita
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.837

Abstract

The validity of marriage in Indonesia is considered to have religious overtones, religious elements that dominate the requirements for a valid marriage, so there is a degradation of the achievement of the unification goal of the Marriage Law which refers to the uniformity of holding marriages for every citizen. Pluralism in Indonesia with its diversity of ethnicities and nations is not actually an obstacle for a woman and a man in Indonesia to get married. The vulnerability to interfaith marriages is quite high due to the large number of religious diversity that is recognized by the constitution but interfaith marriages are marriages that are prohibited and not recognized by the Marriage Law in Indonesia. In the perspective of Human Rights (HAM) religious marriage is not prohibited and freedom is given to brides and grooms of different religions to be able to carry out the marriage (non-derogable rights). This research is a legal research (doctrinal research) with a conceptual approach (conceptual approach), the legal approach (statues approach), and the case approach (cases approach). The results of this study explain first, the Court, in the life of the nation and state based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, religion is the basis and the state has an interest in matters of marriage, it cannot only be seen from a purely formal aspect, but must also be seen from a spiritual and social aspect. Religion determines the validity of marriage. Second, interfaith marriage is part of the universal right that every individual has to carry out marriages to brides of different religions and marriage is part of a right that cannot be limited and reduced by differences in religion.