Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

KEBENARAN HEGEMONIK AGAMA Tajrid, Amir
WALISONGO Vol 20, No 1 (2012): Walisongo, Fundamentalisme
Publisher : IAIN Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract Â Anarchic violence against jamaah Ahmadiyah and âAliansi Kebangsaan untuk Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan (AKKBB)â by Front Pembela Islam (FPI) constitutes a form of truth claim among religious groups in religious society. The religious interpretation which formerly opened now reduced to become the closed interpretation. The formerly is the substantive interpretation now become the hegemonic interpretation. This is one of the greatest theological challenge facing by religious community. This article will show the patterns of attitude and idea among religious comminity members which stimulate hegemonic truth claim in order to find out the friendly, egalitarian, and tolerant forms of religions, so the hegemonic truth claim of the religion should be avoided. Â *** Kekerasan anarkis yang ditujukan kepada jamaah Ahmadiyah dan âAliansi Kebangsaan untuk Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan (AKKBB)â oleh Front Pembela Islam (FBI) merupakan bentuk klaim kebenaran di antara kelompokkelompok agama di dalam masyarakat agama. Interpretasi agama yang sebelumnya terbuka kini menjadi tertutup. Sebelumnya interpretasinya bersifat substantif namun kini menjadi hegemonik. Inilah salah satu tantangan terbesar yang dihadapi oleh komunitas agama saat ini. Artikel ini akan membahas pla sikap dan ide di kalangan anggota komunitas yang mencetuskan klaim kebenaran yang hegemonik dalam rangka untuk menemukan bentuk keberagamaan yang bersahabat, egalitarian, dan toleran sehingga klaim kebenaran hegemonik agama dapat dihindari. Â Keywords: kebenaran hegemonik, kebenaran substantif, klaim kebenaran Â

KAJIAN EPISTIMOLOGIS ILMU USHUL FIQH - Studi terhadap Pemikiran AbÅ« Isá¸¥Äq IbrÄhÄ«m al-ShÄ«razÄ« al-Al-FayrÅ«z AbÄdÄ« Tajrid, Amir
AL-AHKAM Volume 22, Nomor 2, Oktober 2012
Publisher : AL-AHKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (60.419 KB)

Artikel ini bermaksud melakukan kritik epistimologis terhadap Kitab al-Lumaâ yang ditulis oleh AbÅ« Isá¸¥Äq IbrÄhÄ«m al-ShÄ«razÄ« al-Al-FayrÅ«z AbÄdÄ« (al-ShÄ«razÄ«). Tulisan ini, secara deskriptif berusaha menggali dan mengkritisi karakteristik dan pengetahuan mengenai ilmu ushul fiqh yang terkandung di dalamnya. Beberapa catatan penting terhadap kitab ini adalah: pertama, pemikiran ushul fiqh al-ShÄ«razÄ« dalam Kitab al-Lumaâ ditulis pada era keemasan karya-karya ushul fiqh, sehingga metode dan pokok-pokok pemikiran ushul fiqh al-ShÄ«razÄ« menjadi inspirator generasi berikutnya. Kajian materi ushul fiqh didasarkan pada metode para tokoh pendahulunya, terbukti pada dominasi metode komparatif yang digunakan ketika mengetengahkan materi ushul fiqh dari beberapa tokoh ushul fiqh yang berbeda pandangan. Kedua, al-ShÄ«razÄ« termasuk dalam barisan ahli ushul mutakallimin yang mempunyai pemikiran orisinil dan merdeka. Kritik tajam yang dilancarkan mengajak para pihak untuk tidak condong terhadap madzhab fiqh tertentu. Oleh karena itu penyajian pemikiran ushul fiqh al-ShÄ«razÄ« dalam al-Lumaâ lebih bersifat kalamÄ«, karena bangunan argumentasi yang melibatkan unsur-unsur kalam dan mengedepankan logika menjadi alat dalam menilai dan mengukur kebenaran ilmu ushul fiqh. Ketiga, al-Lumaâ telah memenuhi dasar-dasar ilmu pengetahuan baik secara ontologi, epistemologi, maupun aksiologi.***This article intends to conduct epistemological critique of the Book âal-Lumaâ thatÂ written by AbÅ« IbrÄhÄ«m al-Shirazi Ishaq al-Al-Fayruz Abadi (al-Shirazi). This paper, is trying to explore and criticize the characteristics and knowledge of ushul fiqh that contained in. There are some important notes: first the thinking of al-Shirazi on ushul fiqh is written in the golden era of ushul fiqh works, that makes the methods and subjects of thought of al-Shirazi on ushul fiqh became inspiration for the next generation. Study of content of ushul fiqh is based on the its method of predecessor leaders. This is proved by the dominance of the comparative method which is used when explores ushul fiqh of several different leaders view. Second, al-Shirazi included as experts of ushul, which has original thinking and independent. A sharp criticism launched, invite the parties to be impartial towards certain schools of thought . Therefore the presentation of ideas al-Shirazi on ushul fiqh is in the sense of Kalami, because the arguments are built from elements of kalam and prioritize the logic as a tool in assessing and measuring the truthÂ of ushul fiqh. Third, al-Luma has fulfilled the basics of science both in ontology, epistemology, and axiology.***Keywords: uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh, al-Lumaâ, epistemologi, al-ShÄ«razi

KAJIAN EPISTEMOLOGIS ILMU Uá¹¢ÅªL AL-FIQH Studi terhadap Pemikiran AbÅ« Isá¸¥Äq IbrÄhÄ«m al-ShÄ«razÄ« al-FayrÅ«z AbÄdÄ« Tajrid, Amir
Al-Ahkam Volume 22, Nomor 2, Oktober 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Shariah and Law, State Islamic University (UIN) Walisongo

This article intends to conduct epistemological critique of the the Book â€œal-Lumaâ€ thatÂ written by AbÅ« IbrÄhÄ«m al-ShÄ«razÄ«Â Isá¸¥Äq al-FayrÅ«z AbÄdÄ« (al-ShÄ«razÄ«). This paper, trying to explore and criticize the characteristics and knowledgeÂ of uá¹£Å«l al-fiqhÂ that contained in. There are some important notes: first the thinking of al-ShÄ«razÄ« on uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh is written in the golden era of uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh works, that makes the methods and subjects of thought of al-ShÄ«razÄ« on uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh became inspiration for the next generation. Study of content of uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh is based on the its method of predecessor leaders. This is proved by the dominance of the comparative method which is used when explores uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh of several different leaders view. Second, al-ShÄ«razÄ« included as experts of uá¹£Å«l, which has original thinking and independent. A sharp criticism launched, invite the parties to be impartial towards certain schools of thought. Therefore the presentation of ideas al-ShÄ«razÄ« on uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh is in the sense of kalÄmÄ«, because the arguments are built from elements of kalÄm and prioritize the logic as a tool in assessing and measuring the truthÂ of uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh. Third, al-Luma has fulfilled the basics of science both in ontology, epistemology, and axiology.***Artikel ini bermaksud melakukan kritik epistemologisÂ terhadap Kitab al-Lumaâ€™ yang ditulis oleh AbÅ« Isá¸¥Äq IbrÄhÄ«m al-ShÄ«razÄ«Â al-FayrÅ«z AbÄdÄ« (al-ShÄ«razÄ«). Tulisan ini, secara deskriptif berusaha menggali dan mengkritisi karakteristik dan pengetahuan mengenai ilmu uá¹£Å«l al-fiqhÂ yang terkandung di dalamnya. Beberapa catatan penting terhadap kitab ini adalah: pertama, pemikiran uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh al-ShÄ«razÄ« dalam Kitab al-Lumaâ€™ ditulis pada era keemasan karya-karya uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh, sehingga metode dan pokok-pokok pemikiran uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh al-ShÄ«razÄ« menjadi inspirator generasi berikutnya. Kajian materi uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh didasarkan pada metode para tokoh pendahulunya, terbukti pada dominasi metode komparatif yang digunakan ketika mengetengahkan materi uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh dari beberapa tokoh uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh yang berbeda pandangan. Kedua, al-ShÄ«razÄ« termasuk dalam barisan ahli ushul mutakallimin yang mempunyai pemikiran orisinil dan merdeka. Kritik tajam yang dilancarkan mengajak para pihak untuk tidak condong terhadap mazhab fikih tertentu. Oleh karena itu penyajian pemikiran uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh al-ShÄ«razÄ« dalam al-Lumaâ€™ lebih bersifat kalamÄ«, karena bangunan argumentasi yang melibatkan unsur-unsur kalam dan mengedepankan logika menjadi alat dalam menilai dan mengukur kebenaranÂ ilmu uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh. Ketiga, al-Lumaâ€™ telah memenuhi dasar-dasar ilmu pengetahuan baik secara ontologi, epistemologi,Â maupun aksiologi.***Keywords: uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh, al-Lumaâ€™, epistemologi,Â al-ShÄ«razÄ«

PLURALITAS AGAMA SEBAGAI MEDIA INTEGRASI SOSIAL (Ikhtiar Memperkokoh Persatuan Dan Kesatuan Bangsa) Tajrid, Amir
RELIGIA Vol 12 No 2: Oktober 2009
Publisher : IAIN Pekalongan

At present, religious community faces big theological challenge in defining themselves in religious plurality. In Indonesian context, the biggest theological challenge sometimes happens in internal religious community. In this context, it is also understood that the meetings among religious figures to dialogue their communities’ problems. At individual level, their relationship seems harmony, but at theological level, it still experiences big enough obstacle, either at religious elite or laity. At this level, religious truth is conditioned be something absolute and not plural. Therefore, religious plurality view becomes something urgent as a medium of social integration in consolidating framework of nation unity

KEBENARAN HEGEMONIK AGAMA Tajrid, Amir
Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan Vol 20, No 1 (2012): Fundamentalisme Agama
Publisher : LP2M - Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/ws.20.1.190

Anarchic violence against jamaah Ahmadiyah and “Aliansi Kebangsaan untuk Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan (AKKBB)” by Front Pembela Islam (FPI) constitutes a form of truth claim among religious groups in religious society. The religious interpretation which formerly opened now reduced to become the closed interpretation. The formerly is the substantive interpretation now become the hegemonic interpretation. This is one of the greatest theological challenge facing by religious community. This article will show the patterns of attitude and idea among religious comminity members which stimulate hegemonic truth claim in order to find out the friendly, egalitarian, and tolerant forms of religions, so the hegemonic truth claim of the religion should be avoided.***Kekerasan anarkis yang ditujukan kepada jamaah Ahmadiyah dan “Aliansi Kebangsaan untuk Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan (AKKBB)” oleh Front Pembela Islam (FBI) merupakan bentuk klaim kebenaran di antara kelompok-kelompok agama di dalam masyarakat agama. Interpretasi agama yang sebelumnya terbuka kini menjadi tertutup. Sebelumnya interpretasinya bersifat substantif namun kini menjadi hegemonik. Inilah salah satu tantangan terbesar yang dihadapi oleh komunitas agama saat ini. Artikel ini akan membahas pla sikap dan ide di kalangan anggota komunitas yang mencetuskan klaim kebenaran yang hegemonik dalam rangka untuk menemukan bentuk keberagamaan yang bersahabat, egalitarian, dan toleran sehingga klaim kebenaran hegemonik agama dapat dihindari.

TRADISI WIWITAN - Kajian Simbolik-Hermeneutik terhadap Masyarakat Desa Jetak, Kecamatan Wedung, Demak, Jawa Tengah Tajrid, Amir
Sabda: Jurnal Kajian Kebudayaan Vol 7, No 1: 2012
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/sabda.7.1.19 - 29

Wiwitan tradition of Jetak villagers, Wedung district, Demak Regency, is a value system in a society which is expressed through symbols. These symbols can be viewed as ritual representation containing confidence, sacrifice and hope of peace, balancing between the physical and the spiritual, and fusion of Hindu-Budha elements and Islamic values. Besides, symbols used in stages and processes of wiwitan tradition were means of expressive communication delivered to mean to convey our hopes to God the Almighty.

Tracing the Genealogy of MaqÄá¹£id al-SharÄ«'ah Concept: A Historical Approach Tajrid, Amir
Al-Ahkam Volume 31, Nomor 1, April 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

This paper aims to explore the emergence, continuity and shifting of the meaning of maqÄá¹£id al-sharÄ«â€™ah. Initially, maqÄá¹£id al-sharÄ«â€™ah entered into the study of uá¹£Å«l al-fiqh and later became an independent scientific discipline. Historically, the journey of maqÄá¹£id al-sharÄ«â€™ah has four periods, namely, the pre-codification era, the first development era, the second development era, and the maturation era as a scientific discipline. This paper is qualitative with a descriptive-analytic method, namely exploring the concept of maqÄá¹£id al-sharÄ«â€™ah in various literature. The findings in this paper are, first, the history of the emergence and development of maqÄá¹£id al-sharÄ«â€™ah is closely related to the enforcement of Islamic law. Second, the continuity of maqÄá¹£id al-sharÄ«'ah is an ideological concept because it is based on the prevailing paradigm

KAJIAN EPISTEMOLOGIS ILMU UṢŪL AL-FIQH Studi terhadap Pemikiran Abū Isḥāq Ibrāhīm al-Shīrazī al-Fayrūz Abādī Amir Tajrid
Al-Ahkam Volume 22, Nomor 2, Oktober 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

This article intends to conduct epistemological critique of the the Book “al-Luma” that written by Abū Ibrāhīm al-Shīrazī Isḥāq al-Fayrūz Abādī (al-Shīrazī). This paper, trying to explore and criticize the characteristics and knowledge of uṣūl al-fiqh that contained in. There are some important notes: first the thinking of al-Shīrazī on uṣūl al-fiqh is written in the golden era of uṣūl al-fiqh works, that makes the methods and subjects of thought of al-Shīrazī on uṣūl al-fiqh became inspiration for the next generation. Study of content of uṣūl al-fiqh is based on the its method of predecessor leaders. This is proved by the dominance of the comparative method which is used when explores uṣūl al-fiqh of several different leaders view. Second, al-Shīrazī included as experts of uṣūl, which has original thinking and independent. A sharp criticism launched, invite the parties to be impartial towards certain schools of thought. Therefore the presentation of ideas al-Shīrazī on uṣūl al-fiqh is in the sense of kalāmī, because the arguments are built from elements of kalām and prioritize the logic as a tool in assessing and measuring the truth of uṣūl al-fiqh. Third, al-Luma has fulfilled the basics of science both in ontology, epistemology, and axiology.***Artikel ini bermaksud melakukan kritik epistemologis terhadap Kitab al-Luma’ yang ditulis oleh Abū Isḥāq Ibrāhīm al-Shīrazī al-Fayrūz Abādī (al-Shīrazī). Tulisan ini, secara deskriptif berusaha menggali dan mengkritisi karakteristik dan pengetahuan mengenai ilmu uṣūl al-fiqh yang terkandung di dalamnya. Beberapa catatan penting terhadap kitab ini adalah: pertama, pemikiran uṣūl al-fiqh al-Shīrazī dalam Kitab al-Luma’ ditulis pada era keemasan karya-karya uṣūl al-fiqh, sehingga metode dan pokok-pokok pemikiran uṣūl al-fiqh al-Shīrazī menjadi inspirator generasi berikutnya. Kajian materi uṣūl al-fiqh didasarkan pada metode para tokoh pendahulunya, terbukti pada dominasi metode komparatif yang digunakan ketika mengetengahkan materi uṣūl al-fiqh dari beberapa tokoh uṣūl al-fiqh yang berbeda pandangan. Kedua, al-Shīrazī termasuk dalam barisan ahli ushul mutakallimin yang mempunyai pemikiran orisinil dan merdeka. Kritik tajam yang dilancarkan mengajak para pihak untuk tidak condong terhadap mazhab fikih tertentu. Oleh karena itu penyajian pemikiran uṣūl al-fiqh al-Shīrazī dalam al-Luma’ lebih bersifat kalamī, karena bangunan argumentasi yang melibatkan unsur-unsur kalam dan mengedepankan logika menjadi alat dalam menilai dan mengukur kebenaran ilmu uṣūl al-fiqh. Ketiga, al-Luma’ telah memenuhi dasar-dasar ilmu pengetahuan baik secara ontologi, epistemologi, maupun aksiologi.***Keywords: uṣūl al-fiqh, al-Luma’, epistemologi, al-Shīrazī

Tracing the Genealogy of Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah Concept: A Historical Approach Amir Tajrid
Al-Ahkam Vol 31, No 1 (2021): April
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

This paper aims to explore the emergence, continuity and shifting of the meaning of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah. Initially, maqāṣid al-sharī’ah entered into the study of uṣūl al-fiqh and later became an independent scientific discipline. Historically, the journey of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah has four periods, namely, the pre-codification era, the first development era, the second development era, and the maturation era as a scientific discipline. This paper is qualitative with a descriptive-analytic method, namely exploring the concept of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah in various literature. The findings in this paper are, first, the history of the emergence and development of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah is closely related to the enforcement of Islamic law. Second, the continuity of maqāṣid al-sharī'ah is an ideological concept because it is based on the prevailing paradigm

KEBENARAN HEGEMONIK AGAMA Amir Tajrid
Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan Vol 20, No 1 (2012): Fundamentalisme Agama
Publisher : LP2M - Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/ws.20.1.190

Anarchic violence against jamaah Ahmadiyah and “Aliansi Kebangsaan untuk Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan (AKKBB)” by Front Pembela Islam (FPI) constitutes a form of truth claim among religious groups in religious society. The religious interpretation which formerly opened now reduced to become the closed interpretation. The formerly is the substantive interpretation now become the hegemonic interpretation. This is one of the greatest theological challenge facing by religious community. This article will show the patterns of attitude and idea among religious comminity members which stimulate hegemonic truth claim in order to find out the friendly, egalitarian, and tolerant forms of religions, so the hegemonic truth claim of the religion should be avoided.***Kekerasan anarkis yang ditujukan kepada jamaah Ahmadiyah dan “Aliansi Kebangsaan untuk Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan (AKKBB)” oleh Front Pembela Islam (FBI) merupakan bentuk klaim kebenaran di antara kelompok-kelompok agama di dalam masyarakat agama. Interpretasi agama yang sebelumnya terbuka kini menjadi tertutup. Sebelumnya interpretasinya bersifat substantif namun kini menjadi hegemonik. Inilah salah satu tantangan terbesar yang dihadapi oleh komunitas agama saat ini. Artikel ini akan membahas pla sikap dan ide di kalangan anggota komunitas yang mencetuskan klaim kebenaran yang hegemonik dalam rangka untuk menemukan bentuk keberagamaan yang bersahabat, egalitarian, dan toleran sehingga klaim kebenaran hegemonik agama dapat dihindari.

Title

Found 16 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 16 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 16 Documents
Search