Nur Robiah Nofikusumawati Peni
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Honai Math

Number talks: Comparative insight into undergraduate and graduate student literacy Peni, Nur Robiah Nofikusumawati; Pratiwi, Septia Ayu; Prabowo, Anggit
Journal of Honai Math Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): Journal of Honai Math
Publisher : Universitas Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30862/jhm.v7i3.614

Abstract

Variations in competence and confidence among higher education students in mathematical literacy, numeracy, and logical thinking are crucial for developing critical reasoning, problem-solving skills, and the application of quantitative knowledge in both academic and real-world contexts. However, limited research has explored how students from different academic disciplines vary in their competence, confidence, and challenges related to these fundamental areas. This gap in the literature highlights the need for a comprehensive examination of such variations across diverse higher education fields. This study aims to compare the levels of mathematical literacy, numeracy, and logical thinking among university students, focusing on their knowledge, confidence, and the challenges they face. A comprehensive survey was employed, covering several dimensions of mathematical literacy, such as real-world applications of mathematics, numeracy comprehension, numerical self-confidence, and the role of emotions in logical thinking. Drawing on responses from Indonesian university students, the study reveals that students generally perceive their abilities as moderate to good, though significant differences are evident across academic disciplines and levels of study. A notable correlation was found between the focus of students' academic programs and their mathematics literacy, with certain disciplines demonstrating higher competency levels. The findings highlight the importance of integrating practical applications and emotional intelligence into mathematics education to foster greater confidence, knowledge, and engagement. This research contributes valuable insights into mathematical literacy and proposes new strategies to improve teaching practices and curricula. The comparative analysis offers a broader perspective, essential for shaping future assessments in mathematics, logical reasoning, and numeracy literacy.
Monte Carlo method at the 24 game and its application for mathematics education Fitrianawati, Meita; Aliansyah, Zulhaj; Peni, Nur Robiah Nofikusumawati; Farid, Imam Wahyudi; Hakim, Lukman
Journal of Honai Math Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Journal of Honai Math
Publisher : Universitas Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30862/jhm.v5i2.250

Abstract

Students often find mathematics a challenging subject and turn it into a scourge for them. Game-based learning, such as “24-card game”, help engage students in a self-paced and fun learning process and thus may overcome students’ math anxiety and promote mental math skills. This research aims to examine how the 24-card game works using the Monte Carlo method and the possibility to overcome students' mathematics anxiety. The meta-analysis method was used to explain Monte Carlo’s simulation to solve the solution for all possible combinations of cards in the game and respectively assign difficulty levels. The student's proficiency level was evaluated based on the divergence value in the number of guesses required to solve the dealt combination at 87% to show full proficiency. The evaluation could also show the math difficulty of advanced operations, such as fractions and grouping games. This game is more efficient in developing students' mental math skills compared to a conventional and rigidly structured classroom lecture.