Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

KONSEPSI HUKUM PERDATA INTERNASIONAL DALAM HAK PENGANGKATAN ANAK DI INDONESIA Iffan, Ahmad
El-Sirry: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Sosial Vol 1, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : UIN SYEKH ALI HASAN AHMAD ADDARY PADANGSIDIMPUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/ejhis.v1i2.10505

Abstract

Child adoption is one of the ways that some families want to complete their families. In international adoption there are two global international conventions on child adoption, namely The Hague Convention on the Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Inter-Country Adoption 1993 (The Hague Convention 1993) and The Hague Convention on the Juridiction and Applicable Law and Recognition of Decrees Relating to Adoption 1965 (The Hague Convention 1965). There are legal consequences in the legal consequences of international child adoption on the adopted child, namely legal consequences on the legal relationship between adopted children, legal consequences on alimony rights and legal consequences on inheritance and guardianship rights. the conception of child adoption by hpi is also refined by the provisions contained in civil law and Islamic law regarding child adoption.
JUSTICE IN HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS: INTEGRATING THE CONCEPT OF ISLAMIC JUDICIARY AND THE PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Ahmad Iffan; Mustafid
Muadalah : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Muadalah : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Keluarga (Akhwal Syahsiyyah) IAIN Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47945/muadalah.v5i2.2293

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the concept of justice in Human Rights Courts through the integration of Islamic judicial principles and international legal norms. The research employs a normative-comparative juridical approach by examining primary and secondary legal sources, including international human rights instruments, Islamic legal provisions, and jurisprudential practices of national and international human rights courts. The analysis applies a qualitative and hermeneutic legal method to identify the points of convergence between the two systems in achieving substantive justice. The findings reveal that both Islamic and international legal systems share an ethical foundation centered on human dignity and moral accountability for human rights violations. The integration of these legal traditions strengthens the moral legitimacy and effectiveness of human rights adjudication, particularly in Muslim-majority countries. This research highlights the importance of cross-system legal dialogue in developing a universal paradigm of justice that transcends formal legality and embodies deeper humanistic and spiritual values