Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.195
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Jurist-Diction Jurnal Konstitusi JAPHTN-HAN SOSIO YUSTISIA Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial as-Shahifah JLAS: Journal of Law and Administrative Science Jurnal Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Hukum Administrasi Negara
Aini Shalihah
Universitas Teknologi Surabaya
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Problematika Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pelarangan Pencatatan Nikah Beda Agama Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Habiburrahman, Muhammad; Maskur, Moh.; Shalihah, Aini
Sosio Yustisia: Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): November
Publisher : Magister Hukum Tata Negara Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/sosyus.v3i2.550

Abstract

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia issued a Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 2 of 2023 concerning the Prohibition of Registration of Interfaith Marriages. However, the rules reap the pros and cons. Various international agreements on civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights as well as conventions on the elimination of discrimination against women have given men and women the right and freedom to marry without any religious restrictions. The purpose of this writing will be to answer the formulation of the problem, namely to find out the complexity of recording interfaith marriages from a human rights perspective with material for analysis of the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 of 2023. The research method in this paper uses normative law with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the research show that there is SEMA No. 2 of 2023 guided by the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 (Marriage Law) which has a standard that regulates the complete rejection of the legality of marriage for all religions and beliefs. Even though these various international conventions are contradictory, it needs to be understood that Indonesia has rules regarding marriage which are contained in Law Number 1 of 1974 which should be the main legal rule (lex specialist) in its implementation. Meanwhile, the rules or norms contained in international conventions conflict with Law Number 1 of 1974. Therefore there is no legal problem with the existence of Law No. 1 of 1974 is different from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a fundamental instrument of human rights.
The Future of MK Legal Instruments In Mapping The Study of The Philosophy of Utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham Shalihah, Aini; Khoyyinah, Khoyyinah
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023): October
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2023.13.2.334-351

Abstract

This research analyzes the changes to the Constitutional Court Law in Indonesia, focusing on their socio-political consequences. The research method used is a normative legal methodology, which evaluates the socio-political impact of the changes based on Jeremy Bentham’s theory of utilitarianism. The research considers factors such as the organization and the role of the Constitutional Court, the independence of judges, and the state of democracy in Indonesia. The study shows that the Constitutional Court Law changes have significantly impacted societal welfare, with some parties supporting increased constitutional protection and human rights. In contrast, others are concerned about the potential politicization and reduced effect reduced effectiveness of other democratic institutions. The practical implication of this research is to provide policy recommendations to improve the regulation and implementation of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia to maximize overall public welfare. Keywords: Constitutional Court, Utilitarianism, social welfare.
Kompleksitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Lembaga Negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Shalihah, Aini; Huroiroh, Ernawati
APHTN-HAN Vol 1 No 1 (2022): JAPHTN-HAN, January 2022
Publisher : Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55292/japhtnhan.v1i1.6

Abstract

Penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara yang kewenangannya dilimpahkan oleh Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi, hal ini masih menyisakan tanda tanya serta problematika. Di dalam Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi sendiri masih mengandung multi-interpretasi mengenai frasa lembaga negara. Tidak dijelaskan secara spesifik mengenai lembaga-lembaga negara apa saja yang kemudian menjadi lingkup kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam menyelesaikan sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara. Mengingat bahwa pembahasan lembaga negara di Indonesia itu amat luas, dalam artian tidak hanya ada 1 ataupun 2 lembaga negara saja. Tujuan dari penulisan ini ingin menganalisis tentang bagaimana kompleksitas penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Metode yang dipakai ialah penelitian hukum normatif dengan mengambil pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kompleksitas dalam penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara yaitu dari konsep lembaga-lembaga negara serta optimalisasi dari proses penyelesaiannya. Dalam hal ini, tampaknya undang-undang memberikan keleluasaan bagi hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk menafsirkan apa dan siapa lembaga negara yang dapat bersengketa di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Sehingga melalui Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 08/PMK/2006 hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi memberikan penegasan antara subjectum litis dan objectum litis dalam sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara.
Co-Authors ABD MUNI Ahmad Rifki Mubarak Ahmadi Ernawati Huroiroh fahri Hozaini Fahrizal Nur Mahalli Huroiroh, Ernawati Imam Muslim Khoyyinah Khoyyinah, Khoyyinah Lian Fawahan Lukman Hakim Maskur, Moh. Muhammad Habiburrahman, Muhammad Sujudi, Muhammad