Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Keadilan Substantif Dalam Proses Asset Recovery Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ade Mahmud; Chepi Ali Firman Z; Husni Syawali; Rizki Amrulloh; Weganisa
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v3n2.p227-250

Abstract

The problem of returning assets in cases of corruption act still displays the face of procedural justice and is far from substantive justice, because the value of state losses in many cases are not returned in full and the perpetrator is punished with minor crimes. This study uses a normative juridical approach using secondary data which is analyzed qualitatively because it does not use mathematical formulas and numbers. The urgency of returning assets resulting from criminal acts of corruption is based on the reasons for preventing assets from being used to commit other crimes in the future, the reasonableness that morally the perpetrators of the crime do not deserve to control assets illegally acquired, the priority reasons are based on the valuation of assets controlled by the perpetrator. social rights and reasons of ownership that the state has an interest in taking assets controlled by the perpetrator against the law. The progressive legal model for expropriation of asset recovery takes the form of (a) tracing assets and freezing and confiscating assets of the perpetrator regardless of whether or not they are related to the criminal act of corruption. (b) the application of the burden of proof is reversed. (c) the judge imposes a verdict in the form of a penalty of substitute money without being subject to imprisonment, this decision is based on a guarantee for repayment of replacement money for the assets that have been confiscated. Keywords: Substantive Justice, Asset Recovery. Corruption.
Criminal Response Formulation Policy Distribution News (Hoax) through Social Media Hendral Veno; Chepi Ali Firman; Dey Ravena; Aji Mulyana
Journal La Sociale Vol. 2 No. 6 (2021): Journal La Sociale
Publisher : Borong Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v2i6.495

Abstract

The spread of fake news (hoax) is increasingly prevalent nowadays. Hoax is fake news that often appears on the internet and aims to spread panic and mass fear. Many irresponsible individuals carried out an activity to achieve a goal that can cause unrest, chaos, and disrupt state security. The research objective is to understand the criminal provisions in the ITE Law into conditions that follow the development of the criminal act of spreading hoaxes—knowing the policy formulation in handling the spread of fake news (hoax) through social media in Indonesia in the future. The approach method used in this research is a normative juridical approach. The types of data used in this study are secondary data and primary data. This research is classified as a kind of qualitative research. The results of this study indicate that: The provisions that follow the development of the criminal act of spreading fake news (hoax) are seen from several aspects. First, the factory itself, the second legal factor of law enforcement officers, the third is facilities and infrastructure, fourth, the community factor. In terms of this aspect, the formulation of criminal law in dealing with fake news in the future looks better and more complete, especially in the concept of the Criminal Code, which regulates things that can be convicted regarding fake news and hate speech, the form of fake news and hate speech in cyberspace. The current criminal law policy still has shortcomings, especially in terms of policy formulation.
INFORMED CONSENT AS A THERAPEUTIC AGREEMENT IN HEALTH SERVICES: PERSETUJUAN TINDAKAN KEDOKTERAN SEBAGAI WUJUD PERJANJIAN TERAPEUTIK DALAM UPAYA PELAYANAN KESEHATAN Agus Gede Sutamaya; Dey Ravena; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Interdental Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi (IJKG) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022): Interdental Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi (IJKG)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46862/interdental.v18i1.4306

Abstract

Informed Consent as a legal implication of the general agreement regulated in Article 1320 BW is the embodiment of a therapeutic agreement which is included in the law of engagement, specifically a legal relationship between a number of legal subjects who bind themselves to do or not do something to another party. Therapeutic agreement is an agreement formed because of the legal relationship between doctor and patient. Legal relationship is the relationship between legal subjects or between legal subjects and legal objects, which are regulated by law. The conditions for the occurrence of a legal relationship are the existence of a legal basis, namely the legal regulations governing the relationship and the existence of legal events, namely events that have consequences regulated by law. Before giving medical treatment to the patient, based on Law no. 36 of 2009 concerning Health, Law no. 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice and Menistry of Health No. 585/Menkes/Per/IX/1989 concerning Approval of Medical Action which was later changed to Menistry of Health No. 290/Menkes/Per/III/2008 Regarding Medical Action Approval, doctors must obtain informed consent from their patients for medical treatment, since without that doctors can be legally blamed for their actions. This paper was made to know and understand that the informed consent is a form of therapeutic agreement in the effort of health services.
Pemberian Remisi terhadap Narapidana yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Lapas Sukamiskin dihubungkan dengan Asas Non Diskriminasi dan Persamaan di Muka Hukum dikaitkan dengan Undang-undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1995 tentang Pemasyarakatan Muhammad Akbar; Chepi Ali Firman Z
Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Volume 1, No. 2, Desember 2021, Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum (JRIH)
Publisher : UPT Publikasi Ilmiah Unisba

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (321.04 KB) | DOI: 10.29313/jrih.v1i2.447

Abstract

Abstract. The crime of corruption in Indonesia has become increasingly widespread among thepeople. Law NUMBER 12/1995 explains that prisoners must receive the same treatment but with theestablishment of PP. 99 of 2012 granting remissions to convicts in corruption cases and otherextraordinary crime cases has additional requirements compared to general criminal convicts. Theestablishment of this PP has tightened certain conditions and criteria in granting remissions, thecontents of which must obtain a letter that convicts have collaborated with law enforcement (justicecollaborators) to help dismantle criminal cases committed during investigation. getting difficult.Therefore, the problems studied are directed at identifying the following problems: (1) What are theconsequences of punishment for corruption convicts from the application of granting remissions tocorruption convicts on the principles of non-discrimination and equality before the law; (2) How tofulfill the principle of non-discrimination and equality in the law towards granting remissions forcorruption convicts. Methods This research uses normative juridical research. The researchspecification uses descriptive analysis. Library study data collection techniques, carried out bycollecting secondary data. As well as the analytical method using normative qualitative to connectrelated regulations and legal principles. The result of this research is PP No. 99 of 2012 has tightened,the form of tightening the granting of this remission, is contained in the terms and procedures forgranting it, in which the condition is a willingness to cooperate with law enforcement to dismantle thecriminal case he committed. In article 1 and article 14 which states that one of the rights of prisonersis to get the right to reduce their criminal period, then this should be given to prisoners withoutdiscrimination because prisoners are human beings who have the same rights in the eyes of the lawand the government, including those convicted of corruption cases so that the system punishment inIndonesia is in accordance with the due process of law and does not conflict with human rights. Abstrak. Tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia sudah semakin meluas di kalangan masyarakat. UUNOMOR 12 Tahun 1995 menjelaskan bahwa narapidana harus mendapatkan perlakuan yang samanamun dengan dibentuknya PP No. 99 Tahun 2012 pemberian remisi untuk napi kasus korupsi dankasus extraordinary crime lainnya memiliki persyaratan tambahan dibandingkan napi pidana umum.Dibentuknya PP ini telah melakukan pengetatan dengan syarat dan kriteria tertentu dalam pemberianremisi yang isi dari PP tersebut harus mendapatkan surat bahwa narapidana telah bekerjasama denganpenegak hukum (justice collaborator) untuk membantu membongkar perkara tindak pidana yangdilakukannya pada saat penyidikan.. Sedangkan prosedur pemberiannya, semakin sulit. Oleh karenaitu permasalahan yang dikaji diarahkan kepada identifikasi masalah sebagai berikut: (1) Apa akibatkukum terpidana korupsi dari penerapan pemberian remisi terhadap narapidana korupsi dengan asasnon diskriminasi dan persamaan dimuka hukum; (2) Bagaimana pemenuhan asas non diskriminasidan persamaan di dalam hukum terhadap pemberian remisi narapidana korupsi. Metode Penelitian inimenggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif. Spesifikasi penelitian menggunakan deskriptif analisis.Teknik pengumpulan data studi kepustakaan, dilakukan dengan cara mengumpulkan data sekunder.Serta metode analisis menggunakan kualitatif normatif untuk menghubungkan peraturan-peraturanmaupun asas-asas hukum yang terkait. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah PP No. 99 Tahun 2012 telahmelakukan pengetatan, bentuk dari pengetatan pemberian remisi ini, terdapat dalam syarat maupunprosedur pemberiannya, yang mana syarat tersebut adalah kesediaan untuk bekerjasama denganpenegak hukum untuk membongkar perkara tindak pidana yang dilakukannya. Dalam pasal 1 danpasal 14 yang menyatakan salah satu hak narapidana adalah mendapatkan hak pengurangan masapidana, maka hal tersebut sudah sepatutnya diberikan kepada narapidana tanpa diskriminasi karenanarapidana adalah manusia yang memiliki hak yang sama dimata hukum dan pemerintah, termasukpara terpidana kasus korupsi sehingga sistem pemidanaan di indonesia telah sesuai dengan dueprocces of law dan tidak bertentangan dengan Hak asasi Manusia
Analisis Putusan Hakim Penggelapan di PT. X Dihubungkan dengan KUHP Bunga Tania Putri; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Volume 2, No. 1, Juli 2022, Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum (JRIH)
Publisher : UPT Publikasi Ilmiah Unisba

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (97.928 KB) | DOI: 10.29313/jrih.v2i1.956

Abstract

Abstract. Acts of embezzlement always exist and even tend to increase and develop in society as the times progress. In developing countries meeting the economic needs of the community also develops, the higher it is, the higher the risk of crime. Article 372 of the Criminal Code (Criminal Code) on The Crime of Embezzlement seems to still lack to make perpetrators afraid and make them deterrent. The method used in this research is a juridical-empirical research method by conducting sociological legal research and can also be called field research, which is to examine the provisions of applicable law and what happens in reality in society using primary, secondary and tertiary legal material research sources. Therefore, the results of the study showed that in the ruling the judge mistakenly sentenced the defendants by using the provisions in article 374 of the Criminal Code (Criminal Code) while the article more relevant to the case was article 372 of the Criminal Code (Criminal Code) on The Crime of Embezzlement. Therefore, the purpose of the law in fulfilling the elements of justice, expediency and legal certainty has not been fully realized in this case. Abstrak. Perbuatan penggelapan selalu ada bahkan cenderung meningkat dan berkembang di dalam masyarakat seiring kemajuan zaman. Dalam Negara berkembang pemenuhan kebutuhan ekonomi masyarakat ikut berkembang, semakin tingginya itu maka semakin tinggi pula resiko terjadinya kejahatan. Pasal 372 Kitab Undang–Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) tentang Tindak Pidana Penggelapan nampaknya masih kurang untuk membuat pelaku menjadi takut dan membuat mereka jera. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian Yuridis-Empiris dengan melakukan penelitian hukum sosiologis dan dapat disebut pula dengan penelitian lapangan, yaitu mengkaji ketentuan hukum yang berlaku serta apa yang terjadi dalam kenyataan di masyarakat dengan menggunakan sumber-sumber penelitian bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Maka dari itu hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dalam putusan tersebut hakim keliru menjatuhkan hukuman kepada para terdakwa dengan menggunakan ketentuan pada pasal 374 Kitab Undang–Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) sedangkan pasal yang lebih relevan dengan kasusnya adalah pasal 372 Kitab Undang–Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) tentang Tindak Pidana Penggelapan. Oleh karena itu tujuan hukum dalam pemenuhan unsur keadilan, kemanfaatan serta kepastian hukum belum terwujud sepenuhnya dalam kasus ini.
Kebijakan Formulasi Pemberian Remisi Yang Berorientasi Pada Kepentingan Narapidana Kasus Korupsi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Narapidana Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Aktualita : Jurnal Hukum Volume 1 No. 1 (Juni) 2018
Publisher : Universitas Islam Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (287.565 KB) | DOI: 10.29313/aktualita.v1i1.3711

Abstract

Salah satu tugas dari sistem pemasyarakatan, adalah memberikan pelayanan dan perlindungan terhadap hak-hak narapidana, diantaranya hak untuk mendapatkan remisi, yang diberikan kepada Narapidana dan Anak Pidana. Berkaitan dengan remisi untuk narapidana kasus korupsi, diatur dalam PP Nomor 99 Tahun 2012. Pemberlakuan PP ini menimbulkan pro kontra, karena dianggap memperberat syarat untuk pemberian remisi bagi narapidana yang melakukan tindak pidana berat seperti terorisme, narkotika, dan korupsi. Akibat adanya pro kontra ini, timbul keinginan dari Kemenkumham untuk merevisi PP tersebut, karena dianggap memperberat syarat pemberian remisi.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Pelecehan Seksual Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 2014 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Adela Berliana Nugraha; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (64.145 KB) | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v2i2.2529

Abstract

Abstract. The crime of sexual harassment is a dangerous problem in social life, because it is not only a physical and psychological burden on the victim, the crime of sexual harassment is a problem that also burdens the state. This crime of decency and sexual harassment has reached a very complex stage, disturbing and worrying the community. However, looking at the facts on the ground which show that sexual harassment crimes that occur in Indonesia where the victim is the weakest position are often used as perpetrators in other crimes, therefore the purpose of this study is to find out how the optimal legal protection for victims is by regulation and practice. This study uses a normative juridical research method with the nature of the research using analytical descriptive with secondary data obtained through literature study or documentation study. Then, all data and information were processed using qualitative data analysis. The research approach used is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that suppressing legal protection for victims of criminal acts of sexual harassment optimally in practice becomes an urgency, given the rise of cases of sexual violence in Indonesia. Optimal law enforcement to protect victims of sexual violence is Article 5 of Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims, and also entitled to medical assistance, rehabilitation, compensation and restitution. Abstrak. Tindak pidana kekerasan seksual merupakan suatu persoalan yang sangat serius dalam kehidupan bermasyarakrat, karena selain menjadi beban fisik dan psikis terhadap korban, tindak pidana pelecehan seksual ini merupakan persoalan yang juga membebani negara. Kejahatan kesusilaan dan pelecehan seksual ini sudah sampai pada tahap begitu kompleks, meresahkan serta mencemaskan masyarakat. Namun, melihat fakta lapangan yang menunjukan bahwa kejahatan pelecehan seksual yang terjadi di Indonesia yang mana korbannya adalah posisi yang paling lemah sering dijadikan sebagai pelaku dalam tindak pidana lain, oleh karena itu tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana perlindungan hukum yang optimal bagi korban secara regulasi dan praktik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan sifat penelitian menggunakan deskriptif analitis dengan data sekunder diperoleh melalui cara studi kepustakaan atau studi dokumentasi. Kemudian, seluruh data dan informasi diolah dengan menggunakan analisis data kualitatif. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang- undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pengekan perlindungan hokum terhadap korban tindak pidana pelecehan seksual yang optimal secara praktik menjadi suatu hal yang urgensi, mengingat maraknya kasus kekerasan seksual di Indonesia. Penegakan hokum yang optimal melindungi korban kekerasan seksual terdapat Pasal 5 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan korban, serta juga berhak mendapatkan sebuah bantuan medis, rehabiltasi, kompensasi dan juga restitusi.
Tinjauan Yuridis Pemidanaan Sanksi Pidana terhadap Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan yang Dilakukan oleh Kelompok Geng Motor Ramadhan Zaky Alfath; Chepi Ali Firman Z
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (47.447 KB) | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v2i2.2562

Abstract

Abstract. Decision making is needed by the judge in determining the decision to be handed down to the defendant. In making a criminal decision, the judge must consider the purpose of the punishment itself, which is to make the perpetrators of criminal acts a deterrent and will not repeat their actions again. Based on Article 10 of the Criminal Code, we can know that Indonesia adheres to the combined theory because of the imprisonment which is included in the theory relatively because existence repair self, and also existence criminal die included into the theory revenge because existence element retaliation. In the case on decision No.15/Pid.B/2020/PN Smd about act criminal persecution by motorcycle gangs. Weakness indictment prosecutor general who gives Article 170 (1) of the Criminal Code with sentence of 7 (seven) months confinement imprisonment and charged a court fee of Rp. 5,000.00 (five thousand rupiah), this is very not enough effective should prosecutor general can give punishment more heavy from indictment should be, because when seen from real facts that abuse committed Defendant Andi Sopyan Alias Bool Bin Hamid is wrong one act criminal persecution with blatantly and with power together use violence against people or goods. With dropping criminal the no will give effect deterrent to the perpetrator, and lack of pressure to society not to to do act criminal the and also repair self to perpetrator not enough maximum. Abstrak. Pengambilan keputusan sangat diperlukan oleh hakim dalam menentukan putusan yang akan dijatuhkan kepada terdakwa. Dalam menjatuhkan putusan pidana, hakim harus mempertimbangkan tujuan dari pemidanaan itu sendiri, yaitu membuat pelaku tindak pidana jera dan tidak akan mengulangi perbuatannya lagi. Berdasarkan Pasal 10 KUHP dapat kita ketahui bahwa Indonesia menganut teori gabungan dikarenakan adanya pidana penjara yang dimana itu termasuk ke dalam teori relatif karena adanya perbaikan diri, dan juga adanya pidana mati yang termasuk kedalam teori pembalasan dikarenakan adanya unsur pembalasan. Dalam kasus perkara pada putusan No.15/Pid.B/2020/PN Smd tentang tindak pidana penganiayaan yang dilakukan oleh kelompok geng motor. Lemahnya dakwaan penuntut umum yang memberikan pasal 170 (1) KUHP dengan hukuman 7 (tujuh) bulan kurungan penjara dan dibenbankan biaya perkara sebesar Rp.5.000,00 (lima ribu rupiah), hal ini sangat kurang efektif seharusnya penuntut umum bisa memberikan hukuman lebih berat dari dakwaan seharusnya, karena bila dilihat dari fakta-fakta yang sebenarnya bahwa penganiayaan yang dilakukan terdakwa Andi Sopyan Alias Bool Bin Hamid adalah salah satu tindak pidana penganiayaan dengan terang-terangan dan dengan tenaga bersama menggunakan kekerasan terhadap orang atau barang. Dengan penjatuhan pidana tersebut tidak akan memberikan efek jera kepada pelaku, dan kurangnya tekanan terhadap masyarakat agar tidak melakukan tindak pidana tersebut dan juga perbaikan diri terhadap pelaku kurang maksimal.
Hak terhadap Korban Perdagangan Orang Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban Evand Hadi Adiwena; Chepi Ali Firman Z
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (54.817 KB) | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v2i2.2566

Abstract

Abstract. The Crime of Trafficking in Persons is a serious crime that violates Human Rights. Due to the difficulty of finding employment opportunities, as well as the dense population of human resources, as well as the low level of education, there are many victims of the crime of trafficking in persons. The Crime of Trafficking in Persons is regulated in Law No. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons. Victims are people who suffer physical, mental or economic loss. In Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 it is stated that victims have the right to be protected. In the case of the decision Number 536/PID.B/2019/PN.BDG the issues to be discussed are the protection, as well as the victim's right to obtain their rights which have been regulated in Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law Number 13 2006. What are the rights of victims and how are legal considerations by the judge during the trial. Based on research from decision Number 536/PID.B/2019/PN.BDG, the problems in this study are 1) Whether the rights of the victim are fulfilled or not or the victim has been treated properly according to the relevant law. And 2) the legal protection by the judge is in accordance with what the defendant did or not? The results of this study are based on facts in the trial, namely the panel of judges did not mention the rights of the victim, because Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 states that if the victim wants to get his rights, the victim must submit his initiative to the LPSK ( Witness and Victim Protection Agency). Abstrak. Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang merupakan kejahatan berat yang melanggar Hak Asasi Manusia. Karena sulitnya mencari lapangan pekerjaan, serta padatnya populasi sumber daya manusia juga masih rendahnya pendidikan menjadikan banyaknya korban tindak pidana perdagangan orang. Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang diatur dalam Undang-Undang No 21 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Korban adalah orang yang mengalami penderitaan fisik, mental atau kerugian ekonomi. Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 disebutkan jika korban memiliki hak untuk dilindungi. Dalam perkara pada putusan Nomor 536/PID.B/2019/PN.BDG permasalahan yang akan di bahas adalah perlindungan,serta hak korban untuk mendapatkan haknya yang telah diatur dalam Undang Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006. Bagaimana hak korban serta bagaimana pertimbangan hukum oleh hakim selama di persidangan. Berdasarkan penelitian dari putusan Nomor 536/PID.B/2019/PN.BDG maka permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah 1) Apakah hak korban terpenuhi atau tidak atau korban sudah diperlakukan semestinya sesuai Undang-Undang yang terkait. Dan 2) Perlindungan hukum oleh hakim sudah sesuai dengan apa yang terdakwa lakukan atau tidak? Hasil penelitian ini berdasarkan fakta dalam persidangan yaitu Majelis hakim tidak menyinggung tentang hak korban,karena dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 menyebutkan jika korban ingin mendapatkan haknya maka korban harus mengajukan dengan inisiatifnya pada LPSK (Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban).
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pelaku Penggelapan Mobil Leasing Dihubungkan dengan Pasal 372 KUHP tentang Penggelapan Farhan Ednur Satria; Chepi Ali Firman
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (58.252 KB) | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v2i2.4669

Abstract

Abstract. Decision Number 668/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Tjk is an example of a car embezzlement case that was credited from PT. U FINANCE INDONESIA criminal liability in the credit agreement is imposed on the party who deliberately takes the action as described in Article 372 of the Criminal Code. The purpose of this study is to understand criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of embezzlement of leasing cars related to article 372 of the Criminal Code concerning embezzlement and the prevention of perpetrators of embezzlement of leasing cars associated with article 372 of the Criminal Code concerning embezzlement. To achieve this goal, it is carried out using normative juridical methods, descriptive analysis data collection techniques, literature studies using secondary data, and normative analysis. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that an act against the law can be said to be embezzlement if it fulfills the elements of Article 372 of the Criminal Code, namely whoever, intentionally, against the right/against the law takes something that wholly or partly belongs to another person, who is in his power not because of the crime. The application of criminal law is one of the efforts to overcome crime. Crime prevention efforts need to be taken with a policy approach, namely a combination of crime prevention efforts with penalties (after it occurs) and (before it occurs). Criminal tackling or criminal policies are divided into penal efforts and non-penal efforts, penal efforts are repressive efforts (suppression/eradication/suppression) after a crime has occurred, while non-penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that focus more on efforts to prevent crime. efforts that are preventive in nature (prevention/deterrence/control) before the crime occurs. Abstrak. Putusan Nomor 668/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Tjk merupakan contoh kasus penggelapan mobil yang dikredit dari PT. U FINANCE INDONESIA maka Pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam perjanjian kredit dikenakan pada pihak yang dengan sengeja melakukan tindakan sebagaimana dijelaskan dalam Pasal 372 KUHP. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap pelaku penggelapan mobil leasing dihubungkan dengan pasal 372 KUHP tentang penggelepan dan penanggulangan terhadap pelaku penggelapan mobil leasing dihubungkan dengan pasal 372 KUHP tentang penggelapan. Untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, teknik pengumpulan data deskriptif analisis, studi kepustakaan yang menggunakan data sekunder, serta analisis normatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa, perbuatan melawan hukum dapat dikatakan sebagai penggelapan apabila memenuhi unsur Pasal 372 KUHP yaitu barang siapa, dengan sengaja, melawan hak/melawan hukum mengambil barang sesuatu yang seluruhnya atau sebagian adalah kepunyaan orang lain, yang ada dalam kuasanya bukan karena kejahatan. Penerapan hukum pidana merupakan salah satu upaya penanggulangan kejahatan. Upaya penanggulangan kejahatan perlu ditempuh dengan pedekatan kebijakan, yaitu perpaduan antara upaya penanggulangan kejahatan dengan penal (sesudah terjadi) dan (sebelum terjadi). Penanggulangan pidana atau kebijakan kriminal dibagi menjadi upaya penal dan upaya non-penal, upaya penal adalah upaya–upaya yang sifatnya repressive (penindasan/pemberantasan/penumpasan) sesudah kejahat terjadi, sedangkan upaya non-penal merupakan upaya penanggulangan kejahatan yang lebih menitikberatkan pada upaya-upaya yang sifatnya preventif (pencegahan/penangkalan/pengendalian) sebelum kejahatan tersebut terjadi.