Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Penegakan Hukum Perdagangan Orang (Human Trafficking) Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Adam Rizky Febriansyah; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v3i1.5107

Abstract. In this era of globalization, the development of crime (crime) is increasingly widespread and new types of crimes are emerging, one of which is trafficking in persons. This study aims to find out how to enforce the law on trafficking in persons and how to apply criminal sanctions for victims of trafficking in persons in accordance with Law No. 21 of 2007 where this case of trafficking in persons has been going on for a long time and also with new modes that people rarely encounter. This is very detrimental to both human rights and dignity, which we should and should respect to the highest degree of such rights and dignity. This research uses an approach method, this research uses a normative juridical approach. Normative juridical research is a problem approach by reviewing the laws and regulations. The application of sanctions to the criminal act of trafficking in persons in which the act is a special crime the provisions regarding the prohibition have been regulated in the Criminal Code, Article 297.298, and in its later development it has been regulated in Law no. 21 of 2007, and violated Law No. 26 of 2000 concerning human rights violations because the act was a violation of humanity. Legal protection for victims of human trafficking is increasingly gaining its position with the ratification of Law no. 21 of 2007 in Articles 43 to 53, the provisions for the protection of victims are carried out based on Law no. 13 of 2006 which regulates the rights of victims of the crime of trafficking in persons. Trafficking in persons is a behavior that deviates from the norms that exist in a social system because trafficking in persons includes a series of complex problems and sensitive issues. The pattern or mode used in trafficking in persons begins with manipulative stages, promising potential victims with high salary without being told the type of risk of the job. Abstrak. Di era globalisasi ini, perkembangan kejahatan (tindak pidana) semakin marak dan bermunculan jenis-jenis kejahatan baru salah satunya adalah perdagangan orang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana penegakan hukum perdagangan orang dan bagaimana penerapan sanksi pidana bagi korban perdagangan orang sesuai dengan Undang-Undang no 21 Tahun 2007 dimana kasus perdagangan orang ini sudah berlangsung lama dan juga dengan modus-modus baru yang jarang sekali masyarakat jumpai juga banyak sekali merugikan baik hak maupun martabat manusia yang seharusnya dan sepatutnya kita hargai setinggi-tinggi nya hak dan martabat tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan, penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. Penelitian yuridis normatif adalah pendekatan masalah dengan melakukan tinjauan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangannya. Penerapan sanksi pada tindak pidana perdagangan orang yang dimana bahwa perbuatan tersebut termasuk tindak pidana khusus ketentuan mengenai larangan tersebut sudah diatur dalam KUHP, Pasal 297,298, dan dalam perkembanganya kemudian sudah diatur dalam UU No. 21 Tahun 2007, dan melanggar UU No.26 Tahun 2000 Tentang pelangaran HAM karena perbuatan tersebut termasuk pelanggaran terhadap kemanusiaan. Perlindungan hukum bagi korban perdangan orang pun semakin mendapatkan posisinya dengan disahkannya UU No. 21 Tahun 2007 dalam Pasal 43 sampai Pasal 53, ketentuan perlidungan pada korban tersebut dilaksanakan berdasarkan UU No. 13 Tahun 2006 yang di dalamnya mengatur hak-hak korban tindak pidana perdagangan orang. Perdagangan orang adalah suatu perilaku yang menyimpang dari norma-norma yang ada dalam suatu system sosial karena perdagangan orang mencakup serangkaian masalah yang kompleks dan isu isu sensitive, Pola atau modus yang dipergunakan dalam perdagangan orang di awali dengan tahap-tahap manipulatif, menjajikan calon korban dengan gaji yang tinggi tanpa diberitahukan jenis resikon nya.

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Korban Pelecehan Seksual dalam Perspektif Keadilan Restoratif Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria; Ade Mahmud; Aji Mulyana
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 1 (2023): March Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.59-70

Sexual violence against child is a global problem today. Although international instruments have been ratified, they do not guarantee the realization of the rights of child victims. One reason is that not all countries’ legal systems support victims. The principles of redress for victims of child sexual violence are set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Convention recognizes the principle of non-discrimination, the best interests of the child, child survival and development, and values Child opinions. The problem you encountered is related to 1) your security system. 2). Reintegration, psychosocial support, treatment and recovery, protection and support in court proceedings. A model of restorative justice that protects the rights of victims of child sexual violence can use the victim-offender mediation model. This model provides an opportunity for communities to come together and find solutions together when offenders are willing to admit their mistakes and take responsibility according to the needs of the victim’s child. The implications of this research are hoped to make a real contribution to the nation by providing better protection for children who are victims of sexual violence and reducing the trauma they experience.

Reevaluation and Reorientation of the Philosophy of Retributive Justice to Restorative Justice in Imposing Criminal Sanctions Padlilah Padlilah; Dey Ravena; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria; Aji Mulyana
Journal La Sociale Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Journal La Sociale
Publisher : Borong Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v4i2.786

In the last few decades, there has been a paradigm shift in the provision of criminal sanctions from retributive justice to restorative justice. Retributive justice assumes that criminal punishment must be based on the concept of revenge and retribution for the mistakes made by the perpetrator, while restorative justice emphasizes recovery for the victim and repairing the damaged relationship between the perpetrator and the victim. This study discusses the re-evaluation and reorientation of the philosophy of retributive justice to restorative justice in imposing criminal sanctions, as well as the purpose of punishment itself. This article presents the history and basic concepts of both types of justice, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. In addition, this research also discusses the application of restorative justice in sentencing practices and how this approach can help improve the relationship between perpetrators and victims, as well as prevent crimes from occurring in the future. By examining and considering both approaches, this research can help improve the existing penal system to achieve goals that are more effective and fairer for all parties involved in the sentencing process.

Settlement of Traffic Offences: A Shift in the Presumption of Innocence and the Impact on Legal Justice Beny Harkat; Nandang Sambas; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Journal La Sociale Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Journal La Sociale
Publisher : Borong Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v5i3.1175

Traffic offences are a serious issue in Indonesia, creating complex challenges for the justice system and social costs. Although Law No. 22/2009 has defined the rules, the high number of accidents and offences indicates the ineffectiveness of law enforcement. This study aims to investigate the impact of traffic offences on legal justice, the effectiveness of sanctions, and the shifting presumption of innocence in Indonesia. The research methodology included both quantitative and qualitative approaches, involving analyses of accident data and interviews with authorities. The results showed a high number of offences, a lack of effectiveness of Law No. 22 of 2009, and the phenomenon of "peace in place." The implementation of ETLE cameras became an alternative, despite internet access constraints. Perma No. 12/2016 changed the judicial process, moving from a presumption of innocence to a presumption of guilt. This shift provides uniform sanctions without considering individual circumstances. The limitation of violators' rights in ticket hearings violates the principle of justice. The implementation of e-ticket technology shows advantages, but the dependence on the internet and the potential for misuse are obstacles. The shift to the presumption of innocence in the Perma raises doubts about the fairness of the justice system. Improving fairness requires a re-evaluation of the application of sanctions, technological improvements, and a deeper understanding of the rights of offenders. These recommendations are expected to improve the justice system related to traffic offences in Indonesia.

Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Pelaku Penganiayaan Oleh Anak Dibawah Umur di Kabupaten Cilacap Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Doni Sonjaya; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.9782

Abstrak. Dengan mengacu pada Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, skripsi ini menyelidiki pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku penganiayaan oleh anak di bawah umur di Kabupaten Cilacap. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mempelajari perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada anak pelaku penganiayaan dan bagaimana hal ini berdampak pada tindakan pidana yang dijatuhkan. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan konseptual. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui penelitian kepustakaan dan pemeriksaan dokumen perundang-undangan yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak memungkinkan anak-anak berusia antara 12 dan 18 tahun untuk dijatuhi pidana atas tindak pidana penganiayaan. Namun, pidana yang dijatuhkan terhadap anak memiliki batasan maksimum yang lebih rendah daripada pidana yang dijatuhkan terhadap orang dewasa. Penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum anak yang menjadi korban kekerasan harus diperkuat. Anak seringkali menjadi korban kekerasan, termasuk kekerasan oleh sesama anak sebaya, meskipun hak-hak anak telah diakui secara nasional. Penelitian ini menyelidiki kasus penganiayaan di lingkungan pendidikan di SMP Negeri 2 Cimanggu di Kabupaten Cilacap, di mana sekelompok siswa menganiaya seorang siswa lainnya. Korban mengalami cedera parah akibat penganiayaan tersebut. Sangat penting untuk melindungi anak-anak sebagai korban dan pelaku kekerasan. Untuk menangani kasus penganiayaan terhadap anak di bawah umur, Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 telah dibuat. Namun, perlu ada peningkatan komprehensif dalam perlindungan hukum terhadap anak untuk memastikan pertumbuhan dan perkembangan yang optimal serta mencegah penganiayaan oleh anak sebayanya. Abstract. By referring to the Criminal Code and Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, this thesis investigates the criminal responsibility of perpetrators who are permitted by minors in Cilacap Regency. The aim of this research is to study the legal protection provided to children who commit crimes and how this impacts the criminal actions imposed. This normative legal research uses a statutory and context approach. The data used is secondary data collected through library research and examination of relevant statutory and regulatory documents. The results of the research show that Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System allows children aged between 12 and 18 years to be sentenced to criminal sentences on authority. However, penalties imposed on children have a lower maximum limit than penalties imposed on adults. This research also shows that legal protection for children who are victims of violence must be strengthened. National children are often victims of violence, including violence perpetrated by peers, even though children's rights have been recognized.

Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan terhadap Anak Secara Bersama-Sama yang Mengakibatkan Mati (Studi Putusan Nomor 262/Pid.B/2021/Pn Bandung) Defid Firdausa Poer; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.9791

Abstract. Child abuse is a deprivation of human rights. In essence, every child has the right to survive, grow, and develop and is entitled to protection from violence and discrimination. Decision number 262/Pid.B/2021/PN.Bdg. due to differences in perception that occur in the judicial process so that judges pay more attention to things that relieve the perpetrator rather than the suffering experienced by the victim. There are several things that need to be studied comprehensively in the crime of child abuse, which results in death, especially in the realization of substantive justice that must be obtained by the victim based on the decision of the panel of judges. The purpose of this research is to find out and understand the analysis of the judge's considerations and the fulfillment of substantive justice for perpetrators of violent crimes committed jointly that resulted in death. Normative juridical approach method, data collection techniques using library research, and qualitative descriptive data analysis methods. The results of this research show that the judge has carried out juridical considerations in the form of in-depth considerations in Article 80, Paragraph 3, of Law Number 35 of 2014; in non-juridical considerations, the panel of judges has carried out several considerations from the defendant's side in the form of mitigating circumstances, but it should be possible. The weight was given because Defendant II is an adult and legally competent, knows the consequences of the actions he committed, and also as a preventive measure so that in the future a similar case does not occur. Then, because there is no jurisprudence, doctrine, or theoretical basis and no legal values that exist in society in making decisions, the decision does not reflect the standard of a good and comprehensive decision in terms of substantive justice, which has consequences for the considerations made by the Panel of Judges that lack solid foundations in terms of belief. judge, legal doctrine, which provides information on the truth, and the sociological basis of living legal values to support the basic principles of the judge's considerations. Abstrak. Penganiayaan terhadap anak merupakan perampasan terhadap hak asasi manusia. Hakikatnya setiap anak berhak atas kelangsungan hidup, tumbuh dan berkembang serta berhak atas perlindungan dari kekerasan dan diskriminasi. Putusan nomor 262/Pid.B/2021/PN.Bdg. atas perbedaan persepsi yang terjadi dalam proses peradilan sehingga hakim lebih memperhatikan hal yang meringankan pelaku daripada penderitaan yang dialami korban. Ada beberapa hal yang perlu dikaji secara komprehensif dalam kejahatan penganiayaan terhadap anak yang mengakibatkan kematian terkhusus dalam perwujudan keadilan substantif yang harus didapatkan oleh korban atas putusan majelis hakim. Tujuan dari Penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan memahami analisis pertimbangan hakim dan pemenuhan keadilan substantif terhadap pelaku tindak pidana kekerasan yang dilakukan secara bersama-sama yang mengakibatkan kematian. Metode pendekatan yuridis normatif, teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan penelitian kepustakaan, dan metode analisis data deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah Hakim telah melakukan pertimbangan secara yuridis berupa pertimbangan mendalam pada pasal 80 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014, kemudian dalam pertimbangan non yuridis majelis hakim melakukan beberapa pertimbangan dari sisi terdakwa berupa keadaan yang meringankan, namun seharusnya bisa diberikan pemberatan karena terdakwa II sudah dewasa dan cakap hukum, mengetahui konsekuensi atas perbuatan yang dilakukan, juga sebagai langkah preventif agar di kemudian hari tidak terjadi perkara serupa. Kemudian, karena tidak ditemukannya yurisprudensi, doktrin, atau dasar teori, dan nilai-nilaiihukum yang ada di masyarakatidalam membuat keputusan, makaiputusan tersebut kurangimencerminkan standariputusan yang baik danikomprehensif dariisegi keadilan substantif yang memiliki konsekuensi padaipertimbangan-pertimbangan yang dibuatioleh Majelis iHakim kurang imendapatkan ilandasan kuatidari segi keyakinan hakim, Doktrinihukum yangimemberikan informasiikebenaran, dasarisosiologis tentanginilai-nilai hukum yang hidup guna mendukungidasaripertimbangan hakim.

Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Penyidik Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia terhadap Tindakan Salah Tangkap (Error In Persona) Disertai Penganiayaan terhadap Anak Fauziah Balqis Sitorus; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.9875

Kepolisian Republik Indonesia merupakan pemerintahan negara yang berfungsi untuk menjaga ketertiban, keamanan dalam lingkungan masyarakat, mengayomi dan melayani masyarakat. Kepolisian adalah lembaga yang diberi wewenang oleh negara dalam penegakan hukum. Penyidik adalah pejabat yang diberi wewenang oleh undang-undang untuk melakukan proses penyidikan. Tindakan salah tangkap atau kekeliruan pada saat proses penangkapan sudah beberapa kali terjadi. Seperti yang terjadi pada dua siswa SMA di Pasangkayu, Sulawesi Barat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pertanggungajwaban hukum penyidik Kepolisian Republik Indonesia terhadap tindakan salah tangkap yang disertai penganiayaan terhadap anak serta perlindungan bagi anak yang menjadi korban salah tangkap atau error in persona yang terjadi di Pasangkayu Sulawesi Barat ditinjau dengan Undang-undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Metode yang penulis gunakan adalah metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. Penelitian yuridis normatif adalah pendekatan pada tinjauan terhadap perundang-undangannya. Pertanggungjawaban hukum yang diberikan kepada penyidik terhadap tindakan salah tangkap disertai penganiayaan akan menjalankan sidang kode etik profesi kepolisian, serta perlindungan hukum yang diberikan pada anak berupa bantuan hukum dan bantuan lainnya. The Indonesian National Police is a state government that functions to maintain order, security in the community, protect and serve the community. The police are institutions authorized by the state in law enforcement. Investigators are officials authorized by law to carry out the investigation process. Wrongful arrests or mistakes during the arrest process have occurred several times. As happened to two high school students in Pasangkayu, West Sulawesi. This study aims to determine how the legal responsibility of investigators of the Indonesian National Police for wrongful arrest accompanied by persecution of children and protection for children who are victims of wrongful arrest or error in persona that occurred in Pasangkayu, West Sulawesi in review with Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection. The method that the author uses is a normative juridical approach. Normative juridical research is an approach to the review of the legislation. Legal responsibility given to investigators for wrongful arrest accompanied by persecution will carry out a police professional code of ethics hearing, as well as legal protection provided to children in the form of legal aid and other assistance.

Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Pidana Ujaran Kebencian Atas Nama Terdakwa Habib Bahar Bin Smith Andika Pradipta Putra W; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.10170

Abstract. The development of information and communication technology has led to increasingly open opportunities for individuals to interact with others on social media. But not infrequently comments on social media often lead to giving blasphemy or hate speech to an individual or other group that can cause polemics between individuals or groups, one of which is BAHAR bin SMITH. BAHAR bin SMITH was submitted to the Bandung District Court by JPU, alleging that he had committed hate speech during his lecture in December 2021 in Margaasih District, Bandung Regency in commemoration of the Birthday of the Prophet Muhammad SAW. Some of the content of his lecture was provocative, containing hate speech against the government to the Indonesian Police institution, which actually Habib Rizieq was punished not for commemorating the Birthday of the Prophet Muhammad SAW, however, due to violations of the Health Process in Petamburan and the Bogor Hospital Swab case. As for the death of 6 FPI fighters, the actual facts from the Visum et Repertum Results, the death of 6 FPI fighters, due to 2 gunshot wounds, there were no injuries due to persecution due to having their nails removed, skinned, and their genitals burned. This study aims to know, study, and analyze whether the acts committed by the accused BAHAR bin SMITH meet the criteria for hate speech; The specifics of the research on this case are descriptive analytical, with the method of juridical-normative approach, the analysis is qualitative juridical. Legal considerations that handed down a verdict on hate speech against this act, BAHAR bin SMITH has been sentenced by the Bandung District Court to imprisonment for 6 months and 15 days, as referred to in the Bandung District Court decision Number 220/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Bdg dated August 16, 2022 which was later corrected by the Bandung High Court to 7 months as referred to in the Court decision. Abstrak. Perkembangan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi memungkinkan individu berinteraksi di media sosial, namun seringkali muncul komentar yang bersifat hujatan atau ujaran kebencian, seperti dalam kasus BAHAR bin SMITH. BAHAR bin SMITH dihadapkan ke Pengadilan Negeri Bandung karena dianggap melakukan ujaran kebencian dalam ceramahnya pada peringatan Maulid Nabi Muhammad SAW di Margaasih, Kabupaten Bandung, Desember 2021.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai apakah tindakan BAHAR bin SMITH memenuhi kriteria ujaran kebencian dengan pendekatan yuridis-normatif dan analisis kualitatif. Ceramahnya dianggap provokatif karena berisi ujaran kebencian terhadap pemerintah dan kepolisian terkait kasus Habib Rizieq dan kematian 6 laskar FPI.Pengadilan Negeri Bandung menjatuhkan hukuman 6 bulan 15 hari, yang diperbaiki Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung menjadi 7 bulan. Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan hukum yang mendukung putusan tersebut adalah adanya elemen ujaran kebencian dalam ceramah BAHAR bin SMITH yang dapat menimbulkan kerusuhan sosial. Dengan demikian, hukuman tersebut dianggap sesuai dengan norma hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia.

Pencemaran Nama Baik sebagai Tindak Pidana berdasarkan KUHP dan Undang-Undang ITE viko musadad; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.12446

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini berfokus kepada pencemaran nama baik sebagai tindak pidana berdasarkan KUHP dan UU ITE. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui kualifikasi dan penegakan hukum tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik berdasarkan KUHP dan Undang-Undang ITE. Metode pendekatan penelitian ini kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian hukum doktrinal. Spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analisis dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus. Penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa KUHP dan UU ITE memiliki kualifikasi yang sama terkait pencemaran nama baik yaitu sama-sama menyerang kehormatan, harga diri, reputasi, dan nama baik seseorang secara sengaja yang bertujuan diketahui umum. Perbedaannya, pencemaran nama baik pada KUHP dilakukan secara langsung oleh pelaku sedangkan yang diatur UU ITE dilakukan melalui perantara media elektronik oleh pelaku maupun pihak yang turut serta melakukan. Penegakan hukum tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik diwujudkan melalui sanksi pidana penjara maupun denda bagi pelaku. Sanksi pidana yang terdapat pada UU ITE lebih berat jika dibandingkan dengan sanksi KUHP. Abstract. This research focuses on defamation as a criminal offense under the Criminal Code and the ITE Law. The purpose of this research is to determine the qualifications and law enforcement of criminal acts of defamation based on the Criminal Code and the ITE Law. This research approach method is qualitative with a type of doctrinal legal research. Specifications for descriptive analysis research using a statutory and case approach. This research proves that the Criminal Code and the ITE Law have the same qualifications regarding defamation, namely that they both intentionally attack a person's honor, self-esteem, reputation and good name with the aim of becoming public knowledge. The difference is that defamation in the Criminal Code is carried out directly by the perpetrator, whereas what is regulated in the ITE Law is carried out through electronic media by the perpetrator or parties who participate in the crime. Law enforcement of criminal acts of defamation is realized through prison sanctions and fines for perpetrators. The criminal sanctions contained in the ITE Law are more severe compared to the Criminal Code sanctions.

Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Perjudian Kertas Koa di Lingkungan Masyarakat Minangkabau Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Penertiban Perjudian Muhammad Alhaddid Andrefva; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i2.15754

Abstract. Gambling is one of the widespread social problems in our environment. This gambling causes a lof of concern in the local community so its existence must be contolled and eradicated. One type of gambling that occurs in the Minangkabau community is koa paper gambling. This research aims to determine the causal factors and to find out the process of law enforcement against perpetrators of koa paper gambling crimes that occur in the community. Therefore, it is hoped that the legal system can contribute to positive changes, especially in the process of handling down decisions by judges. This research approach method is qualitative with a type of doctrinal legal research. The specification of this research is descriptive analysis using a descriptive approach and a case study approach. Data collection was carried out through a literature review an then analyzed descriptively. The result of this research indicate that gambling can be caused by two factors, namely internal and external factors. Internal factors are factors created by oneself, while external factors are factors created outside oneself, which canbe said to be quite complex and versatile. Social inequality, economic inequality and so on are examples of causes of crime that priginate from outside themselve. Law enforcement of gambling crime is realized through imprisonment and fines for perpetrators. Law enforcement of criminal acts of gambling control law is carried out by the police, prosecutors and judges as law enforcement officers Abstrak. Perjudian adalah salah satu masalah sosial yang tersebar luas di lingkungan kita. Perjudian ini menimbulkan banyak kekhawatiran di masyarakat setempat sehingga keberadaannya harus dikendalikan dan diberantas. Salah satu jenis perjudian yang terjadi dilingkungan masyarakat Minangkabau adalah perjudian kertas koa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor penyebab serta untuk mengetahui bagaimana proses penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana perjudian jenis kertas koa yang terjadi dilingkungan masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, sistem hukum diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi terhadap perubahan positif, khususnya dalam proses penjatuhan putusun oleh hakim. Metode pendekatan penelitian ini adalah kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian hukum doktrinal. Spesifikasi penelitian ini adalah analisis deskriptif dengan menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif dan pendekatan studi kasus. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui tinjauan pustaka keudian dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini faktor terjadinya perjudian bisa disebabkan oleh dua faktor yaitu faktor intern dan ekstern. Faktor intern adalah faktor yang diciptkan oleh diri sendiri, sedangkan faktor ekstern adalah faktor yang diciptakan di luar diri, yang bisa dikatakan cukup kompleks dan serbaguna. Ketimpangan sosial, ketimpangan ekonomi dan lain-lain merupkan contoh penyebab terjadinya kejahatan yang berasal dari luar dirinya. Penegakan hukum tindak pidana perjudian diwujudkan melalui sanksi pidana penjara maupun denda bagi pelaku. Penegakan hukum tindak pidan perjudian berdasarkan UU Penertiban Perjudian dilakukan oleh kepolisian, jaksa, dan hakim selaku aparat penegak hukum.

Title

Found 23 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 23 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 23 Documents
Search