Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.002
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Taqnin: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Journal of Student Research Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Umum Jurnal Ilmiah Research Student Jurnal Sains Student Research IIJSE Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Tabayyun : Journal of Islamic Studies Tabayyanu : Journal of Islamic Law Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara Konstitusi: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Fatih: Journal of Contemporary Research Mesada: Journal of Innovative Research Albayan : Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies
Muhammad Amar Adly
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 20 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Kaidah yang Digunakan dalam Pembahasan Pengantar Bab Nikah Sulastri Daulay; Muhammad Amar Adly; Heri Firmansyah
Mesada: Journal of Innovative Research Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Januari-Juni
Publisher : Yayasan Zia Salsabila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61253/h9vk4847

Abstract

Penelitian ini standar mengenai hukum Islam atau tentang penerapan kaiah kaidah fikih yang memainkan peran penting dalam hukum Islam sebagai landasan untuk menilai legalitas kontrak pernikahan, dan dibahas dalam pengantar studi ini pada bab tentang pernikahan. Dengan mengacu khusus pada bahasa kontrak pernikahan dan persyaratan saksi, studi ini berusaha untuk mengklarifikasi peran dan pentingnya norma yurisprudensi Islam dalam menetapkan hukum pernikahan. Metode Penelitian ini adalah studi kepustakaan (library research) dengan menggunakan pendekatan normatif terhadap literatur tentang yurisprudensi Islam, baik klasik maupun modern. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa dua aturan utama pedoman untuk menyusun kontrak atau akad pada pernikahan yang mengikat secara hukum dan persyaratan adalah saksi dalam kontrak pernikahan berfungsi sebagai landasan untuk percakapan ini. Tujuan penelitian unutk menegaskan bahwa pemahaman dan penerapan kaidah fikih dalam bab nikah tidak hanya menjaga validitas hukum pernikahan, tetapi juga sejalan dengan maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah dalam menjaga keturunan, kehormatan, dan kemaslahatan umat. Selain itu, fleksibilitas kaidah fikih memungkinkan adaptasi hukum Islam terhadap perubahan sosial tanpa mengabaikan prinsip dasar syariat.
Kaidah Al-Massaqah Tajlibut Taysir: Pengertian, Dalil, Asal Kaidah, Contoh dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Pengecualian Kaidah Zainul Aziz Nasution; Muhammad Amar Adly; Heri Firmansyah
Fatih: Journal of Contemporary Research Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): July-December
Publisher : Yayasan Zia Salsabila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61253/sck3yc81

Abstract

Suatu hukum terkadang tidak ditemukan di dalam Al-QUR’AN dan Hadits, penafsiran dan pemikiran dengan ijtihad sering kali digunakan untuk menggali suatu hukum. Pemikiran dengan ijtihad harus dikondisikan dengan perubahan zaman dan tuntutan masyarakat. Hal ini harus sesuai dengan maqasid syari’ah, yaitu menjaga tujuan syari’at untuk mengatasi masalah hukum yang diperlukan individu (mukallaf). Syariah telah menjamin kesejahteraan setiap orang sesuai dengan kemampuan masing-masing. Islam adalah agama yang mudah dan menekankan pentingnya kemudahan dalam mengatasi masalah hukum. Menurut kaedah المشقة تجلب التيسر yang berarti kepayahan itu mendatangkan kemudahan, kaedah ini sangat memudahkan untuk menangani kesusahan dalam ibadah dan bertransaksi. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode normatif deskritif. Metode pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder dan bahan pustaka. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengertian kaidah Al-Massaqah Tajlibut Taysir, dalil dan asal kaidah, contoh kaidah dalam hukum keluarga dan pengecualian kaidah. Hasil penelitian ini adalah Al-Massaqah Tajlibut Taysir adalah untuk meringankan kesulitan dalam penerapan hukum keluarga Islam sehingga orang dapat memenuhi kewajiban mereka tanpa mengalami kesulitan yang semestinya.
Prohibition of Sexual Marriage in Batak Toba Samosir Traditions Perspective of Islamic Law Erwansyah Erwansyah; Muhammad Amar Adly; Imam Yazid
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Sharia Economics
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/iijse.v8i2.6509

Abstract

Regulations regarding mahram and the prohibition of intermarriage in Samosir Batak society are some of the important aspects that influence social life and marriage. The clan in the Samosir Batak tradition has a very central position, so the prohibition on intermarriage within the clan is regulated to maintain the purity of the lineage and social harmony. In Islamic law, the prohibition on intermarriage can be analogous to the prohibition against mahram, namely people who are forbidden to marry because of blood or marriage relations. This research aims to examine the relationship between mahram in Islamic law and the prohibition of intermarriage in Samosir Batak custom, as well as explore the similarities and differences between the two. The method used is descriptive qualitative with a normative approach. The research results show that there are similar goals between the two systems in protecting offspring and family honor. However, there are differences in determining which parties are considered mahram and semarga. This research suggests that there should be a deeper understanding of these two systems to create a balance between religious and customary law in Samosir Batak society. Even though there are differences in determining who is considered a mahram in Islamic law and who is considered a clan in Samosir Batak custom, these two systems have the same goals of maintaining family honor, protecting legitimate descendants, and preventing marriage within a close lineage. Socialization and Education require more intensive outreach efforts regarding the differences and similarities between mahram in Islamic law and the prohibition on intermarriage in Samosir Batak custom. This is important to provide a clear understanding to the community, especially the younger generation so that they can live their religious and traditional lives in harmony.
Larangan Meminang Wanita dalam Masa Iddah Menurut Mazhab Syafi`i Endah Lakona Sitakar; Muhammad Amar Adly
Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari : Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konstitusi.v3i1.1451

Abstract

The prohibition of proposing to a woman during her ‘iddah period constitutes an Islamic legal provision that is firmly grounded in the normative foundations of the Qur’an and fiqh. This provision aims to preserve the clarity of lineage, protect women’s dignity, and maintain order within the legal framework of marriage. This article examines, from a normative perspective, the prohibition of proposing to a woman during her ‘iddah according to the Shāfi‘ī school of law. The study employs a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach through library research, drawing upon the Qur’an, hadith, and authoritative (mu‘tabar) Shāfi‘ī fiqh texts. The findings indicate that the Shāfi‘ī school strictly prohibits explicit proposals to women during all types of ‘iddah, including ‘iddah resulting from revocable divorce (ṭalāq raj‘ī), irrevocable divorce (ṭalāq bā’in), annulment (fasakh), and death. As for indirect proposals (ta‘rīḍ), they are permitted only for women whose ‘iddah is not accompanied by a right of reconciliation, such as ‘iddah due to death and ‘iddah of ṭalāq bā’in, while remaining prohibited during ‘iddah raj‘ī. This legal ruling reflects the prudence of the Shāfi‘ī school in preventing the occurrence of invalid marriage contracts and affirms the function of ‘iddah as an instrument of Islamic legal regulation rather than merely a biological waiting period.
KONSEP MAHAR (ṢIDĀQ) DALAM HUKUM PERKAWINAN ISLAM: ANALISIS FIKIH TERHADAP KETENTUAN DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA Isman Nuddin Ritonga; Muhammad Amar Adly
JURNAL ILMIAH NUSANTARA Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara Maret 2026
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jinu.v3i2.8589

Abstract

Mahr (ṣidāq) is an essential element in Islamic marriage law and constitutes a mandatory obligation for the prospective husband. Beyond its symbolic function, mahr carries significant legal implications concerning the rights and obligations of spouses. This article aims to analyze the concept of mahr from a contemporary fiqh perspective by examining its normative foundations, legal requirements, and juridical consequences within Islamic marriage. This study employs a library research method with a normative-juridical approach, focusing on contemporary Islamic legal scholarship published within the last five years. The findings reveal that mahr is an exclusive right of the wife that must be fulfilled by the husband, regardless of whether it is explicitly stated in the marriage contract. Furthermore, mahr has ongoing legal consequences, particularly in cases of divorce, annulment, and the protection of women's rights. Therefore, a comprehensive fiqh-based understanding of mahr is crucial for ensuring substantive justice in modern Islamic marriage law.
Perlindungan Kehormatan dalam Aturan Pandangan dan Sentuhan antar Mahram Menurut Mazhab Syafi‘i Husnul Furqon; Muhammad Amar Adly
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v3i1.1450

Abstract

This article examines in depth the concept of protecting human dignity through the regulation of gaze and physical contact among mahram according to the Shafi‘i School of Islamic law. From an Islamic perspective, the preservation of dignity (ḥifẓ al-‘irḍ) occupies a highly fundamental position as part of the objectives of Islamic law, particularly in regulating social relations and family interactions. Although mahram relationships legally allow closer interaction, Islam continues to establish ethical boundaries to safeguard purity and moral values. This study is a normative legal research employing conceptual and normative-fiqh approaches, relying on primary sources such as the Qur’an, the Prophetic traditions (hadith), and classical as well as contemporary Shafi‘i jurisprudential literature. The findings indicate that the Shafi‘i School does not regard mahram relations as a sphere of absolute and unrestricted freedom, but instead provides clear regulations concerning gaze and physical contact. Visual interaction is permitted in a limited manner, restricted to certain parts of the body and subject to the condition that it does not provoke desire or potential moral temptation (fitnah). Meanwhile, physical contact is regulated more strictly and, in principle, is only permitted in situations of legitimate shar‘i necessity, such as medical treatment or emergency circumstances. Therefore, the regulation of gaze and physical contact among mahram in the Shafi‘i School functions as an instrument for protecting human dignity, preserving the sanctity of family relationships, and preventing behavioral deviations from an early stage.
Walimah atau Pesta Perkawinan sebagai Praktik Sunnah dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Meifiani Ritonga; Muhammad Amar Adly
JURNAL ILMIAH RESEARCH STUDENT Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Maret
Publisher : KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jirs.v3i1.8621

Abstract

Walimah or wedding celebrations are one of the sunnah practices in Islam that have religious and social dimensions. However, in contemporary society, their meaning has often shifted to become an event of prestige and a symbol of social status. This shift has the potential to cause waste and economic burdens that are not in line with the principles of Islamic law. This study aims to examine the position of walimah from the perspective of Islamic law and analyze the principles and practices of its implementation in modern society. The research method used is a qualitative approach with library research, with data sources in the form of the Qur'an, Hadith, classical fiqh books, and relevant contemporary scientific literature. Data analysis was conducted descriptively and analytically using a normative-juridical approach. The results of the study show that walimah is considered a highly recommended sunnah mu'akkadah, with the main principles of implementation being simplicity, affordability, and benefit, as well as the prohibition of extravagance (israf and tabzir) However, the practice of walimah in society often deviates from this principle due to the influence of customs and social pressure. This study concludes that the implementation of walimah can accept elements of local customs and culture as long as they do not conflict with Sharia values, so that walimah should ideally be returned to its essence as a means of gratitude, announcement of marriage, and strengthening of social solidarity.
Pembebasan Iwadh bagi Istri yang Melakukan Khuluk Terhadap Suami Yang Masih Hutang Mahar: Studi Tekstual Naskah Fath al-Mu‘īn Willy Zulfan; Muhammad Amar Adly
JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Februari
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jssr.v4i1.8731

Abstract

Khuluk is a divorce mechanism carried out at the wife's initiative. In Islamic law, the wife is given the right to end the marriage with the burden of providing compensation (iwāḍ) to the husband who is khuluk. New problems arise when the wife performs khuluk against her husband, while the dowry as the wife's right has not been paid by the husband. This article aims to analyze the concept of the wife's release from iwāḍ towards her husband in this condition based on the study of the Fath al-Mu'īn manuscript by Sheikh Zainuddin al-Malibari. This research uses a library method with a normative approach to fiqh and textual analysis. The results show that textual analysis of the Fathul Mu'in manuscript permits the cancellation of the outstanding dowry as a form of compensation (iwāḍ), even opening up the possibility of a full release from iwāḍ. This finding confirms that the obligation of iwadh is conditional and must consider the principles of justice and protection of women's rights in Islamic family law.
Wali Nikah Sebagai Rukun Perkawinan dalam Hukum Islam: Analisis Normatif-Komparatif Mazhab Fikih dan Rekonstruksinya dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam Indonesia Mustafa Parinduri; Muhammad Amar Adly
Tabayyanu : Journal Of Islamic Law Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Dar Arrisyah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Marriage in Islamic law is a legal contract that carries theological, social, and juridical consequences, the validity of which depends on the fulfillment of its essential pillars (arkān al-nikāḥ). Among these pillars, marriage guardianship (wali nikah) remains one of the most fundamental and contested issues in Islamic jurisprudence. This article examines the legal status of wali nikah as a pillar of marriage through a normative–comparative analysis of major Sunni legal schools and explores its reconstruction within Indonesian Islamic family law. Employing doctrinal legal research with a conceptual and comparative madhhab approach, this study analyzes classical fiqh texts alongside contemporary legal instruments, particularly the Indonesian Compilation of Islamic Law. The findings demonstrate that the majority of jurists (jumhūr) regard guardianship as a constitutive element determining the validity of marriage, primarily to ensure legal certainty and the protection of women’s interests. In contrast, the Hanafi school grants greater legal autonomy to adult women under specific conditions. The article argues that Indonesia’s adoption of the jumhūr position represents not merely a transplantation of classical doctrine but a normative reconstruction aimed at safeguarding legal order, women’s rights, and social stability within a modern Muslim legal framework.
Hukum Menikahkan Anak Perempuan Luar Nikah oleh Ayah Biologisnya Menurut Imam Syafi’i dan Imam Hanafi Ihsan Siregar; Muhammad Amar Adly
JURNAL ILMIAH RESEARCH STUDENT Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Maret
Publisher : KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jirs.v3i1.8786

Abstract

The marriage guardian is an important aspect of Islamic marriage law that has been the subject of disagreement among scholars, particularly between Imam Shafi'i and Imam Hanafi. This difference in opinion has significant legal implications for the validity of marriage, especially regarding the position of guardians for adult women. This study aims to analyze the basis for the differences in opinion between Imam Shafi'i and Imam Hanafi regarding the position of the marriage guardian and its relevance in the development of Islamic family law. The research method used is library research with a legal-normative and historical-conceptual approach, using primary sources in the form of classical fiqh books and secondary sources in the form of books, scientific journals, and relevant laws and regulations. The data was analyzed descriptively, analytically, and comparatively to compare the arguments of the two schools of thought. The results of the study show that Imam Shafi'i established the guardian as an absolute pillar of marriage, so that marriage without a guardian is declared invalid, both for unmarried women and widows, adults and minors. Meanwhile, Imam Hanafi argues that adult women of sound mind can marry themselves without a guardian as long as they meet the requirements of kufu' and a suitable dowry, so that the presence of a guardian is sunnah, not an essential element. The conclusion of this study confirms that these differences of opinion are caused by differences in understanding the arguments of the Qur'an and hadith, as well as the methods of istinbath (derivation of legal rulings) used by each imam, which demonstrates the flexibility of Islamic law in responding to social contexts and community needs.
Co-Authors andi_89, heri Anna Muwaffika Dahanum, Wani Dewiyanti Rambe Endah Lakona Sitakar Heri Firmansyah Husnul Furqon Ihsan Siregar Imam Yazid Indah Amani Lubis Isman Nuddin Ritonga Khalid Khalid M. Syafii Nasution Meifiani Ritonga Muhammad Saputra Mustafa Parinduri Nurmala Dewi Lubis Rahmadhani Simatupang Rima Rahmayani Tanjung Sulastri Daulay Taufikh Watni Marpaung Willy Zulfan Zainul Aziz Nasution