Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Kehujahan Kias dalam Rukhsah Syar’iyyah: Blasphemy of Metaphor in Rukhsah Syar'iyyah Rahmat Rahmat; Sirajuddin Sirajuddin; Sabna Sabna
BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M), Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/bustanul.v5i3.1747

Abstract

This research aims to find out the blasphemy of kias in rukhsah syar'iyyah, and to find out examples of the application of kias in rukhsah syar'iyyah. This research includes library research using a normative approach method. The data were analyzed using deductive and descriptive qualitative methods. The research results found are as follows: A number of ulama from the Mālikiyah, Syāfi'iyah, and Hanābilah schools of thought allow the use of kias in rukhsah syar'iyyah with the requirement that the pillars and conditions are met. Meanwhile, the Hanafiyah school of thought rejects the use of kias in rukhsah syar'iyyah because rukhsah is a legal provision whose arguments are clear from both the Al-Qur'an and the Sunnah, so kias does not apply in this case. The two actualizations of the application of kias in rukhsah syar'iyyah include examples: istinja using a figurative tissue on a stone, wiping the figurative imamah over wiping shoes, wiping the hijab figuratively over wiping the imamah, wiping figurative socks over wiping shoes, combining two prayers for those who stay because they are afraid allusion to the plural of prayers at 'Arafah and Muzdalifah, and plural prayers because of desire or a figurative work for the plural of prayers at Árafah and Muzdalifah. After examining the arguments from the jumhur ulama and the Hanafiyah school of thought, the opinion of the jumhur ulama which allows the use of kias in rukhsah syar'iyyah is stronger because the opinion of the Hanafiyah school of thought is weak and even some of their followers also refute the opinion which does not allow the use of kias in rukhsah syar'iyyah.
اختلافات الشافعية والحنابلة في صفات الصلاة الفعلية: Comparative Analysis of the Prayer Movement in the Shafii and Hanbali Schools Sirajuddin Sirajuddin; Nuraeni Novira; Awal Rifai Wahab; Dian Novita Nur
البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M), Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/bashirah.v3i1.527

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to determine the differences between the Shafii and Hanbali schools in the prayer movement and its foundations. This research is a qualitative descriptive study with a comparative study technique. The results showed that: (1) the differences between the Shafii and Hambali schools in the movement of prayer were the limit of raising the hand during takbiratul ihram, the state of the fingers when lifting, the position of the right hand on top of the left hand when holding hands, raising the hand when standing from tasyahud for the third rak'ah, the position of the hands after standing from bowing, and the law of sitting and resting before giving, how to raise the index finger when pointing, and how to hold hands when tasyahud; (2) the difference between the Shafii and Hambali schools in the prayer movement is caused by differences in taking, understanding, compromising and tarjih hadith.
حجّية الاستحسان عند الحنفيّة والشّافعيّة وآثاره في الحكم الشّرعيّ (دراسة مقارنة): Authenticity of Approval According to the Hanafis and Shafi’is and Its Effect on the Sharia Rules Rahmat Rahmat; Sirajuddin Sirajuddin; Ahmad Syaripudin; Danang Danang
البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M), Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/bashirah.v3i2.614

Abstract

The study aimed to know the sayings of the Hanafi and Shafi’i scholars regarding the authority of istihsan in inference and its effects on the legal ruling. The scientific method that the researcher followed to reach the most important results of the research is the descriptive method, the inductive method, and then the deductive method. The most important results from this research: The approval that the Hanafis adhere to is the following of the best of the two evidence, either a hidden analogy in contrast to a clear analogy, or the exception of a partial issue from a general origin or a universal rule that requires that. As for the Shafi’is, they considered istihsan to be a statement of desire and desire. And when the term istihsan settled on a specific idiomatic meaning, Imam Al-Shafi’i took a positive position on it, rather he mentioned issues whose legal ruling was deduced through him and declared that he said, whether it is recommended or desirable. Here it became clear that the disagreement is a verbal dispute. And that the work with the correct approval agreed upon shows the flexibility of the tolerant Sharia and to achieve the interests of the nation and to preserve the hardship from the methods of analogy.