Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.909
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tekno - Pedagogi : Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Jurnal Bidang Pendidikan Dasar International Journal of Language Teaching and Education JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan) Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education Studies in English Language and Education Indonesian Educational Administration and Leadership Journal (IDEAL) Vocational: Journal of Educational Technology Educational Leadership and Management Journal LINGUISTS : JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGE TEACHING
Eddy Haryanto
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Studies in English Language and Education

 1 
Project-based or problem-based learning? Unveiling Islamic university students preferences and experiences in writing classes Angraini, Desti; Sulistiyo, Urip; Haryanto, Eddy; Pratama, Aryawira
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 12, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v12i3.40831

Abstract

Project-Based Learning (PjBL) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) have emerged as the leading teaching methods of this century. Thus, this study investigates the students preferences and experiences with PjBL and PBL in the development of writing skills at an Islamic university in Indonesia. Utilizing the qualitative analysis framework proposed by Miles and Huberman (1994), this research provides an in-depth examination of the students experiences, preferences, and the pedagogical efficacy of these two approaches. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews with the students who participated in writing courses that incorporated both PjBL and PBL strategies, allowing for a comprehensive comparison of their impacts on writing skills. The findings reveal that PjBL was particularly effective in enhancing the students writing abilities by nurturing sustained engagement, enabling thorough content exploration, and supporting iterative refinement through extended project work that integrates research, critical thinking, and feedback. In contrast, PBL proved valuable in promoting critical thinking and concise writing by utilizing structured problem-solving tasks. Overall, the study contributes to the discourse on effective writing instruction in higher education by suggesting that, while PjBL offered a more comprehensive framework for writing development, PBL served as a practical complementary method. The combined use of these strategies could, therefore, provide a balanced framework for enhancing the students academic writing proficiency.
Co-Authors Ali, Muhammad Raden Angraini, Desti Atri Widowati Bashir, Ashadi Charles Darwin Duti Volya Dwi Oktalia Edi Suryadi, Edi Ekawarna Ekawarna Firman Firman Hadiyanto Hadiyanto Kurnia Saputri, Kurnia Masbirorotni Masbirorotni, Masbirorotni Mochammad Imron Awalludin Mukhlash Abrar Nazurty Nazurty Nia Daniati Pratama, Aryawira Rahayu, Sulathi Resti, Meri Rosmiati Rosmiati Sofyan Sofyan Sulistiyo, Urip Sulistyo, Urif Syifa, Putri WINDA TRISNAWATI Zalviardi, Sanca