Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Analisis Disparitas Pendapatan Kabupaten dan Kota Di Provinsi Jawa Timur Kukuh Danuargo Priyambodo; Agus Luthfi; Edy Santoso
e-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi Vol. 2 No. 1 (2015)
Publisher : UPT Penerbitan Universitas Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejeba.v2i1.1403

Abstract

Pola pertumbuhan ekonomi kabupaten dan kota di Provinsi Jawa Timur berbeda-beda yang disebabkan sektor potensial antar daerah berbeda. Mengakibatkan antar daerah terjadi disparitas pendapatan. Penelitian ini, menggunakan data sekunder PDRB untuk melihat pola pertumbuhan, seberapa besar tingkat disparitas yang terjadi, serta sektor unggulan pada daerah maju. Dari 29 kabupaten dan 9 kota, terdapat 22 kabupaten dan 1 kota tergolong daerah relatif tertinggal. Tingkat disparitas pendapatan, dengan menggunakan analisis indeks williamson (Vw), disparitas antar daerah mengalami peningkatan sedangkan analisis indeks entropi theil (Td) disparitas pendapatan mengalami penurunan. Upaya dalam meningkatkan pembangunan ekonomi Provinsi Jawa Timur melalui Perda Provinsi Jawa Timur nomor 5 tahun 2012 tentang RTRW Provinsi Jawa Timur tahun 2011-2030, mengenai kawasan andalan. Sektor unggulan kompetitif (C’ij)  dan spesialisasi (Aij) di Kota Surabaya, adalah sektor jasa-jasa dan sektor konstruksi. Kota Malang, sektor unggulan (C’ij) adalah sektor perdagangan, hotel dan restoran serta sektor jasa-jasa, sedangkan sektor pertanian hanya spesialisasi (Aij) namun menjadi kawasan andalan. Kota madiun, sektor dengan C’ij namun tidak memiliki Aij, pada sektor pertanian, jasa-jasa; pengangkutan dan transportasi; serta perdagangan, hotel dan restoran  namun menjadi kawasan andalan. Sedangkan di Kabupaten Gresik, sektor pertambangan dan penggalian meskipun memiliki C’ij dan Aij positif, namun tidak menjadi kawasan andalan di Kabupaten Gresik.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pengelolaan Limbah Baterai Kendaraan Listrik Sebagai Limbah B3 Berdasarkan PP No. 27 Tahun 2020 Dwiyanti Sri; Habeahan Binner; Alamsyah Prayudi; Maulana ihsan; Fikri Romadlon; Edy Santoso; Nugraha Pranadita
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 4 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i4.1981

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi global dalam mendukung transisi energi bersih mendorong pertumbuhan signifikan penggunaan kendaraan listrik di berbagai negara, termasuk Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan hukum terkait pengelolaan limbah baterai kendaraan listrik, mengidentifikasi kelemahan dalam penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian dan extended producer responsibility (EPR), serta mengevaluasi prospek harmonisasi kebijakan nasional dengan instrumen internasional. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi literatur terhadap peraturan nasional, doktrin, serta kerangka hukum internasional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kerangka hukum di Indonesia belum memiliki regulasi teknis yang komprehensif untuk mengatur klasifikasi, penanganan, pelacakan, dan daur ulang limbah baterai kendaraan listrik, sehingga menciptakan kesenjangan kebijakan dan lemahnya akuntabilitas produsen. Temuan ini berimplikasi pada perlunya pembaruan regulasi berbasis lex specialis, penguatan implementasi EPR, integrasi teknologi pelacakan digital, dan harmonisasi kebijakan dengan standar global untuk mewujudkan tata kelola lingkungan yang lebih berkelanjutan dan mendukung keberhasilan transisi energi
Analisis Efektivitas Instrumen Hukum Lingkungan dalam Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia Deny M. Ramdhany; Budiono; Dedi Junaedi; Jeny Mellysa Ariyanti; Edy Santoso; Nugraha Pranadita
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Siyasi: Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v1i2.51397

Abstract

Regulatory reforms in Indonesia including the Environmental Protection and Management Law, the risk-based licensing regime, and Government Regulation 22/2021create both opportunities and challenges for achieving sustainable development. This article analyzes the effectiveness of environmental law and maps its realization from upstream instruments (Strategic Environmental Assessment/SEA and Environmental Impact Assessment/EIA) to downstream mechanisms (monitoring and multi-track enforcement). The study employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, complemented by a policy-evaluation lens that links process indicators (EIA quality, public participation, oversight, administrative sanctions) to outcome indicators (ambient quality, land-cover change, pollution events). Findings indicate that: (i) post-approval oversight and progressive administrative sanctions strengthen compliance; (ii) high-quality EIA and meaningful participation enhance decision legitimacy and reduce dispute costs; (iii) information transparency reinforces accountability and scientific proof; (iv) civil and criminal tracks remain necessary for severe violations, while the polluter-pays principle and strict liability are effective if supported by robust damage-valuation guidance; (v) SEA functions as an upstream policy guardrail; and (vi) anti-SLAPP and citizen-lawsuit avenues broaden access to justice. The article’s novelty lies in an integrated evaluation framework that connects participation, transparency, and enforcement to measurable biophysical outcomes. Policy implications emphasize risk-based compliance assurance, strengthened environmental forensic laboratories, the use of remote sensing, independent audits, and routine public performance reporting across jurisdictions to drive continuous improvement
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Peran TNI dalam Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Berdasarkan Hukum Positif di Indonesia: A Legal Analysis of the Role of the Indonesian National Armed Forces in Environmental Protection and Management Based on Positive Law in Indonesia Gandana, Aan Tirta; Agus Hendrayana; Dainsyah; Dian Amalia Dewi; Yudha Permana Sidiq; Edy Santoso; Nugraha Pranadita
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Siyasi
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v3i2.51456

Abstract

Environmental crimes in Indonesia are cross-sectoral and long-term, often exceeding the capacity of civilian enforcement and thus requiring limited support from the armed forces (TNI) under Military Operations Other Than War (OMSP). This article aims to: (1) map the TNI’s role in environmental law enforcement as a proportional supporting actor; (2) assess regulatory coherence and jurisdictional limits under Law No. 34/2004 (TNI) and Law No. 32/2009 (Environmental Protection and Management); and (3) propose an accountable evaluation matrix for TNI involvement. We employ a normative juridical method with statute, conceptual, and case approaches (Citarum Harum and the maritime domain), combined with policy analysis and document review (laws, presidential regulations, MoUs, strategic plans) triangulated with scholarly literature. Findings indicate that judicial authority remains with environmental civil investigators/police and prosecutors, while the TNI contributes to area/scene security, situational stabilization, mobilization, and logistics—subject to prompt handover, preserved chain of custody, and clear inter-agency SOPs. In the maritime domain, effectiveness hinges on interoperability and deconfliction; on land (forestry/mining), support is effective when paired with strengthened environmental forensics and investigator capacity. The novelty lies in a four-dimensional evaluation matrix (legal mandate & jurisdictional limits; operational roles & interoperability; forensic evidentiary quality; governance accountability & legitimacy) accompanied by guardrails to prevent overreach. Policy implications highlight the need for detailed secondary regulations on assistance tasks, collaborative performance indicators, and data transparency so that TNI involvement acts as a catalyst rather than a substitute for environmental law supremacy.
The Legal Position of Electronic Systems in Digital Forensic Practices under Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code of Indonesia Eti Haryati; Dhanang Widijawan; Edy Santoso
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID) Vol. 5 No. 05 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), May 2026
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the legal position of electronic systems in digital forensic practices under Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code of Indonesia. The development of information technology has transformed criminal activities and evidentiary processes, making conventional evidence insufficient to address crimes involving digital data. Therefore, the recognition of electronic information and electronic documents as lawful evidence marks an important step in the modernization of Indonesia’s criminal law. This research uses a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, relying on legal materials such as legislation, legal doctrines, journal articles, and scholarly opinions, which are analyzed qualitatively through legal reasoning and interpretation. The findings show that Law Number 1 of 2023 strengthens the position of electronic systems as sources of evidence and supporting infrastructures in the criminal justice system. Digital forensics plays a crucial role in ensuring the authenticity, integrity, and reliability of electronic evidence through identification, collection, analysis, and presentation processes. However, challenges remain, including the absence of standardized forensic procedures, limited institutional capacity, shortage of experts, cybersecurity threats, cross-border jurisdictional issues, and privacy concerns. In conclusion, the effectiveness of electronic evidence depends not only on legal recognition but also on harmonized regulations, adequate infrastructure, professional competence, and strong legal safeguards to ensure justice, legal certainty, and effective law enforcement in the digital era.