Articles
<![CDATA[KORELASI KETERAMPILAN MEMBACA PEMAHAMAN DENGAN KETERAMPILAN MENULIS TEKS DESKRIPSI SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 20 PADANG ]]>
<![CDATA[Ayuni, Qurrata]]>;
<![CDATA[Tressyalina, Tressyalina]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Vol. 8 No. 1 (2019): SERI B ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (455.634 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24036/103932-019883
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT The purpose of this research was to describe things as follows. First, it describes the skills of reading comprehension grade VII JUNIOR 20 Country field. Second, it describes the writing skills text description grade VII JUNIOR 20 Country field. Third, explain the relationship between the keterampilaan reading comprehension with writing skills text description grade VII JUNIOR 20 Country field. Type of this research is quantitative research with the method korelasional. The research design used was the korelasional relationship of two variables. The population of this research grade VII SMP Negeri Padang 20 listed in the teaching of 2018/2019 with a total of 254 students scattered in seven classes. The sample in this study amounted to 48 people. Sample taken using a simple random technique with a precision of 15% using a proportional random sampling techniques. Research instrument this is a test performance, namely, test write text description and objective tests the skills of reading comprehension text description. Based on the results of the study it was concluded that research done about the relationship skills reading comprehension dengana writing skills text descriptions have a relationship on a level may 95% i.e. thitung is greater than ttabel with dk = n-1. Thus, it can be noted that the higher the reading comprehension skills of students will be increasingly higher skill levels write a text description of the students. Kata Kunci: Korelasi, Membaca Pemahaman, Menulis, Teks Deskripsi]]>
<![CDATA[Civil Reserve Component as an Alternative for Strengthening Border Security in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Ayuni, Qurrata]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Journal of International Law ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (660.849 KB)
<![CDATA[Indonesia as the world’s largest archipelagic state has 90 outer islands with 67 islands bordering to the neighboring countries. Through this frontier, it is found number of problems that arise such as the smuggling of goods and people, drug trafficking, terrorism, small arms smuggling and occupation of territory by neighbouring countries. Not all these problems can be handled by the government and Indonesia National Army (Tentara Nasional Indonesia or TNI). Therefore the idea for the establishment of civil reserve components through basic military training to increase border community defence of Indonesian sovereignty needs to be considered. Through the civil reserve component, the community will be given training to strengthen Pancasila values while preparing the community to be responsive to the various border issues. Using a juridical normative study, this paper will discuss the benefits and challenges of border security through the strengthening of the civil reserve component using national law and international law perspectives]]>
<![CDATA[Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi [Court of Ethics and Constitutional Ethics] ]]>
<![CDATA[Ayuni, Qurrata]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesia Law Review Vol. 6, No. 1 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This book presents an idea on making a court of ethics in Indonesia, written by Indonesia’s famous scholar in Constitutional Law, Prof. Dr. Jimly Asshiddiqie. This book has brought new perspectives by advancing the existence of law of ethics in the domination of rule of law.]]>
<![CDATA[Kedudukan Hukum Khusus dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi ]]>
<![CDATA[Fitra Arsil]]>;
<![CDATA[Qurrata Ayuni]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk19410
<![CDATA[In general, the Constitutional Court has the view that political parties that have seats in the DPR and/or members of the DPR already have legislative space and do not have the legal standing to review laws. However, there are a number of exceptions in many cases where political parties and members of the DPR are considered to have a special position even though they are also discussing the passed laws. This paper discusses the jurisprudential pattern of the Constitutional Court in granting special legal status to political parties and members of the DPR. Using the case approach method in collaboration with the comparison method this paper seeks to map the potential for testing with specific constitutional rights. The findings in this paper reinforce the concept that although the results of law formation in the legislature and legal review in the judiciary are equally binding for citizens, the process of law formation and legal review has a different character and these differences are beneficial within the framework of checks and balances.]]>
<![CDATA[Kedudukan Hukum Khusus dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi ]]>
<![CDATA[Fitra Arsil]]>;
<![CDATA[Qurrata Ayuni]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 4 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (388.051 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk19410
<![CDATA[In general, the Constitutional Court has the view that political parties that have seats in the DPR and/or members of the DPR already have legislative space and do not have the legal standing to review laws. However, there are a number of exceptions in many cases where political parties and members of the DPR are considered to have a special position even though they are also discussing the passed laws. This paper discusses the jurisprudential pattern of the Constitutional Court in granting special legal status to political parties and members of the DPR. Using the case approach method in collaboration with the comparison method this paper seeks to map the potential for testing with specific constitutional rights. The findings in this paper reinforce the concept that although the results of law formation in the legislature and legal review in the judiciary are equally binding for citizens, the process of law formation and legal review has a different character and these differences are beneficial within the framework of checks and balances.]]>
<![CDATA[KONSTITUSI RIS 1949 DAN UUDS 1950 STATUS HUKUM TATA NEGARA DARURAT YANG DI UTAMAKAN TENTANG PEMERINTAHAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Achmad Alif Nurbani]]>;
<![CDATA[Qurrata Ayuni]]>
<![CDATA[ JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2022): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v7i2.1965
<![CDATA[Hukum Tata Negara Darurat merupakan konsep hukum yang secara terpaksa, harus dijalankan oleh Negara, dimana Negara berada dalam keadaan bahaya dan/atau darurat. Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini bagaimanakah Hukum Tata Negara Darurat Pada Masa Republik Indonesia Serikat (RIS 1949) dan Hukum Tata Negara Darurat Pada Masa Undang-Undang Dasar Sementara (UUDS 1950)? Kemudian Hukum Tata Negara Darurat pada masa konstitusi RIS 1949 dan UUDS 1950 banyak mengeluarkan Undang-undang terkait darurat pemerintahan pada masa RIS 1949 dan UUDS 1950. Tetapi terdapat perubahan Undang-undang Darurat Militer pada masa UUDS 1950. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam kategori penelitian hukum normatif karena hanya menggunakan bahan kepustakaan atau data sekunder. Dalam masa Konstitusi RIS 43 Undang-Undang Daruta yang dibentuk kebanyakan merupakan Undang-Undang terkait jalannya suatu pemerintah dan peradilan pada masa Konstitusi RIS. Pada tahun 1953 masa Konstitusi UUDS dibentuk Undang-Undang Darurat Sembilan peraturan darurat. Kemudian pada tahun 1954 terdapat 12 Peratuan Darurat, pada tahun 1955 terdapat 20 peraturan darurat yang di bentuk, pada tahun 1956 sembilan peraturan yang dibuat, pada tahun 1957 terdapat 27 peraturan darurat yang dibuat, dan pada tahun 1959 terdapat tujuh peraturan darurat. Kemudian dalam masa Konstitusi UUDS Peraturan Pemerintah yang keadaan darurat dibentuk sebanyak sebelas Peraturan pemerintah dan satu Keputusan Presiden terkait kedaruratan.]]>
<![CDATA[The Problem of Citizenship Requirements for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates in Indonesia: Problematika Persyaratan Kewarganegaraan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Sutan Sorik]]>;
<![CDATA[Fitra Arsil]]>;
<![CDATA[Qurrata Ayuni]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk2021
<![CDATA[This article examines the problematic citizenship requirements of presidential and vice presidential candidates in Indonesia. The research method used is qualitative, with normative juridical research and constitutional comparisons with fifty countries in the world that adhere to presidential government systems. The results of the study show that each country regulates the citizenship requirements of Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates in its constitution. The regulation of the citizenship requirements for the candidates for President and Vice President in Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is ideal because it is not discriminatory and also does not have multiple interpretations. Based on a comparison with fifty countries, the regulation of citizenship requirements in Indonesia falls into the first category, namely citizen/nasionality by birth/born. The challenge for Indonesia in the future is how to implement these constitutional provisions without being politicized, especially when the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections will be held.]]>
<![CDATA[Constitutional Review of Covid-19 Law at Indonesia Constitutional Court ]]>
<![CDATA[Qurrata Ayuni]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1065
<![CDATA[This paper analyzes the constitutionality of Law Number 2 of 2020 concerning COVID-19 which was originally passed as emergency legislation in the form of “government regulation in lieu of law”. The COVID-19 Law reaps pros and cons because it is considered to have the potential to give birth to abuse of power in times of crisis. Grounded by final decision of The Constitutional Court, this paper raises three main issues; First, the vital role of judicial power in providing checks and balances in an emergency situation. Second, the prohibition of granting immunity to the practice of irregularities in state finances in times of crisis. Third, the need for a time limit for granting discretion caused by COVID-19 to ensure legal certainty. Through the method used, namely normative juridical, conclusions were obtained regarding the urgency of the role of the power of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia as the protector of the Constitution in the COVID-19 emergency.]]>
<![CDATA[Model Pengaturan Kedaruratan Dan Pilihan Kedaruratan Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Pandemi Covid-19 ]]>
<![CDATA[Arsil, Fitra]]>;
<![CDATA[Ayuni, Qurrata]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Indonesia own various of legal models uses to deal with emergencies. Two emergency arrangements in the 1945 Constitution are represented by the phrase "state of danger" in Article 12 of the 1945 Constitution and the phrase " coercive importance " in Article 22 of the 1945 Constitution. Both have different characters and implications for both the power generated and the oversight mechanism. In addition, there are also emergency legal instruments based on laws, which are represented among others by the Disaster Mitigation Act and the Health Quarantine Act. Interestingly, an emergency based on this law is not directly related to an emergency based on the Constitution which has implications for the legal system and character of the resulting emergency power. Dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic The Indonesian government was confronted with these choices to form an emergency policy. The choice of emergency legal scheme chosen by Indonesia is more for activating emergency based on the law in dealing with Covid 19.]]>
<![CDATA[Gagasan Pengadilan Khusus Untuk Sengketa Hasil Pemilhan Kepala Daerah ]]>
<![CDATA[Ayuni, Qurrata]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The Constitutional Court in Decision Number 97 / PUU-XI / 2013 states that the dispute over the head of region election is not included in the authority of its constitutionality. The Lawmakers follow up this ruling by initiating a special judicial body that will hear disputes over the results of head of region election. Special judicial bodies should have been formed before the head of region election simultaneously. In the transitional period, before the establishment of a special judicial body, disputes over the results of head of region election are still handled by the Constitutional Court in 2015 and 2017. This study aims to seek and provide an overview of the options for the form and design of special courts of head of region election such as through the State Administrative High Court, Election Supervisory Board and remain in the Constitutional Court. This paper suggests the existence of a judicial body that will handle disputes over regional head elections that will provide legal certainty for the democratic process in Indonesia.]]>
