Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

Foot Sensitivity Increases in Diabetes Patients Who Are Given Range of Motion Exercise at Kabila Community Health Center : A Case Series Falah, Fakhriatul; Luawo, Herman; Tambuwun, Gregevita; Ayuni, Qurrata
Journal Nursing Care Jurusan Keperawatan Politeknik Kesehatan Gorontalo Vol 10, No 1 (2024): JOURNAL NURSING CARE
Publisher : Poltekkes Kemenkes Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52365/jnc.v10i1.1073

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a disease that always increases from year to year. Diabetes mellitus sufferers can experience various kinds of complications which can result in decreased body function, one of which is decreased foot sensitivity. Various efforts can be made to overcome this problem, one of which is the active range of motion (ROM) of the legs. Active foot ROM is a basic movement to increase foot sensitivity in diabetes mellitus sufferers.Purpose: Describe the effect of Range of Motion (ROM) in increasing foot sensitivity in diabetes mellitus sufferers.Methods: The study using descriptive qualitative design with case study approachResults: There was an increase in foot sensitivity score in the three informants. There was also reduction in neuropathy symptoms after undergoing range of motion therapy.Conclusion: Range of motion can be applied to patient with decrease of foot sensitivity so that quality of life of diabetic patient can be improved.
Constitutional Review of Covid-19 Law at Indonesia Constitutional Court Ayuni, Qurrata
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1065

Abstract

This paper analyzes the constitutionality of Law Number 2 of 2020 concerning COVID-19 which was originally passed as emergency legislation in the form of “government regulation in lieu of law”. The COVID-19 Law reaps pros and cons because it is considered to have the potential to give birth to abuse of power in times of crisis. Grounded by final decision of The Constitutional Court, this paper raises three main issues; First, the vital role of judicial power in providing checks and balances in an emergency situation. Second, the prohibition of granting immunity to the practice of irregularities in state finances in times of crisis. Third, the need for a time limit for granting discretion caused by COVID-19 to ensure legal certainty. Through the method used, namely normative juridical, conclusions were obtained regarding the urgency of the role of the power of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia as the protector of the Constitution in the COVID-19 emergency.
DUALISME LEMBAGA PELAKSANA REDISTRIBUSI TANAH PADA KEBIJAKAN REFORMA AGRARIA DI INDONESIA Ayuni, Qurrata; Erwinda, Mira; Febriyanto, Satrio
Majalah Hukum Nasional Vol. 55 No. 1 (2025): Majalah Hukum Nasional Volume 55 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33331/mhn.v55i1.1137

Abstract

Tulisan ini membahas tentang dualisme lembaga pelaksana redistribusi tanah di tingkat nasional, yaitu Panitia Pertimbangan Landreform (PPL) dan Tim Pelaksana Percepatan Reforma Agraria Nasional (TPPRAN). Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis akar permasalahan dan solusi atas dualisme lembaga pelaksana reforma agraria yang jarang diulas karena kebanyakan kajian berfokus pada masalah dampak kebijakan semata. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan regulasi dan historis, tulisan ini memiliki beberapa temuan. Pertama, dualisme lembaga pelaksana redistribusi tanah berakar dari tumpang tindih regulasi karena regulasi landreform tidak kunjung dicabut setelah kemunculan regulasi reforma agraria. Kedua, perbedaan kewenangan kedua lembaga pelaksana redistribusi tanah terletak pada kewenangan TPPRAN yang lebih teknis seperti menentukan lokasi dan menyelesaikan konflik dalam redistribusi tanah. Tulisan ini merekomendasikan integrasi lembaga pelaksana redistribusi tanah melalui perubahan regulasi dengan memasukkan PPL ke dalam Peraturan Presiden No. 62/2023 atau mengubah keseluruhan regulasi dari level undang – undang agar tercipta kesamaan paradigma dalam seluruh pengaturan mengenai reforma agraria.
FULL E-BOOK MAJALAH HUKUM NASIONAL VOLUME 55 NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2025 Nurahmani, Aditya; Azizah, Anisa Kurniatul; Santoso, Bagus Teguh; Fauzi, Resti; Harefa, Safaruddin; Bahari, Syaiful; Collins, Josua Satria; Ayuni, Qurrata; Erwinda, Mira; Febriyanto, Satrio
Majalah Hukum Nasional Vol. 55 No. 1 (2025): Majalah Hukum Nasional Volume 55 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33331/mhn.v55i1.1200

Abstract

Versi Ebook ini merupakan kumpulan dari 7 (tujuh) tulisan yang ada di Majalah Hukum Nasional Volume 55 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025. Selamat membaca dan semoga bermanfaat.
Legal Standing Provision to The Community on Disputes Over The Results of Regional Elections With A Single Candidate In Constitutional Court Yakub, Sandra Leoni Prakasa Yakub; Ayuni, Qurrata
JASSP Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/jassp.v2i1.60

Abstract

This article discusses Constututional Court Regulations Number 6 of 2020 which  regulates parties who can be applicants in disputes over the results of Regional election with a single candidate are only candidate itself and election monitors, but ignores the right for community to become applicants. This paper argues that legal standing in disputes over the results of regional head elections with a single candidates should also be given to the community based on: community is a real subject involved in elections, and has an impact on the election of regional heads, the right to argue and actualize themselves in the democratic process, then the state should be able to open an opportunity for the public. The approach method used is normative juridical with secondary data. This paper concludes with the existence of a mechanism that provides access to the public as applicants in disputes over the results of regional elections with one pair of candidates, the community does not only play a role in choosing the options offered by the political system but is able to speak out over the circumstances created by the system.
Memahami Penggunaan Pasal 12 UUD 1945 dalam Perspektif Legislative Model di Indonesia Ayuni, Qurrata
Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 16, No 1 (2025): JNH VOL NO 1 JUNI 2025
Publisher : Pusat Analisis Keparlemenan Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v16i1.4621

Abstract

This article analyzes the application of Article 12 of the 1945 Constitution as the constitutional basis for the State of Emergency (Hukum Tata Negara Darurat) in Indonesia. The study is driven by the historical tendency to abuse emergency powers and the marginalization of the legislature’s role in declaring a state of danger. The main question addressed is: How can the provisions of Article 12 be understood and applied within the framework of the Legislative Model to ensure legislative involvement and oversight over presidential emergency powers? The purpose of this study is to explain how Article 12 of the 1945 Constitution can be interpreted within this framework to strengthen legislative oversight and provide a normative foundation for emergency law reform in Indonesia. This research employs a doctrinal method, using conceptual and statutory approaches. The findings show that Article 12 of the 1945 Constitution not only grants authority to the President but also mandates the involvement of the House of Representatives (DPR) in determining the conditions and consequences of an emergency through legislation. The conclusion highlights the urgent need to reform emergency-related regulations in line with Article 12 of the 1945 Constitution and to establish a clear mechanism for legislative oversight.AbstrakTulisan ini menganalisis penerapan Pasal 12 UUD 1945 sebagai dasar konstitusional dalam Hukum Tata Negara Darurat (HTN Darurat) di Indonesia. Kajian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh kecenderungan historis penyalahgunaan kewenangan darurat dan pengabaian peran legislatif dalam penetapan keadaan bahaya. Permasalahan utama yang dikaji adalah: Bagaimana pengaturan dalam Pasal 12 UUD 1945 dapat dipahami dan diterapkan dalam kerangka Legislatif Model guna menjamin keterlibatan dan pengawasan lembaga legislatif terhadap kewenangan darurat Presiden?Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk menjelaskan bagaimana Pasal 12 UUD 1945 dapat diinterpretasikan dalam kerangka tersebut, guna memperkuat peran pengawasan legislatif terhadap kewenangan darurat Presiden dan memberikan dasar pembaruan hukum kedaruratan di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah doktrinal dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 12 UUD 1945 bukan sekadar memberi kewenangan kepada Presiden, tetapi juga mengatur keterlibatan DPR dalam menetapkan syarat dan akibat pelaksanaan keadaan darurat melalui undang-undang. Simpulan menekankan pentingnya pembaruan regulasi dengan karakter kedaruratan yang merujuk pada Pasal 12 UUD 1945 dan memperjelas mekanisme pengawasan legislatif.
Emergency War Arrangements In ASEAN: A Comparative Analysis Susanto, Ardi; Ayuni, Qurrata
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Hague Conventions include a general participation clause and is regarded as customary international law, meaning that ASEAN countries are considered bound by the norms contained within the convention. The declaration of war as stated in the Hague Convention III of 1907 was adopted in Article 11 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which, to date, has not provided further regulations governing the implementation of legislative and executive powers concerning the declaration of war. Therefore, it is necessary to look at the constitutional arrangements for the state of war in ASEAN countries through comparative law study to determine and observe the pattern of these arrangements to be implemented in Indonesia. The results of research regarding the practice of war in 10 ASEAN countries. Firstly, the constitutional pattern in ASEAN countries follows the parliamentary model. Secondly, there are checks and balances between parliament and the government during a state of war. Thirdly, in a state of war or other emergencies, it is necessary to extend the term of office of the parliament and the president. Fourthly, the extension and termination of a state of war or other emergency is in the hands of parliament. Fifthly, the existence of a time limit is necessary during a state of war. Sixthly, exceptions in a state of war include constitutional amendments prohibited, the parliament may not be dissolved, and can restrict or suspend human rights. Lastly, in Indonesia, it is necessary to include the DPD in the declaration of a state of war.
The Hajj Ministry and the Politics of Religious Capital in Indonesia Ayuni, Qurrata; Febriyanto, Satrio; Charles Simabura; Nurizal Ismail
al-'adalah Vol 23 No 1 (2026): Al-'Adalah
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/adalah.v231.30996

Abstract

The establishment of the Ministry of Hajj and Umrah (Kemenhaj) in 2025 raises important constitutional questions. Within Indonesia’s non-confessional state framework, the relationship between state and religion appears to be shaped more by economic considerations than by ideological commitments. This paper suggests that state regulation of the Hajj may serve purposes beyond the spiritual welfare of pilgrims, potentially reflecting a broader logic in which worship is positioned as a form of capital. This argument is developed through three lines of inquiry. First, the state’s selective engagement with sharī’ah by regulating economically significant practices such as Hajj and zakat, while leaving private acts of worship like prayer unregulated, points to a predominantly economic rationale. Second, the substantial funds managed by BPKH (Rp171 trillion), its mega-project in Mecca in collaboration with Danantara, and a Rp34.5 trillion investment partnership with Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund suggest that Hajj governance has increasingly taken on the characteristics of state-managed enterprise. Third, the creation of a religion-specific ministry raises concerns about institutional inequality, potential fragmentation, and fiscal fairness, particularly regarding the use of public funds from taxpayers of all faiths to support an institution serving Muslims exclusively. Drawing on doctrinal legal research, this paper concludes that the formalization of Hajj governance may reflect not only a commitment to serving the ummah, but also an accumulation of religious capital that warrants closer scholarly attention