Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.916
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Al-'Adalah Jurnal Konstitusi Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Unes Law Review JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Al Ahkam University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainable Development Majalah Hukum Nasional Indonesian Journal of International Law Sultan Jurisprudence : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi Journal Nursing Care Jurusan Keperawatan Politeknik Kesehatan Gorontalo Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Journal Of Advance In Social Sciences And Policy
Qurrata Ayuni, Qurrata
Faculty Of Law, Indonesia University, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Pembentukan Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Dalam Berbagai Konstitusi di Dunia Natalia, Siska Windu; Ayuni, Qurrata
JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol 7, No 2 (2023): JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) (Maret)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jisip.v7i2.4956

Abstract

Kewenangan pembentukan undang-undang berdasarkan UUD NRI 1945 menjadi kewenangan DPR sebagai badan legislatif, namun dalam pelaksanaannya tetap dilakukan bersama dengan Presiden sebagai eksekutif. Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 5 ayat (2) UUD NRI 1945, Presiden berwenang menetapkan peraturan pemerintah untuk melaksanakan undang-undang sebagaimana mestinya. Lebih lanjut dilihat dari hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan dalam UU No. 12 Tahun 2011, Presiden sebagai eksekutif sebenarnya memiliki kewenangan yang sangat besar dalam pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia, mulai dari pembentukan Peraturan Pemerintah dan Peraturan Presiden, belum lagi banyaknya peraturan teknis yang ditetapkan oleh menteri sebagai perpanjangan tangan Presiden. Kondisi ini menyebabkan masalah hyper regulation. Studi banding konstitusi dilakukan untuk melihat bagaimana konstitusi di berbagai negara mengatur kewenangan eksekutif untuk melaksanakan undang-undang.
Disharmonisasi Penormaan Final dan Mengikat Antara Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum Dengan Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Kurniawaty, Yuliana Rosalita; Ayuni, Qurrata
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2025): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v10i1.3719

Abstract

The aim of this research is to obtain an alternative solution to the disharmonizing of final and binding norms between the decision of the Honorary Council of General Election Organizers and the Decision of the State Administrative Court. This research uses a doctrinal approach by explaining and testing legal problems based on relevant previous legal doctrine or opinions. The research results show that there are problems in implementing the final and binding DKPP Decision which has been confirmed and tested through the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 31/PUU-XI/2013. Election organizers have a legal obligation to implement DKPP decisions because there are no other legal remedies when a case has been decided by DKPP. The definition of final and binding means forcing all election management institutions to carry it out in accordance with the original intent of establishing the DKPP. Therefore, in order to protect and maintain the DKPP's very strategic authority as an election organ, the DKPP should be given immunity rights, including for DKPP decisions which cannot be challenged in the judicial process. Apart from that, regulations are needed to provide limitations and scope of KTUN qualifications and/or types of KTUN exceptions that can be disputed in the TUN court
Inkonstitusionalitas Pembatasan Jangka Waktu Pengajuan Grasi Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 107/PUU-XIII/2015 Azhari, Deki; Ayuni, Qurrata
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i3.3855

Abstract

Grasi adalah pemberian oleh dari Presiden dalam bentuk pengampunan yang berupa perubahan, peringanan, pengurangan, atau penghapusan pelaksanaan putusan kepada terpidana. Pemberian grasi merupakan hak prerogatif Presiden untuk memberikan ampunan, akan tetapi dala pengaturannya terdapat sebuah permasalahan yaitu adanya pembatasan waktu pengajuan grasi, sehingga dalam hal ini membuat beberapa pihak merasa dirugikan hak konstitutionalnya karena tidak bisa mendapatkan grasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui latar belakang diajukannya permohonan oleh pemohon dalam putusan nomor dan apa dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara yang diajukan pemohon. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Data sekunder digunakan untuk menganalisis berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang hukum, peraturan mengenai pemberian grasi, buku-buku yang berkaitan dengan grasi dan mahkamah konstitusi dan jurnal terkait.
State of Emergency: Measuring Constitutional Court Oversight Fitriyani, Desi; Ayuni, Qurrata
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty Sharia and Law, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2025.15.1.1-29

Abstract

A state of emergency is an inevitable circumstance that has arisen in several regions of the world, including Indonesia. In these circumstances, there is widespread abuse of authority manifested by the excessive curtailment of rights and the violation of constitutional norms for declaring emergencies. Thus, it is necessary to have oversight from other state institutions to provide adequate checks and balances. This research aims to measure the supervision of the Indonesian Constitutional Court during a state of emergency. Normative legal research is a type of research that uses a conceptual approach, a case approach, and a comparative country approach. Through the analysis of decisions, cases, and elaboration with the principles of State Emergency Law, this paper finds that of the 3 (three) aspects of judicial supervision during a state of emergency, the aspect of supervision in the form of testing the declaration of a state of emergency is an aspect that is not owned by the Indonesian judiciary. Whereas this aspect is important, the declaration of a state of emergency issued by the President is unconstitutional.
Foot Sensitivity Increases in Diabetes Patients Who Are Given Range of Motion Exercise at Kabila Community Health Center : A Case Series Falah, Fakhriatul; Luawo, Herman; Tambuwun, Gregevita; Ayuni, Qurrata
Journal Nursing Care Jurusan Keperawatan Politeknik Kesehatan Gorontalo Vol 10, No 1 (2024): JOURNAL NURSING CARE
Publisher : Poltekkes Kemenkes Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52365/jnc.v10i1.1073

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a disease that always increases from year to year. Diabetes mellitus sufferers can experience various kinds of complications which can result in decreased body function, one of which is decreased foot sensitivity. Various efforts can be made to overcome this problem, one of which is the active range of motion (ROM) of the legs. Active foot ROM is a basic movement to increase foot sensitivity in diabetes mellitus sufferers.Purpose: Describe the effect of Range of Motion (ROM) in increasing foot sensitivity in diabetes mellitus sufferers.Methods: The study using descriptive qualitative design with case study approachResults: There was an increase in foot sensitivity score in the three informants. There was also reduction in neuropathy symptoms after undergoing range of motion therapy.Conclusion: Range of motion can be applied to patient with decrease of foot sensitivity so that quality of life of diabetic patient can be improved.
Constitutional Review of Covid-19 Law at Indonesia Constitutional Court Ayuni, Qurrata
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1065

Abstract

This paper analyzes the constitutionality of Law Number 2 of 2020 concerning COVID-19 which was originally passed as emergency legislation in the form of “government regulation in lieu of law”. The COVID-19 Law reaps pros and cons because it is considered to have the potential to give birth to abuse of power in times of crisis. Grounded by final decision of The Constitutional Court, this paper raises three main issues; First, the vital role of judicial power in providing checks and balances in an emergency situation. Second, the prohibition of granting immunity to the practice of irregularities in state finances in times of crisis. Third, the need for a time limit for granting discretion caused by COVID-19 to ensure legal certainty. Through the method used, namely normative juridical, conclusions were obtained regarding the urgency of the role of the power of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia as the protector of the Constitution in the COVID-19 emergency.
DUALISME LEMBAGA PELAKSANA REDISTRIBUSI TANAH PADA KEBIJAKAN REFORMA AGRARIA DI INDONESIA Ayuni, Qurrata; Erwinda, Mira; Febriyanto, Satrio
Majalah Hukum Nasional Vol. 55 No. 1 (2025): Majalah Hukum Nasional Volume 55 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33331/mhn.v55i1.1137

Abstract

Tulisan ini membahas tentang dualisme lembaga pelaksana redistribusi tanah di tingkat nasional, yaitu Panitia Pertimbangan Landreform (PPL) dan Tim Pelaksana Percepatan Reforma Agraria Nasional (TPPRAN). Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis akar permasalahan dan solusi atas dualisme lembaga pelaksana reforma agraria yang jarang diulas karena kebanyakan kajian berfokus pada masalah dampak kebijakan semata. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan regulasi dan historis, tulisan ini memiliki beberapa temuan. Pertama, dualisme lembaga pelaksana redistribusi tanah berakar dari tumpang tindih regulasi karena regulasi landreform tidak kunjung dicabut setelah kemunculan regulasi reforma agraria. Kedua, perbedaan kewenangan kedua lembaga pelaksana redistribusi tanah terletak pada kewenangan TPPRAN yang lebih teknis seperti menentukan lokasi dan menyelesaikan konflik dalam redistribusi tanah. Tulisan ini merekomendasikan integrasi lembaga pelaksana redistribusi tanah melalui perubahan regulasi dengan memasukkan PPL ke dalam Peraturan Presiden No. 62/2023 atau mengubah keseluruhan regulasi dari level undang – undang agar tercipta kesamaan paradigma dalam seluruh pengaturan mengenai reforma agraria.
FULL E-BOOK MAJALAH HUKUM NASIONAL VOLUME 55 NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2025 Nurahmani, Aditya; Azizah, Anisa Kurniatul; Santoso, Bagus Teguh; Fauzi, Resti; Harefa, Safaruddin; Bahari, Syaiful; Collins, Josua Satria; Ayuni, Qurrata; Erwinda, Mira; Febriyanto, Satrio
Majalah Hukum Nasional Vol. 55 No. 1 (2025): Majalah Hukum Nasional Volume 55 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33331/mhn.v55i1.1200

Abstract

Versi Ebook ini merupakan kumpulan dari 7 (tujuh) tulisan yang ada di Majalah Hukum Nasional Volume 55 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025. Selamat membaca dan semoga bermanfaat.
Legal Standing Provision to The Community on Disputes Over The Results of Regional Elections With A Single Candidate In Constitutional Court Yakub, Sandra Leoni Prakasa Yakub; Ayuni, Qurrata
JASSP Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/jassp.v2i1.60

Abstract

This article discusses Constututional Court Regulations Number 6 of 2020 which  regulates parties who can be applicants in disputes over the results of Regional election with a single candidate are only candidate itself and election monitors, but ignores the right for community to become applicants. This paper argues that legal standing in disputes over the results of regional head elections with a single candidates should also be given to the community based on: community is a real subject involved in elections, and has an impact on the election of regional heads, the right to argue and actualize themselves in the democratic process, then the state should be able to open an opportunity for the public. The approach method used is normative juridical with secondary data. This paper concludes with the existence of a mechanism that provides access to the public as applicants in disputes over the results of regional elections with one pair of candidates, the community does not only play a role in choosing the options offered by the political system but is able to speak out over the circumstances created by the system.
Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mengadili Sengketa Hasil Pilkada dan Pemilu M Minanurrochman; Qurrata Ayuni
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i2.3488

Abstract

Perdebatan mengadili sengketa hasil Pemilu dan Pilkada menjadi tanggung jawab Mahkamah Konstitusi, meski terdapat hal yang berlawanan dari Putusan MK No. 97/PUU-XI/2013 dengan 85/PUU-XX/2022. Fenomena paradoks ini kemudian menjadi sisi yang menarik dan unik untuk dibahas dan dikaji secara mendalam serta menimbulkan pertanyaan mengapa tidak terdapat keserasian pada putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi bahkan kewenanganNya sudah melampaui batas yang ditentukan. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian Doktrinal yang berorientasi deskripsi  analisis  terhadap hasil dari kepustakaan, hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa badan peradilan khusus Pilkada masih dibutuhkan terlebih dalam menangani persoalan sebagaimana adanya konflik pelanggaran kode etik, konflik pelaku tindak pidana dll. Keberadaan badan peradilan khusus masih perlu untuk dikonstruksikan kembali konstitusionalnya.
Co-Authors Achmad Alif Nurbani Ardi Susanto Ayudina Larasanti Azhari, Deki Azizah, Anisa Kurniatul bagus teguh santoso, bagus teguh Bahari, Syaiful Cindy Margaretha Collins, Josua Satria David Aprizon Putra Dumilah Ayuningtyas Erwinda, Mira Fakhriatul Falah Fauzi, Resti Febriyanto, Satrio Fitra Arsil Fitriyani, Desi Humaatul Islam Irfan Zidni Kurniawaty, Yuliana Rosalita Luawo, Herman M Minanurrochman Mohammad Raihan Natalia, Siska Windu Naurah Naziihah Nisa'atul Maharanita Fitrianingrum Nurahmani, Aditya Nurizal Ismail Raihanah Abdullah Rini Maryam Safaruddin Harefa Sahfira Ulfa Hasibuan Simabura, Charles Sutan Sorik Tambuwun, Gregevita Tressyalina Tressyalina Wirdyaningsih, Wirdyaningsih Yakub, Sandra Leoni Prakasa