Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : BISNIS

Walking the Talk on Social Equity: A Call for Advancing the Fourth Pillar of Public Administration Mulyadi, Asal Wahyuni Erlin; Kusumasari, Bevaola; Keban, Yeremias T.
BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi Vol. 25, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Once had been emphasized in the New Public Administration (Frederickson, 1990), equity is subsequently named as thefourth pillar of public administration by the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) in 2005, together with the other three pillars, namely Economy, Efficiency, and Effectiveness (called as the 4E’s). The pillar of equity emerged with the development of public administration reflecting the success of economic development in both developed and developing countries that still raisen justice issues. Keban (2001) stated that social equity and social justice must be fundamental principles in public administration.Subarsono (2008) and Kumorotomo (2014) also confirmed that for choosing public policy alternatives, one of the variables to consider is “able to promote equity and fairness in society” or guarantee equal resources across the country. Unfortunately, of the four pillars of public administration, the application of equity is still far behind that of the other three pillars: economy, efficiency, and effectiveness (Andrews & Van de Walle, 2012; Wang & Mastracci, 2012; Johnson-III, 2011; Charbonneau & Riccucci, 2008; Miller, Kerr, & Ritter, 2008). To precisely declare social justice as an objective of public policy is still not much of a challenge to the public administrator (Wooldridge & Gooden, 2009). This review is intended to discuss and examine the emerging issue of social equity in public administration and its application on the public policy performance measurement that has not received the same attention as the other three pillars. This is expected to provide an academic contribution to advance equity in the development of public administration particularly in Indonesia.
The Business Model of Social Entrepreneurship in Indonesia Kusumasari, Bevaola
BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi Vol. 22, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a conceptual setting in which the business models of social enterprises can be analyzed through value proposition, value creation and value capture. This study employed a method of qualitativeresearch through in-depth interviews of 30 social entrepreneurships in Jakarta, Yogyakarta, Bandung and Bali. The result of the study showed that, in terms of the value proposition in business models of entrepreneurship, all organizations areestablished in response to discriminations suffered by marginal communities. Regarding the aspect of value capture, it seems to appear through a series of activities such as conducting humanity-based programs, capacity building and holding educationand training on the environment. Value creation is found in cases where the more benefits the community gains from program implementation, the more successful and sustainable the social entrepreneurship will be. This research proposes a new typeof business model that aims to categorize and explain business model innovations for sustainability, provides mechanisms to assist the innovation process for embedding sustainability in business models and defines a clear agenda for business modelsfor sustainability. Based on the empiric data, this study successfully identified four types of social entrepreneur models in Indonesia which are based on the mapping results found in all of the organizations aiming to resolve social, economic, andenvironmental issues in Indonesia. This study successfully identified four types of business models: Mixed-based Model, Sharia-based Model, Volunteerism-based Model, and Cooperation-based Model.
Is Regional Mobility Control Effective in Minimising COVID-19 Spread? Lessons Learned From Jakarta’s Large-Scale Social Restriction Azmi, Fisca Rizkiani; Kusumasari, Bevaola
BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi Vol. 28, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In times of crisis such as a pandemic, local governments serve a pivotal role as first-hand responders in managing emergencies in local areas, with the expectation of an effective policy to implement. Notwithstanding, there are limited literature studies of emergency management on local governments, concentrating on identifying policy effectiveness by the implementation in the field. This article emphasizes the effectiveness of local policy implementation in managing the emergency of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Jakarta area, with the centralization on Large-Scale Social Restriction as the case study. The objective is to provide lessons related to coronavirus for the government to evaluate future policies. Using secondary data analysis as a method, the findings would diagnose the empirical stratum of the local government's implementation in handling COVID-19, which defines the policy's effectiveness. The result of this analysis is intended to propound insights to public managers in the hope of receiving a more profound comprehension of their possibility and improving their enactment in handling a crisis.
Amplifying Local Leadership: A Twitter Analysis of Indonesian Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic Kusumasari, Bevaola; Fauzi, Fadhli Zul; Santoso, Anang Dwi
BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi Vol. 30, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Social media has altered emergency communication between local governments and citizens. Studies on social media and natural disasters are expanding. Few studies have explored the crisis of social media use among local government officials. This study investigated how Indonesian leaders use social media. It used data scraping techniques with the Twitter API and the http://tweepy.readthedocs.io/en/v3.5.0/api.html#tweepy-api-twitter-api-wrapper library to collect tweets from each governor's account in Bahasa, Indonesia, between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. The collected data were stored in a MySQL database to facilitate manual analysis and converted to text format. The data were manually labeled using a three-step coding procedure and assigned to categories to identify social media trends among local government leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines the government response effectiveness concept, which depends on the timeliness and breadth of official engagement and how communities receive, perceive, and respond to information provided by governments and other agencies. Four leaders demonstrated compassion, care, and self-assurance throughout the pandemic. Leaders must have two-way communication. A recent study investigated the Twitter links between local leaders and pandemic victims. This study supports the notion that social media use by government officials during epidemics influences community perceptions of risk and trust, thereby influencing policy decisions. These findings have policy ramifications, notably for establishing social media restrictions for local government leaders during future health emergencies.