Articles
<![CDATA[Kedudukan Objek Sewa Guna Usaha Dengan Hak Opsi (Finance Lease) Dalam Kepailitan Lessee ]]>
<![CDATA[Risma Cahya Yudita Pratama]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Hadi Shubhan]]>
<![CDATA[ Notaire Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): NOTAIRE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v5i1.33639
<![CDATA[AbstractFinance lease is a form of lease agreement for a certain period of time with payments in installments and at the end of the agreement the lessee has the right to purchase the previously leased goods or continue the lease agreement. In the case of a lessee’s bankruptcy, all the assets of the bankrupt debtor will become the bankruptcy estate and what was obtained during the bankruptcy. The bankruptcy resulted in the implementation of the lease agreement being unresolved and the position of the object of the lease being unclear. The existence of this ambiguity is important to be discussed further because it becomes the basis for legal protection for the lessor in which the lessee is declared bankrupt while the agreement is still in progress. Through the statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach, it is concluded that the continuation of the implementation of the lease agreement with option rights will be stopped if the curator does not provide an answer or refuses to continue the agreement but if the curator is willing, then the agreement will continue with guarantees. at the discretion of the curator. Regarding the object of the lease, the lessee will become bankruptcy boedel because the rights born from the lease agreement are individual rights, where these rights only have relative legal power.Keywords: Leasing; Finance Lease; Lessee; Leasing Object; Bankruptcy; Bankrupcty Boedel.AbstrakSewa guna usaha dengan hak opsi (finance lease) merupakan bentuk perjanjian sewa guna usaha selama jangka waktu tertentu dengan pembayaran secara angsuran dan pada akhir masa perjanjian pihak penyewa guna usaha memiliki hak untuk membeli barang yang telah disewa sebelumnya atau melanjutkan perjanjian sewa guna usaha. Dalam kasus kepailitan lessee, maka segala harta kekayaan debitor pailit akan menjadi harta kepailitan dan apa yang diperoleh selama kepailitan. Kepailitan tersebut mengakibatkan pelaksanaan perjanjian sewa guna usaha yang belum terselesaikan dan kedudukan objek sewa guna usaha menjadi tidak ada kejelasan. Adanya ketidakjelasan tersebut menjadi penting untuk dibahas lebih lanjut karena menjadi dasar bagi perlindungan hukum terhadap lessor yang dimana pihak lessee dinyatakan pailit pada saat perjanjian masih berlangsung. Melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus maka diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa kelanjutan pelaksanaan perjanjian sewa guna usaha dengan hak opsi yang akan menjadi terhenti apabila kurator tidak memberikan jawaban atau menolak untuk melanjutkan perjanjian tetapi apabila kurator bersedia, maka perjanjian akan berlanjut dengan jaminan atas kesanggupan oleh kurator. Terkait objek sewa guna usaha akan menjadi boedel pailit lessee karena hak yang lahir dari perjanjian sewa guna usaha adalah hak perorangan, dimana hak tersebut hanya berkekuataan hukum relatif. Kata Kunci: Sewa Guna Usaha; Hak Opsi; Penyewa Guna Usaha; Objek Sewa Guna Usaha; Kepailitan; Harta Pailit.]]>
<![CDATA[THE UTILIZATION OF UNWRITTEN LAWS IN BANKRUPTCY DISPUTES ]]>
<![CDATA[M. Hadi Shubhan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol 8, No 1 (2019): April 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i1.299
<![CDATA[Unwritten laws hold a strategic role in bankruptcy dispute settlement, both in the act of bankruptcy and in the management and settlement of a bankruptcy estate after the debtor is declared bankrupt.This paper will discuss about the characteristics of Indonesia bankruptcy law and the legal basis and theoretical basis for the possibility of using unwritten law in bankruptcy cases. This research employed a doctrinal legal research method with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. In Article 8 paragraph (6) of Law No. 37 of 2004 made it possible for judges to use an unwritten law as the basis in deciding on act of bankruptcy. Similarly, in regard to the management and settlement of a bankruptcy estate, some norms provide some space for the supervisory judge's and curators to make a decision or take action based on the principles of unwritten justice. In a number of court decisions, the law has also not been written down in consideration of its law.]]>
<![CDATA[KEPAILITAN JOINT OPERATION DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB PARA PESERTA JOINT OPERATION ]]>
<![CDATA[Zukhruffiyah Rizqi Addinda]]>;
<![CDATA[Hadi Shubhan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 2 No 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Bisnis ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (131.042 KB)
|
DOI: 10.33121/hukumbisnis.v2i1.597
<![CDATA[The Joint Venture bankruptcy which is a limited liability company has been regulated both in Law Number 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies and Law Number 37 Year 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Obligation of Debt Payment. The form of a Joint Venture business entity has also been specified in several regulations. This is in contrast to the related Joint Operation rules which are a joint venture of two or more companies to run a project within a certain period of time and do not establish a new legal entity in accordance with Indonesian legislation. Lack of Joint Operation arrangements either in terms of definition, the form of the business entity or in the event of a bankruptcy petition against Joint Operation by a third party, it creates a legal void. Uncertainty in bankruptcy of Joint Operation is about the position of Joint Operation whether as the legal subject of bankruptcy and / PKPU, and result in responsibility for debt which is not paid by Joint Operation. Moreover, there have been cases of bankruptcy and PKPU against Joint Operation with Case Number 54 / PKPU / 2012 / PN. Jkt.Pst between PT. Putra Sejati Indomakmur to Joint Operating Body (JOB) Pertamina-Golden Spike Energy Indonesia Ltd.Keywords: bancrupty, business entity, Joint Operation]]>
<![CDATA[DECONSTRUCTING SIMPLE EVIDENCE IN BANKRUPTCY PETITION FOR LEGAL CERTAINTY ]]>
<![CDATA[Shubhan, M. Hadi]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesia Law Review Vol. 9, No. 2 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This study analyzed the theories, norms, and practice of simple evidence (pembuktian sederhana) which have become the requirements for bankruptcy petition applications. The evidence applied in the procedure law of the bankruptcy petition and the Suspension of Debt Repayment Obligation or PKPU was simple evidence. The existence of the simple evidence requirement actually caused the bankruptcy petition to have a complication and legal uncertainty. Therefore, the norm of simple evidence needs to be reconstructed. The aspects that have fulfilled simple evidence in the bankruptcy petition or PKPU application included two (2) bankruptcy requirements, namely, unpaid debt that has matured and is collectible and the presence of at least two creditors. The research results found that the Bankruptcy Law determined that simple evidence in bankruptcy was necessary. However, the Bankruptcy Law did not definitively set the limits referred to as simple evidence, which resulted in norm obscurity. In practice, the judges had rejected bankruptcy petitions with unimportant considerations in evidence. In addition, disparities took place in bankruptcy decisions in applying simple evidence because there were complicated cases regarding the conditions for bankruptcy petitions. The court, on the other hand, considered and decided that the cases were not simple. Conversely, there were also simple cases that were adjudicated by the court to be not simple, thus, their bankruptcy petitions were overruled.]]>
<![CDATA[CHARGING DIRECTOR OF COMPANY WITH PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY FOR COMPANY MISMANAGEMENT ]]>
<![CDATA[M. Hadi Shubhan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 8, No 3 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.3.2019.353-370
<![CDATA[This study aims to examine the theories, regulations, and practices at the commercial court in Indonesia regarding the possibility of charging director of limited liability companies (LLC, Perseroan Terbatas(PT)) with personal bankruptcy as a form of personal liability due to mismanagement causing the company to go bankrupt. This is an interesting issue to study because, in general, the rights and obligations of the company, and specifically LLC in this article, are separated from the rights and obligations of the directors. Therefore, the company’s liability cannot be requested upon its directors’ personal liability. Nonetheless, this general principle is revocable if the director makes an error which causes the company to go bankrupt. This study uses the normative (doctrinal) legal research method with statute approach, conceptual approach, and cases approach. The study results revealed that directors could be asked for personal liability if they create problems which lead to a company going bankrupt. The director's liability comes in the form of the obligation to file bankruptcy for the director him/herself. In this study, several cases were found that punished the director with the director's personal bankruptcy, like in the case of personal bankruptcy of director PT QSAR and in the case personal bankruptcy of director of PT CHK.]]>
<![CDATA[Trends in Violation of the Notary Code of Ethics in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Mustiqo Vitra Ardhiansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Jusuf Irianto]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Hadi Shubhan]]>
<![CDATA[ Enrichment : Journal of Management Vol. 12 No. 5 (2022): December: Management Science And Field ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Institute of Computer Science (IOCS) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (237.844 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35335/enrichment.v12i5.844
<![CDATA[Notaries are public officials who have a big responsibility to the community in terms of making authentic deeds. Notary in carrying out activities to act professionally by complying with the code of ethics of the Notary position. However, the fact is that violations of the code of ethics still often occur which makes the image of the Notary tarnish. Describe the forms of violations of the Notary code of ethics in Indonesia for the last 5 (five) years. This research is a qualitative research with data collection methods through the study of SINTA indexed journals that violate the code of ethics violations committed by a Notary and then analyzed using qualitative data analysis. The forms of violations of the code of ethics committed by Notaries in Indonesia during the last 5 (five) years consist of planned violations (planned violations) originating from the wishes of the Notary himself and unplanned violations (unplanned violations) which originate from the Notary's fault. . Notaries who commit violations make Notaries unprofessional, because they do not carry out their duties according to their responsibilities and as stated in the Notary's code of ethics.]]>
<![CDATA[Kewajiban Kreditor Separatis yang Menjual Benda Jaminannya Untuk Memberikan Hasilnya Kepada Kreditor Preferen ]]>
<![CDATA[Maria Clarisa Talia]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Hadi Shubhan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurist-Diction Vol. 5 No. 6 (2022): Volume 5 No. 6, November 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20473/jd.v5i6.40129
<![CDATA[AbstractProperty owned by the debtor which has been declared bankrupt by the court, based on Article 1131 Indonesia Civil Code will be gathered as bankruptcy estate and used for repayment of all debts. Article 60 Paragraph (2) Regulation 37/2004 regulates in the event that the collateral object is successfully executed by a separatist creditor during the 2 months period, if then there are privileged creditors such as tax and workers’ wage whom asks for a share of the sales, the creditor is obliged to provide whereas the collateral good isn’t always sufficient to settle the related separatist creditor's bill. In practice, judges often issue discretion to achieve justified distribution of bankruptcy estate. Therefore, there’s a need for legal certainty regarding rights of the sale of collateral goods by separatist creditors, and legal remedies the preferred creditor can use to get their rights. Keywords: Structured Creditor Principle; Preferred Creditor; Miscellaneous Lawsuit. AbstrakSegala kebendaan yang dimiliki debitor yang telah dinyatakan pailit oleh pengadilan berdasarkan Pasal 1131 KUHPER akan menjadi harta pailit untuk kemudian digunakan untuk pelunasan atas segala utangnya. Pasal 60 ayat (2) UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 mengatur dalam hal benda jaminan berhasil dieksekusi oleh kreditor separatis selama masa 2 bulan tersebut, jika kemudian terdapat kreditor yang diistimewakan seperti pajak dan buruh yang meminta bagian dari hasil penjualan tersebut maka kreditor separatis wajib memberikan. Di lain sisi, belum tentu benda jaminan tersebut cukup untuk melunasi piutang kreditor separatis terkait. Pada prakteknya, hakim seringkali mengeluarkan diskresi supaya pembagian harta pailit memenuhi rasa keadilan. Maka dari itu, perlu adanya kepastian hukum terkait hak atas hasil penjualan benda jaminan oleh kreditor separatis, serta upaya hukum apa yang dapat dilakukan oleh kreditor preferen untuk mendapatkan haknya. Kata Kunci: Prinsip Structured Creditor; Kreditor Preferen; Gugatan Lain-Lain.]]>
<![CDATA[The Community Empowerment Policy to Lead A Clean and Healthy Life in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Rr. Herini Siti Aisyah]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Hadi Shubhan]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur Basuki Minarno]]>;
<![CDATA[Siswanto Siswanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Sudarsono Sudarsono]]>;
<![CDATA[Siswandi Hendarta]]>;
<![CDATA[Raissa Virgy Rianda]]>;
<![CDATA[Rama Azalix Rianda]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Munir]]>;
<![CDATA[Heru Irianto]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7, Issue 1 January 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.1367.pp173-188
<![CDATA[Clean and Healthy Living Behavior (CHLB) is influenced by some factors such as knowledge, attitudes, economic status, and supports from health and social officers. Increasing the knowledge of CHLB in the household structure is very important. The regulation on Health Development Program concerns the guidelines for implementing healthy Indonesian programs with a family approach. Several obstacles involved the queue of patients, doctors, installation and emergency room, and working hours. This study aims to examine community empowerment policies for clean and healthy living behaviours, which are expected to be a solution to restrictions on several aspects of health facilities, increasing population and demands better service quality. The research method uses a socio-legal qualitative approach. Supporting Legal is collected. Field research is also conducted. In-depth interviews and FGDs carried out data collection. This study concludes that community empowerment is carried out using an educational approach involving community and religious leaders. Community empowerment aims to develop community knowledge and skills, use health facilities, and create health institutions that originate from the community. Critical awareness must be built by forming a Clean and Healthy Community Movement group to give the community a CHLB. Empowering people to live clean and healthy lives takes a long time and consistently. For this reason, there is a need for legal instruments that must be enforced strictly and with wisdom.]]>
<![CDATA[PENGGUNAAN INSTRUMEN SANKSI PIDANA DALAM PENEGAKAN HAK NORMATIF PEKERJA/BURUH ]]>
<![CDATA[M. Hadi Shubhan]]>
<![CDATA[ Arena Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Arena Hukum ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01301.1
<![CDATA[AbstractThis study examines theories, norms and practices regarding labour criminal sanctions in industrial relations. The purpose of this research is to fi nd answers normatively and alternative praxis of legal efforts for workers / laborers to uphold normative rights that have been violated by employers by using labor criminal instruments. This is a normative legal research using statute, conceptual, and case approach. The results shows that there is a tendency, from various fi elds of law governing industrial relations which is now more functional, especially by workers/labourers whose rights are violated by employers in the fi eld of labour criminal law. It was also found that labour criminal sanctions in industrial relations have their own characteristics compared to general criminal sanctions contained in the Criminal Code and even compared to certain other criminal sanctions outside the Criminal Code. In terms of law enforcement, several labour criminal cases have been decided by the court such as the criminal union busting, where the crime does not include workers in workers’ social security and criminal wages below the minimum wage. AbstrakPenelitian hukum ini mengkaji teori, norma dan praktik mengenai sanksi pidana perburuhan dalam hubungan industrial Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menemukan jawaban normatif dan praksis alternatif upaya hukum bagi pekerja/buruh untuk menegakkan hak-hak normatif yang telah dilanggar oleh pengusaha dengan menggunakan instrumen pidana perburuhan Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus Dari penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa terdapat kecenderungan, dari berbagai bidang hukum yang mengatur hubungan industrial yang sekarang lebih difungsikan terutama oleh pihak pekerja/buruh yang dilanggar hak-haknya oleh pengusaha adalah bidang hukum pidana perburuhan Dalam kajian juga ditemukan bahwa sanksi pidana perburuhan dalam hubungan industrial memiliki karakteristik tersendiri dibandingkan sanksi pidana umum yang ada dalam KUHP dan bahkan dibandingkan dengan sanksi pidana tertentu lainnya diluar KUHP Dalam praktik penegakan hukum dilapangan, sudah ditemukan beberapa kasus pidana perburuhan yang telah diputus oleh pengadilan seperti pidana union busting, pidana tidak mengikutsertakan pekerja dalam jaminan sosial pekerja, dan pidana pengupahan dibawah upah minimum]]>
<![CDATA[PRINSIP INDEPENDENSI DAN PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN KURATOR DALAM PENGURUSAN KEPAILITAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Raden Besse Kartoningrat]]>;
<![CDATA[Peter Mahmud Marzuki]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Hadi Shubhan]]>
<![CDATA[ RechtIdee Vol 16, No 1 (2021): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Trunojoyo Madura University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21107/ri.v16i1.10165
<![CDATA[Filosofi adanya lembaga kepailitan merupakan bentuk dari prinsip keadilan karena kepailitan adalah proses dan prosedur untuk membagikan atau mendistribusikan aset debitor secara adil dan merata kepada para kreditornya atas ketidakmampuan debitor dalam melaksanakan kewajibannya. Profesi kurator muncul sebagai bagian dari lembaga kepailitan yang mempunyai tanggung jawab cukup berat yang belum ada batasan dari tanggung jawab tersebut. Untuk itu perlu dibahas untuk diketahui tanggung jawab kurator itu.Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan konseptual. Penelitian ini mempunyai isu hukum yaitu prinsip dan konsep tanggung jawab kurator kepailitan juga membahas tanggung jawab kurator terhadap resiko kerugian dalam pengurusan dan pembersan harta pailit.Hasil penelitian ini yaitu bahwa kurator bertanggung jawab terhadap kesalahan atau kelalaiannya dalam melaksanakan tugas pengurusan dan/atau pemberesan terhadap harta pailit. Kedua tanggung jawab kurator terbagi atas 2 yaitu tanggung jawab kurator dalam kapasitas sebagai kurator dan tanggung jawab pribadi kurator sehingga kurator harus bertanggung jawab apabila terjadi kerugian terhadap harta pailit dengan batasan-batasan tanggung jawabnya berdasarkan Undang Undang Kepailitan.]]>
