Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Utilization Of Waste Selection Of KOI Fish Cultivation In Improving The Food Security Of The Community (Fullowers) In The Village Of Kondangjajar, Pangandaran Regency Kosasih Adi Saputra; Defri Mulyana; Randy Fadillah Gustaman; Thaufan Abiyuna
ABDIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): ABDIMAS UMTAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah Tasikmalaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (453.655 KB) | DOI: 10.35568/abdimas.v5i2.2425

Abstract

Covid-19 is an epidemic that has a huge impact on people's lives around the world. One of the sectors that the government is currently paying attention to is the food security of the community, which is feared to be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Academics in universities have very vital roles and responsibilities in solving these problems. The main object of this community service focuses on how to utilize koi fish farming waste so that it can be utilized by the community in supporting food security in the midst of the current covid-19 pandemic. Koi fish culture waste here is fish seed that does not pass the selection of koi fish quality. So far, in traditional koi cultivation, koi fish seeds that do not pass the selection will be destroyed. In fact, the number of koi fish seeds that did not pass the selection was an average of 80% of the total fish seeds in one spawning. The community service locations that become partners are 2 (two) fishery groups in the Kondangjajajar Village area, Kec. Cijulang, Pangandaran Regency. It is reasonable that the utilization of koi fish selection waste in the cultivation system in that place is not effective and needs assistance to change to a more effective direction.
Urgensi Program Pendidikan Berkarakter Dalam Menumbuhkan Sikap Toleransi Siswa (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Purwakarta) Thaufan Abiyuna
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (268.435 KB) | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i2.3704

Abstract

AbstrakPemerintah kabupaten Purwakarta mengeluarkan kebijakan program Pendidikan Berkarakter melalui Peraturan Bupati Nomor 69 Tahun 2015 sebagai upaya pelembagaan toleransi siswa. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui urgensi Pendidikan Berkarakter dalam menumbuhkan karakter toleransi antar umat beragama siswa di SMP Negeri 1 Purwakarta. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan metode studi kasus. pengumpulan data menggunakan metode wawancara, observasi, dan studi dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa terdapat empat urgensi pendidikan berkarakter siswa dilingkungan sekolah meliputi: 1). Pendidikan berkarakter menjadi sarana penanaman toleransi sebagai solusi dari isu perpecahan, 2). Pendidikan Berkarakter sebagai Upaya Pendidikan Multikultural dalam Kehidupan Beragama di Lingkungan Sekolah, 3) Pendidikan Berkarakter sebagai Implementasi Visi Misi PKn dalam Nation and Character Building, dan 4) Pendidikan Berkarakter sebagai Upaya Penyeimbangan Moral Knowing, Moral Feeling, dan Moral Action. Dari temuan di atas dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa pendidikan berkarakter memiliki urgensi dalam membangun karakter siswa yakni nilai Toleransi dalam kehidupan Bergama.Kata Kunci: Pendidikan Berkarakter, Urgensi, Toleransi AbstractThe Purwakarta district government issued a policy for the Character Education program through Regent Regulation Number 69 of 2015 as an effort to institutionalize student tolerance. The purpose of this study is to determine the urgency of Character Education in fostering the character of tolerance between religious students at SMP Negeri 1 Purwakarta. This research uses a qualitative approach and a case study method. data collection using interview methods, observation, and documentation studies. The results showed that there are four urgency of student character education in the school environment including: 1). Character education becomes a means of instilling tolerance as a solution to the problem of division, 2). Character Education as an Effort to Multicultural Education in Religious Life in the School Environment, 3) Character Education as an Implementation of the Vision and Mission of Civics in Nation and Character Building, and 4) Character Education as an Effort to Balance Moral Knowing, Moral Feeling, and Moral Action. From the findings above, it can be concluded that character education has an urgency in building student character, namely the value of Tolerance in Bergama life.Keywords: Character Education, Urgency, Tolerance
The PANCASILA IS INJURED: A CRITICISM OF THE STATE'S FAILURE TO GUARANTEE THE RIGHT TO LIFE OF ITS CITIZENS Siti Tiara Maulia; Imam Alfikri Pratama; Thaufan Abiyuna
Bhineka Tunggal Ika Kajian Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan PKN
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in Collaboration with AP3Kni (Asosiasi Profesi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Indonesia/Indonesia Association Profession of Pancasila and Civic Education)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36706/jbti.v13i1.260

Abstract

Hak hidup merupakan hak asasi paling fundamental yang menjadi prasyarat bagi terpenuhinya hak-hak lainnya. Dalam konteks Negara Indonesia, jaminan hak hidup memiliki dasar normatif kuat dalam Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Namun, berbagai fenomena sosial menunjukkan adanya kegagalan negara dalam menjamin hak hidup warga negaranya secara substantif. Tulisan ini menunjukkan adanya paradoks antara komitmen normatif konstitusi dan realitas empirik kesejahteraan warga. Negara yang secara konstitusional berkewajiban menjamin hak hidup dan kesejahteraan sosial belum sepenuhnya mampu menghadirkan keadilan distributif. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif-analitis dengan teknik studi literatur, analisis dokumen kebijakan, serta kritik kekerasan struktural memperlihatkan bahwa problem sosial bukan hanya sekedear persoalan ekonomi, melainkan persoalan etika kekuasaan dan kegagalan dalam mengimplementasikan nilai Pancasila.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketimpangan struktural, ketidakmerataan layanan dasar, dan lemahnya perlindungan sosial mencerminkan jarak antara nilai normatif Pancasila dan praksis kebijakan negara. Artikel ini menegaskan bahwa ketika negara gagal menjamin hak hidup secara adil dan setara, maka Pancasila sebagai dasar ideologis tidaklah gagal namun kegagalan ini disebabkan oleh negara yang secara praksis tidak mampu mengaktualisasikan nilai-nilai Pancasila atau disebut sebagai Delegitimasi Praksis.   The right to life is the most fundamental human right and a prerequisite for the fulfillment of other rights. In the context of the Indonesian State, the guarantee of the right to life has a strong normative basis in Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. However, various social phenomena indicate the failure of the state to guarantee the right to life of its citizens substantively. This paper shows the paradox between the normative commitment of the constitution and the empirical reality of citizen welfare. The state, which is constitutionally obliged to guarantee the right to life and social welfare, has not been fully able to provide distributive justice. This study uses a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach with literature study techniques, policy document analysis, and criticism of structural violence, showing that social problems are not merely economic issues, but also issues of the ethics of power and the failure to implement the values ​​of Pancasila. The results of the study indicate that structural inequality, inequality in basic services, and weak social protection reflect the distance between the normative values ​​of Pancasila and the practice of state policy. This article emphasizes that when the state fails to guarantee the right to live fairly and equally, then Pancasila as an ideological basis does not fail, but this failure is caused by the state being practically unable to actualize the values ​​of Pancasila or we can say that is a Practical Delegitimization.