Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.123
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tahkim (Jurnal Peradaban dan Hukum Islam) JUSTISI Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Mutawasith: Jurnal Hukum Islam USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Transformasi: Journal of Economics and Business Management JSE: Jurnal Sharia Economica Al Hakam: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law and Gender Issues
Hendriana Hendriana
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung
Religion Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Putusan Hakim Dalam Menuntaskan Sengketa Perkawinan Poligami Di Indonesia Nuryamin Nuryamin; Diana Farid; Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti; Hendriana Hendriana; Mohamad Hilal Nu'man
JUSTISI Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v9i2.2303

Abstract

Polygamy only applies to those who according to law and religion allow their husbands to have multiple wives. This is explained in the general description of the Marriage Law Point 4c, which states: As permissible by law and the religion concerned, a husband can have multiple wives only if the parties so desire. The court has absolute power to negotiate on the basis and conditions of the polygamy permit application and the court has the authority to try and make decisions in the form of legal considerations and reasons. The scholars, the Prophets of the Qur'an and Hadith, depending on the case. In order not to harm the parties in the proceedings, cases decided in court must have clear reasons. Courts need such evidence to determine their case. Article (1) Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning the Religious Courts regulates all court decisions with reasons, and special provisions or relevant legal written sources used as the basis for decisions.
Co-Authors Dety Mulyanti Diana Farid Diana Farid Diana Farid Diana Farid Diana Farid Hendra Maulana Heni Mulyasari Iffah Fathiah Lina Marlina Susana Moh. Imron Taufik Mohamad Hilal Nu'man Mohamad Hilal Nu’man Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti Nuryamin Nuryamin Ratu Tiara Zilliavirni Rheza Fasya Robet Andika Saputra Roby Putra Yahya Saepullah, Usep Sofyan Mei Utama