Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.984
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Journal on Education Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP) Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Educational Journal of Islamic Management (EJIM) Journal of Innovative and Creativity Tihamah: Jurnal Studi Islam INSANI: Jurnal Ilmu Agama dan Pendidikan Ulil Albab Al-Tarbawi Al-Haditsah
Mukh Nursikin
UIN Salatiga
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Evaluation of Islamic Education: Test Forms and Characteristics Muhamad Julfa Kamal; Mukh Nursikin
INSANI: Jurnal Ilmu Agama dan Pendidikan Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Vol 4 No 1 (2026): INSANI: Jurnal Ilmu Agama dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam (YPI) AN NUR INSANI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70424/insani.v4i1.124

Abstract

This study examines various methods and approaches to learning outcome assessment applied to measure the achievement of learning objectives. The learning outcome evaluation process plays a critical role in detecting the level of competency mastery achieved by students. Various assessment formats, such as written tests (both objective and descriptive), oral exams, attitude observations, student work collections (portfolios), project assignments, and presentations, are used comprehensively to assess students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Methodologically, evaluation techniques can be classified into two main approaches: quantitative and qualitative, each with its own advantages and limitations. The development of innovative assessment systems, including the use of technology through online exams and digital portfolios, has significantly increased the efficiency and accuracy of the evaluation process. This study aims to map the variety of evaluation forms and techniques while emphasizing the urgency of selecting contextual methods that consider learning objectives and the unique characteristics of each student. 
Co-Authors Arya Angga Dinata Saputra Dedek Nursiti Khodijah Dedek Nursiti Khodijah Nursiti Khodijah Dinda Meilasari An Nisa Dirga Ayu Lestari Ika Ayu Rohmiyanti Junedi Junedi Karwadi Karwadi Laeli Zzakiyah Mansur Mansur Mohamad Maulidin Alif Utama Mohamad Maulidin Alif Utama Muhamad Bayu Safii Muhamad Julfa Kamal Muhammad Abdul Gofur Muhammad Nur Fadkhurrohmad Muhammad Roziqin Yusuf Mutiara Afifah Rizky Maulana Aziz Sa'adi Sa'adi Sa'adi Sangkot Sirait Zainal Arifin