Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustitiabelen Journal of Law Science Mediation : Journal Of Law Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Rizki Nurdiansyah
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Primagraha
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Impact Of Political Policy On The Implementation Of Law Enforcement Muhamad Romdoni; Santy Fitnawaty WN; Rizki Nurdiansyah
Mediation : Journal Of Law Volume 1, Nomor 2, Juni 2022
Publisher : Pusdikra Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Enforcement law in Indonesia is still not yet walked with good and so concern. Problem enforcement law (law enforcement) always tends to inequality interaction dynamic Among aspect law in hope or das sollen, with aspect application law in the reality of the signal. In practice maintenance law in the field, there is sometimes a contradiction Between certainty law and justice. Writing this discusses the influence of politics on law enforcement in Indonesia. Politics and law are two things that affect each other. In enforcing the rule of law by institutions politics, the role of strength politics sitting in institutions politics is very decisive. When position law is more determined by politics, then activity political governed by and must be following rule law. The writer uses an approach to Socio-Legal studies, which is a study that sees law by merging Among analysis normative (norms law, juridical) and approach non-legal science. Socio-legal nature is prescriptive in that it gives solutions to problem law with a combined analysis of social normative and non-legal / aspect social approaches. Research results from this showing that politics heavily influence law in its formation. However, even though the law could not be separated from the element of political should when the law applies, all political activity must be subject to the law.
AKIBAT HUKUM PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN VERSTEK DALAM SENGKETA WARIS Rizki Nurdiansyah; Muhamad Romdoni; Santy Fitnawati WN
Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Vol 8, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Institut agama islam negeri Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (329.654 KB) | DOI: 10.24952/yurisprudentia.v8i2.6152

Abstract

This study examines the inheritance dispute submitted to the Serang Religious Court by the Plaintiffs with case register No. 0551/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Srg but not attended by the Defendants. This study aimed to examine the process of resolving inheritance disputes that were not attended by the Defendants and to analyze the legal consequences of the versek decision by the panel of judges. This study uses a normative juridical method with a law approach and a case approach. The data used are secondary, consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data obtained are then inventoried and identified, managed, and analyzed qualitatively using deductive logic thinking. The results of this study indicate that inheritance disputes not attended by the Defendants can still be carried out under procedural law with a verstek decision. The legal consequences of the verstek have implications for the defendants who must accept the verdict from the Serang Religious Court judges. However, if they do not accept the decision, the Defendants can still file a legal action, namely verzet. 
Harta Bersama: Sebuah Penyelesaian Objek Sengketa Yang Berstatus Agunan Di Pengadilan Agama Serang Santy Fitnawati WN; Muhamad Romdoni; Rizki Nurdiansyah
Yustitiabelen Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): Januari, 2023
Publisher : Universitas Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36563/yustitiabelen.v9i1.568

Abstract

Akibat dari sebuah perceraian adalah putusnya ikatan lahir dan batin pasangan suami istri. Pasca perceraian ini akan menimbulkan akibat hukum lainnya, yaitu pembagian harta bersama yang diperoleh selama dilangsungkannya perkawinan. Seperti pada perkara nomor 584/Pdt.G/2022 /PA.Srg Penggugat mengajukan gugatan atas harta bersama kepada Pengadilan Agama Serang namun objek yang disengketakan masih menjadi agunan di salah satu perbankan. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana penyelesaian gugatan harata bersama yang berstatus agunan di Pengadilan Agama Serang. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan putusan pengadilan, data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder karena menggunakan undang-undang dan peraturan lainnya yang berhubungan dengan harta bersama, selanjutnya data tersebut dianalisis dengan metode kualitatif sehingga menghasilkan sebuah kesimpulan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa majelis hakim Pengadilan Agama Serang dalam perkara nomor 584/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Srg menyatakan gugatan Penggugat tidak dapat diterima (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard), padahal jika merujuk UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman pada Pasal 5 ayat (1) menyatakan bahwa hakim dan hakim konstitusi wajib menggali, mengikuti, dan memahami nilai-nilai hukum dan rasa keadilan yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Hal ini berarti mengharuskan majelis hakim Pengadilan Serang menggali keadilan yang sesungguhnya dalam perkara a quo demi memenuhi rasa keadilan, kemanfaatan dan kepastian hukum.
Hukum Tentang Orang (Perbandingan Antara KUH Perdata Indonesia, Inggris Dan Amerika) Rizki Nurdiansyah; Muhammad Adam Damiri
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): November : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v1i4.649

Abstract

The law of persons is an important aspect of a country's legal system that regulates the status, rights and obligations of individuals. In this study, we will compare the legal treatment of persons in the Indonesian, British and American Civil Codes. This comparative analysis will cover several aspects,including the legal status of persons, personal rights, and legal obligations relating to individuals. The comparison begins by looking at the legal status of people within the three legal systems. The Indonesian Civil Code recognizes a person's legal status based on nationality, age, and legal capacity. In the UK, the legal status of a person is determined by nationality and citizenship status, whereas in the United States, the legal status of a person relates to citizenship, nationality and immigration status. The abstract is short, about 150-200 words, written with the size of 10. The abstract should be informative and briefly described the research background (review), research purposes, research method, main results, and main conclusion. The abstract is often presented separately from the complete script, so it must be able to stand on itself. The library is not allowed to be listed in the abstract, but if it is important then the citation refers only to the name of the first author and the year. The abstract is written in Indonesian and English. In this overall comparison, it was found that although there are differences in legal approaches to persons in the Indonesian, British and American Civil Codes, there are also some similarities in the protection of individual rights. Universal legal principles such as liberty, human rights and legal responsibility remain the cornerstone of these three legal systems. Further research on this comparison can provide deeper insights in understanding legal protection for individuals in different contexts
A critique and solution of justice, certainty, and usefulness in law enforcement in Indonesia Muhamad Romdoni; Mawarni Fatma; Rizki Nurdiansyah; Suyanto Suyanto; Arief Fahmi Lubis
Journal of Law Science Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): October : Law Science
Publisher : Institute Of computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/jls.v5i4.4269

Abstract

In Indonesia, law enforcement agencies do not collaborate to achieve justice. Due to the legal institution's position and status, the Supreme Court is responsible for adjudicating and deciding cases, while the executive is responsible for investigating and adjudicating. Consequently, instead of striving to uphold the law in the public interest, they typically prioritize the interests of their respective institutions. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine if law enforcement and judicial justice can bring harmony to those seeking justice. This study aims to provide answers through the use of juridico-philosophical methods and literature studies by conducting theoretical studies of theories of justice and their relationship to the implementation of law enforcement within the judiciary. The findings indicate that power and other powers continue to influence the judicial system as an institution whose independence in upholding law and justice is guaranteed, particularly the influence of executive power and political power. In addition, the court's function as a law enforcement agency is not entirely autonomous, so the court's primary responsibility is to promote peace and justice in society. Therefore, in order to promote a sense of tranquility among justice advocates, it is necessary to strengthen the justice system, which is their final sanctuary.
Co-Authors Arief Fahmi Lubis Mawarni Fatma Muhamad Romdoni Muhammad Adam Damiri Santy Fitnawati WN Santy Fitnawaty WN Suyanto