Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Analisis Hukum terhadap Status Pernikahan Beda Agama dan Implikasinya terhadap Hak Waris di Indonesia Yani Andriyani; Amelya Julianti; Iman Jalaludin Rifa’i
LOGIKA : Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan Vol 16 No 02 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/logika.v16i02.8862

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the law on interfaith marriage and its implications for inheritance rights in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative approach by examining and interpreting theoretical matters concerning legal principles. The results of this study indicate that interfaith marriage is strictly prohibited in Islam. This has been explained in the Compilation of Islamic Law, Article 40 letter c and Article 44 explicitly regulate the prohibition of marriage between Muslim men and non-Muslim women and Muslim women and non-Muslim men. Regarding the settlement of inheritance rights for children born from interfaith couples according to the perspective of Islamic Inheritance Law, children born from interfaith marriages do not have the right to inherit property if they are not of the same religion as the testator, in this case the testator is Muslim. However, if the testator is not Muslim (non-Muslim), while the heirs are not of the same religion as the testator, then they still have the right to inherit based on the blood relationship between the testator and the heirs which is explained in Article 832 of the Civil Code and Article 171 letter c of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). From this research, it can be concluded that interfaith marriages not only violate religious principles but also have significant legal implications regarding inheritance rights for children resulting from such marriages and there must be improvements to existing laws to provide legal certainty regarding the legal status of interfaith marriages and especially those related to inheritance.
Constitutional Implications of Local Government Restrictions on the Validity of Religious Legal Entity Deeds Iman Jalaludin Rifa’i; Erga Yuhandra; Fatur Faturohman
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v13i1.51422

Abstract

This study examines the constitutional limits of regional government authority in restricting religious activities and analyzes their implications for legal certainty concerning religious deeds and permits. Although decentralization grants substantial administrative discretion to local governments, constitutional guarantees under the 1945 Constitution require that any limitation on religious freedom comply with legality, necessity, and proportionality standards. Normative inconsistencies arise when regional regulations introduce additional procedural burdens or discretionary mechanisms that exceed statutory delegation and potentially undermine constitutional supremacy. This research employs normative legal methodology through statute, conceptual, and case approaches by examining constitutional provisions, regional governance legislation, and relevant Constitutional Court decisions. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively using constitutional reasoning, hierarchical norm conformity review, and proportionality assessment. The findings indicate that the constitutional boundary of regional authority lies in strict adherence to proportionality parameters, including legitimate aims, suitability, necessity, and balancing. Furthermore, regional restrictions have significant implications for administrative legal certainty, particularly regarding the issuance of religious permits and the enforceability of related civil documentation. Regulatory fragmentation and inconsistent procedural standards risk generating unequal treatment and indirect limitations on religious freedom. The novelty of this research lies in integrating proportionality doctrine with administrative legal certainty analysis, offering a constitutional design model that harmonizes regional autonomy with fundamental rights protection without negating legitimate local governance functions.