Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Constitutional Implications of Local Government Restrictions on the Validity of Religious Legal Entity Deeds Iman Jalaludin Rifa’i; Erga Yuhandra; Fatur Faturohman
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v13i1.51422

Abstract

This study examines the constitutional limits of regional government authority in restricting religious activities and analyzes their implications for legal certainty concerning religious deeds and permits. Although decentralization grants substantial administrative discretion to local governments, constitutional guarantees under the 1945 Constitution require that any limitation on religious freedom comply with legality, necessity, and proportionality standards. Normative inconsistencies arise when regional regulations introduce additional procedural burdens or discretionary mechanisms that exceed statutory delegation and potentially undermine constitutional supremacy. This research employs normative legal methodology through statute, conceptual, and case approaches by examining constitutional provisions, regional governance legislation, and relevant Constitutional Court decisions. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively using constitutional reasoning, hierarchical norm conformity review, and proportionality assessment. The findings indicate that the constitutional boundary of regional authority lies in strict adherence to proportionality parameters, including legitimate aims, suitability, necessity, and balancing. Furthermore, regional restrictions have significant implications for administrative legal certainty, particularly regarding the issuance of religious permits and the enforceability of related civil documentation. Regulatory fragmentation and inconsistent procedural standards risk generating unequal treatment and indirect limitations on religious freedom. The novelty of this research lies in integrating proportionality doctrine with administrative legal certainty analysis, offering a constitutional design model that harmonizes regional autonomy with fundamental rights protection without negating legitimate local governance functions.
Kedudukan Lembaga Kemasyarakatan Desa dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Desa Berdasarkan UUD NRI Tahun 1945: The Position of Village Community Institutions in the Implementation of Village Government Based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Erga Yuhandra; Iman Jalaludin Rifa’i; Haris Budiman
Constitution Journal Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Constitution Journal June 2026
Publisher : UIN Kiai Haji Ahmad Sidiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/constitution.v5i1.348

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the constitutional position of Village Community Institutions (LKD) in the Indonesian state system based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, examine the legal construction of LKD in the hierarchy of laws and regulations, and analyze the implications of LKD's constitutional legitimacy on the implementation of village governance. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory, conceptual, and historical approach, as well as legal material collection techniques through library studies. The results of the study indicate that the constitutional position of LKD is implicit-derivative, sourced from Article 1 paragraph (2), Article 18B paragraph (2), and Article 28C paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The normative construction of LKD is pyramidal-incomplete: solid at the level of laws to ministerial regulations, but weak at the constitutional and village regulation levels. Strengthening the constitutional position of the Village Fund Management (LKD) is an urgent need considering that Indonesia has more than 75,000 villages that require effective participatory institutions. Meanwhile, various empirical studies show that the authority of the LKD remains unclear, there is a lack of synchronization between Home Affairs Ministerial Regulation Number 18 of 2018 and regional regulations, and the suboptimal implementation of the empowerment function and channeling of village aspirations. These conditions indicate a gap between normative regulations and institutional implementation in the field, so that legislative reform and vertical harmonization of regulations are needed to strengthen legal certainty and the effectiveness of village governance. ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan konstitusional Lembaga Kemasyarakatan Desa (LKD) dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia berdasarkan UUD NRI Tahun 1945, mengkaji konstruksi hukum LKD dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan, serta menganalisis implikasi legitimasi konstitusional LKD terhadap penyelenggaraan pemerintahan desa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan historis, serta teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedudukan konstitusional LKD bersifat implisit-derivatif, bersumber dari Pasal 1 ayat (2), Pasal 18B ayat (2), dan Pasal 28C ayat (2) UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Konstruksi normatif LKD bersifat piramidal-tidak lengkap: solid pada tingkat undang-undang hingga peraturan menteri, namun lemah pada tataran konstitusional dan peraturan desa. Penguatan kedudukan konstitusional LKD menjadi kebutuhan yang mendesak mengingat Indonesia memiliki lebih dari 75.000 desa yang memerlukan kelembagaan partisipatif yang efektif, sementara berbagai penelitian empiris menunjukkan masih adanya ketidakjelasan kewenangan LKD, ketidaksinkronan antara Permendagri Nomor 18 Tahun 2018 dengan regulasi daerah, serta belum optimalnya pelaksanaan fungsi pemberdayaan dan penyaluran aspirasi masyarakat desa. Kondisi tersebut menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan antara pengaturan normatif dan implementasi kelembagaan di lapangan, sehingga diperlukan reformasi legislasi dan harmonisasi regulasi secara vertikal guna memperkuat kepastian hukum dan efektivitas penyelenggaraan pemerintahan desa.
Pergeseran Asas Legalitas Formal ke Material dalam KUHP Baru dan Konsekuensinya terhadap Hukum Adat Sarip Hidayat; Yani Andryani; Iman Jalaludin Rifa’I; Raden Yeni Muliani
Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): Published 30 Juni 2025
Publisher : Universitas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jhmj.v11i1.5160

Abstract

Pergeseran asas legalitas dari yang semula bersifat formal dalam KUHP lama ke arah asas legalitas material dalam KUHP baru, serta implikasi dari perubahan ini terhadap eksistensi dan penerapan hukum adat di Indonesia. Asas legalitas formal menekankan bahwa tidak ada perbuatan yang dapat dipidana tanpa ketentuan undang-undang yang tertulis terlebih dahulu, sedangkan asas legalitas material membuka ruang bagi penilaian keadilan substantif dan pengakuan terhadap sumber hukum tidak tertulis, termasuk hukum adat. Metode pendekatan Yuridis-Empiris dan deskriftif kualitatif, penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa KUHP baru secara eksplisit mengakui hukum adat sebagai salah satu sumber hukum pidana, asalkan memenuhi syarat-syarat tertentu. Konsekuensinya, hukum adat memiliki posisi yang lebih kuat dalam sistem hukum nasional, namun juga menimbulkan tantangan serius terkait kepastian hukum, keseragaman penegakan hukum, dan potensi pelanggaran hak asasi manusia. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan adanya pengaturan lebih lanjut dan pembentukan pedoman nasional agar penerapan hukum adat tidak bertentangan dengan prinsip-prinsip universal hukum pidana modern.
Legal Protection of Batik Based on Communal Rights in the Context of Digitalization and Globalization: A Reconstruction of Legal Policy Anthon Fathanudien; Bias Lintang Dialog; Iman Jalaludin Rifa’i
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.2.436-442

Abstract

Batik, as a traditional cultural expression of Indonesia, embodies significant philosophical, cultural, and economic values; however, in the context of digitalization and globalization, its existence faces increasing threats of misappropriation, unauthorized commercialization, and weakening of communal rights. This study aims to analyze the legal protection of batik based on communal intellectual property and to reconstruct legal policy to achieve a more effective and equitable protection system. The research employs a normative juridical approach with a doctrinal legal research design, utilizing statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Data are derived from secondary legal materials, including legislation, legal doctrines, and scholarly works, and are analyzed through qualitative juridical methods to identify regulatory gaps and structural weaknesses. The findings reveal that although batik has been formally recognized under the communal intellectual property regime, such recognition remains largely administrative and has not been supported by strong enforcement mechanisms, particularly in responding to challenges arising from digital technology and global market dynamics. Furthermore, the absence of adaptive regulations, limited institutional coordination, and minimal community participation exacerbate the vulnerability of batik protection. The novelty of this research lies in proposing a reconstruction of legal policy that integrates political law perspectives with digital governance, emphasizing the strengthening of communal rights, regulatory adaptation, and equitable benefit-sharing mechanisms. This reconstruction is expected to transform legal protection from symbolic recognition into a responsive, just, and sustainable system in safeguarding batik as Indonesia’s cultural heritage.
Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Hukum Pemerintah Daerah dalam Perlindungan Kelompok Rentan di Era Desentralisasi Iman Jalaludin Rifa’i; Naili Azizah; Erga Yuhandra
Edulaw : Journal of Islamic Law and Yurisprudance Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): EduLaw : Journal of Islamic Law and Yurisprudance
Publisher : Islamic Criminal Law Study Program, Bunga Bangsa Cirebon Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47453/edulaw.v6i1.4667

Abstract

Desentralisasi memberikan kewenangan kepada pemerintah daerah untuk menyelenggarakan urusan pemerintahan sekaligus memenuhi kebutuhan dan melindungi hak masyarakat. Namun, distribusi kewenangan belum sepenuhnya diikuti kejelasan batas kewenangan, harmonisasi regulasi, kapasitas kelembagaan, dan mekanisme perlindungan yang efektif, sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan disparitas perlindungan antarwilayah, terutama bagi kelompok rentan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis konstruksi kewenangan pemerintah daerah dalam perlindungan kelompok rentan dan merumuskan rekonstruksi kebijakan hukum yang mampu menjamin perlindungan secara efektif, setara, dan berkelanjutan. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan analitis melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas kewenangan daerah ditentukan oleh keterpaduan antara legitimasi kewenangan, harmonisasi regulasi, kapasitas kelembagaan, koordinasi, pengawasan, dan partisipasi masyarakat. Rekonstruksi kewenangan perlu diarahkan pada penguatan standar perlindungan nasional dengan fleksibilitas implementasi lokal. Temuan utama menegaskan perlunya pergeseran paradigma dari authority to regulate menuju authority to protect agar desentralisasi menjadi instrumen perlindungan hukum yang berkeadilan