Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Kewenangan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) dalam Pembinaan Narapidana Grenaldo Ginting; Jhonly Wendur; Karel Wowor; Nopesius Bawembang; Johanis Polii
Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Vol 11 No 5 (2022): Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gresik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Tujuan dari pembinaan yang dilakukan oleh Lembaga Pemasyarakatan adalah agar narapidana tidak mengulangi lagi perbuatannya dan bisa menemukan kembali kepercayaan dirinya serta dapat diterima menjadi bagian dari anggota masyarakat. Selain itu pembinaan juga dilakukan terhadap pribadi dari narapidana itu sendiri. Tujuannya agar narapidana mampu mengenal dirinya sendiri dan memiliki tingkat kesadaran diri yang tinggi. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah dengan cara meneliti studi bahan kepustakaan atau library research. Pembinaan Top Down Approach adalah bentuk pembinaan dengan melakukan pembinaan dari atas ke bawah. Pembinaan ini diterapkan oleh petugas lapas terhadap narapidana sesuai dengan kemampuan dan kepribadian narapidana. Pembinaan Bottom Up Approach merupakan pendekatan dari bawah ke atas. Dalam pendekatan ini narapidana diperbolehkan untuk memilih atau menentukan wujud pembinaan yang diinginkan dan sesuai dengan bakatnya. Metode Top Down Approach atau pembinaan dari atas kebawah dapat kita ketahui pada waktu petugas menghimbau narapidana untuk menjalankan wujud pembinaan kepribadian yang disediakan Lapas tanpa terkecuali misalnya ibadah sesuai dengan kepercayaannya.

Law Enforcement Against Unscrupulous Health Workers Who Inject Empty Vaccines to Vaccine Recipients Nopesius Bawembang; Johanis LSS. Polii; Janesandre Palilingan; R. Rigen I. Sumilat; Grenaldo Ginting
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i4.771

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in millions of people dying from the virus and has affected various sectors such as education and the economy, therefore efforts are needed to overcome this pandemic, including vaccines with the aim of increasing herd immunity. However, efforts to overcome this outbreak have unscrupulous nurses who recommend empty vaccines. This research aims to determine law enforcement efforts against unscrupulous health workers who inject empty vaccines into vaccine recipients. This research uses the research method of literature study. Data collection techniques in this research are obtained from books, journals, and other relevant information from Google Scholar for the period 2013-2023 with several search keywords. The results showed that nurses injecting empty vaccines in an effort to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic that deliberately hampered the implementation of pandemic mitigation were threatened with imprisonment for a maximum of 1 year and/or a maximum fine of Rp1 million. However, if the vaccine injection occurs due to negligence, the perpetrator is threatened with imprisonment for a maximum of 6 months and/or a fine of up to Rp. 500 thousand.

Legal Examination of Performance Oversight by the Papua People's Representative Council in Accordance with Community Aspirations Through the Mandate of the Special Autonomy Law Wori, Herman; Ginting, Grenaldo; Polii, Johanis
Research Horizon Vol. 3 No. 5 (2023)
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.3.5.2023.173

The enactment of Law No. 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for the Province of Papua reflects the political will of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia towards the people of Papua. This decision is based on the consideration that the governance and development implementation in the province of Papua, while integrated with Indonesia, has not fully met the sense of justice, achieved prosperity, enforced the rule of law, and has not fully respected human rights, especially those of the indigenous Papuans. The legal research conducted in this study is normative legal research, focusing on examining norms or regulations related to the research object. Law No. 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for the Province of Papua represents the ideals and goals of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia in building a fair, prosperous, and prosperous Papuan society based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The reality is that in the implementation of special autonomy, there are many deviations from the basic mandate of special autonomy. As a result, the Papuan people still feel left behind in a dilemmatic situation, unable to fully enjoy the benefits of special autonomy. This is because there is no significant improvement in welfare, peace conditions have not arrived, and basic rights are not adequately respected. The Papua Provincial People's Consultative Assembly (DPRP) is a regional representative institution that acts as an organ of the regional government in the province of Papua. The Papua People's Consultative Assembly has the task and authority to absorb, collect, accommodate, and follow up on the aspirations of the people. In accordance with the mandate of the Special Autonomy Law for the province of Papua, the Papua People's Consultative Assembly has the function of conveying the aspirations of the Papuan people regarding development and the expansion of new autonomous regions in the province of Papua to the People's Consultative Assembly (DPR RI).

Implementation of Law No. 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for Papua in Gefido Village, Abenaho District, Yalimo Regency, Papua Province Wandik, Yanora; Polii, Johanis; Ginting, Grenaldo
Research Horizon Vol. 3 No. 5 (2023)
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.3.5.2023.174

The presence of Law No. 21 of 2001 is the government's answer to overcoming social inequality in Papua. This law contains special policies based on values which include protection and respect for ethics and morals, basic rights of Indigenous Papuans (OAP), Human Rights, supremacy of law, democracy, pluralism, and equality. population, rights, duties and obligations as citizens where the Papuan people can fight for their rights peacefully, because at that time they must be convinced by all components of Papuan society, especially indigenous Papuans, that Special Autonomy is the most appropriate choice. This research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive research methods. To discuss the problems contained in this research, a normative juridical and empirical juridical approach is used. This research was carried out in Gefido Village, Abenaho District, Yanlimo Regency. The Gefido Village Innovative Program (PIO) can be interpreted as one of the Yalimo district government's efforts to improve the welfare of the Gefido Village community by increasing the capacity of Gefido village in developing plans and implementing Gefido village development which focuses on 3 program targets including entrepreneurial development, increasing human resources, as well as providing gefido village infrastructure. The cooperation carried out by the Yalimo government through experts is basically that Gefido village is a source of economic strength. There is still a lot of hidden potential in Gefido village that needs to be explored together. Abundant natural resources and the number of skilled workers make Gefido village a place for very potential business development. If managed professionally, Gefido village can become the main driver of the economy.

Kewenangan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) dalam Pembinaan Narapidana Ginting, Grenaldo; Wendur, Jhonly; Wowor, Karel; Bawembang, Nopesius; Polii, Johanis
Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Vol 11 No 5 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gresik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55129/.v11i5.2467

Tujuan dari pembinaan yang dilakukan oleh Lembaga Pemasyarakatan adalah agar narapidana tidak mengulangi lagi perbuatannya dan bisa menemukan kembali kepercayaan dirinya serta dapat diterima menjadi bagian dari anggota masyarakat. Selain itu pembinaan juga dilakukan terhadap pribadi dari narapidana itu sendiri. Tujuannya agar narapidana mampu mengenal dirinya sendiri dan memiliki tingkat kesadaran diri yang tinggi. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah dengan cara meneliti studi bahan kepustakaan atau library research. Pembinaan Top Down Approach adalah bentuk pembinaan dengan melakukan pembinaan dari atas ke bawah. Pembinaan ini diterapkan oleh petugas lapas terhadap narapidana sesuai dengan kemampuan dan kepribadian narapidana. Pembinaan Bottom Up Approach merupakan pendekatan dari bawah ke atas. Dalam pendekatan ini narapidana diperbolehkan untuk memilih atau menentukan wujud pembinaan yang diinginkan dan sesuai dengan bakatnya. Metode Top Down Approach atau pembinaan dari atas kebawah dapat kita ketahui pada waktu petugas menghimbau narapidana untuk menjalankan wujud pembinaan kepribadian yang disediakan Lapas tanpa terkecuali misalnya ibadah sesuai dengan kepercayaannya.

ENTANGLED LEGAL PLURALISM: AN INCLUSIVE MODEL FOR RESOLVING INDIGENOUS NATURAL-RESOURCE DISPUTES BASED ON THE SDGS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE Polii, Johanis; Bawembang, Nopesius; Kampilong, Joni Kutu'; Lang, Chrestotes; Suoth, Melissa
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 14 No 4 (2025): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i4.6736

This study focuses on the effect of entangled legal systems on the administration of natural resources in multi-ethnic communities in North Sulawesi. We raised three fundamental issues: (1) the mix of formal laws and customary practices as hybrid-norm zones as communities renegotiate the social boundaries and move between different governance forums; (2) formal and informal, gauging the process of renegotiation of the boundaries within communities; and (3) safeguards within communities that promote or impede inclusive participation in dispute resolution. Using a multi-method design consisting of participatory mapping, document review, panel observations, focus group discussions, and expert network analysis, three different hybrid-norm zones were identified (shared-use agroforestry in Minahasa, rotational fishing quota in Sangihe, and sacred resource reserves in Talaud). Seasonal redraw rate data (78%, 65%, 72%) along with average forum shifts (2.3, 1.9, 2.1) indicate that there is a strong correlation between the intensity of boundary-making and the procedures of recursion. Documentary analysis revealed evidence of negotiated joint authorsship in the form of signatures from customary and state actors for documents for which joint authorship is indicated in one-third of the dispute records. Finally, expert accessibility skews and secures the take-up of experts, underscoring the constant equity holes. We conclude that inclusive pluralism results from the mechanisms of spatial, procedural, and documentary reinforcement of each other in a permanent feedback loop. We recommend that hybrid rules be made law, platforms that engage a large number of people be increased, and digital tools be applied to flexible and fair governance.

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 6 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search