Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Gema Wiralodra Journal of Social Research Research Horizon
Johanis L.S.S. Polii
Universitas Kristen Indonesia Tomohon
Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Kewenangan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) dalam Pembinaan Narapidana Grenaldo Ginting; Jhonly Wendur; Karel Wowor; Nopesius Bawembang; Johanis Polii
Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Vol 11 No 5 (2022): Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gresik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan dari pembinaan yang dilakukan oleh Lembaga Pemasyarakatan adalah agar narapidana tidak mengulangi lagi perbuatannya dan bisa menemukan kembali kepercayaan dirinya serta dapat diterima menjadi bagian dari anggota masyarakat. Selain itu pembinaan juga dilakukan terhadap pribadi dari narapidana itu sendiri. Tujuannya agar narapidana mampu mengenal dirinya sendiri dan memiliki tingkat kesadaran diri yang tinggi. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah dengan cara meneliti studi bahan kepustakaan atau library research. Pembinaan Top Down Approach adalah bentuk pembinaan dengan melakukan pembinaan dari atas ke bawah. Pembinaan ini diterapkan oleh petugas lapas terhadap narapidana sesuai dengan kemampuan dan kepribadian narapidana. Pembinaan Bottom Up Approach merupakan pendekatan dari bawah ke atas. Dalam pendekatan ini narapidana diperbolehkan untuk memilih atau menentukan wujud pembinaan yang diinginkan dan sesuai dengan bakatnya. Metode Top Down Approach atau pembinaan dari atas kebawah dapat kita ketahui pada waktu petugas menghimbau narapidana untuk menjalankan wujud pembinaan kepribadian yang disediakan Lapas tanpa terkecuali misalnya ibadah sesuai dengan kepercayaannya.
Law Enforcement Against Unscrupulous Health Workers Who Inject Empty Vaccines to Vaccine Recipients Nopesius Bawembang; Johanis LSS. Polii; Janesandre Palilingan; R. Rigen I. Sumilat; Grenaldo Ginting
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i4.771

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in millions of people dying from the virus and has affected various sectors such as education and the economy, therefore efforts are needed to overcome this pandemic, including vaccines with the aim of increasing herd immunity. However, efforts to overcome this outbreak have unscrupulous nurses who recommend empty vaccines. This research aims to determine law enforcement efforts against unscrupulous health workers who inject empty vaccines into vaccine recipients. This research uses the research method of literature study. Data collection techniques in this research are obtained from books, journals, and other relevant information from Google Scholar for the period 2013-2023 with several search keywords. The results showed that nurses injecting empty vaccines in an effort to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic that deliberately hampered the implementation of pandemic mitigation were threatened with imprisonment for a maximum of 1 year and/or a maximum fine of Rp1 million. However, if the vaccine injection occurs due to negligence, the perpetrator is threatened with imprisonment for a maximum of 6 months and/or a fine of up to Rp. 500 thousand.
Criminal and criminal actions against minors Johanis L.S.S. Polii
Gema Wiralodra Vol. 14 No. 3 (2023): Gema Wiralodra
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/gw.v14i3.495

Abstract

This abstract conveys the importance of protecting children's rights as part of citizens. Every country in the world must provide adequate care and protection for children. This guidance and protection cover the child's overall physical, mental, and social growth and development. Even though there are cases of children involved in criminal acts, the development and protection of children remain the state's responsibility. In recent years, the media has often raised the issue of juvenile delinquency or crimes committed by children. This attracts public attention because children even become perpetrators of crimes. This research uses secondary data from library materials such as books, laws, literature, and journals. The educational punishment system is one form of the punishment system used today. This system pays more attention to children's rights and obligations and provides treatment to promote better integration of children into society. This treatment is carried out by placing children in care or coaching institutions that provide education job training and spiritual aspects to improve children's morals and spirituality so that mental improvement can be carried out more quickly. The rules for implementing juvenile crimes in Indonesia are regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHP) and Law Number 3 of 1997 concerning Juvenile Courts. In this way, it can be seen how the child punishment system currently applies in Indonesia.
Legal Examination of Performance Oversight by the Papua People's Representative Council in Accordance with Community Aspirations Through the Mandate of the Special Autonomy Law Wori, Herman; Ginting, Grenaldo; Polii, Johanis
Research Horizon Vol. 3 No. 5 (2023)
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.3.5.2023.173

Abstract

The enactment of Law No. 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for the Province of Papua reflects the political will of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia towards the people of Papua. This decision is based on the consideration that the governance and development implementation in the province of Papua, while integrated with Indonesia, has not fully met the sense of justice, achieved prosperity, enforced the rule of law, and has not fully respected human rights, especially those of the indigenous Papuans. The legal research conducted in this study is normative legal research, focusing on examining norms or regulations related to the research object. Law No. 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for the Province of Papua represents the ideals and goals of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia in building a fair, prosperous, and prosperous Papuan society based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The reality is that in the implementation of special autonomy, there are many deviations from the basic mandate of special autonomy. As a result, the Papuan people still feel left behind in a dilemmatic situation, unable to fully enjoy the benefits of special autonomy. This is because there is no significant improvement in welfare, peace conditions have not arrived, and basic rights are not adequately respected. The Papua Provincial People's Consultative Assembly (DPRP) is a regional representative institution that acts as an organ of the regional government in the province of Papua. The Papua People's Consultative Assembly has the task and authority to absorb, collect, accommodate, and follow up on the aspirations of the people. In accordance with the mandate of the Special Autonomy Law for the province of Papua, the Papua People's Consultative Assembly has the function of conveying the aspirations of the Papuan people regarding development and the expansion of new autonomous regions in the province of Papua to the People's Consultative Assembly (DPR RI).
Implementation of Law No. 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for Papua in Gefido Village, Abenaho District, Yalimo Regency, Papua Province Wandik, Yanora; Polii, Johanis; Ginting, Grenaldo
Research Horizon Vol. 3 No. 5 (2023)
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.3.5.2023.174

Abstract

The presence of Law No. 21 of 2001 is the government's answer to overcoming social inequality in Papua. This law contains special policies based on values which include protection and respect for ethics and morals, basic rights of Indigenous Papuans (OAP), Human Rights, supremacy of law, democracy, pluralism, and equality. population, rights, duties and obligations as citizens where the Papuan people can fight for their rights peacefully, because at that time they must be convinced by all components of Papuan society, especially indigenous Papuans, that Special Autonomy is the most appropriate choice. This research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive research methods. To discuss the problems contained in this research, a normative juridical and empirical juridical approach is used. This research was carried out in Gefido Village, Abenaho District, Yanlimo Regency. The Gefido Village Innovative Program (PIO) can be interpreted as one of the Yalimo district government's efforts to improve the welfare of the Gefido Village community by increasing the capacity of Gefido village in developing plans and implementing Gefido village development which focuses on 3 program targets including entrepreneurial development, increasing human resources, as well as providing gefido village infrastructure. The cooperation carried out by the Yalimo government through experts is basically that Gefido village is a source of economic strength. There is still a lot of hidden potential in Gefido village that needs to be explored together. Abundant natural resources and the number of skilled workers make Gefido village a place for very potential business development. If managed professionally, Gefido village can become the main driver of the economy.
Co-Authors Grenaldo Ginting Janesandre Palilingan, Janesandre Jhonly Wendur Karel Wowor Nopesius Bawembang Rigen Sumilat Wandik, Yanora Wori, Herman