Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

Asuransi Sosial Syariah bagi Muslim Indonesia Fatkhul Muin; Rully Syahrul Mucharom
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 15, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v15i1.2854

Abstract

The basic concept of the insurance is because people need protection against any incident that occurs in the community such as illness and natural disasters. The article 14 In Law No. 2 of 1992 on  Insurance, that social insurance is a type of insurance to the implemented by the government for public welfare.  The current population is Moslem Indonesia reached 80%, therefore, the Indonesian Muslim community needs the systema syariah  social insurance.   The system of syariah social insurance where there are 2 (two) products, where there are participants and savings accounts tabarru’ and as managers by the BUMN (state corporation) in law No. 2 of 1992 on Insurance.DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v15i1.2854
THE HEALTHCARE SERVICE SYSTEM OF BPJS PARTICIPANTS IN TANGERANG REGENCY Rully Syahrul Mucharom; Rilla Kusumaningsih
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2019): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (536.265 KB) | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v3i1.1713

Abstract

Healthcare service has become the main priority of executors as it is one of the basic rights of the people, and that its service must be established by the government. As mentioned in the Republic of Indonesia’s 1945 Constitution Article 28H paragraph (1) and Article 34 paragraph (3), the government has the obligation to provide proper and worthy healthcare services which suit the needs of the people.   A state is an instrument which may give protection for all its citizens through a system built by that state. Economic gaps tend to bring out problems such as poverty and social gaps. Both of them are the central issues of social policies and of the welfare development.  In early 2014, right on January 1 st  the government of Indonesia through the Ministry of Health has operated the National Healthcare Security Program (Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional/JKN). The JKN program has also been applied in Tangerang. One of the focuses of the regional government and the BPJS (Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial/Social Security Administering Body) in Tangerang Regency is establishing social welfare for its citizens and to start a system of Healthcare Social Security.
PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA SINEMATOGRAFI FILM YANG DISEBARLUASKAN MELALUI APLIKASI TELEGRAM SELAMA COVID-19: COPYRIGHT PROTECTION OF FILM CINEMATOGRAPHIES DISSEMINATED VIA THE TELEGRAM APPLICATION DURING COVID-19 Inge Dwisvimiar; Rully Syahrul Mucharom; Isdal Alzafar
Journal Presumption of Law Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Volume 6 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Universitas Majalengka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31949/jpl.v6i1.4815

Abstract

People during the Covid-19 period switched to watching movies from movie theaters to digital by paying application service fees, but not all people want to pay a fee to watch and switch to watching movies through the Telegram application, the movies in the Telegram application are pirated movies. The purpose of the research is: to analyze the protection of cinematographic copyright of films disseminated through the Telegram application during the Covid-19 pandemic and to explain, legal settlements in cases of violation of cinematographic copyright of films disseminated through the Telegram application during the Covid-19 pandemic. The research method used is the Normative-Empirical method. The data sources used are secondary data sources primary data sources. Data collection techniques are literature study and interviews.  Data analysis used qualitative data analysis. The result of this study is that, the legal protection of cinematographic films disseminated through the Telegram application during the Covid-19 pandemic is through the closure of accounts or content based on recommendations from DJKI and then given to Dit PAI Kominfo and will be continued to Telegram with the legal basis of the Joint Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights and the Minister of Communication and Information Number 14 of 2015 and Number 26 of 2015 concerning the Implementation of Closing Content and / or Access Rights of Users of Copyright Infringement and / or Related Rights in Electronic Systems. Legal settlement in cases of copyright infringement of cinematographic films disseminated through the Telegram application during the Covid-19 pandemic through the district court for violating Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright Article 9 paragraph (1) letter a, letter b, letter e, and / or letter g Jo Article 113 paragraph (3) Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code.  ABSTRAK Masyarakat selama masa Covid-19 beralih dalam menonton film dari bioskop menjadi digital dengan membayar biaya layanan aplikasi, namun tidak semua masyarakat ingin membayar sejumlah biaya untuk menonton dan beralih menonton film melalui aplikasi Telegram, film dalam Aplikasi Telegram adalah film hasil pembajakan. Tujuan penelitian adalah: untuk menganalisis perlindungan hak cipta sinematografi film yang disebarluaskan melalui aplikasi Telegram selama masa pandemic Covid-19 dan untuk menjelaskan, penyelesaian hukum dalam kasus pelanggaran Hak Cipta sinematografi film yang disebarluaskan melalui aplikasi Telegram selama masa pandemic Covid-19. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode Normatif-Empiris. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah sumber data sekunder sumber data primer. Teknik pengumpulan data studi kepustakaan dan wawancara.  Analisis data yang digunakan analisis data kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa, perlindungan hukum sinematografi film yang disebarluaskan melalui aplikasi Telegram selama masa pandemic Covid-19 yaitu melalui penutupan akun atau konten berdasarkan rekomendasi dari DJKI lalu diberikan ke Dit PAI Kominfo dan akan dilanjutkan ke Telegram dengan dasar hukum Peraturan Bersama Menkumham dan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Nomor 14 Tahun 2015 dan Nomor 26 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pelaksanaan Penutupan Konten dan/atau Hak Akses Pengguna Pelanggaran Hak Cipta dan/atau Hak terkait dalam Sistem Elektronik. Penyelesaian hukum dalam kasus pelanggaran Hak Cipta sinematografi film yang disebarluaskan melalui aplikasi Telegram selama masa pandemi Covid-19 melalui pengadilan negeri karena melanggar Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta Pasal 9 ayat (1) huruf a, huruf b, huruf e, dan/atau huruf g Jo pasal 113 ayat (3) Jo Pasal 55 ayat (1) KUHPidana.
WTO Subsidies Agreement on Fisheries (2022-2024): Agreed Terms and Implications for Indonesia Mucharom, Rully Syahrul; Suriaamadja, Toto Tohir; Januarita, Ratna; Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega; Maharani, Dwi Gita; Asari Taufiqurrohman
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v12i2.1394

Abstract

Indonesia has issued a fisheries subsidy policy to encourage the development of the fishing industry because this sector contributes to national development, but the subsidies applied must be in accordance with the provisions stipulated in the WTO. Indonesia is a member of the WTO and in the last few meetings held by the WTO in which the WTO prohibits subsidies, besides that fisheries subsidies can cause depletion of fish stocks and damage to marine biota. This is not in line with the UN program, namely Sustainable Development related to sustainable fisheries, so the implementation of fisheries subsidy policies can cause problems. the 12th WTO ministerial conference, a draft was drafted, but until now the draft has not been ratified, the draft fisheries subsidies at the WTO specifically regulate fisheries subsidies that are prohibited and exceptions in general. the 13th Ministerial Conference 2024 has not yet concluded negotiations on agricultural and fisheries subsidy issues, which remain key concerns for the conference organizers. Trade or Economic Ministers of the WTO engaged in negotiations are aware of the significant differences in positions among member states, necessitating further time for additional negotiations to be continued by permanent delegations in Geneva. The impact of the draft WTO fisheries subsidy, if successfully ratified, will have a negative impact on Indonesia in terms of the fishery market, fishery resources and employment.
TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN METODE BISNIS DALAM KASUS HAK CIPTA HASAN AZHARI DAN PT GOJEK TOKOPEDIA Aulia, Silvy Puspa; Mucharom, Rully Syahrul
Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 16, No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/jmk.v16i1.28302

Abstract

Sengketa antara Hasan Azhari dan PT Gojek Tokopedia menyoroti pentingnya pemahaman tentang validitas klaim hak cipta atas metode bisnis di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis klaim tersebut berdasarkan hukum hak cipta Indonesia, yang hanya melindungi ekspresi ide yang terwujud dalam bentuk konkret dan bukan ide atau konsep bisnis. Dalam kasus ini, metode bisnis yang diklaim oleh Hasan Azhari, yang lebih bersifat abstrak dan belum diwujudkan dalam bentuk nyata, tidak memenuhi kriteria untuk dilindungi oleh hak cipta. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga mengeksplorasi bukti dan dasar hukum yang menjadi pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung dalam memutuskan perkara No. 1033 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2023, yang didasarkan pada pengertian hak cipta yang membedakan antara ide dan ekspresi. Mahkamah Agung menolak klaim hak cipta atas metode bisnis tersebut karena tidak memenuhi persyaratan perlindungan hak cipta, yang lebih tepat untuk dilindungi melalui hak paten atau rahasia dagang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat kerangka hukum yang cukup jelas, masih terdapat kesenjangan dalam penerapan hukum yang memerlukan pemahaman lebih lanjut mengenai batasan perlindungan hak cipta terhadap konsep atau metode bisnis.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum PT. Gojek Indonesia terhadap Ketidaksesuaian Identitas Driver dalam Layanan Go-Send di Kota Serang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Dewi, Rachawanti Puspita; Agus, Dede; Mucharom, Rully Syahrul
Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Mei
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/lawstudies.v2i3.3782

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of PT. Gojek Indonesia regarding the mismatch of driver identity in the Go-Send delivery service in Serang City, based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The main issue examined is the loss or non-delivery of goods due to drivers whose identities do not match the information displayed in the application. The research employs an empirical juridical approach, collecting primary data through interviews and secondary data through literature studies. The findings reveal that PT. Gojek holds legal liability to compensate consumers for their losses, either in the form of money or equivalent goods, as stipulated under consumer protection regulations. However, in practice, the dispute resolution process has not been effective, as consumers have not yet received clear compensation. Consequently, some consumers have escalated the matter to consumer protection agencies. The study concludes that PT. Gojek must improve identity verification procedures for its drivers and enhance the dissemination of information regarding claim mechanisms to users. Additionally, it is recommended to implement a mandatory-read agreement feature to ensure that consumers understand their rights. These efforts are expected to strengthen consumer trust and the overall credibility of Go-Send services.
Analysis of Overmacht Credit Agreements During Pandemic (Case Study of Loss Claims Rejections By Judges) Mucharom, Rully Syahrul; Suriaatmadja, Toto Tohir; Ravena, Dey; Mufidi, M. Faiz
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v21i2.2290

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to identify and analyze Covid-19 as a form of comparative advantage and the consequences of the advantage method in loan agreements and loan termination policies due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The research method is norm-law. It is a legal research method that examines and studies the provisions of legislation as a basis for subsequent analysis of the issues discussed. The research uses primary and secondary legal material for analysis through the study of relevant documents and literature. The analysis is a qualitative analysis that addresses the question in question. According to the research, Covid-19 is an unnatural disaster and thus can be classified as a measure of superiority. As a priority relationship, the laws governing the spread of Covid-19 result in a priority relationship with the loan agreement, which means that the debtor must continue to meet his obligations to the debtor even after Covid-19 is over. When it was implemented following POJK 11/2020, the debtor obtained credit relief through restructuring in the form of interest rate cuts, extension of maturity, reduction of funds owed, and interest reduction in arrears according to the restructuring table issued by the bank. After verification and analysis by the bank, the affected debtor Covid- 19
Insurance Agreement Through A Digital System In The Framework Of Consumer Protection Approach For Insured Participants Mucharom, Rully Syahrul; Muin, Fatkhul
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of the study: This study focuses on legal developments regarding digital agreements that occur in insurance offerings to the public and are considered a legally valid written agreement. Law No. 40 of 2014 concerning Insurance establishes the basis of insurance as an agreement between two parties, namely the insurance company and the policyholder, which serves as the basis for the insurance company's premium receipt as compensation. With the development of technology, digital insurance offerings are often conducted on the basis of a valid insurance agreement. Electronic insurance policies can be used and are recognized as stipulated in Article 21 Paragraph (1) of OJK Regulation No. 23/POJK.05/2015 concerning Insurance Products and Marketing of Insurance Products. Consumer protection in insurance in the form of digital agreements is necessary. Materials and Methods: This study focuses on qualitative methods with a legal approach, conducting an in-depth analysis of insurance agreements through digital systems within the framework of a consumer protection approach for insurance participants. Results: The development of technology and information has driven behavioral changes in the business world, one of which is the insurance business. Therefore, aspects of Law No. Law No. 40 of 2014 concerning Insurance and Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection must be aligned. Conclusions: This research focuses on Law No. 40 of 2014 concerning Insurance and Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Therefore, in insurance, the interests of insurers must be safeguarded and protected.